Home Page

Stefan's Florilegium

cl-Scotland-msg



This document is also available in: text or RTF formats.

cl-Scotland-msg - 10/31/01

 

Clothing of Scotland. folding of kilts.

 

NOTE: See also the files: cl-Scot-fem-art, cl-Scot-male-art, cl-Ireland-msg, Scotland-msg, Ireland-msg, clothing-books-msg, fd-Scotland-msg, haggis-msg.

 

************************************************************************

NOTICE -

 

This file is a collection of various messages having a common theme that I  have collected from my reading of the various computer networks. Some messages date back to 1989, some may be as recent as yesterday.

 

This file is part of a collection of files called Stefan's Florilegium. These files are available on the Internet at: http://www.florilegium.org

 

I  have done  a limited amount  of  editing. Messages having to do  with separate topics  were sometimes split into different files and sometimes extraneous information was removed. For instance, the  message IDs  were removed to save space and remove clutter.

 

The comments made in these messages are not necessarily my viewpoints. I make  no claims  as  to the accuracy  of  the information  given by the individual authors.

 

Please  respect the time  and  efforts of  those who have written  these messages. The  copyright status  of these messages  is  unclear at this time. If  information  is  published  from  these  messages, please give credit to the originator(s).

 

Thank you,

    Mark S. Harris                  AKA:  THLord Stefan li Rous

                                          Stefan at florilegium.org

************************************************************************

 

From: ddfr at quads.uchicago.edu (david director friedman)

Date: 9 Oct 90 02:39:57 GMT

Organization: University of Chicago

 

    Tartans Etc.

 

"I think that clan-specific tartans date from the late 18th and early

19th centuries." (Steve Duncan)

 

"A question comes to mind immediately....  How much of the clan

tartan business is a Victorian Romanticism" (Laura Rydal)

 

I read up on this subject many years ago; I am afraid I no longer

have the references. Apparently the "traditional clan tartans" were

forged by the brothers Sobieski-Stuart early in the nineteenth

century. They claimed to have gotten them from a medieval manuscript

in their possession (Vestiarum Scoticum? Some Latin name like that)

which they were very reluctant to let anyone else examine. The

Sobieski-Stuarts claimed to be descendants of both the Polish and

Scottish royal families, and were very popular with the celtophile

aristocracy of the time. There are, I believe, regimental tartans

that are much older, but I do not think any are known to be period.

 

Incidentally, the Skean Dhu (stocking knife) also appears to be a

"celtic revival" invention (not necessarily by the same people). The

Scottish Dirk, on the other hand, is real, but the earliest evidence

is slightly post-period; it appears to be a descendant of the ballock

dagger, which is period.

 

Cariadoc

(David Friedman)

DDFR at Midway.UChicago.Edu

 

 

From:    Ioseph of Locksley  

Date: 09-Oct-90 01:09pm

Subject: tartans

 

From: laura at ux1.lbl.gov (Laura Mcvay)

>Is there a good reference extant which discusses Medieval Scottish  

>Dress, with illustrations from paintings, brasses, etc.  There were

>some differences according to period accounts, but I'll like to know  

>more.  Perhaps there is a book of portraits from the National Museum

>of Scotland?  I'd love to know about it and how to obtain it..

        My researches show that Scots nobility, at least, wore Anglo-French

        fashions, about 50 to 100 years out-of-date. The Highland garb was

        mostly the "saffron shirt" (which tended to be a padded gambeson)

        for men, and standard generic peasant garb for women.

"I read up on this subject many years ago; I am afraid I no longer

have the references. Apparently the "traditional clan tartans" were forged by

the brothers Sobieski-Stuart early in the nineteenth century. They claimed to

have gotten them from a medieval manuscript in their possession (Vestiarum

Scoticum? Some Latin name like that) which they were very reluctant to let

anyone else examine. The Sobieski-Stuarts claimed to be descendants of both

the Polish and Scottish royal families, and were very popular with the

celtophile aristocracy of the time. There are, I believe, regimental tartans

that are much older, but I do not think any are known to be period."

(Cariadoc)

        There are, apparently, five setts that have been accepted by Lyon

        King-of-Arms as pre-1745 -clan- patterns. Three of those are my own

        clan (MacRae) setts, MacRae Hunting/Dress, and Prince Charles Edward

        Stuart. There is also Rob Roy, and Black Watch. I have yet to find

        any pictorial evidence of tartan in medieval times, tho much from

        post 1550 can be dug out. Most of the other setts tend towards post

        Victorian times in age.

"Incidentally, the Skean Dhu (stocking knife) also appears to be a

"celtic revival" invention (not necessarily by the same people). The

Scottish Dirk, on the other hand, is real, but the earliest evidence is

slightly post-period; it appears to be a descendant of the ballock dagger,

which is period." (also Cariadoc)

        Worn in the stocking of the kilt (a post-1650 style) yes, but in

        period it was worn in the armpit. I figured out how to do this

        from research about two years ago.....and have been working on an

        article for TI on period Highland dress ever since.....should be

        ready to fly in about 6 months or so.

                                        -Ioseph of Locksley

                                         Harper to Clan MacRae

 

 

From: kinsey at nas.nasa.gov (Cassandra L. Kinsey)

Date: 16 Oct 90 16:15:04 GMT

Organization: NAS Program, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA

Newsgroups: rec.org.sca

 

>>I've seen 16th century portraits (not many,

>>but a male and a female) that show the great kilt incorporated with

>>doublet and shirt.

>

>Where?  Where?  I'd love to do a scots doublet for 12th night.

 

When I was in Scotland, I went to the National Art Museum in Edinburgh.  There

was one painting in particular that had left an impression on me.  It was

a picture of a large (stocky) man in a great kilt, but instead of a tunic

covering his upper body, or bareskin, the man was wearing furs.  I think the

painting was done in either the 16th or 17th century, but I think is was

portraying someone from earlier times, probably 15th century.  

 

Also, I just watched "Highlander" again this past weekend, and parts of the

story take place in 15th century Scotland.  This was the manner in which

the Scots were dressed in the movie.  Hope this helps.

 

Yours in service,

Eiriol of Lothian

 

 

From: sgj at slc1.brl.mil (S. Gwen Johnson)

Date: 13 Oct 90 06:15:35 GMT

Organization: Paladin.aberdeen.md.us

Newsgroups: rec.org.sca

 

I'll make it brief, kilts come in two basic types: great kilt and

little kilt.  Little kilts are modern kilts, and are an 18th century

invention.  It seems that the word kilt at this time was attached to

this garment, and the term great kilt was coined to descirbe what had

been worn before.  Alas, I can't remember what the gret kilt was

called in period before, but it was nothing remotely ressembling

'kilt'.  The great kilt is a plaid (a rectangular peice of cloth, not

necessarily tartan. Isn't the evolution of langauge fun?)

 

Great kilts are period, they were worn for a long time. Just how the

were worn is a matter of debate.  As is just who wore them, and for

what activities.  I know a couple of wearing a great kilt, I'll

describe them if asked.  I've seen 16th century portraits (not many,

but a male and a female) that show the great kilt incorporated with

doublet and shirt.  The basic great kilt takes five yards minimum of

wide wool.  In period it was made of narrower fabric than we have now,

'and going up a hill, or in a wind, the indecency of it is plain'

which is a fairly close quote of an eyewitness account in a time

period I can't remember.  Aargh!  'Formal' great kilts took up to

thirty yards.  Great kilts are not sewn (a boon for those of us who

view needles with supsicion) and have *pockets*, lots of pockets.  

 

Scotland seemed to delight in 'chequered cloths' as one translation of

Diodorus would have it, the Irish seemed to prefer plain cloths.  As

to when they were worn, well, only by men on foot.  (Do not ride a

horse in a skirt with no underwear underneath!)  As such I suspect

they were only worn by the nobility on rare occassion, and were in

fact the garb of the commoner.  Having worn great kilts myself on a number of

occassions they are quite comfortable, even at Pennsic (as long as you

don't exert yourself.)  Some historians suggest the kilt was only worn

out of doors and was removed upon entering a dwelling. This would

mean that the shirt/tunic worn underneath was long enough to preserver

modesty, which is certainly possible.  The consensus of opinion is

that they were worn all the time, and were not reserved for outerwear.

 

Do note that in period they were only worn by men, but in SCA are

often worn by women.  In period something similar (the illustration

wasn't real clear) was worn by women over their skirt, but it was

tucked in the waist and not taken up onto the shoulder as the great

kilt was.  On the other hand, kilts are heavy and pull at the

shoulder, even ripping a lightweight shirt, so it is quite conceivable

that the woman painted had tucked her plaid in at the waist for

reasons of comfort, and that the custom was to wear them on the

shoulder as men did.

 

Note that modern SCA usage says women should pin the kilt to the right

shoulder, and men to the left.  This is not documented in period in

any way shape or form. (That I know of, and I've looked into the

subject.) Men would pin it to whichever shoulder would leave them a

free arm for using a weapon.  And I imagine it was sometimes pinned to

both shoulders, for various reasons having to do  with comfort.  And

sometimes it was not pinned.  The great kilt has many virtues, but it

voluminous folds can get in the way of real work.

 

Legend has it that the little kilt was invented by a carpenter who got

tired of the bulk.  He removed his great kilt, cut it in half and wore

it as a cloak and a little kilt, the cloak being laid aside during

work or warm weather.  This is no doubt (in my mind) part of the

Apocrypha of Scottish culture.  But it does sound plausible.

 

Sorry I can't name my documentation, it's been a long time since I

looked into this matter and having settled it to my satisfaction, I

ceased to worry about it.  

 

Awilda Halfscot, sometimes Halfdane

                  

                  

From: ddfr at quads.uchicago.edu (david director friedman)

Date: 22 Oct 91 03:47:28 GMT

Organization: University of Chicago

 

Everyone knows that period Scotsmen wore Skean Dhu's (stocking

knives). So far as I can tell, they are actually an invention of the

Celtic Revival, c. 1800. The Scottish Dirk is earlier, but there seem

to be no examples before 1600, although it may be a descendant of the

period ballock dagger. The present system of clan tartans is

apparently a forgery by the brothers Sobieski-Stuart, c. 1800,

although tartan patterns go way back.

 

Cariadoc

 

 

Subject: Scottish Persona Question

Date: 31 May 92

From: boris at sys6626.bison.mb.ca (boris)

Newsgroups: rec.org.sca

Organization: system 6626 BBS, Winnipeg MB

 

  GREETINGS AND FELICITATIONS.

 

I am amazed at the number of people who aren't willing to walk over

to an encyclopedia and look something up.

 

  dates :

         1500's  tartans come into use, predominatly in the

                 northern highlands.

         1715  The earl of mar brings the tartan to public attention.

                   (ie widespread knowledge )

         1745  tartan and highland dress banned. Most tartan patterns

               lost.  most modern tartans date from the 18th century.

 

 

  Until the middle of the 1700's both men and women of the highlands

wore 'simple' clothing made of tartan.  The men wore a 'feile-mor',

which was a rectangular piece of cloth 5 or 6 yards long and 54 inches

wide. The lower 22 inches or so were pleated onto a belt and secured

around the waist. The shorter edge fell to just above the knee, while

the remainder was used as a cloak over the head or shoulders and

pinned on one shoulder. It was often used as a blanket at night, but

mostly severed as a 'coat'.

 

It should be noted that the pleats of the feilemor were not stiched

in as in the modern kilt and that they were held in place only by the

belt. The military were the first to stich the 'kilt' in the late

1700's.

 

Triubhas or trews are as old as the feilemor. Of tartan cut on the

cross, (on-the-cross means with the lines running diagonally to the

horizontal)  with the feet tailored in and worn inside the shoes.

Garters were worn at the knee to prevent bagging. The trews were

favored by gentlemen of the times. Only occasionally were the

trews separated into breeches and hose.

 

A very long shirt was worn, long enough to be quite decently dressed

in it alone.

 

Often many different tartans were worn at the same time. By this I

mean the trews would be different from the hose and both would be

different again from the cloak. Fairly common. It drives the

uneducated up a wall when you do it too.

 

The sporran originated as a bag worn on the belt. The modern version

is very stylized and decorative version of the common english purse of

the middle ages. It was plain leather and often highly decorated.

 

The balmoral bonnet of knitted wool is at least 500 years old,

while the flat wedge-shaped glengarry bonnet favored today was

only invented in the early 1800's.

 

Shoes are straight forward style of the time. Same as in england.

Though in earliest times were of untanned hide. Cuaran (sock-like

boots) were made of horse or cow hide and were worn to just below the

knee. They were shaped to the form of the leg and secured in place

with thongs. Though it was common practise to go bare-legged or

barefoot.

 

Arms consisted of bows and arrows, spears, swords, dirks, axes,

shields and later firearms.

Expert archers were very common. The claymore is the older sword most

commonly used. the broadsword is fairly modern. Very good with the

claymore they were without equal with the dirk. Shields or targes were

also common.

 

wickerwork was common.

 

As far as what tartan to wear, wear whatever strikes your fancy.

the idea of wearing a 'clan' tartan is a modern one, and many people

in days of old wore whatever the weaver produced or had tartans

invented or modified. trends or a good weaver would set the 'common'

tartan of a village or district but borrowing from distant areas was a

common practise.  ANYONE can wear a tartan.  If they tell you that you

have no right to the tartan then laugh at them.  Clan badges are an

entirely different thing though as each is usually the personal badge

of the clan chief.

 

Early tartans are likely to have been simple chequered cloth, with the

plaids and elaborate tartans evolving much later.

 

All this from a coupla Scottish Clan and Tartan history texts from

Scotland and written by Scots.    A lot of lore got lost as a result of

the oral traditions and after the failure of the jacobite rebellions.

 

hope it helps.

 

boris

 

;E-mail: boris at sys6626.bison.mb.ca

;system 6626: 63 point west drive, winnipeg manitoba canada R3T 5G8

 

 

Subject: Scottish Persona Question

Date: 26 May 92

From: ewright at convex.com (Edward V. Wright)

Newsgroups: rec.org.sca

Organization: Engineering, CONVEX Computer Corp., Richardson, Tx., USA

 

In <1992May26.122406.25733 at dartvax.dartmouth.edu> nathans at coos.dartmouth.edu (Nathan Shafer) writes:

 

>1) What's the earliest that the [I don't remember the Gaelic spelling, so

>   I have to go phonetic] "breck'n faile", the precursor to the kilt in

>   which the pleats were folded in and belted, not sewn in, was worn? I

>   want to make my persona as early as possible.

 

I'm afraid you're not going to like the answer.  The more recent books

on the subject all seem to indicate that the belted plaid, the predecessor

of the modern kilt, does not go back nearly as far as once believed.  

Apparently, the idea that the kilt had origins "lost in the midst of

antiquity" originated with 18th Century Scottish poets, and later authorities

repeated this as fact without bothering to check it. Modern research seems

to indicate that the belted plaid originated in the Scottish Highlands

sometime around the early 1600's and did not become universally popular

until the mid-to-late 1600's.  The earliest reference to something which

might be a belted plaid seems to be a description of Scottish mercenaries

who arrived in Ireland in the 1580's wearing "fringed cloaks beneath their

belts" (or something very close to that).  Prior to this, it appears that

Scots wore trousers or "trewes" (not to be confused with the short pants,

also called "trewes," which are worn underneath a kilt).

 

 

>2) If at some point I should become interested in Court goings-on, I

>   assume I should acquire some garb that is more formal, yes? What is

>   available to Scotsman tyhat would be period and accurate? The dress

>   kilt, with all the flashy accoutrements, would not be available in

>   the time period I'm thinking about.

 

Portraits of Mary, Queen of Scots and her husband, Lord Darney, show them

in what appears to be more-or-less standard Tudor-Elizabethan costumes. If

it's good enough for them...

 

-- Nicholas van Leyden

 

 

Newsgroups: soc.culture.celtic,rec.org.sca

From: gleason at scf16.scf.loral.com (Robert Gleason)

Subject: Re: Instructions for ancient kilt - feileadh mor

Organization: Loral Space and Range Systems, Sunnyvale, CA

Date: Wed, 21 Jul 1993 16:11:28 GMT

 

Ok. Here's how I fold my great kilt. It's not the only way to do it but

it works for me...

 

I take 6 yards of plaid, or roughly twice the length from my hands

extended above my head to the floor, 60" wide and fanfold it so it

unfolls easily. (Note: some use 8-10 yards but that's silly and is

too bulky and keeps in too much heat.)

 

Take one edge of the fabric and measure in 1 cubit (elbow to fingertip)

Pleat the rest of the plaid (deeply) until there is 1 cubit unpleated

on the other end. You want the pleats deep enough and close enough

together to form 1 cubit of pleats. For me that's wrist-to-fingertip

deep and 1.5" to 2" apart.

 

Take a belt and slide it under the plaid across the pleats. Lie down

on top of the pleats having the fabric end at the knee (or just above

if you wanna show them off). Adjust the belt to where your waist is.

Put the right edge of the plaid over your body. Now the left. Cinch

the belt to fit.

 

Now stand up. You'll notice that in front you have 4 layers of

fabric; the outer two longer than the inner two. There are two ways

to go with these:

 

Method 1: Take the corner of

the first layer and twist to bunch the fabric.  Tuck this under itself

and into the belt under it to keep it there.  Put on another belt and

a sporan over the plaid. Take the second layer at the corner and twist.

Pull this around

the back and over your shoulder. Affix to shirt with a brooch or pin;

or to belt with a length of cord.

 

Method 2: Do the same for the first and second layer in this method

that you did for the first layer in method 1. This keep the plaid off

your shoulders (cooler), doesn't put holes on your shirts, and doesn't

slode off your shoulder all the time.

 

You may want to take the outer layer in back and tuck it over and into

your outer belt to give you better ventilation.