Home Page

Stefan's Florilegium

birth-control-msg



This document is also available in: text or RTF formats.

birth-control-msg – 6/26/06

 

Period birth-control. Period abortifacients.

 

NOTE: See also the files: aphrodisiacs-msg, Sex-in-the-MA-art, p-hygiene-msg, p-sex-msg, perfumes-msg, bathing-msg, cosmetics-msg, Medvl-bathng-lnks.

 

************************************************************************

NOTICE -

 

This file is a collection of various messages having a common theme that I  have collected from my reading of the various computer networks. Some messages date back to 1989, some may be as recent as yesterday.

 

This file is part of a collection of files called Stefan's Florilegium. These files are available on the Internet at: http://www.florilegium.org

 

I  have done  a limited amount  of  editing. Messages having to do  with separate topics  were sometimes split into different files and sometimes extraneous information was removed. For instance, the  message IDs  were removed to save space and remove clutter.

 

The comments made in these messages are not necessarily my viewpoints. I make  no claims  as  to the accuracy  of  the information  given by the individual authors.

 

Please  respect the time  and  efforts of  those who have written  these messages. The  copyright status  of these messages  is  unclear at this time. If  information  is  published  from  these  messages, please give credit to the originator(s).

 

Thank you,

    Mark S. Harris                  AKA:  THLord Stefan li Rous

                                          Stefan at florilegium.org

************************************************************************

 

From: huff at silver.lcs.mit.EDU (Robert Huff)

Newsgroups: rec.org.sca

Subject: condoms and birth control

Date: 1 Apr 1993 19:40:24 -0500

 

Ave!

      I remember reading in a book on Elizabethan women (no citation at hand)

that abortion was, at least in practice, condemned only if the soul had entered

the body.  This was said to take place at the time of quickening ....

 

      Diego mundoz

 

 

From: jeffs at math.bu.EDU (Jeff Suzuki)

Newsgroups: rec.org.sca

Subject: fetus as property

Date: 2 Apr 1993 17:24:59 -0500

 

Ah, found the reference:  Exodus 21:22, right after the decalog.

Essentially, if two men get into a fight and hit a woman, causing a

miscarriage, the one responsible shall be fined a sum determined by

the woman's husband and the judges.  

 

This assumes that the woman is not harmed physically.  If she is

harmed physically, then the penalty is death.

 

Fujimoto

 

 

From: parr at acs.ucalgary.ca (Charles Parr)

Newsgroups: rec.org.sca

Subject: Re: condoms and birth control, some discussion of sexuality.

Date: 7 Apr 93 18:22:51 GMT

Organization: The University of Calgary, Alberta

 

jeffs at math.bu.EDU (Jeff Suzuki) writes:

>Ken Mondschein writes:

>> Condoms were invented by a Dr. Condom (who soon changed his name) for

>> the court of the ribald Charles II (or was it James II?).

>

>I've heard arguments that this story is true, and other arguments that

>"Dr. Condom" never existed.  Anyone out there want to sort out the

>mystery?

>

>Moreach writes:

>>I once read somewhere that there is some evidence that Renaissance women

>>used cervical caps made from half a lime rind, which lime "essence" is a

>>decent spermicide.

>

>Anything acidic (I'm assuming lime "essence" would be) acts as a

>decent spermicide; it's the principle behind douching. (It's why, in

>a pinch, coca cola will do -- eeyuk!)

>

>Anyone know about period abortifacients and want to comment on it?

>

>Incidentally, does anyone know when the idea that abortion is

>equivalent to murder got started?  I'm inclined to believe it's a 20th

>century thing; certainly the Bible does not treat the unborn fetus as

>a human being but rather as a piece of property.  

>

>Fujimoto

 

I remember reading, in a scholarly journal somewhere, that Olive

Oil makes a pretty decent spermicide, and that Greek Hetaira

used it as such...

 

Does anyone know of any detailed research on period birth control

techniques? I know that the church proscribed Oral and Rectal

sex *because* these techniques were used as birth control...

 

This might make a good subject for a TI article, or even a

Compleat Anachronist...I think I'd add a disclaimer, though,

just to avoid paternity suits;-) (well, carolus wrote that

in period they used a sock, and quoted this rhyme, and so I

tried it, and 9 months later came the twins...)

 

If anyone missed the warning in the header, and is offended

by this subject...Sorry...

 

Carolus Malvoix

Montengarde An Tir

 

 

From: donna at kwantlen.bc.CA (Donna Hrynkiw)

Newsgroups: rec.org.sca

Subject: Bryn Mawr: Contraception and Abortion

Date: 25 Aug 1993 12:13:07 -0400

 

Another book of possible interest to the SCA from the

Bryn Mawr Medieval Review. The review is too long to post

here, but if you're interested drop me a note and I'll

mail it to you.

 

Riddle, John M.   Contraception and Abortion from the Ancient World to the

Renaissance.   Cambridge, Mass./London:  Harvard University Press 1992.

Pp. x, 245. ISBN 0-674-16875-5.

     Reviewed by Paul T. Keyser -- University of Alberta

 

Elizabeth Braidwood

An Tir

 

[The following is the review that Elizabeth sent:

 

From bmmr-l at cc.brynmawr.edu Tue Aug 24 20:53:52 1993

Date: Tue, 24 Aug 93 23:56:59 -0400

Originator: bmmr-l at cc.brynmawr.edu

From: bmr at ccat.sas.upenn.edu (Bryn Mawr Reviews)

Subject: BMMR 93.8.8, Riddle, Contraception and Abortion

 

at  at  at  at  93.8.8, Riddle, Contraception and Abortion

 

Riddle, John M.   Contraception and Abortion from the Ancient World to the

Renaissance.   Cambridge, Mass./London:  Harvard University Press 1992.

Pp. x, 245. ISBN 0-674-16875-5.

 

     Reviewed by Paul T. Keyser -- University of Alberta

 

     A seminal and unique work of great importance. Riddle has

studied Dioskorides in a recent monograph, and now focusses on

one aspect of his drug lore, already broached in a valuable

article, "Oral Contraceptives and Early-term Abortifacients

during Classical Antiquity and the Middle Ages," Past and Present

no. 132 (August 1991) 3-32. A frequent problem in attempting to

understand ancient medicine is the precise nature of the

condition described: e.g. the Athenian plague. Studies of

conception and its prevention have the advantage that diagnosis

('pregnant') is proven by birth. Riddle is firmly historicist--

the procedures described are taken as such and not as metaphors

symbols or signs (vii-viii). After all, pre-modern women had as

much or more interest as moderns in effective contraceptives and

abortion.

 

     Riddle asks was it possible for pre-modern people to

regulate fertility by other than abortion, infanticide, or

abstinence (1-16)? He rightly concludes that evidence (literary

and archaeological) shows little recourse to such methods and a

birth rate too low to explain unless achieved by the use of

contraceptives. Restraint, delayed marriage, coitus interruptus,

non-fertile intercourse, rhythm, surgical abortion, infanticide:

it is clear that none was the method of choice. The point is

crucial and elsewhere thoughtlessly neglected. The best recent

survey of any other part of ancient medicine, R. Jackson, Doctors

and Diseases in the Roman Empire (1988) devotes only two shallow

pages (109-111) to the whole topic and is hesitant to credit the

use or efficacy of any contraceptives. Similarly two otherwise

excellent books concerned in part with ancient population growth

quickly dismiss any possibility with even less discussion: J.

Diamond, The Third Chimpanzee (1992) 189-90 and M. N. Cohen,

Health and the Rise of Civilization (1989) 103, 129.

 

     Riddle then discusses at length the abundant but neglected

evidence in Dioskorides and Soranos (16-56) for herbal (oral)

contraceptives (ATO/KIA) and abortifacients (FQO/RIA). These

chapters ought to be required reading for those who believe that

the conceptual world of Greek medicine is wholly alien to and

disjoint from ours. First, laws and precepts from Plato to Talmud

show that ancient people believed that oral contraceptives worked

to reduce fertility (16-20), and they distinguished contraception

from abortion (20-24). Riddle evaluates the prescriptions of

Soranos 1.61-3 by reference to numerous modern pharmacologic

studies which show that nearly every plant claimed as

contraceptive by Soranos and which has been tested, in fact

works. For example, Soranos (and others) advise pomegranate rind,

which when fed to guinea pigs prevents pregnancy (25-6). SI/LFION

is prescribed, now usually thought extinct, but ferujol

(extracted from another ferula species, asafetida, which the

ancients thought an inferior substitute) is "nearly 100 %

successful in preventing pregnancy up to three days after coitus

at a low dose of 0.6 mg/kg in adult female rats" (28). A third

herb is rue (PH/GANON) now used to induce abortion in horses, in

humans in Latin America, and in rats (where it also prevents

implantation) in the lab (28-9). Modern tests validate such of

Dioskorides' prescriptions as have been tested as well. The point

is important: ancient doctors knew about working oral-route

contraceptives-- and knew they knew.

 

     Riddle next asks how widespread were the knowledge and

agents (57-65)? Literary references and modern folklore parallels

show they were wide-spread indeed. E.g., the seeds of Queen

Anne's Lace (wild carrot) were prescribed post-coitally by Diosk.

3.72 and Scr. Larg. 121, and are still used in the Western part

of Riddle's home state, North Carolina, and in India, for the

purpose--a practice validated by modern bioassays (58-9). Jokes

in Aristophanes Pax 706-12 and Lys. 87-9 turn on audience

recognition that penny-royal (BLH/XWN) was an effective

contraceptive--and it is (53-4, 59).

 

     In order to establish the continuity of the tradition of

knowledge and practice, Riddle returns to Egyptian papyri

(66-72). Already the Kahun papyrus of ca. 1850 B.C. contains

contraceptive pessaries, of doubtful efficacy, but the recipe of

the Ebers papyrus of ca. 1550 B.C., linen soaked with honey

steeped in acacia spikes (cp. the modern sponge and diaphragm)

was probably effective (69-70), and Soranos describes similar

devices (25-6, 30). At least one oral contraceptive is prescribed

in the Berlin papyrus, ca. 1300 B.C. (72-3), of uncertain

efficacy. I am surprised that there is no information from the

very potion-oriented Mesopotamian medicine: R. Campbell Thompson,

The Assyrian Herbal (London 1924). As Riddle notes, his "study

has a conspicuous omission," China and India (154): the texts are

very difficult of access (the Indian "herbal", Charaka Samhita,

so far as I know, is available in English only in a

privately-published, unindexed version by A. Ch. Kaviratna:

Calcutta 1897-1912).

 

     From Hippokrates to Galen, Greek medical writings contain a

variety of contraceptive prescriptions, whose known ingredients

when tested show anti-fertility effects (74-86). Such knowledge

was acquired in the same way that we have learned over centuries

and millennia which plants are edible, cure headache or heart

trouble, etc. (87). Observations of low fertility in animals by

herders allowed further discoveries (88). In the Late Roman

Empire and Early Middle Ages the tradition survived, albeit

weakened, in standard medical texts (89-107). The difficulty was

the Roman Church's well-known opposition to abortion and

contraception: yet in Macer's influential XI-A.D. herbal,

pennyroyal is still given as a birth control herb (108-117).

Arabic medicine showed no such inhibition, and is replete with

contraceptive herbs, some ancient, some new (127-34). Riddle

brings his survey down to the Renaissance (135-57) and

investigates what happened thereafter: physicians banished the

long-preserved herbalists' knowledge to the realm of superstition

(159-60). Furthermore, much of this knowledge was probably

originally resident in the oral female culture of herbalists and

midwives, who were marginalised by the professionalisation of

medicine in the XVIIII A.D. (155-7). The increasing tendency to

criminalise abortion and even contraception contributed (158-9,

161-3).

 

     In addition to showing the efficacy, prevalence, and

continuity of know-ledge and use of oral herbal contraceptives

and abortifacients, Riddle discusses the attitudes of the

ancients, pagan, Christian, and Jewish, toward abortion and the

status of the fetus (7-10, 17-24, 62-4, 109-112). Although Riddle

treats the famous prohibition of abortive pessaries in the

Hippokratic Oath (7-10) and cites Edelstein's magisterial study,

he does not note that Edelstein argues cogently that the oath

derives from IIII-B.C. neo-pythagoreans (see Edelstein Ancient

Medicine 18-20). Riddle and Edelstein come otherwise to the same

conclusion, that from Hippokrates and Plato through Aristotle to

Augustine and Gregory of Nyssa all Greek and Roman (and Jewish)

writers more or less agreed that aborting an unformed fetus

incurred no impurity or guilt (20-24). The lone exceptions are

Musonius Rufus and Basil of Caesarea, apparently.

 

     Riddle however misses three documents relevant to abortion

of great importance and influence, which hamartia he shares with

many scholars (not Edelstein): none have ever yet been done into

any modern language. The latest is the earliest extant

anti-abortion pamphlet, which circulated for centuries in perhaps

the most influential corpus of ancient medicine, and collects

arguments against abortion still standard. An animal sit id quod

in utero est, formerly ascribed to Galen (19.158-81 Kuehn), is

clearly a late III-A.D. neo-pythagorean or neo-platonic work (by

Iamblichos?). [Galen] makes use of the same polar dichotomy which

inflames the modern debate, and argues since the embryo has all

the parts which make a living being, uses its organs in the womb,

and when born already knows how to eat, etc., it must therefore

be a living being and hence laws should and do exist to protect

it. The earlier PRO\S *GAU=RON PERI\ TOU= PW=S E)MYUXOU=TAI TA\

E)/MBRUA of Porphyry--see K. Kalbfleisch, Abh. Akad. Wiss.

Berlin: Philol.-Hist. Kl. (1895)--was one of [Galen]'s sources

but is more complex and aporetic. Galen's own views, in de Fet.

Form. (4.652-702 K.), are, he claims, based on anatomy (652.1-9,

664.9-13, 676.7-9.1, etc.) and he concludes the embryo has liver,

heart, and brain from an early date (663.2-17), formed properly

in that order (672.7-4.5). It is Galen's teleologic God who forms

the fetus, not FU/SIS, the soul itself, or anything else

(687.5-8.15), but he hesitates to declare when a fetus has a

rational human soul (665.3-6.3, 685.1-14, 701.7-2.4).

 

     There are copious notes (171-210) and an extensive and

valuable bibliography (211-35). Although Riddle's focus is

herbal, he might have noted W. Krenkel, "Hyperthermia in Ancient

Rome," Arethusa 8 (1975) 381-6: the hot Roman baths reduced sperm

production, and Hippokrates may have known that heating the

testicles caused temporary sterility. With reference to abortion,

add Diethard Nickel Untersuchungen zur Embryologie Galens (Berlin

1989), W. Krenkel, "Der Abortus in der Antike," WZRost 20 (1971)

443-52, and idem, "Familienplanung und Familienpolitik in der

Antike," WJA 4 (1978) 197-203.

 

     Although it is no longer common to study classics offering

blood to ghosts, here at least the ghosts (esp. of Dioskorides

and Soranos) seem to have blood for us. Society has moved beyond

the ancients in most areas of science, and fancies it has in

politics, but it seems that the Renaissance and Enlightenment

missed A)TO/KIA. Riddle repairs that lack. In a world of fifty

myriads of myriads of people, curtailing growth would alleviate

most of our most crucial problems. According to the Cypria (fr.

1) Zeus ordained the Trojan War because the Earth groaned with

too many people. Whether or not Riddle's book influences modern

medicine (as I hope), it should influence our views of ancient

social and medical history. The ancients did seek, find, and use

effective herbal oral contraceptives and abortifacients, and

probably did so extensively. That matters for our understanding

of ancient ethics, demography, science, and women.

 

 

From: STEWARTL%WOO1.LEA1 at leav-emh.ARmy.MIL (LOU STEWART)

Newsgroups: rec.org.sca

Subject: Medieval Sexuality

Date: 17 Feb 1994 09:01:23 -0500

 

In my mailbox last night was the March/April issue of _Archaeology_

which has an article titled "Birth Control in the Ancient World."

The article discusses means of contraception used in classical times

and continues to explore the reasons why the techniques used by the

ancients faded from common use during the Renaissance.

   "   demographic profiles of the Middle Ages provide persuasive

evidence that women used oral contraceptives and early term

abortifacients.  Such demographic research, laboratory studies, and

scrutiny of ancient texts have given us new hints concerning the

effacy of ancient 'family planning.'"

According to the article, the ancient Greeks and Romans used a

plant known as Silphium, which became extinct in the 3rd or 4th

century AD, because of overharvesting.  The article also explores

alternate plants used after the extinction of Silphium.

 

Luigsech ni Ifearnain, Calanais Nuadh, Calontir

 

 

Newsgroups: rec.org.sca

From: tbarnes at silver.ucs.indiana.edu (thomas wrentmore barnes)

Subject: A Book Review: The Medieval Health Handbook

Organization: Indiana University

Date: Fri, 18 Feb 1994 15:51:34 GMT

 

      Greetings from Lothar,

 

      As promised here is my review of the book I was raving about a

couple of days ago.

 

      You real medievalists can laugh like donkeys at my poor attempt

at a scholarly style if you wish...

 

      THE MEDIEVAL HEALTH HANDBOOK: Tacuinium Sanitas by Luisa

Cogliati Arano translated by Adele Westbrook and Oscar Ratti. George

Brazillier Press; New York. 1976. ISBN 0-8076-1277-4. US$20.00

      10" x 6", 48 color plates, 243 black and white plates, 46 page

introduction, concordance, and bibliography.

      Much of medieval medicine, like modern medicine focused on

preventive measures that would ward off illness. In some respects

medieval preventive medicine was more elaborate than modern preventive

medicine since the medicine of the High Middle Ages and Renaissance was

based on predicting and balancing astrological influences and the four

bodily humors of Galenic medicine. This lead medieval physicians, like

19th c. medical reformers, to prescribe not just medicines, but proper

diet, living conditions, and activities for their patients. By the 14th

and 15th c. working on the works of the Arab physician Dioscorodies,

medieval health writers had created a genre of "health manuals" that

expanded on medieval herbals. The "Tacuinium Sanitas" is a fine example

of this genre, and the George Brazillier edition is an excellent and

easily accessible source for this manuscript.

      The book begins with a 46 page history of the genre of medieval

health manuals and a discussion of the history and origins of the six

texts from which the book is collated. The illustrations and

translations of the text which make up most of the book are taken from

the Tacuinums of Leige, Paris, Vienna, and Rouen, and the Theatrum of

the Casanatense Library, Rome. All of these works were executed by work

shops in Northern Italy and Berry from the last quarter of the 14th

century to the first quarter of the 15th century with illustrations of

contemporary scenes wedded to an earlier text.

      Each color plate gives a full page illustration from a page of

one of the six texts (mostly the Rouen and Leige texts) with a

translation of the text that accompanied the illustration in the

original manuscript at the bottom of the page. Each entry describes

the virtues and dangers of the item in the picture, when it is optimum

from a medicinal point of view, the nature of the humors of the item,

and the way to neutralize the dangers of the item. Plates are arranged

in alphabetical order by the latin name for each item.

      As an example, and also as documentation for the Medieval Sex

thread, here is the text of pl. IX Coitus.

 

      IX. Coitus (Coytus)

      Nature: It is the union of two for the purpose of introducing

the sperm. Optimum: That which lasts until the sperm has been completely

emitted. Usefulness: It preserves the species. Dangers: It is harmful to

those with cold and dry breathing. Neutralization of the Dangers: With

sperm-producing foods. (Paris, f. 100v)

 

      The accompanying color illustration depicts a late 14th c.-

early 15th c. couple in bed having sex in the missionary position.

 

      Other plates give similar information about various herbs,

spices, foods, textiles, seasons, winds, emotions, and activities. The

black and white plates are reproduced 6 to a page, but have the same

text format. In many cases, the text of a given illustration has been

taken from several of the other manuscripts to accompany an illustration