peas-msg - 7/1/18
Period peas. Pea broth. Recipes.
NOTE: See also the files: beans-msg, vegetables-msg, vegetarian-msg, salads-msg,
seeds-msg, soup-msg, grains-msg, bread-msg.
************************************************************************
NOTICE -
This file is a collection of various messages having a common theme that
I have collected from my reading of the various computer networks. Some
messages date back to 1989, some may be as recent as yesterday.
This file is part of a collection of files called Stefan's Florilegium.
These files are available on the Internet at: http://www.florilegium.org
I have done a limited amount of editing. Messages having to do with
seperate topics were sometimes split into different files and sometimes
extraneous information was removed. For instance, the message IDs were
removed to save space and remove clutter.
The comments made in these messages are not necessarily my viewpoints. I
make no claims as to the accuracy of the information given by the
individual authors.
Please respect the time and efforts of those who have written these
messages. The copyright status of these messages is unclear at this
time. If information is published from these messages, please give
credit to the orignator(s).
Thank you,
Mark S. Harris AKA: THLord Stefan li Rous
mark.s.harris at motorola.com stefan at florilegium.org
************************************************************************
--------
Peas pies hot
Peas pies cold
Peas pies recipe
Please be told!
- Doc (who's codeine is working really well now)
Daniel Myers <doc at medievalcookery.com>
---------
From: Philip & Susan Troy <troy at asan.com>
Date: Sat, 07 Jun 1997 00:56:59 -0400
Subject: Re: SC - Period Recipes
Dottie Elliott wrote:
> In a related question, what kind of pea is meant when a recipe calls for
> peas? Many of the recipes call for a green or grene pea. However some
> just mention peas. Is this the standard green peas I buy canned/frozen
> today, some of the brown peas I can buy canned or something entirely
> different?
There's a standard white pea that is still eaten across Northern Europe.
They look a little like blackeyed peas without the eye, and are just a
bit rounder. I don't know the botanical name offhand. It's doubtless in
Harold McGee. Green peas are the fresh, new variety of this pea, as
opposed to the dried form.
They represent one out of a total of four known varieties of legume
found in Medieval Europe, the others being favas, chick peas, and
lentils.
Adamantius
From: Philip & Susan Troy <troy at asan.com>
Date: Sat, 07 Jun 1997 08:52:31 -0400
Subject: Re: SC - Period Recipes
david friedman wrote:
> At 12:56 AM -0400 6/7/97, Philip & Susan Troy wrote:
> >Dottie Elliott wrote:
>
> Green peas are the fresh, new variety of this pea, as
> >opposed to the dried form.
>
> I'm not certain, but my memory of McGee's discussion was that our green pea
> was a variant of the old world pea which was harvested immature. I don't
> think it was clear when its use started. I believe the modern term for the
> non-green version is "field pea," but I could easily be wrong.
>
> David/Cariadoc
Sorry! I may have caused some confusion: what I should have said that
what is referred to as green peas in period recipes is the fresh, new
variety of this pea, etc. I understand our standard modern green pea was
developed in France in the 17th-18th century or so...
As regards field peas, it had been my understanding that they are the
same thing as cow peas, and, again, similar to the black-eyed pea, and
that they came to places like the Carribean and the American South via
Africa. Whether they are indigenous to Africa or came from South America
with the Rest of The Usual Suspects I don't know offhand. That would be
kind of an interesting line to pursue.
Adamantius
Date: Thu, 09 Oct 1997 13:11:49 -0400
From: "Sharon L. Harrett" <ceridwen at commnections.com>
Subject: Re: SC - Cassoulet
Yep, I have Gerard's... and we did discuss this a few months back, but
anyway, here goes.
Gerard states that there are 9 kinds of "kidney bean" known to him (and
quotes from other sources as well). These include some from India,
Egypt, and Brazil, as well as those grown in earlier times in the
Mediterranean. His illustrations resemble our lima bean far more than a
kidney bean, being flat ovals, and the pods are flat also with a
distinct string along the straight side. He says they come in several
colors, white, black, red, purple, and orange. The plants and flowers
resemble our lima bean much more than a string or shell bean, having
narrow leaves well apart on the stalks.
Among the other legumes, he has lentils(2 kinds) garden peas (6 kinds)
several edible vetches, and the "garden bean" or fava, with 3 kinds
being known (white, yellow, and black)- the black being grown
ornamentally only, not eaten.
There are no references to what we have now... string beans, although
he says that the favas and "kidney" beans may be cooked immature, in
their pods, and dressed with vinegar and salt as a "daintie meat"
Ceridwen
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 1997 20:45:52 -0600
From: L Herr-Gelatt and J R Gelatt <liontamr at ptd.net>
Subject: SC - Green peas
Green peas are and were a cheap and plentiful food in our period of study.
Easily grown and dried, recipes abound using (yech....and don't you say a
word, Adamantius) dried peas. Fresh peas were seasonal, but highly prized
for natural sweetness. Several methods were developed to try and preserve
them, from immersing and keeping in water, to sealing in butter for short
periods (this actually works for a time, but the peas lose their color after
a week or so. They still taste good, however). In dried form peas were used
in many ways such as porridge (pottage) and mush, as a thickening agent, as
"pulse" which was flour made in part or wholly with pea, barley, and bean
meal, and in horse-bread, made of the afore mentioned pea and bean/barley
meal. Horse bread was human food, not horse food. These things were all
available to the common man. In fact, Horse Bread would not have made it to
the tables of the nobility, nor would any item made from "pulse".
This is true for western Europe and Britain, your author's area of interest.
I cannot speak for other areas that fall into our range of study.
Aoife
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 1997 00:26:29 -0500 (EST)
From: LrdRas at aol.com
Subject: SC - Peas-current research
<< Perhaps Ras could jog my memory----weren't peas a Roman Import to the
British Aisles?
Aoife
>>
Peas- History of
1) Extensively used by Egytians, Romans, Greeks.
2) Native of Mediterranean basin, Nile Vallry, mountians of Asia.
3) Found in archeological sites in Herault , France dating to 7000 B.C.E.
4) Gathered by Roman Legions from sand dunes around Palestine to supllement
rations.
Word origins
1) pea( modern coined singular) from pison (Greek)=pisum (Latin)= pise (Old
English)= pease (later English)= pea (coined singuler because pease was
misunderstood as a plural)
Use of Peas
1) Cultivated peas mainly eaten dry by Romans and in medieval times; e/g/
dried peas cooked with bacon.
Green Peas ( Note: Found this info astonishing)
1) Sugar peas (mange-tout) introduced to France in 1600 C.E. from Holland.
2) Green peas (petit pois) introduced to France in 1660 C.E. by the Sieur
Audiger returning from a mission to Genoa where he had hoped to learn the
secret of making liqueurs (:-0). The Comte de Soissons shelled the peas. They
were prepared and served in tiny dishes> one for the Queen, one for the
Cardibnal and the King and his brother each had a tiny dish of them. The
official pronouncement was, " All declared with one voice that nothing could
be better or more of a novelty, and that nothing like them, in that season,
had ever been seen in France before".
Curious fact
Split peas introduced as food at the end of the Victorian Age.
Sources
History of Food
Food in Histroy
The Fieldbook of Natural History
The Catalogue of Foods
Ras
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 1998 21:36:47 -0800
From: "Anne-Marie Rousseau" <acrouss at gte.net>
Subject: SC - SC-reconstructions of medieval grain and legume dishes
Hi all from Anne-Marie
as promised, here's my reconstructions for medieval dishes that can be used
to combine grains and legumes. As Cariadoc has pointed out, this is not a
medieval concept, but these are reconstructions of medieval dishes, so I
guess its better than sneaking in your Veggie burger cuz there's nothing
else to eat.
Once again, formatting didn't transfer over well, and so if you need
citations, etc, let me know. And, of course, as always, if you choose to
use my recipes, that's great, just let me know and please cite me
appropriately.
Thanks, and enjoy!
- --AM
NEW PEAS (le Menagier M-13, c. 1395)_
When you have New Peas, sometimes they are cooked on meat day both in meat
stock and with ground parsley, to make green soup, and this is on a meat
day: and on a fish day, you cook them in milk, with ginger and saffron in
them; and sometimes "a la cretonnée" of which I shall speak later.
With all these peas, whether new or old, you can force them though a sieve,
or a fine or horsehair mesh; but the old peas must be yellowed with ground
saffron of which the water may be put to boil the pease and the saffron
itself with the liquid from the peas.
CRETONNÉE (le Menagier M-19, c. 1395)_
Cretonnée of New peas or new beans. Cook them almost to a purée, then
remove from the liquid and take fresh cow's milk and tell her who sells it
to you that she will be in trouble if she has added water to it, for very
often they extend their milk thus, and if it is not quite fresh or has
water into, it will turn. And first boil this milk before you put anything
gin it, or it still could turn; then first grind ginger to give appetite,
and saffron to yellow; it is said that if you want to make a liaison with
egg yolks poured gently in from above, these yolks will yellow it enough
also make the liaison, but milk curdles quicker with egg-yolks than with a
liaison of bread and with saffron to color it. And for this purpose, if you
use bread, it should be white unleavened bread, and moisten it in a bowl
with milk or meat stock, then grind and put it through a sieve; and when
your bread is sieved and your spices have not been sieved, put it all to
boil with your peas; and when it is all cooked, then add your milk and
saffron. You can make still another liaison, with which is the same peas or
beans ground then strained; use whichever you please.
2 cups frozen peas
1 cup whole milk
1/2 slice day old white unleavened pita bread
1 T chopped Italian parsley
1 tsp. ginger
1 pinch saffron
salt to taste
Boil the peas in the milk until tender. In a cuisinart, purée the milk,
bread, spices and all but 1/2 cup of the cooked peas. Put back in the
saucepan, and add back the reserved peas. Heat gently until warmed through,
adjusting salt to taste.
Serves 4 (1/2 cup of pea soup per person)
Reconstruction Notes: This modern version is a blending of the two period
pea recipes. It is a delightfully fresh tasting pea soup. Pease pottage is
mentioned specifically in the menus for boon day meals in period_.
Unfortunately, our cretonnée got ruined and so was not serve. It apparently
had a very unfortunate chemical reaction with the aluminum pot that it was
prepared in, and so ended up tasting like tin foil. We chose to throw it
out rather than ruin everyone's taste buds. We cooks who had tested this
recipe before knew what we were missing, though, and were sorely
disappointed.
<snip of bean recipe - see the file beans-msg>
Date: Mon, 4 May 1998 22:07:20 -0700
From: "Anne-Marie Rousseau" <acrouss at gte.net>
Subject: Re: SC - re:period recipes and sources/mustards
Hi all from Anne-Marie
Ceridwen says:
> Dried peas : several sources had recipes for soups or purees of "old",
> "yellow" or "white" peas that needed to be soaked to remove the hulls. I
> would guess they are dried peas. Ancient Cookery pp427 & 444, Forme of
> Cury #71, Le Menagier #1 ,Two Fifteenth Century p. 33.
Here's a bit of kitchen science for y'all.
Unhulled dried peas are indeed white. Boil them and the hulls separate and
float to the top. In fact, Elizabethan recipes for pea pottage specify that
you are to boil them till the hulls separate and then skim them off. Once
boiled and hulls removed, you get a dark green glop indistinguishable from
cooked split peas in taste, texture and appearance.
So, I feel confident that I can use split peas for "white peas" in any
application where they are cooked to moosh and skimmed.
- --Anne-Marie
Date: Wed, 6 May 1998 15:18:15 -0700
From: david friedman <ddfr at best.com>
Subject: Re: SC - Seeking period recipes & sources...
At 4:49 PM -0400 5/2/98, Kallyr wrote:
>I am seeking period recipes, documentation and sources for the following:
<snip>
>Porridge or soup made with dried peas, and whether split peas are period.
There are lots of pea recipes in the English/French 14th-15th c sources,
and it isn't clear to me which are dried and which fresh. For a recipe
where we interpreted it as split peas:
Longe Wortes de Pesone
Two Fifteenth Century p. 89
Take grene pesyn, and wassh hem clene, And cast hem in a potte, and boyle
hem til they breke; and then take hem vppe fro the fire, and putte hem in
the broth in an other vessell; And lete hem kele; And drawe hem thorgh a
Streynour into a faire potte. And then take oynones in ij. or iij. peces;
And take hole wortes, and boyle hem in fayre water; And then take hem vppe,
And ley hem on the faire borde, And kutte hem in .iij. or in .iiij. peces;
And caste hem and the oynons into that potte with the drawen pesen, and
late hem boile togidre til they be all tendur, And then take faire oile and
fray, or elles fressh broth of some maner fissh, (if thou maist, oyle a
quantite), And caste thereto saffron, and salt a quantite. And lete hem
boyle wel togidre til they ben ynogh; and stere hem well euermore, And
serue hem forthe. [end of original; I've substuted th's for thorns.]
1 c split peas wortes: 1/2 lb chard 8 threads saffron
1 whole onion = 5/8 lb 1/4 c olive oil (or fish broth) 1/2 t salt
Wash peas, put in 4 c of water, simmer 50 minutes covered, squash the peas
with their liquid through a potato ricer, let cool. Cut up the onion into
eighths. Simmer onions covered in 3 c water for 20 minutes. Add chard,
cover again, cook 10 minutes more. Remove chard, cut in quarters, combined
everything with peas. Add salt, saffron. Bring to simmer and add oil,
simmer, stirring constantly, another 10 minutes.
>~~MinnaGantz <KALLYR at aol.com>
Elizabeth/Betty Cook
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 1998 12:55:43 +0200 (MET DST)
From: Par Leijonhufvud <parlei at algonet.se>
Subject: SC - pea bread/porrige
[Adamatius wrote regarding the fact that most grains/peas were consumed
boiled, not baked, in Roman eras.]
This was most likely true for many other regions and times. I have been
told by archaeologists who study early food that it varied from region
to region during the Viking age. The avaiable grains probably played a
large part in this; not everything can be sucessfully baked into bread.
One example of the boiled pea and grain dishes is the porrige that has
been reconstructed based on gravefinds in Groetlingbo (the "oe" is
<o-with-umlaut>) on Gotland (10th c, I think). Peas and barley porrige.
Good stuff too, even if I've never tried it with the sheeps milk that
the original calls for.
/UlfR
P.S. You want a recipie? Why on earth for? Probably want me to give it
in English as well...
The Groetlingbo Porrige
(Based on a porrige from a Viking age womans grave on Gotland)
Makes 10 servings.
3,5 dl barley, preferably whole grain
0,5 dl peas (dried)
0.8 l water
1.3 l milk (sheeps milk in the original)
[NB one dl is one tenth of a liter, i.e. 3.4 fl.oz.]
* Soak the peas overnight. Throw away the water.
* Mix peas, barley and water. Perhaps some salt as well.
* Boil in a covered pot for 10 minutes.
* Add the milk, stir and bring to a boil.
* Allow to swell at a suitable temperature (45-60 min).
* Serve with milk, honey and dried or fresh apples or berries.
I have no idea if the archaeological record indicated the honey, berries
and apples, or if they were added by the archaeologist that
reconstructed it.
- --
Par Leijonhufvud parlei(at)algonet.se
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1999 14:20:36 -0600
From: LYN M PARKINSON <allilyn at juno.com>
Subject: Re: SC - new theory on pea broth
Somewhere, I have recipes that call for 'pea broth'. We've discussed
this on the list, I think. Now, when you cook the dried peas, and you
take the lid off the pot, you have cooked peas at the bottom of the pot
and a brownish/clearish liquid at the top. Normally, we mush everything
together and go from there. The recipes don't call for pea soup, bruet,
or pottage. They want *broth*. This morning I cooked peas and then
drained them into a bowl. The fairly clear liquid I have divided and
will freeze for use when I find those recipes. Not in Chiquart,
apparently, 'find' couldn't produce 'pea broth'.
I simmered my ham bone and the trimmings with an onion, carrot, and
celery stalk and a twig of dried rosemary, then strained off that broth.
The soft peas went into the blender with the ham broth, and are back on
simmer with some fresh thyme. The bone and meat are cooling until I can
pick them and add the meat to the soup. I think the soup is better,
already, because there's less water in it.
What do people think of this form of 'pea broth'? Or do you all know
this and I'm the only one who didn't? Does anyone remember, off-hand,
where the pea broth recipes are, before I have to check everything??
Regards,
Allison
allilyn at juno.com, Barony Marche of the Debatable Lands, Pittsburgh, PA
Kingdom of Aethelmearc
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1999 15:41:07 -0500
From: Philip & Susan Troy <troy at asan.com>
Subject: Re: SC - new theory on pea broth
LYN M PARKINSON wrote:
>
> Somewhere, I have recipes that call for 'pea broth'. We've discussed
> this on the list, I think. Now, when you cook the dried peas, and you
> take the lid off the pot, you have cooked peas at the bottom of the pot
> and a brownish/clearish liquid at the top. Normally, we mush everything
> together and go from there. The recipes don't call for pea soup, bruet,
> or pottage. They want *broth*. This morning I cooked peas and then
> drained them into a bowl. The fairly clear liquid I have divided and
> will freeze for use when I find those recipes. Not in Chiquart,
> apparently, 'find' couldn't produce 'pea broth'.
Taillevent's exact phrase is "puree de poys", which he uses seven or
eight times in Le Viandier, which is why this issue is so confusing. I
believe Chiquart does use the same expression, but whether an English
translation calls it "pea broth" I don't know. Most translators, AFAIK,
skirt the issue as to what this substance _is_ and simply translate it
as pea puree. From the context it's pretty clearly a liquid, and it is
tempting to assume it is the water peas are boiled in, with or without
the peas strained into it for additional thickening power.
I seem to recall Chiquart giving a recipe for pea puree, though...I'll
have to go back and check on this.
The question of what pea puree really is, is one of those insoluble
medieval cookery questions, which is why, when most people on the cooks'
list bring up cuskynoles as a sort of thread-ender, you'll find that
Cariadoc asks what pea puree is, the peas or the juice.
Adamantius
Østgardr, East
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1999 16:20:59 -0500
From: Wade Hutchison <whutchis at bucknell.edu>
Subject: Re: SC - questions on pea broth
>The question of what pea puree really is, is one of those insoluble
>medieval cookery questions, which is why, when most people on the cooks'
>list bring up cuskynoles as a sort of thread-ender, you'll find that
>Cariadoc asks what pea puree is, the peas or the juice.
>
>Adamantius
The real question that I have, is what kind of peas to use.
Scully in both the French cookery and Art of.. books talks about
medieval peas being _white_, but he never (that I could find)
tells you what to use as a modern substitute or equivalent.
Black-eyed peas behave properly (bursting and puree-ing just fine),
but tend to come out more of a grey sludge color. Anyone
have any suggestions or experience.
----wade/Gille
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1999 20:16:54 EST
From: LrdRas at aol.com
Subject: Re: SC - new theory on pea broth
allilyn at juno.com writes:
<< What do people think of this form of 'pea broth'? Or do you all know
this and I'm the only one who didn't? Does anyone remember, off-hand,
where the pea broth recipes are, before I have to check everything??
Allison >>
It sounds really tasty. My first question though is what form of peas did you
use? If they were split peas I can see why you fail to get a clear broth.
Split peas were an invention of the Victorian era and did not exist in
period.
Dried peas in period were whole dried peas which can be bought at some
markets, especially those that carry Goya products, including the white peas
that are occasionally mentioned in period recipes. These peas when cooked
still have their 'husk' on them and do not turn into a homogenous mush. The
broth is relatively clear depending on the added ingredients.
Ras
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1999 21:25:57 -0500
From: Philip & Susan Troy <troy at asan.com>
Subject: Re: SC - new theory on pea broth
Mordonna22 at aol.com wrote:
> The verb "puree" means to crush until a paste is formed, so why is there a
> question as to what "pea puree" means?
Because that's a modern usage. Translators like Scully use the word
because it's so close (identical, in fact) to a modern word, in spite of
a slight change in the definition.
Period purees were strained, not crushed: they were purified. Two types
of puree were therefore possible. One, which separates liquids from
solids (either of which could be used, or both), and one which combines
[most of] them in a more or less homogeneous, well, puree. Therefore pea
puree, according to the period definition of "puree", could be pea
water, crushed peas, or a smooth mix of the two, depending on various
factors.
Adamantius
Østgardr, East
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1999 21:32:30 -0500
From: Philip & Susan Troy <troy at asan.com>
Subject: Re: SC - new theory on pea broth
LrdRas at aol.com wrote:
> It sounds really tasty. My first question though is what form of peas did you
> use? If they were split peas I can see why you fail to get a clear broth.
> Split peas were an invention of the Victorian era and did not exist in period.
>
> Ras
On a partially related note, there are, however, numerous period uses
for, and references to, a variety of hulled (as in removal of the
cotyledon, as well as the seed pod), and sometimes chopped, dried beans,
so while split peas don't seem to appear in the medieval European cook's
arsenal of goodies, split favas do.
Adamantius
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1999 22:46:30 -0500
From: Philip & Susan Troy <troy at asan.com>
Subject: Re: SC - split peas
Seton1355 at aol.com wrote:
> What husk? I thought one shelled peas. Also, if they are dried (aren't split
> peas also dried?) Wouldn't they cook up the same as split peas?
> Also, abput split peas. What is the point of spliting them? And how is it
> they are Victorian? What did they use them for or how/why were they invented?
> Phillipa
In the case of most peas and beans there is a paper-thin, transparent
layer surrounding the legume. You can eat them, but some consider them,
well, a sort of aesthetic issue, which is one reason why some people
find it necessary to completely puree (in the modern sense whiz whiz)
pea soup...
Your basic fresh green pea has this layer, too.
Adamantius
Østgardr, East
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1999 20:28:48 -0800
From: Anne-Marie Rousseau <acrouss at gte.net>
Subject: Re: SC - split peas
Hi all from Anne-Marie
we are asked:
> What husk? I thought one shelled peas. Also, if they are dried (aren't split
> peas also dried?) Wouldn't they cook up the same as split peas?
> Also, abput split peas. What is the point of spliting them? And how is it
> they are Victorian? What did they use them for or how/why were they
> invented?
I have used both the modern split pea and the unhulled whole dry peas. In a
side by side batch of pea soup (a la Martha Washington), they both cooked
down. The unhulled peas let loose their thin white skins, which are skinned
off, as per the instructions in the primary source. The resulting glop is
indistinguishable from the regular ol' split pea glop, in color, texture
and taste.
By splitting them, you don’t have to hull them or skim off the skins (which
look rather like little eyeballs. ugh!), and they may cook slightly
quicker...
- --AM
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1999 22:44:28 -0800
From: david friedman <ddfr at best.com>
Subject: Re: SC - new theory on pea broth
The recipe for Perre in _Two Fifteenth Century_ says:
Take grene pesyn, and boile hem in a potte; And whan they ben y-broke,
drawe the broth a good quantite thorgh a streynour into a potte, And sitte
hit on the fire; and take oynons and parcelly, and hewe hem small togidre,
And caste hem thereto; And take pouder of Canell and peper, and caste
thereto, and lete boile; And take vynegur and pouder of ginger, and caste
thereto; And then take Saffron and salte, a litull quantite, and caste
thereto; And take faire peces of paynmain, or elles of such tendur brede,
and kutte hit yn fere mosselles, and caste there-to; And then serue hit so
forth.
When I originally did it, I assumed you were supposed to be putting
everything through the strainer. It later occurred to me that an
alternative reading was that you were using the broth in the dish, and
doing something else with the peas--and that possibility is mentioned at
the end of the recipe in the current edition of the _Miscellany_.
David/Cariadoc
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1999 07:36:26 -0500
From: Philip & Susan Troy <troy at asan.com>
Subject: Re: SC - new theory on pea broth
david friedman wrote:
>
> The recipe for Perre in _Two Fifteenth Century_ says:
>
> Take grene pesyn, and boile hem in a potte; And whan they ben y-broke,
> drawe the broth a good quantite thorgh a streynour into a potte,
<snip>
> When I originally did it, I assumed you were supposed to be putting
> everything through the strainer. It later occurred to me that an
> alternative reading was that you were using the broth in the dish, and
> doing something else with the peas--and that possibility is mentioned at
> the end of the recipe in the current edition of the _Miscellany_.
One thing to consider is that the recipe does give us a backhanded,
vague guide as to how much of the pea substance is infused/dissolved
into the broth. The peas are boiled until they break open, which
indicates some of the internal pea stuff is going to end up in the
broth, even if strained under normal gravity and no other pressure.
But yes, I recall a couple of other recipes where peas are boiled and
strained for the cooking liquid (French Joutes?). My only question is if
anyone has an example of a recipe that does use the drained pea
solids...offhand, I can't think of one, unless you count bread and
animal fodder.
Adamantius
Østgardr, East
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1999 17:29:09 -0800
From: Anne-Marie Rousseau <acrouss at gte.net>
Subject: Re: SC - split peas
Hi all from Anne-Marie
we are asked:
>So are the peas referred to as "white peas" just un-hulled regular peas
>and therefore I can make the split pea soup recipe from the Medieval
>Kitchen that I wanted to make using split peas and it won't be OOP?
That's my take on it. Well, its not totally period, but its a reasonable
substitute. (the un hulled peas are WAY more expensive). Others may
disagree, of course! :)
- --AM
PS dunno nuthin 'bout yellow peas...
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 00:53:05 -0600
From: LYN M PARKINSON <allilyn at juno.com>
Subject: Re: SC - new theory on pea broth
>> These peas when cooked still have there 'husk' on them and do not turn
into a homogenous mush. The broth is relatively clear depending on the
added ingredients.<<
But once their husks are off, you get the same pea puree, minus the pea
broth. I'm sparing my arthritic fingers, using the split peas. My broth
may be a little cloudy, but meat stock is sort of 'beige' too. If I
really need the pea broth to be clear, I could strain through linen.
I realize that Scully refers to 'pea puree', so those were not the
recipes I'm remembering. They were ones in which the color green would
have been atrocious, as Adamantius points out. Ras, you said once that
pea beans are navy beans. Do you use these as a substitute for white
peas, ever? We get some Goya products, but I'm not sure I've ever seen
white peas. How long do you cook them before straining, and do you have
to remove husks with the hands, as per Forme of Cury's instructions?
Adamantius, what do you use? And do you always make the full puree for
your recipes?
Allison, full of delicious pea soup!
allilyn at juno.com, Barony Marche of the Debatable Lands, Pittsburgh, PA
Kingdom of Aethelmearc
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 09:31:22 EST
From: LrdRas at aol.com
Subject: Re: SC - new theory on pea broth
allilyn at juno.com writes:
<< you said once that
pea beans are navy beans. Do you use these as a substitute for white
peas, ever? >>
No. Since they are New World that thought never really occured to me. However,
not a few legume/bean recipes could be prepared using either ingredient and
still produce a very tasty end product.
<<We get some Goya products, but I'm not sure I've ever seen white peas.>>
The color is not intensely white like Phaseolus species. It is more on the
greyish white side.
<<How long do you cook them before straining, and do you have
to remove husks with the hands, as per Forme of Cury's instructions? >>
Until they are done and fully cooked. I have not seen other recipes that say
to remove the contents from the skin exceptpossibly for the one you site
although I imagine they might exist. The skins are not 'inedible' and really
are not objectionable in the mouth. They are 'indigestable' and pass through
you though. When I need to remove the skins, I simple press the cooked peas
through a strainer. The skins stay behind and the pea mush goes through the
holes.
Would it be possible to post the original recipe you are referring to as I
don't have ny copy of Curye at hand. Is it possible he is referring to
removing the dry peas from their shells as opposed to their skins? I know
that a few fava recipes include this step.
So far as Goya products are concerned, I get my white peas at Giant. The
manager tells me that Goya is a 'difficult' company to deal with and not all
products ordered are delivered or even available on a regular basis or in a
timely fashion. This may have something to do with unavailability in your
area. Dried white peas look like whole dried green peas but are almost white
and wrinkled.
Ras
Date: Sun, 31 Jan 1999 20:31:54 -0800
From: Anne-Marie Rousseau <acrouss at gte.net>
Subject: SC - SC: pea recipe
hi all from Anne-Marie
Heres my recipe for cretonne. OUTSTANDING stuff!!! pretty, light green in
color and wonderfully fresh in taste. We made large batches ahead of time and
reheated in a large double boiler set up to prevent scorching. Oh, and if you
do it in an aluminum pot, it will have the unfortunate taste of tin foil :P.
all rights reserved, no reproduction without permission, etc etc etc. Enjoy!
NEW PEAS (le Menagier M-13, c. 1395)
When you have New Peas, sometimes they are cooked on meat day both in meat
stock and with ground parsley, to make green soup, and this is on a meat day:
and on a fish day, you cook them in milk, with ginger and saffron in them; and
sometimes "a la cretonn=E9e" of which I shall speak later.
With all these peas, whether new or old, you can force them though a sieve, or
a fine or horsehair mesh; but the old peas must be yellowed with ground saffron
of which the water may be put to boil with the pease and the saffron itself
with the liquid from the peas.
CRETONNEE (le Menagier M-19, c. 1395)
Cretonnee of New peas or new beans. Cook them almost to a puree, then remove
from the liquid and take fresh cow's milk and tell her who sells it to you that
she will be in trouble if she has added water to it, for very often they extend
their milk thus, and if it is not quite fresh or has water in it, it will turn.
And first boil this milk before you put anything in it, or it still could turn;
then first grind ginger to give appetite, and saffron to yellow; it is said
that if you want to make a liaison with egg yolks poured gently in from above,
these yolks will yellow it enough and also make the liaison, but milk curdles
quicker with egg-yolks than with a liaison of bread and with saffron to color
it. And for this purpose, if you use bread, it should be white unleavened
bread, and moisten it in a bowl with milk or meat stock, then grind and put it
through a sieve; and when your bread is sieved and your spices have not been
sieved, put it all to boil with your peas; and when it is all cooked, then add
your milk and saffron. You can make still another liaison, which is the same
peas or beans ground then strained; use whichever you please.
2 cups frozen peas
1 cup whole milk
1/2 slice day old white unleavened pita bread
1 T chopped Italian parsley
1 tsp. ginger
1 pinch saffron
salt to taste
Boil the peas i in the milk until tender. In a cuisinart, pur=E9e the milk,
bread, spices and all but 1/2 cup of the cooked peas. Put back in the saucepan,
and add back the reserved peas. Heat gently until warmed through, adjusting
salt to taste.
Serves 4 (1/2 cup of pea soup per person)
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 1999 17:27:13 -0800
From: david friedman <ddfr at best.com>
Subject: Re: SC - new theory on pea broth
>LYN M PARKINSON wrote:
>> Somewhere, I have recipes that call for 'pea broth'. We've discussed
>> this on the list, I think. Now, when you cook the dried peas, and you
>> take the lid off the pot, you have cooked peas at the bottom of the pot
>> and a brownish/clearish liquid at the top. Normally, we mush everything
>> together and go from there. The recipes don't call for pea soup, bruet,
>> or pottage. They want *broth*. This morning I cooked peas and then
>> drained them into a bowl. The fairly clear liquid I have divided and
>> will freeze for use when I find those recipes. Not in Chiquart,
>> apparently, 'find' couldn't produce 'pea broth'.
and Adamantius answered:
>Taillevent's exact phrase is "puree de poys", which he uses seven or
>eight times in Le Viandier, which is why this issue is so confusing. I
>believe Chiquart does use the same expression, but whether an English
>translation calls it "pea broth" I don't know. Most translators, AFAIK,
>skirt the issue as to what this substance _is_ and simply translate it
>as pea puree. From the context it's pretty clearly a liquid, and it is
>tempting to assume it is the water peas are boiled in, with or without
>the peas strained into it for additional thickening power.
...
>The question of what pea puree really is, is one of those insoluble
>medieval cookery questions, which is why, when most people on the cooks'
>list bring up cuskynoles as a sort of thread-ender, you'll find that
>Cariadoc asks what pea puree is, the peas or the juice.
>
Here is what Menagier de Paris says about making and using pea broth (Janet
Hinson's translation):
And first a SOUP of OLD PEAS. It is appropriate to shell them, and to find
out from the people the place the nature of the peas of the area (for
commonly peas do not cook well in well-water: and in other places they cook
well in spring-water and in river water, as in Paris, and in other places,
they do not cook at all in spring-water, as at Besiers) and this known, it
is appropriate to wash them in a pan with warm water, then put in a pot
with warm water on the fire, and boil them until they burst. Then separate
the liquid from the solid, and put the liquid aside, then fill the pea-pot
with warm water and put on the fire and separate a second time, if you wish
to have more liquid...[directions on how to make pea soup out of the solid
part snipped]
The liquid from the peas on a meat day is of no account. On a fish day and
in Lent, fry the onions as is told in the preceding chapter, and then put
the oil in which the onions were fried and the onions in along with
bread-crumbs, ginger, cloves and grain, ground: and sprinkle with vinegar
and wine, and add a little saffron, then adorn the bowl with slices of
bread.
Item, with the liquid make a broth on fish days. Do not stir it and take it
soon from the fire, etc.
Item, mix the liquid with beet-leaves and it will be a very good soup, but
do not add any more water; and this is for Lent...
See here how onions are cooked: in water for a long time before the peas,
and until the water is all used up in cooking; then add some pea-liquid to
cook and to take away the flavor of the water.
Also oysters are first washed in hot water, then parboiled, then they must
be partially cooked in the pea-liquid so that their flavor will stay in the
liquid, and not allowed to froth, then remove the oysters and fry them if
you wish, and put some of them in the bowls, and with the rest make a dish.
Adamantius later writes:
>My only question is if anyone has an example of a recipe that does use the
>drained pea
>solids...offhand, I can't think of one, unless you count bread and
>animal fodder.
See the pea soup recipe above; the rest of it is in Le Menagier on
Cariadoc's web page.
Elizabeth of Dendermonde/Betty Cook
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 1999 20:40:49 EST
From: SigridPW at aol.com
Subject: SC - peas in period
There is a traditional Venetian dish called 'risi e bisi' (rice and peas). It
was the official dish served to the Doge on the 25th of April (feast of St.
Mark, patron saint of Venice). There was a big too-doo over who could bring
the best peas for the Doge.
The recipe as I've found it (with the above historical references) in Venice
& Food by Sally Spector.
4 servings
2T olive oil
5T butter
1 small onion, finely chopped
2 lb fresh (or 8oz frozen) peas
pinch of sugar
1 1/2 qt broth*
10 oz rice "fino" or "super-fino"
salt and pepper
2-3T minced fresh parsley
freshly grated Parmesan cheese
1) Shell the peas. *Rinse the pods and put them in 2qt. salted water OR put
in a bouillon cube and no salt. Boil very slowly for one hour.
2) Strain broth, pressing liquid out of the pods and discard them. If using
bouillon for the liquid, prepare 1 1/2 qt of it
3) Put onion, oil and 2 1/2T butter in a pot. Cook gently until golden.
4) Add the peas with a pinch of sugar, and a bit of broth. Cook gently,
stirring occasionally, until they soften (add frozen peas straight from the
freezer, do not defrost)
5) When the liquid has evaporated and the mixture is "dry", add the rice.
raise the heat and mix quickly.
6) Pour in a ladle of hot broth. Should be boiling. Stir constantly,
adding
a ladle of broth when the liquid has reduced, but keeping the rice from
sticking. (no mean trick, that!) After about 18 minutes, the rice should be
done: if it's still too crunchy, cook another minute or two.
7) Turn off heat. Taste for salt and pepper. Add a ladle of broth, the
remaining butter and the parsley, but do not mix them in. Cover pot and let
sit on the burner 2-3 minutes, then gently stir together.
8) serve immediately with freshly grated parmesan cheese
The author goes on to point out that tiny fresh peas are best. She also
states that according to Venetian legend, there was to be one pea for each
grain of rice for the Doge's bowl.
Imagine how green and fresh and spring-like this would be! I am hoping to
include this in my menu for the banquet for Summergate's Anniversary.
Lady Giuglia Madelena Sarducci
Date: Tue, 02 Feb 1999 18:18:09 -0800
From: Anne-Marie Rousseau <acrouss at gte.net>
Subject: Re: SC - Pea soup sugar peas question
Hi all from Anne-Marie
Ras sez that one should use whole snap peas instead of shelled ones for le
menagiers cretonnee.
I disagree, for several reasons...(what, me and Ras disagree???? Heeaven
forfend! :))
1. the same source contatins a recipe for "new peas in the pod". These
definately call for whole peas. If the cretonnee recipe meant to use the
same items, wouldnt it have said so? I mean, the "peas in the pod" were to
be different enough that he felt he needed to mention that they were in the
pod.
2. There are other cretonnee type recipes in the French corpus, including
Taillevent. Taillevent specifies to "cook them to mush and drain them".
This doenst work if you're thinking of using the mange tout type peas..you
never get the mush, and theres no squishing step to make them mush.
3. My logic says that both the New PEas and the Cretonne PEas are the same
ones, just that one is in the pod and the other shelled. I could be wrong,
of course. Now, if you're trying to approximate a taste and think that the
modern frozen peas taste radically different, I could see using mange tout
peas, but the texture would be so different I would be hesitant to do so.
I've grown modnern mange touts large enough to shell and eat and they dont
taste really siginifantly differnt from the frozen ones. The skins are
tougher, but that's about it (according to my memory, anyway).
Again, each of us has to decide for ourselves how we choose to interpret
such things...we can never really know, until they find a stash of peas in
a medieval midden and do some DNA fingerprinting on them...:)_
- --AM
Date: Fri, 5 Feb 1999 19:11:53 EST
From: LrdRas at aol.com
Subject: Re: SC - SC: pea recipe
allilyn at juno.com writes:
<< But the recipes called for peas, not pea pods. Ever tried making pea pod
soup?
Allison >>
As a matter of fact , yes. They turn to mush in a very short time. :-).
IIRC, getting the peas to a state of mush was one of the instructions.
Also the recipe in question can also be made by using dried peas . My question
is about whether the recipe was intended to be used with fresh green shelled
peas. I don't personally think so.
Granted that AM believes that a corrobarating recipe in the same tome which is
very similar does call for peas in the pod and in this she is most certainly
correct. However, the existence of a similar recipe does not , IMO,
necessarily translate into the fact that this one would use fresh green
peas.
Instructions to remove the peas from their pods could also refer to removing
dried peas from their husks. Another possible twist on the interpretation
might be that the pea in pod version was meant for early summer use and the
peas out of pod version was meant to be used in the off season.with dried
peas.
As was noted there is a definite logic to AM's theory. My main concern is that
all the references to period use of peas that I am AWARE of points to the use
of dried peas or podded sugar peas. The illogical part, for me, is that sugar
peas, and indeed, almost all non-petite pois varieties of peas have a VERY
short period of time, a matter of a couple of days, when they are sweet and
succulent enough to be used as fresh shelled peas. Their palatability at this
stage is of such a short duration that I find it inexplicable why such a
recipe for their use would be included in the manuscript. at all.
In the meantime, we have a great tasting redaction from AM that might be
correct so why not use it? :-)
Ras
Date: Sat, 6 Feb 1999 18:21:19 -0600
From: LYN M PARKINSON <allilyn at juno.com>
Subject: Re: SC - More greene pease
Was AM's recipe from deLaVarenne? I know she has it. Just found this,
and think it may be a sugar pea pod type to try.
87. Greene pease. Passe them, if you will, in the panne with butter, and
seeth them with cabidge, lettice, or with purslaine; after they are well
sod with a bundle of hearbs, and well seasoned, serve them garnished with
lettice. You may dresse and season them with creame, as the sparagus
whereof mention is madeabove, in the article 79,. of sparagus with
creame.
79 says to "stove them a very little, with very new creame, and serve if
you will with a little nutmeg."
These are from the Falconwood Reprint edition.
I think I'll try mint and rosemary if I make this.
Allison
allilyn at juno.com, Barony Marche of the Debatable Lands, Pittsburgh, PA
Kingdom of Aethelmearc
Date: Sun, 7 Feb 1999 00:39:45 -0600
From: LYN M PARKINSON <allilyn at juno.com>
Subject: Re: SC - Pea soup sugar peas question
Pontormo, Jacopo. _Diario_, the diary of the painter, quotes him as
saying that he had fresh, young peas for dinner. The bibliography did
not give any publication information, and is in Italian. Furthermore,
this is late period, which I know you think is 'scribal error', Ras, but
within our total period people did begin to eat green peas that were not
dried or mush. These can work for a late feast, Italian in theme,
French, according to the quotes people put up earlier, and possibly other
cultures as well.
Allison
allilyn at juno.com, Barony Marche of the Debatable Lands, Pittsburgh, PA
Kingdom of Aethelmearc
Date: Sun, 7 Feb 1999 10:11:02 EST
From: LrdRas at aol.com
Subject: Re: SC - Pea soup sugar peas question
Sweet Lady,
In a message dated 2/7/99 4:05:35 AM Eastern Standard Time, allilyn at juno.com
writes:
<< Pontormo, Jacopo. _Diario_, the diary of the painter, quotes him as
saying that he had fresh, young peas for dinner. >>
Out of the pod? In the pod? I see no justification for assuming he meant out
of the pod in this quote. I am aware that the idea of eating fresh shelled
peas was introduced to France by an Italian church official through the
French court. Here we have no disagreement.
What is interesting is that this quote apperently shows us that at the very
least 'young peas' in whatever form they happened to be were being eaten
outside the noble class. For those researching late Italian peasant or non-
noblemen's food this is an exciting bit of information.
<<but within our total period people did begin to eat green peas that were
not dried or mush. >>
I agree. There is some evidence that fresh shelled green peas of the petite
pois variety may have been eaten in certain sections of Italy in the early
stages of modern cookery. We have no argument here. However, I do not agree
that they were used outside of Italy within even SCAdianly excepted time
limits. Their introduction into France is documented as 1681 C.E. and then
only a handful of French royals ate them as a novel treat on a single
occasion. The following introduction into the general popular diet could not
have been achieved until later than that. My math may be a little off but
this appears to be well outside the time frame of the SCA.
<< These can work for a late feast, Italian in theme,>>
Correct. But to use this as a spring board for using them in other cuisines
in late period is, IMO, an error.
<< French, according to the quotes people put up earlier, >>
My interpretation of that data does not conclude with the same observations
you have arrived at. The French recipes work very well without the use of
fresh shelled green peas and , IMO, there is no justification for doing so
before 1681 C.E. in France and certainly none within period in places such
as England.
<<and possibly other cultures as well.>>
On what basis do you make the above statement? Every known authority has
clearly indicated the use of dried peas (out of season) and podded peas (in
season) throughout the middle ages. The only possible exception to this is
the one you indicated referring to Italian cuisine SFAIK.
<< Allison >>
al-Sayyid Ras
Date: Tue, 09 Feb 1999 07:16:51 -0500
From: Philip & Susan Troy <troy at asan.com>
Subject: Re: SC - Pea soup sugar peas question
LYN M PARKINSON wrote:
> Actually, Ras, I can't think of any source that I know that has peas and
> pods eaten. They may be in some of my books and I haven't seen them, or
> noticed them. With the long habit of eating the dried, shelled peas I
> would have expected to read that people made a point of saying "...and
> they ate the pea pods, too!" Pontormo only comments on the peas, not the
> peapods. Doesn't prove anything, since he didn't paint himself eating
> them.
I've been meaning to throw a word or two into this one for a while,
FWIW. I think in cases where dried peas are pretty clearly intended
(probably the case in recipes calling simply for "peas"), the peas are
shelled because they'd be likely to get moldy before drying
sufficiently. Bearing in mind, of course, that in medieval Europe there
was an entire technology developed (and evidently fairly widely used) to
keep beans from molding in storage from insufficient drying [see
references to canebynes, frizzled beans, etc.], so evidently this was a
reasonable concern.
Conversely, the recipes calling for new or green peas specify, well, new
or green peas, pease, or peysoun, but then there are some, I believe,
which refer to peasecods. I doubt the shells from peas are what they're
talking about (although I suppose it's possible).
Anyway, I believe that in _most_ instances if a recipe called for peas
in the shell the reference would be pretty specific.
Adamantius
Date: Sat, 13 Feb 1999 13:51:19 EST
From: THLRenata at aol.com
Subject: SC - Another Pea Recipe
I found this one in The Good Huswife's Jewell by Thomas Dawson 1596:
To make a close Tarte of Greene Pease
Take half a peck of greene Pease, sheale them and seeth them, and cast them
into a cullender, and let the water go from them then put them into the Tart
whole, & season then with Pepper, saffron & salte, and a dish of sweet butter,
close and bake him almost one houre, then drawe him, and put to him a little
Vergice, and shake them and set them into the Ovven againe, and so serve it.
These look like fresh shelled peas to me. How much is half a peck? And did
the term "sweet butter" refer to unsalted butter as it does today?
Renata
Barony of Altavia
Kingdom of Caid
Los Angeles, CA
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 1999 17:28:35 GMT
From: "Bonne of Traquair" <oftraquair at hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: SC - Help in getting to plan medieval luncheon for the college union
>perhaps a pea pottage
Use the very first one in the book by Odile Redon, it's flavored with ginger
and thickened with egg (my new version of pea soup for the family keeps the
ginger, skips the egg.) I've recently got a stack of books from the library
that include the Digby book and one by a contemporary (?) John Evelyn. I
recall reading another pea soup with ginger recipe, probably in one of those
as I haven't gotten to the others yet. But I was skimming so many while at
the library that it could be in some other random book. I'll double check.
Bonne
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 1999 08:08:58 -0800
From: Anne-Marie Rousseau <acrouss at gte.net>
Subject: Re: SC - legumes (was: survival/ camp cooking)
hey all from Anne-Marie
Ras sez:
> Split peas would be a good thing for a 'survival' kit but they are not
> 'period.' The process used for producing split peas was introduced in the
> late 19th century CE.
yes, but my experiements show that the final result is indistinguishable
whichever you start with. In fact, the recipes that specify to start with
dry peas in the later corpus I was looking at specify that you are to boil
them until the hulls remove and then skim off the skins. Whether we started
with regular modern split peas or the medieval whole dried peas, both
yielded a pea green glop.
interestingly, the whole dried peas are "white"...perhaps the source of the
"white peas" vs green peas distiniction in the earlier sources? (ie dried
vs fresh). dunno, but its intereseting to think about! :)
Brighid asks:
>Dried whole peas are late period, however. Don't know how readily
>available they are. I think I've seen them in Indian grocery stores.
>(Maybe health food stores, too?)
my regular grocery store carries them in the ethnic bulk food section (OK,
its regular for me, but Ballard Market is anything but ordinary :))
- --AM
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2000 22:30:08 -0800
From: Anne-Marie Rousseau <acrouss at gte.net>
Subject: white peas...was Re: SC - Crown Tourney feast
hey all from Anne-Marie
Lucrezia tells us:
- - white peas = chickpeas (oops)
actually, I dont know that this is true. Chickpeas or ceci beans or
garbanzos are indeed in the pea family, but my reading suggests that white
peas are peas.
see, when you take whole green peas and dry them, the outer husk turns
white, and they look, well, white.
Interestingly, when you boil them, as in the period pea soup recipes from
Martha Washington etc, the skins come off (just like the recipe describes),
and you can skim them off (just like the recipe describes) and you end up
with green pea glop, just as if you had startted with modern split peas.
go figure!
if any one has any evidence to the contrary, I'd love to hear about it...
- --AM, who is very jealous of Lucruztias neat event in Wales :)
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2000 14:38:29 -0000
From: Christina Nevin <cnevin at caci.co.uk>
Subject: white peas...was Re: SC - Crown Tourney feast
hey all from Anne-Marie
Lucrezia tells us:
- - white peas = chickpeas (oops)
actually, I dont know that this is true. Chickpeas or ceci beans or
garbanzos are indeed in the pea family, but my reading suggests that
white peas are peas. see, when you take whole green peas and dry them, the
outer husk turns white, and they look, well, white.
Interestingly, when you boil them, as in the period pea soup recipes
from Martha Washington etc, the skins come off (just like the recipe
describes), and you can skim them off (just like the recipe describes) and
you end up with green pea glop, just as if you had startted with modern
split peas.go figure! if any one has any evidence to the contrary, I'd love
to hear about it...
- --AM, who is very jealous of Lucruztias neat event in Wales :)
Hmm, well the recipe I used was:
Pesoun of Almayne FoC.72
Take white pesoun; wisshe hem. Seeth hem a grete while. Take hem vp and cole
hem thurgh a cloth; wisshe hem in colde water til the hulles go off. Cast
hem in a pot and couere hem that no breth go out, and boile hem right wel,
and cast therinne gode mylke of almaundes and a pertye of flour of rys with
powdour gynger, safroun, & salt.
I was going on the premise that as this was a Forme of Cury (ie English)
recipe, they were using un-shucked peas, not chickpeas.
What do people think? Peas or chickpeas?
Al Servizio Vostro, e del Sogno
Lucretzia
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Lady Lucrezia-Isabella di Freccia | mka Tina Nevin
Thamesreach Shire, The Isles, Drachenwald | London, UK
Date: Fri, 5 May 2000 13:58:33 -0500
From: "Decker, Terry D." <TerryD at Health.State.OK.US>
Subject: RE: SC - Truck Crops
> The field pea, IIRC, is descended from the N. African pea that is like
> our black-eyed pea.
> Allison, allilyn at juno.com
No, the field pea is Pisum sativum. The black-eyed pea is Vigna sinensis
and is related to the yard-long bean, Vigna unguiculata. They are both
members of the pulse family, but then, so is carob.
In pre-Columbian Europe, the Latin "phaseolus" is used to describe members
of genus Vigna and was later applied to the New World beans shaped like a
kidney. Phaseolus then became the genus name for the New World beans.
Bear
Date: Wed, 03 May 2000 15:41:11 EDT
From: allilyn at juno.com
Subject: Re: SC - Broda and other chickpea recipes
>From Chiquart:
76. Again syseros: and to give understanding to him who will prepare the
syseros let him take his chick-peas and pick them over grain by grain
such that there remains nothing but the chick-peas themselves, and then
wash them in three or four changes of lukewarm water and put them to
boil; and, being boiled, let him remove them from this water and put in
other fresh water and put back to boil and, being boiled put them to rest
in the said pot until the next day; and when the next day comes drain the
water off them and put in again other fresh water and put to boil with a
very little salt, almond oil, and parsley together with its roots well
picked over and cleaned -- and these roots should be scraped and very
well washed -- and a little sage. And do not put in anything else without
the doctor's order, and if he tells you to put in a little cinnamon and a
little verjuice to give it a little flavor, put them in; otherwise not.
[this differs from the following recipes by the addition of parsley,
parsley root, sage, and possibly cinnamon and verjuice]
Using canned chick peas, drain, rinse, add fresh water, salt,
almond oil, and parsley, and parsley roots, sage. Cinnamon and verjuice
may be added. [possibly, if almond oil is not available, olive oil and
almond extract might be used.] APdeT
>From Forme of Curye:
73. Chyches. Chickpeas. Take chickpeas and lay them in hot ashes all
night or all day, or else lay them in hot embers. In the morning, wash
them in clean water, and cook them over the fire with clean water. Bring
to a simmer and add oil, whole garlic cloves, saffron, powder forte and
salt; simmer until done and dish it up.
Regards,
Allison, allilyn at juno.com
Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2000 13:08:38 EDT
From: Gerekr at aol.com
Subject: Re: SC - Protectorate Feast 2 - No recipes
>From: TerryD at Health.State.OK.US (Decker, Terry D.)
>I also have one other problem. I'm short one dish -- Elizabethan,
>vegetable, preferably green, definitely not spinach. Anyone got any ideas
>or recipes?
>
>Bear
Having had my Lorwin forever (25+ yrs), she was my first reaction...
Let's see, what's "vegetive", not spinach and looks like it would come
out green?
To stewe hartechockes in creme - John Murrell, A Booke of cookerie, 1621
"Take the thickest bottomes of the thickest Hartechockes being very
tender boyled, and stew them in a little butter and vinegar, whole Mace
and Sugar, then take halfe a pinte of sweete Cream boyled with whole
Mace, straine it with the yolkes of two-new-laid egges, and brewe them
together with halfe a ladlefull of the best thicke butter and vinegar,
and a little Sugar, so dish up the bottomes of the Hartechockes, & lay it
with sippets of a slickt Lemon round about, then poure your sauce on the
toppe of the Hartechockes, and sticke them full of fryde tosts upright
scrape on a little Sugar and serve it to the table hot."
To boyle ... peascods - the same
"Take greene sugar Pease when the pods bee but young, and pull out the
string of the backe of the podde, and picke the huske of the stalkes
ends, and as many as you can take up in your hand at three several times,
put them into the pipkin, with halfe a pound of sweete Butter, a quarter
of a pint of faire water, a little grosse Pepper, Salt, and Oyle of Mace,
and let them stue very softly until they bee very tender, then put in the
yolkes of two or three rawe egges strained with six spoonefuls of Sacke,
and as much Vinegar, put it into your Peascods and brew them with a
ladle, then dish them up."
<snip of salad recipes. See salads-msg>
Well, do you want period or Elizabethan? Looks like you might squeeze
the Murrell in, but the May looks pretty late. Here's hoping others come
up with references a bit more in period!
Chimene
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2000 23:28:01 -0500
From: Philip & Susan Troy <troy at asan.com>
Subject: Re: SC - OOP dried split peas
Seton1355 at aol.com wrote:
> Sorry for the off topic / oop question but I'm stumped.
> Tonight I was making dal using yellow split peas. I cooked the peas for 20
> minutes and then added rice and continued to cook them for an additional
> hour, The split peas never got totally soft. Can anyone tell me why?
> Thanks
> Phillipa
pH is a factor in getting dried legumes soft. You'll note that Le
Managier has a section on which peas and, I think, beans, are best from
which locations, and I believe he discusses which area's water is best
for cooking them. Similarly, Apicius frequently mentions adding cooking
soda (probably sodium carbonate or what we call washing soda, but
perfectly edible in small quantities, just as we use sodium bicarb) to
address this issue. The bottom line is that dried peas and beans don't
seem to like acid pH cooking liquids as well as they like neutral or
basic (alkaline) liquids.
I'm not sure why this would be an issue in the case of dal, though,
unless you have some kind of temporary acidic hard water or something.
You might try adding a tiny pinch of soda next time.
Adamantius
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2000 13:17:59 EST
From: Seton1355 at aol.com
Subject: Re: SC - OOP dried split peas
<<
Maybe you should have soaked them first...I am assuming here that they were
dried. I know that, with bean soup, you have to soak the beans overnight,
then cook them for several hours. >>
Yes, I'm thinking that now, after the fact. But I didn't think that split
peas had to be soaked. Oh well, live and learn.
Phillipa
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2000 19:32:48 -0800 (PST)
From: Nisha Martin <nishamartin at yahoo.com>
Subject: SC - split peas and other beans.
Split peas dont usually have to be soaked. Neither do
lentils. There are a few things that can make them
cook unevenly. One is if they are too old. The other
is too much salt in the water, which is why most
cookbooks will tell you to season in the last few
minutes of cooking, and another is cooking them at a
boil instead of a simmer. This goes for most beans,
whether you need to soak them or not.
Nisha
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 19:13:27 -0800
From: lilinah at earthlink.net
Subject: Re: SC - Peas, Peas, Beautiful Peas...
Thanks to Andrea's hint, i searched the web and found a wholesaler of
dried cream peas
They have all sorts of dried peas (green, yellow, cream, field,
crowder, and blackeye) as well as one kind of lentil (i can get at
least three kinds around here) and a selection of beans (nothing
unusual)
But they're in the deep South, and i have no idea if they sell them
around here on the Left Coast :-(
Anahita
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 23:19:30 -0800
From: lilinah at earthlink.net
Subject: Re: SC - Peas, Peas, Beautiful Peas...
Here's a URL with some history, giving them an old pedigree in India
and pointing to the Spanish, as well as Africans, as bringing them to
the New World:
http://sarasota.extension.ufl.edu/FlaFoodFare/SouthPea.htm
- ----- cut & paste -----
Florida Food Fare
by Jean Meadows
Extension Agent IV
Cooperative Extension Service for Sarasota County
Southern Peas
as written for the Sarasota Herald-Tribune, Food Section, August, 29, 1998
Description: a group of peas known by several common names and in
the United States are called "Field peas", "Crowder Peas", "Purple
Hulls", "Cowpeas" and "Black-eyes", but Southern Peas in the
preferred name. There are three types of Southern peas: crowder,
black-eyed and cream. Crowders have a robust flavor and produce a
dark liquor when cooked. Black-eyes have a less robust flavor that
produce a lighter liquor and cream peas are the mildest.
History: originated in India as long as 3,000 years ago, they were
also a staple of Greek and Roman diets. They were later grown in
Africa, then brought to America. In India Southern peas are known
by 50 common names. The black-eyed pea, also known as the cowpea, is
thought to have originated in North Africa, where it has been
eaten for centuries. The peas were probably introduced to the New
World by Spanish explorers and African slaves, and have become a
common food in the southern United States. Southern peas also are
grown to improve soil fertility and structure.
Availability: Most areas of Florida are able to plant two crops a
year of Southern peas so they are available fresh in Florida almost
year round. Peas from north Florida are available on the market now.
Peas are also available in several forms: dried, fresh, canned and
frozen.
Selection and Care: If purchased in the shell, peas are best when
shelled and cooked immediately. Although they will keep refrigerated
4-5 days, the peas will lose moisture to the pods. "The fresher, the
better" is the key to ultimate flavor. If you cannot find fresh peas
or do not want to shell them, then buy them frozen. Frozen peas are
also excellent in flavor and far superior to the canned products.
- ----- end -----
I have not verified the accuracy of the above, but it sounds plausible...
Additionally, i see that white peas are still grown and used in India
- - and they even has "split white peas" - where they appear on
web-search to be known as matar (but that's just "pea" in general),
ghugni, thattaipayir, and arveja. We've got LOTS of Indian and
Pakistani markets around here, so i'll go check them out and see if
they have white peas.
Anahita al-shazhiyya
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 08:28:31 -0600
From: "Decker, Terry D." <TerryD at Health.State.OK.US>
Subject: RE: SC - Peas, Peas, Beautiful Peas...
Blackeyed peas are Vigna unguiculata and are of Old World origin (probably
India with variants in China and Africa). Catjangs, cowpeas, and yard-long
beans are all variants. The Italians lump them together with the New World
Phaseolus, but they apparently were known and eaten (as food of the poor) in
Classical Antiquity (see Pliny).
If you look at the language, peas, lentils, favas and grabanzos are
liguistically separate from phaseolus. The confusion comes because the
Vigna and the New World beans were lumped together as fagiola (or fasioli)
and then the term Phaseolus was taken taxonomically for the New World beans.
Because the Vigna are tied linguistically to the modern variant of
phaseolus, they are probably the phaseolus of the Romans.
I refer you to Annibale Carracci's The Bean Eater for visual evidence of
black-eyed peas being eaten in period.
While Platina gives some recipes specifically for phaseolus (and remembering
he predates Columbus and most taxonomic efforts), it is very likely that
black-eyed peas would not be found much outside of peasant dining.
Bear
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 11:42:33 -0400
From: Philip & Susan Troy <troy at asan.com>
To: sca-cooks at ansteorra.org
Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] Nettles (was viking cook book), rutabegas,
mangetout
Linda M. Kalb wrote:
> The other unfamiliar vegetable name I couldn't quite remember was
> mangetout. Does anyone know what that is and what it looks like?
A mangetout (essentially, French for "eat it all", i.e. the whole
thing), is a small, tender pea pod like a sugar snap pea or a snow pea
pod. As the name implies, you eat the whole thing.
Adamantius
From: lilinah at earthlink.net
Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2002 09:03:31 -0800
To: sca-cooks at ansteorra.org
Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] peapod, peasecods, codpiece
Olwen commented:
> Is there a difference between peapod and peasecods. One sounds like
> something that I know what it is ~ the other sounds like something a man
> should know what it is.
Pea pods are what we say, peasecods is what Elizabethan English
called the same vegetable. There's even an English dance (period or
just out of period) called "Gathering Peasecods".
Anahita
From: "Decker, Terry D." <TerryD at Health.State.OK.US>
To: "'sca-cooks at ansteorra.org'" <sca-cooks at ansteorra.org>
Subject: Black-eyed peas was Re: [Sca-cooks] Happy Assumption
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 14:44:58 -0500
> Are black-eyed peas period?
>
> Margaret, who is a born-and-bred Midwesterner and thus knows naught of
> black-eyed peas
Yes. Vigna sinensis (black-eyed pea, black-eyed bean, cowpea) is definitely
period and is almost certainly the "phaseolus" found in Pliny and Platina.
Bear
Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2002 09:04:03 -0700
To: sca-cooks at ansteorra.org
From: lilinah at earthlink.net
Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] Hello! and questions...
I just looked over Chiquart's cook book at bit more carefully, and i
found a sort of recipe for a pea puree - recipe number 23.
Also, re this recipe, there have been numerous discussions on this
list as to just what "white peas" means. Some folks wonder if they
actually had peas that were white. Since the word "white" is often
used to imply "clean, other cooks think it means dried green peas
with their skins removed.
I wonder if they might not be cream peas. They're Old World, after
all, having an origin in South Asia, and are related to black-eyed
peas, and if IIRC, there's evidence that some legumes in this family
made it to Medieval Europe. I bought some to experiment with,
although i confess the bag is still sitting in my cupboard. I believe
these are readily available in the American South where you are,
Madhavi.
---------------------
23. And first, for your white bruet take almonds according to the quantity
of the potage which you are told to make, and have them blanched and cleaned
and brayed cleanly, and moisten them with the puree of white peas; and when
they are well brayed draw them up with the said broth of peas and put it in
according to the quantity of the said almonds; and put in good white wine
and verjuice and white ginger and grains of paradise, and everything in
measure, and salt, and check that you have not put in too much of anything;
and put sugar in according to the quantity of the broth; and then take a
fair, large, clear and clean pot and put to boil. And when this is at the
sideboard put your fried fish on fair serving dishes and then throw the said
bruet on top; and on the potages which you make from almonds from here on,
when it is to be dressed do not forget the sugar-spice pellets [dragiees]
which should be scattered on top.
And when you have ordered to be made your potages according to the quantity
of the said potages, take your quantities of fish, both marine and fresh
water, and order them to be fried by your diligent assistants; and let them
fry them well and properly while the potages are being made.
---------------------
Of course, you can leave off the dragees, since your recipe calls for
pomegranate seeds :-)
Also, elsewhere in the cookbook, at the end of recipe 29. it says
"turbot should be given green sauce...", so turbot or flounder, if
you can get/afford it, but if, i suspect a nice fine, not coarse,
fleshed white meat fish would be suitable.
Anahita
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 11:42:33 -0400
From: Philip & Susan Troy <troy at asan.com>
To: sca-cooks at ansteorra.org
Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] Nettles (was viking cook book), rutabegas,
mangetout
Linda M. Kalb wrote:
> The other unfamiliar vegetable name I couldn't quite remember was
> mangetout. Does anyone know what that is and what it looks like?
A mangetout (essentially, French for "eat it all", i.e. the whole
thing), is a small, tender pea pod like a sugar snap pea or a snow pea
pod. As the name implies, you eat the whole thing.
Adamantius
Date: Tue, 06 May 2003 14:15:24 -0400
From: johnna holloway <johnna at sitka.engin.umich.edu>
To: sca-cooks at ansteorra.org
Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] roasted peas?
I have to think that these would have been done with dried peas.
Cook them. Sieve them. Mix with eggs and cook (fry?) in butter.
Then take the cooled peas/eggs mixture and spit those to be roasted.
This recipe or one very like it also appears in Daz Buch von Guter Spise.
In Merlitta Adamson's translation recipe 45 is:
45. A tasty little dish.
Take boiled peas, press them through a sieve, add the same quanity of eggs as there are peas, and cook this in butter, not too greasy. Let them cool off,
cut them in bite-sized pieces, and put them on a spit. Roast them well, baste
them with eggs and with herbs, and serve.
Johnnae llyn Lewis Johnna Holloway
Maggie MacDonald wrote: snipped
> The Calafian Cook's guild is looking at working with a translation by
> Thomas Gloning ( I think) of Dos KochBoch des Meisters Erhard.
>
> The particular recipe one of our members is really keen on trying involves
> roasting peas on a spit. Ok, so what kind of peas would you use?
> Maggie MacD.
From: "Olwen the Odd" <olwentheodd at hotmail.com>
To: sca-cooks at ansteorra.org
Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] Re: SCA-Cooks, Roasted Peas
Date: Tue, 06 May 2003 20:18:14 +0000
When I read Maggie's original post on this and saw there were folks even
considering using frozen peas I was surprized. Now I am reading this
missive. There would be a big difference between dry and frozen peas.
Besides the sheer cost of getting enough frozen peas to try to cook
down to a stiff mush, I am not sure it would even work.
Now working this recipe beginning with dry peas would be a snap. I have
used peas paste to sculpt edible centerpieces and can quite easily see how the mash could be made to adhere to a skewer. I am wondering about the "cover it with egg" part. It seems I have read a couple other recipes where
you would dip a very hot piece of food (or pour over) in to a beaten egg
which would then adhere in a very thin layer and cook in the residue
heat of the food. Maybe or maybe wrapping in a thin egg crepe.
Olwen
Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 18:40:32 -0500
From: "Tom Bilodeau" <tirloch at ravenstreet.org>
Subject: RE: [Sca-cooks] cowpeas?
To: "'Cooks within the SCA'" <sca-cooks at ansteorra.org>
>>>
> Hi everyone. We found some 'cow peas' at the Indian market, and I think
> they are period, but I haven't found reference to them in a cursory
> look through the sources I've got to hand. Anyone have solid knowledge
> about this?
I'm not sure this counts as solid knowledge, but they came from India
and at least one website says they were known in 14th c Italy.
http://aggie-horticulture.tamu.edu/plantanswers/publications/
vegetabletravelers/cowpeas.html
<<<
Cowpeas are cited in the Oxford Book of Food. They are also know as
black-eyed peas in the USA. The Oxford citation says the Spanish
brought
them to the New World in the 16th Century.
Tirloch
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 11:02:57 -0500
From: Jadwiga Zajaczkowa / Jenne Heise <jenne at fiedlerfamily.net>
Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] pease porridge?
To: Cooks within the SCA <sca-cooks at ansteorra.org>
Oh, boy. I'm really confused now.
>> From discussions on this list since at least 1997, and my own
>> independent study, I am not happy with any of the common "peas" available.
> "English" peas or garden peas were developed fairly recently in
> France, I believe.
Ok, this is what the Encyclopedia Britannica thinks about peas:
"Pisum sativum is the common garden pea of the Western world. While
their origins have not been definitely determined, it is known that
these legumes are one of the oldest of cultivated crops; fossil remains
have been found in Swiss lake villages."
I know that 'edible-podded peas' are a relatively new development,
though it appears that very young peascods were eaten in England in
period.
> Black eyed peas and field peas and cow peas and
> purple crowders are all related and come out of Africa.
"cowpea also called black-eyed pea
cultivated forms of Vigna unguiculata, annual plants within the pea
family (Fabaceae). In other countries they are commonly known as China
bean, or black-eyed bean. The plants are believed to be native to India
and the Middle East but in early times were cultivated in China. "
According to the US Department of Agriculture, field peas are a variety
of Pisum sativum.
"Field pea is a high-quality, high-protein crop which is native to
southwest Asia. Field pea was one of the first crops cultivated by man.
> Navy peas, and
> white peas found on most grocery shelves are of New World origin.
I've never seen anything called 'Navy Peas', though I'm familiar with
'navy beans' and 'white beans'. White peas are harder to find, I usually
find green split peas. I do see 'white pea beans' but they are beans,
not peas.
I've seen both yellow and white peas for sale (I assumed that yellow
peas were merely a different variety of Pisum Sativium?)
> The
> garden peas named by Gerard do not seem available, having been replaced
> in the main by the varieties developed in the 17th and 18th century.
While the varieties have been developed, the species is the same, pisum
sativium. Different varieties of lentils have also been developed over
time. I've looked at the pictures of garden peas in Gerard, and he
doesn't give a description of whether the dried peas are green or yellow
(like our modern split peas) because he says peas need no description.
However, Le menagier suggests that dried peas need yellowing:
"With all these peas, whether old or new, you can force them through a
sieve, or a fine or horsehair mesh; but the old peas must be yellowed
with ground saffron of which the water may be put to boil with the peas
and the saffron itself with the liquid from the peas."
> Of the nine peas and beans listed by Gerard, only four still seem to be
> readily available: lentils, favas, chick peas, and a standard white pea
> still eaten in Western Europe according to Adamantius.
> The "green" pea
> mentioned in many recipes of our time seem to be the fresh, immature
> form of this same white pea. Because I don't have access or knowledge
> of that one, I choose to use lentils, which are readily available, and
> lend themselves quite well to the recipes calling for peas.
>
> Daniel Myers <edouard at medievalcookery.com> wrote:
>
> Aren't peas (both green and white) old world plants? They both show up
> in enough recipes.
>
> I've found dried white peas in large bags in the Indian (India) section
> of the grocery store - labeled "Vatana".
>
> - Doc
>
> Pat Griffin
> Lady Anne du Bosc
> known as Mordonna the Cook
> Shire of Thorngill, Meridies
> Mundanely, Millbrook, AL
--
-- Jadwiga Zajaczkowa, Knowledge Pika jenne at fiedlerfamily.net
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 10:39:27 -0700 (GMT-07:00)
From: smcclune at earthlink.net
Subject: [Sca-cooks] Re: pease porridge?
To: sca-cooks at ansteorra.org
-----Original Message-----
From: Pat <mordonna22 at yahoo.com>
"English" peas or garden peas were developed fairly recently in France,
I believe. Black eyed peas and field peas and cow peas and purple
crowders are all related and come out of Africa. Navy peas, and white
peas found on most grocery shelves are of New World origin. The garden
peas named by Gerard do not seem available, having been replaced in the
main by the varieties developed in the 17th and 18th century. Of the
nine peas and beans listed by Gerard, only four still seem to be
readily available: lentils, favas, chick peas, and a standard white pea
still eaten in Western Europe according to Adamantius.
<<<
There's a lovely illustration of peas in pods in the Catherine hours --
I'm recalling that the peas were golden/yellow in color.
Unfortunately, nobody seems to have scanned it and put it on line
anywhere yet. Would that be of any help in identifying the variety of
peas in question? I could probably scan it in and toss it out on my
website next week if folks want a look ...
Arwen
Outlands
Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 14:47:12 -0600
From: "Terry Decker" <t.d.decker at worldnet.att.net>
Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] pease porridge?
To: "Cooks within the SCA" <sca-cooks at ansteorra.org>
The field pea is Pisum sativum var. arvense and is of Eurasian origin.
Black-eyed peas and cowpeas are Vigna unguiculata and are believed to be of
African origin.
The European "white" pea appears to be a variety of field pea.
The garden pea is Pisum sativum sativum and it's been around a long time.
Petite pois, a dwarf version of the garden pea, was being eaten in France
during the 14th Century.
The navy pea and the white pea you mention together are better known as the
navy bean or white pea bean. The are members of Phaseolus and are of New
World origin.
If you attempt to use Gerard or any of the early taxonimists to determine
what modern peas were in use then, you will have problems. What were once
classified as a number of different species have been have been rolled into
Pisum sativum (for example, P. majus and P. minus are considered high bush
and low bush variants).
Bear
Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 21:52:59 -0600
From: "Terry Decker" <t.d.decker at worldnet.att.net>
Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] pease porridge?
To: "Cooks within the SCA" <sca-cooks at ansteorra.org>
Field peas were probably what they were using for recipes from the Forme of
Cury. Split peas are field peas.
Petit pois are a small seed variety of garden peas. The basic species is
the same as those being grown in France in the 1400's, but as you pointed
out in an earlier message, there has been a lot of hybridization, so the
variety is probably more modern. If I were a gardener and in a fanatic mood
about historical accuracy, I might chase down the heritage varietals, but
since I'm not I'll use the frozen ones.
The black-eyed peas known to your ancestor may have come over with the
slaves from Africa, but they have been eaten around the Mediterranean since
Antiquity. It may be that they were not commonly available in Northern
Europe.
Bear
> Bear,
> As usual, I bow to your scholarship. Would it be safe to use field peas in
> a recipe from Forme of Cury? What about frozen petit pois? Are these the
> same petit pois grown in the 1400's in France? After all, Petit Pois is
> simply French for Little Pea.
> I've always believed (wrongly, I guess) that field peas were simply a
> blander variety of black eyed peas.
> My family goes a long way back in the Southeastern US, the original
> Immigrant was one Isaac du Bosc, sometime in the 1600's. They were rich
> French Hugenots, related to the famous Hugenot Preacher Pierre du Bosc.
> At one point they owned whopping portions of the SC lowlands and many
> slaves. Common family knowledge was that the blackeyed peas came over
> with the slaves from Africa.
>
> Pat Griffin
> Lady Anne du Bosc
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 11:27:50 -0400
From: Cindy Renfrow <cindy at thousandeggs.com>
Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] 1000 Eggs question
To: Cooks within the SCA <sca-cooks at ansteorra.org>
Most of those recipes call for the same step. If you read a bit
further, the next instruction is generally to rub the entire mess
through a strainer to remove the tough hulls that the initial boiling
loosened. The end result of the cooking and straining process is a
uniform pea mush that we then doctor with almond milk or whatever.
The peas they were using were not our tender petit pois, nor were they
the type now found as split peas. Thanks to the pea plant's tendency to
'run into varieties' (remember Mendel?) they varied in color and size;
but they were generally tough. Hence the long cooking and processing
needed to make them edible; and the joy with which petit pois were
welcomed when they were finally developed and imported.
Cindy Renfrow
part-time maniac and author of Take 1000 Eggs
On Aug 24, 2005, at 12:59 PM, Heather M wrote:
> In volume two, there are recipes for peas. The directions for one that
> I'm looking at include directions to boil till they come apart (I'm
> assuming split in half, not boil them till they surrender all cellular
> cohesiveness). Is this recipe referring to fresh or dried peas?
> Neither the original language or the translation seem to provide me
> enough info to decide? Inquiring minds....
>
> I can functionally go either route, purchasing flash-frozen peas or
> split, but I'd like to know the observations of folks here. The time
> of the year will work, too, as a second harvest of peas is possible at
> the time of year I'm cooking for.
>
> Still planning on spinach pies at some point,
> Margaret Northwode
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 21:11:54 -0500
From: ranvaig at columbus.rr.com
Subject: [Sca-cooks] Bohemian Baba
To: sca-cooks at lists.ansteorra.org
I'm working on this recipe for our event this weekend. Rumpolt has no
less than 17 recipes for strained peas. Another recipe describes a
pea dish as white, and it calls for whole peas, so I made a trip to
the Indian grocery to buy whole white dry peas.
After hours of soaking, cooking, and dehulling I have... split
yellow peas!! Instead of hulling the rest, I'm likely to make
another grocery run and get split peas.
Or should it after all, be black eyed peas?
Ranvaig
Zugem?? 7. Nim(b) Erbe?/ die gekocht vnd durchgestrichen seyn/ mit
Eyerdottern angemacht vnd frischer Butter. Nim(b) gebeht Schnitten
von einem weissen Weck/ thu Butter oder Speck in ein Turtenpfan(n)en/
zerla?/ vnd machs hei? auff Kolen/ weich die Schnitten in die
durchtriebene Erbe?/ vnd leg sie fein nacheinander in die Turtenpfan
(n)en/ sch?t dar?ber die Erbe?/ geu? de(n) Speck oder zerlassene
Butter dar?ber/ setz in Ofen/ oder auff Kolen/ vnd backs/ thu ein
Hafendeckel darauff/ vnd Kolen dar?ber/ da? vnten vnd oben Hitz geht.
Vnd wen(n) du es wilt anrichten/ so st?rtz vmb in eine Sch?ssel/ vn
(d) gibs warm auff ein Tisch. Die Spei? nennet man auff B?hmisch Baba.
Take peas/ that are cooked and strained/ prepared with egg yolks and
fresh butter. Take toasted slices from a white bread/ put butter or
bacon in a pie pan/ melt/ and make hot on coals/ soften the slices in
the strained peas/ and lay them next to each other/ pour the peas
over them/ pour the bacon or melted butter over it/ set in the oven/
or on coals/ and bake/ put a pot cover over it/ that heat goes under
and over. And when you will serve it/ then turn over into a dish/
and give warm on a table. The dish one calls Bohemian Baba.
Zugem?? 8. Nim(b) Erbe?/ die gesotten vnd abgetrucknet seyn in eine M?
rsel/ sto? sie mit Eyerdottern/ s?sser Milch/ vnnd vnzerlassener
Butter/ thu auch ein wenig Saltz darvnter/ vnd r?r es durcheinander.
Nim(b) gebeht Schnitten von eim Weck/ tauch sie in die Erbe?/ vnd leg
sie in die Turtenpfannen/ vnd wen(n) du sie hast auffeinander gelegt/
so thu die vberbliebenen Erbe? dar?ber/ gegeu? mit frischer Butter/
setz in Ofen mit der Turtenpfannen/ vnd la? backen. Nim(b) ein Sch?
ssel/ vnd st?rtz sie darein/ vnd gib sie warm auff ein Tisch. Also
essen sie die B?hmen gern/ vnd man nennet es in B?hmen ein Baba von
Erbe? gemacht.
Take peas/ that are cooked and dried in a mortar/ grind them with egg
yolks/ sweet milk/ and unmelted butter/ put a little salt into it/
and stir them together. Take toasted slices from a weck bread/ dip
them in the peas/ and lay them in a pie pan/ and when you have laid
them next to each other/ then put the pie pan/ and when you have laid
them next to each other/ then add the uberbliebenen peas over it/
baste with fresh butter set in oven with the pie pan/ and let bake.
Take a dish/ and overturn onto it/ and give them warm on a table.
They like to eat it like this in Bohemia/ and in Bohemia they call it
a Baba made of peas.
Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 07:51:42 -0600
From: "Terry Decker" <t.d.decker at worldnet.att.net>
Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] Bohemian Baba
To: "Cooks within the SCA" <sca-cooks at lists.ansteorra.org>
White peas are Lathyrus sativus AKA white vetch, Indian pea, Indian vetch,
almorte (Sp.), alverjon (Sp.), cicerchia (It.), pisello bretonne (It.),
khesari (In.), batura (In.), gesette (Fr.), etc., etc. etc. They are one of
the legumes that was largely replaced by the New World beans after 1492.
Modernly, they are still used in Italy and a few of the Mediterranean
countries, but are more likely to be found in Africa and some parts
of Asia.
White, as a culinary term in German, can be used to describe
blanching, more properly, weissmachen or weissseiden.
Bear
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 14:24:18 -0500
From: "Mairi Ceilidh" <jjterlouw at earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] Syseros?
To: "'Cooks within the SCA'" <sca-cooks at lists.ansteorra.org>
Served them at a feast several years ago, served them at a feast two weeks
ago, served them to the family for Christmas dinner this year, fix them just
for myself from time to time..... You get the idea. I love the things. I
serve them and their meridinating liquid over salad greens. Nummy. I vote
"YES". (And I'll be at that feast, so please, make me happy.
Mairi Ceilidh
<<< Anyone ever served syseros (from Chiqart, etc) at a feast? I have tested the
recipe several times with my family but not with a wider audience (shame on
me). I am thinking about serving syseros with pork pies for lunch, and I'm
afraid they're too weird. Self-doubt a week before the event! Aaaagh!
Madhavi >>>
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2010 23:05:21 -0800 (PST)
From: wheezul at canby.com
To: "Cooks within the SCA" <sca-cooks at lists.ansteorra.org>
Subject: [Sca-cooks] Another question on peas
<<< You can use medievalcookery.com and search under peas or pea for a
Selection of recipes, including ones that might make a pea soup.
Johnnae >>>
So, in a moment of synchronicity I just happened to be reading about peas
in the Lustgarten book I gushed over yesterday. Ryff describes three
types - the common dried white pea that is sewn on acreage, the wild
fieldpea and the well shaped green pea (from Alsace, he tells us). He
also says they are called Pisa, after the city they were first know. He
seems quite comfortable with describing these, and even says that his book
is written for the common man to share this kind of knowledge in the
entry. I'm not so concerned with the actual accuracy of his history as I
am wanting to understand what a 16th century person might have known.
My question is, when wanting to approximate the closest
medieval/renaissance equivalent pea, is it more proper to choose a yellow
dried pea than a green one, or some other choice? I recall someone sagely
posting about the high protein grey pea probably being extinct so I am
curious.
Are there some good basic reference books I should consult about period
specific forms of food that have since been highly hybridized? Grains,
especially? Or is knowledge scattered in food technology journals that
requires one to hitch up the sleeves and find them?
Katrine
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2010 08:57:00 -0600
From: "Terry Decker" <t.d.decker at att.net>
To: "Cooks within the SCA" <sca-cooks at lists.ansteorra.org>
Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] Another question on peas
<<< So, in a moment of synchronicity I just happened to be reading about peas
in the Lustgarten book I gushed over yesterday. Ryff describes three
types - the common dried white pea that is sewn on acreage, the wild
fieldpea and the well shaped green pea (from Alsace, he tells us). He
also says they are called Pisa, after the city they were first know. He
seems quite comfortable with describing these, and even says that his book
is written for the common man to share this kind of knowledge in the
entry. I'm not so concerned with the actual accuracy of his history as I
am wanting to understand what a 16th century person might have known. >>>
A 16th Century person would have referred to pea as pease (the noun is
singular, plural peasen as derived from OE) the ending -se being dropped
sometime after 1600. The word has nothing to do with Pisa, being derived
from the Greek "pison." I suspect, but do not know, that Ryff's error stems
from the Latin plural of "pisum," which is "pisa."
<<< My question is, when wanting to approximate the closest
medieval/renaissance equivalent pea, is it more proper to choose a yellow
dried pea than a green one, or some other choice? I recall someone sagely
posting about the high protein grey pea probably being extinct so I am
curious. >>>
Either yellow or green would work as both were available.
The grey pea or grey field pea is not extinct. These are common names used
to refer to a number of varieties of Pisum sativum arvense. The common name
has fallen into disuse as more accurate terminaolgy entered the agricultural
literature, but you will still find grey pea or grey field pea used in
agricultural publications during the first half of the 20th Century. What
has occurred is field peas have been marginalized as human food and are now
primarily used as animal fodder and ground cover. Yellow and green
varietals are particular favored in the ground cover department because they
have a better amrket value.
<<< Are there some good basic reference books I should consult about period
specific forms of food that have since been highly hybridized? Grains,
especially? Or is knowledge scattered in food technology journals that
requires one to hitch up the sleeves and find them?
Katrine >>>
The basics are covered in Davidson"s Oxford Companion to Food (available in
paperback as the Penguin Companion to Food, IIRC) and The Cambridge World
History of Food. If you seriously get involved in the study, be ready to
read a lot of scientific papers, herbals, obscure journals, contemporary
letters and general history. For grains, legumes and the like, you will
need to add archeological summaries. You also need to work with Linnean
taxonomy (to precisely define what you are talking about) and get a handle
on pre-Linnean taxonomy. Sounds daunting, but I find it a lot of fun.
Bear
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2010 09:22:19 -0800 (PST)
From: wheezul at canby.com
To: "Cooks within the SCA" <sca-cooks at lists.ansteorra.org>
Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] Another question on peas
<<< A 16th Century person would have referred to pea as pease (the noun is
singular, plural peasen as derived from OE) the ending -se being dropped
sometime after 1600. The word has nothing to do with Pisa, being derived
from the Greek "pison." I suspect, but do not know, that Ryff's error
stems from the Latin plural of "pisum," which is "pisa." >>>
That parallel with the plural seems quite logical and the German word for
pea is also in the plural form. I actually giggled when I read that part
about Pisa as it seemed patently untrue, but something my persona would
say having "read it in a book" or being something my husband told me
"having read it in a book".
I need to correct what I wrote about Alsace being the source of green peas
which will teach me to post too late at night - Ryff says that the rounder
forms are sometimes green, and are called "green peas" in Alsace and not
that they come from Alsace. This sentence implies to me that they may not
generally have been thought of as green, especially as he describes the
common form as white and certainly not the way I perceive them in a modern
sense.
Katrine
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2010 11:46:18 -0600
From: "Terry Decker" <t.d.decker at att.net>
To: "Cooks within the SCA" <sca-cooks at lists.ansteorra.org>
Subject: [Sca-cooks] Lustgarten was Another question on peas
If I have this correct, Lustgarten der Geshundheit was originally published
in Frankfort in 1546. It is an encyclopedia on agrarian subject from a
medical point of view, Ryff being a physician.
Let me suggest that you add Leonard Fuchs herbal to your study. The herbal
is contemporaneous to the Lustgarten. The plates are webbed at Yale and
there is another online facsimile with the original German text. Also, an
edition was published (with English translations) only a few years ago.
That may be available through ILL. Fuchs makes some errors and raises a
number of questions, but he is highly useable as a mid-16th Century source.
Bear
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2010 07:40:10 -0600
From: "Terry Decker" <t.d.decker at att.net>
To: "Cooks within the SCA" <sca-cooks at lists.ansteorra.org>
Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] Another question on peas
<<< Either yellow or green would work as both were available.
Bear >>>
What is the difference in texture and taste between these peas? How about
firmness?
--
Ian of Oertha
-------
You'll find them marketed as green or yellow split peas. I find no
particular difference in taste and the texture depends on how soft they are
cooked. If you could get them fresh, it might be a different matter, but
they are basically ground cover plants that can be harvested and sold to
processors for additional revenue. I don't recall ever seeing a fresh field
pea outside of the field.
Bear
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 01:36:49 -0400
From: Sharon Palmer <ranvaig at columbus.rr.com>
To: Cooks within the SCA <sca-cooks at lists.ansteorra.org>
Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] peas vs. beans
Ranvaig commented:
<<< I checked the index of Apicus for "bean" and "torta" and don't see
anything like this. The notes say that one word now associated
with beans, actually meant peas then. >>>
So what determines whether something is considered a bean and when
it is considered a pea? Now and in period?
===================
I found a couple of modern answers:
Beans are of the genus Phaseolus.
Peas are of the genus Pisum.
peas have tendrils and beans do not
peas have a hollow stem and beans have a solid stem.
In general peas have slick vines and beans have hairy vines that enable
them to cling.
Bean is used for a lot of different
things and usually tagged by shape.
In period, it will depend on the language too. Or are you only
asking about English?
Ranvaig
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 15:47:11 -0400
From: Johnna Holloway <johnnae at mac.com>
To: Cooks within the SCA <sca-cooks at lists.ansteorra.org>
Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] Black-eyed peas
http://www.oldcook.com/medieval-jardin_legumes_secs
garden of the beans with photos
Also see
Medieval Gardens on the Continent
The Charlemagne's estate at Asnapio, the Capitulare de Villis
and the Plan of St. Gall
http://wyrtig.com/EarlyGardens/Continental/ContinentalGardens.htm
Johnnae
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2013 00:26:59 -0400 (EDT)
From: JIMCHEVAL at aol.com
To: sca-cooks at lists.ansteorra.org
Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] Black-eyed peas recipes?
To a French speaker, all of these would be haricots.
It's worth pointing out, I think, that the main words for beans used to be
fasiolus (phaseolus) and faba. The word haricoq - as students of French
medieval food will know - originally applied to a mutton dish:
"To make haricoq, take sheep bellies and brown them on the grill. When they are browned, cut up them into pieces, and put in a pot. Take peeled onions, and chop them up fine. Put in the pot with the meat. Take white ginger, cinnamon and assorted spices, that is, clove and seed. Moisten with verjuice and add to the pot. Salt to taste."
Note that there are no greens in this recipe, though the TLF says that the
dish was later made with string beans. The name apparently referred originally to something cut up:
". 1 d?verbal de l'anc. verbe harigoter ? d?chiqueter, mettre en lambeaux
? (1176-81, CHR. DE TROYES, Chevalier Lion, ?d. M. Roques, 831), lequel
est prob. un d?r. en -oter* (cf. tapoter) de l'a. b. frq. *hari?n ? g?cher
?, prononc? *harij?n (d'o? l'all. verheeren ? d?vaster, d?truire ?) et
entr? en Gallo-Romania sous la forme *harig?n. Hericot est peut-?tre d? ?
l'infl. d'?cot* ? rameau ?lagu? imparfaitement, chicot d'arbuste ?, le
rapprochement de ces deux mots s'expliquant sans doute par le fait que la viande du haricot de mouton est d?coup?e en morceaux irr?guliers. "
http://atilf.atilf.fr/dendien/scripts/tlfiv5/advanced.exe?8;s=2857712835;
But as a word for beans, it came along fairly late.
Faba is less complicated, vicia faba having been found often in
archeological digs.
Jim Chevallier
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2013 11:50:50 -0600
From: "Terry Decker" <t.d.decker at att.net>
To: "Cooks within the SCA" <sca-cooks at lists.ansteorra.org>
Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] OOP-French View of English Food
Grey or gray peas get their name from the color of the seed. You will find
that there are both field and sugar varieties of gray pea.
In this particular instance, the pea under discussion is probably the Dutch
gray field pea. It was under cultivation in the Low Countries and appears
to have been introduced into England in the late 15th or early 16th Century
at the same time as the orange carrot.
I wouldn't read much into a reference of the commoners eating "grey pease."
Peas were fairly common poverty fair in England for centuries.
Bear
<<< Otherwise, I've never seen field peas called gray peas before:
"The Common people feed much upon Grey Pease,"
I also wonder if this is an early reference to British vegetarians (who
seem to have been the first to be at all organized):
Jim Chevallier
www.chezjim.com >>>
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2013 13:00:01 -0500 (EST)
From: JIMCHEVAL at aol.com
To: sca-cooks at lists.ansteorra.org
Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] OOP-French View of English Food
As they were in France, going back to Roman times (and possibly before).
But not just poverty fare. Taillevent uses peas as a thickener, for instance.
Overall, it really is striking how important peas were in earlier
centuries. They and broad beans were remarkably dominant through most of the Middle Ages. So anyone who wants a real Medieval meal could probably just boil
up a mess of either and maybe pour some honey on it or eat it with mustard.
Not as sexy as peacock, but way more common, and at all ranks.
But I wasn't really reading much into the mention. Just pointing out I'd
never encountered the term before.
Jim Chevallier
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2013 13:09:50 -0500
From: Sharon Palmer <ranvaig at columbus.rr.com>
To: Cooks within the SCA <sca-cooks at lists.ansteorra.org>
Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] OOP-French View of English Food
Rumpolt has many references to "Weisse Erbe?" or
white peas. There are 16 recipes in the Zugem??
or side dish section for dry peas. They are
mentioned in several menus including the
Keyserliche or Imperial banquet, so not just
poverty food.
I found white whole peas at an Indian grocery,
but after they were cooked and the hulls removed,
they were exactly like common yellow split peas.
The outside was greyish white, but the inside was
yellow.
Ranvaig
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2013 13:22:15 -0500 (EST)
From: JIMCHEVAL at aol.com
To: sca-cooks at lists.ansteorra.org
Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] OOP-French View of English Food
I suspect the safest bet for most people recreating medieval dishes is to
use broad beans, which haven't changed much, and which frequently are listed
alternately with peas.
I'm sure one CAN find true field peas, but with far more effort.
Jim Chevallier
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2013 16:26:29 -0500
From: Johnna Holloway <johnnae at mac.com>
To: Cooks within the SCA <sca-cooks at lists.ansteorra.org>
Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] Gray Peas
Actually you can buy them. Imported from the Netherlands.
Dried Gray Peas (Marrow-Fat)
http://www.dereuzegourmetmarket.com/700201.html
German or European markets might carry them.
Actually Jungle Jims probably does.
Johnnae
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2015 19:08:16 +1000 (GMT+10:00)
From: <lilinah at earthlink.net>
To: sca-cooks at lists.ansteorra.org
Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] Green almond, fresh chickpeas
Green almonds are not yet at the nut stage. There is no hard shell. The outside is green and slightly fuzzy. The inside is like a slightly milky colored gel. Traditionally they are eaten as they are (you can't peel them, there's no nut inside), dipped in salt, as a snack. I have a vague memory of reading something about them in a period text, but can't recall which.
Fresh chickpeas are green in color and, altho firm, are edible lightly cooked. I don't recall any recipes for them in period cookbooks, but i'm not saying there aren't any, just my memory.
I'm currently in Lochac, so rather far from my books and can't double check.
Urtatim
Frim the fb "Medieval & Renaissance Cooking and Recipes" group:
Galefridus Peregrinus
April 20 at 12:43pm
On peeling chickpeas
Last week I prepared a fairly simple recipe out of al-Warraq that called for chickpeas as one of the ingredients. Because they are currently in season, I used fresh chickpeas rather than dried. Yesterday I prepared the recipe again, but used dried chickpeas, after having soaked them overnight.
Medieval Islamic recipes often instruct the cook to bruise and peel the chickpeas. This particular recipe lacks the instruction to peel, stating only that the peas should be bruised. When I used fresh chickpeas last week, I did not bruise them, as I wanted to see how rapidly they would cook. I found that it took about 60-90 minutes for them to cook through, once the pot started boiling. When I used soaked dried peas, I bruised them and found myself peeling them as well, even though the recipe did not tell me to do so. Why? Because the process of bruising them effectively loosens the skins, and I found myself with a bowl of bruised chickpeas mixed with loose skins. It was comparatively easy to pick them out prior to adding the peas to the pot.
As I was prepping the chickpeas, I found myself considering the reasons why the "bruise and peel" instructions might be included. I had previously thought that instruction to peel was for aesthetic reasons, to prevent loose skins from marring the texture and appearance of the dish. But yesterday I came up with a different or perhaps additional hypothesis: Chickpeas take quite a while to cook. Even the fresh ones take at least an hour. The process of bruising loosens the halves of the peas, and the removal of the skins finishes the process of breaking the peas into smaller pieces. Even after breaking, the peas take about 90-120 minutes to cook thoroughly. It therefore seems possible (maybe even probable) that bruising and peeling was done to speed up the cooking process.
I plan on testing this hypothesis by cooking soaked dried chickpeas in plain water, some of which will be bruised and peeled, and some of which will be left intact, and determining exactly how long it takes for them to fully cook. I will report on the results of this experiment at some future date. I will also entertain suggestions from this forum for additional experiments.
<the end>