weddings-msg - 1/10/08 Period and SCA weddings. NOTE: See also the files: weddings-e-art, p-weddings-bib, wed-FAQ, wed-attire-FAQ, beadwork-msg, silk-msg, p-bibles-msg, religion-msg, herbs-msg. ************************************************************************ NOTICE - This file is a collection of various messages having a common theme that I have collected from my reading of the various computer networks. Some messages date back to 1989, some may be as recent as yesterday. This file is part of a collection of files called Stefan's Florilegium. These files are available on the Internet at: http://www.florilegium.org I have done a limited amount of editing. Messages having to do with separate topics were sometimes split into different files and sometimes extraneous information was removed. For instance, the message IDs were removed to save space and remove clutter. The comments made in these messages are not necessarily my viewpoints. I make no claims as to the accuracy of the information given by the individual authors. Please respect the time and efforts of those who have written these messages. The copyright status of these messages is unclear at this time. If information is published from these messages, please give credit to the originator(s). Thank you, Mark S. Harris AKA: THLord Stefan li Rous Stefan at florilegium.org ************************************************************************ From: CONS.ELF at AIDA.CSD.UU.SE ("]ke Eldberg") Date: 11 Apr 90 05:21:36 GMT Organization: Society for Creative Anachronism Greetings from William de Corbie! A gentle whose name I have forgotten asked on the net for information about medieval wedding ceremonies. I am researching that subject, hoping that it might result in an article for T.I. sometime in the future. Here are a few items from the material I have gathered. Pagan and Medieval wedding rituals - a brief outline Copyright (C) 1990 by Ake Eldberg There is no such thing as *The* Medieval Roman Catholic wedding ceremony. Practices varied from country to country and even from see to see. Marriage is not a Christian invention. When Europe was Christianized, the church had to deal with a wide variety of local customs formed by other faiths and traditions Q Celtic, Norse, Latin. The Germanic pagans didn't think of matrimony as a sacrament. To them, it was a legal contract between two families. Even a long time after the they had been converted to Chritianity, it was often difficult to make people understand the need for a Christian wedding service. The "pagan" ceremonies were mostly juridical and only peripherally connected to religion. The church couldn't simply replace the old rituals with one of its own. So the church absorbed everything that was not directly contrary to Christian faith, and incorporated these traditions into its ceremonies. I will try to describe how a medieval wedding might have been done in Scandinavia, but you should be aware that local customs may have been different where your persona comes from. Weddings before Christianity The juridical procedure in Norse society was complicated, but three ceremonial actions seem to have been necessary to make the marriage complete: 1. Engagement, which meant that the man and the woman were promised to each other. This was part of the deal, and economic compensation was necessary if one side wanted to break the engagement. 2. Wedding, where the bride was formally given to the bridegroom by her guardian, usually her father. This was done at a feast in the bridegroom's home. "I give thee my daughter" was the formula spoken by the guardian. 3. Bedding, where the couple went to bed together in the presence of witnesses. This was not a pornographic "live show"! The witnesses left before any sexual action began. But the fact that the couple had gone to bed together was firmly established. With Christianity came a different perspective. Marriage was now a sacrament, instituted by God and therefore something that concerned both church and society outside the two families. Mutual consent was demanded, and the husband was expected to be faithful. These were new ideas. Medieval wedding ceremonies The first part of the ceremony took place outside the church door. At cathedrals with several entrances, there was usually a designated "bridal door" for this. The actions done there corresponded to the functions of the old germanic ceremony. Even though it was now led by a priest, it was essentially a secular act by which the union of the families was confirmed. When people had arrived at the church door, the men were placed on the right side and the women on the left. If the bride was a virgin, her hands were bare. If she was a widow, she wore gloves. In some countries the most important parts were conducted in the vernacular, in others everything was in Latin. In the latter case, the priest would read the words that the bride and bridegroom were supposed to repeat. The ceremony at the church door began with the mutual consent of the man and the woman. The priest asked the man if he would take the woman for his wife. The man replied "Yes", and then turned to the woman and said: "I take thee, N. now to be my wife, in the name of the Lord". The same was then repeated for the woman. Next, the priest blessed the ring. Only one ring was used, given by the man to the woman. The ring was sprinkled with holy water, the bridegroom took the ring and moved it so that it came to be placed in turn on the bride's thumb, index finger and long finger - where it stayed. This was accompanied by the priest (or the bridegroom) saying: "In the name of the Father - and the Son - and the Holy Spirit". Non-Scandinavian rituals have different wordings and movements, where the ring would end on what we call the ring finger. Now the priest would bless the couple, after which the whole party moved into the church. According to some rituals, the couple held burning candles in their hands during the procession. Inside, a "bridal mass" was celebrated. It consisted of prayers, hymns, bible reading, antiphonals, and culminated in the solemn bridal benediction. The couple kneeled at the altar and a fine piece of cloth (called a "paell" in Swedish) was held over them by four unmarried people. The blessing of the bride included many words from the Old Testament, particularly the apocryphic book of Tobias. It included wishes that she should be good to her husband like Rachel, wise like Rebecca, and faithful like Sarah. Let her be fertile, chaste and innocent, and let them both live to see their offspring to the third and fourth generation. The bridal benediction is very old - the first known example is from the 5th century. After this benediction a mass (communion) followed. The ritual kissing of the bride belongs here, at the moment of the kiss of peace. The priest kissed the bridegroom, who kissed the bride, and then the bride passed the kiss on to the women while an assistant cleric brought it from the priest to the male side of the church (of course the men were on the south side and the women on the north side in the nave). Interestingly enough, the formula "I now pronounce you man and wife" was not used everywhere. It occurs in late period German and French rituals, but there is evidence that in older times, the priest left the confirmation of the marriage to God: "May the God of Abraham, Isac and Jacob unite youI" Afterwards, in the evening, there was the bedding. The Church adopted this pagan custom and converted it from a juridical act into a blessing of the matrimonial bed. Remember also that medieval wedding gowns were usually not white, as far as I know. I hope some of the above may be of use to you. If you want a medieval wedding, I suggest that you choose such medieval elements that are compatible with your faith and that are practically feasible, and try to incorporate them into whatever modern ritual your church is using. Having parts of the liturgy sung in Latin will help to give you a medieval feeling. William de Corbie ------- From: whh at PacBell.COM (Wilson Heydt) Date: 30 Aug 90 23:17:58 GMT Organization: Pacific * Bell, San Ramon, CA In article <9008291635.AA20875 at well.sf.ca.us>, well!jeannec at APPLE.COM ("Jeanne C. Stapleton") writes: PURGATORIO: I'd also like to mention, 'cause I didn't see it in Hal's Purgatorio report, that Lord Iulstan Sigewealding and his lady, Juturna the Musical, both received Leaves of Merit from James and Verena in their final court. Vivat and well deserved! I think another item about these two has been missed as well. They were married at the end of June. Full blown SCA wedding and feast. As a very nice touch for the wedding feast, they got a lot of wooden plates for the feast and then gifted them to the wedding guests afterwards. --Hal Hal Ravn, Province of the Mists, West Kingdom Wilson H. Heydt, Jr., Albany, CA 94706, 415/524-8321 (home) ======================================================================= From: atterlep at vela.acs.oakland.edu (Eldon F. Zyzyskuzuk) Date: 12 Nov 90 23:34:06 GMT Organization: Oakland University, Rochester MI In article <29955.273B7965 at stjhmc.fidonet.org> Yves.Fortan er at f510.n370.z1.fidonet.org (Yves Fortanier) writes: Good gentles, why are there 'SCA weddings'? If you've had one or performed one, what was the purpose? If like Brian, you don't like them, why not? Are they at least tolerable if they're entertaining? In my experience with SCA weddings, they're done mainly because, in many cases, many or most of the close friends of the couple are Scadians. Since SCA takes so much of so many people's lives, it seems natural that they would share marriage as they share so much else. As Baron Kevin recently commented, SCA is a family and a major purpose of the marriage ceremony is to have a family gathering. The most innovative way I ever saw of dealing with a SCA marriage is to make it into an event. Two of our group's oldest members (one has been to EVERY Pennsic War) were marrying, and so we decided to incorporate their marriage into our regular summer event. The flyers sent out mentioned the "signing of the marrige contract" as a major event in the day, and the mundane families of bride and groom were decked out in garb (which they acquired on their own). It was a lot of fun, but a huge amount of work (most of the group, myself included missed the ceremony because feast began immediately afterward.) It made for a nice touch and was definitely a lot of fun. (And it was period, too!) From: jerbil at nntp-server.caltech.edu (Joseph R. Beckenbach) Date: 12 Nov 90 19:52:13 GMT Organization: California Institute of Technology, Pasadena Unto the gentles of the Rialto, greetings! Yves.Fortanier at f510.n370.z1.fidonet.org (Yves Fortanier) writes: Good gentles, why are there 'SCA weddings'? If you've had one or performed one, what was the purpose? If like Brian, you don't like them, why not? Are they at least tolerable if they're entertaining? In Caid I have heard of a few, all of which were either The Real Vows between two members with active SCA families on both sides (and thus LOTS of SCA friends), or a second ceremony to share the joy with their SCA friends after having the civil or church ceremony for the non-SCA friends. The only related happenings I have witnessed have been 'hand-fastings' held after Opening Court, which formalized an engagement for the traditional Scottish 'year and a day'. Those have all specifically been announced in Court as being "ten minutes after the end of Court" in a different pavilion than that of Court, and that people are invited to witness if they chose. Such hand-fastings usually are quite well witnessed, and not only by friends of the two principals involved.... A gorgeous little ceremony. In service, Joseph d'Aquitaine From: bloch at mandrill.ucsd.edu (Steve Bloch) Date: 17 Nov 90 02:48:58 GMT Yves.Fortanier at f510.n370.z1.fidonet.org (Yves Fortanier) writes: Good gentles, why are there 'SCA weddings'? If you've had one or performed one, what was the purpose? If like Brian, you don't like them, why not? Are they at least tolerable if they're entertaining? A month or two ago two gentles of the Barony were wed. They scheduled the 20th-century (I'm hesitant to use "mundane" for a wedding!) ceremony for 5 PM, the SCA ceremony for 7 PM, and the reception and semi-potluck feast immediately thereafter. Both ceremonies were held at one of our regular event sites, and everyone changed clothes in between (the couple's non-SCA relatives and guests were provided with adequate garb). The whole thing was not an intrusion on an SCA event, it was effectively an SCA event of its own, though not announced in Kingdom newsletters. It is traditional in this Barony for a gentleman to go to the Baron and Baroness to request permission to court such-and-such lady (unwed ladies being by assumption wards of Their Excellencies), and after some months to return to ask Their Excellencies' permission to wed. This request is followed by lengthy haggling over brideprice and/or dowry, after which arrangements for the wedding are made. The aforementioned wedding had all this (over the course of a year or two), as well as some very good-theatre gift-givings, drinking-from-the-same-cup, etc. culminating in a running jump over a crossed sword and broom. After which it was time to eat, and then dance. This wedding was done very well, and I believe all present (including the dozens of non-SCA folk) enjoyed it immensely. -- Stephen Bloch Joshua ibn-Eleazar ha-Shalib sca>Caid>Calafia>St.Artemas bloch at cs.ucsd.edu From: BERDANJ at YALEVM.BITNET (Amoret of Dragonship Haven) Date: 29 Jan 91 14:43:03 GMT Organization: The Internet Greetings to the Rialto! In answer to the question of Yaakov HaMizrachi regarding appropriate colors for period wedding attire in Europe and the lands of Islam: The modern "white wedding" is a Victorian development (and an upper-class one at that). In Europe at least, period wedding dress would simply be the best outfits the couple had. While it might have been made specifically for the wedding, it would be expected to serve as their "dress-up" clothes until it wore out. No particular color was mandated; whatever is apprpriate in period, but fancier. (I.e., peasants would not be dressed in black, since they could not have gotten the color, etc.) I am less certain about Muslim dress. My only suggestion comes from my viewing of a recent museum exhibit on Saudi costume, which included several wedding outfits. They were several different colors; a shocking-pink one comes to mind. The common denominator was that all were dripping with as much jewelry and decoration as could be managed. I would suspect that the important part was not color, but how much wealth the bride could manage to show off at her wedding. I will gladly be enlightened if someone knows differently. Amoret of Dragonship Haven mka Susan de Guardiola TO: Ravenwing FROM: Da'ud Al-haqq SUBJECT: Weddings -> In the midst of a rare brain-idea collision, Ravenwing said to All: -> -> RR>" One of the members of our Barony is planning to do a -> RR>"13th c British wedding service in late July, but he is -> RR>"having difficulty locating an authentic period text of the -> RR>"service. Can anyone out there help out. I don't even know -> RR>"where to send him to try to look something like that up. . Britain in the 1200's would probably have confined all of its "gentle" wedding services to Church liturgy, with Norman overtones to be sure. The less-than-gentle services, say those of Northern England or Wales might have a measure more fun in them, though, with pre-Norman Danelaw and Celtic commonfolk traditions involved. --- * Origin: Don't be nervous or I'll have you beheaded! (1:135/99) TO: Cadi FROM: Da'ud Al-haqq SUBJECT: Weddings -> CC>"And so, what would those Celtic commonfolk traditions have -> CC>"consisted of? Specifics vary from area to area in the British countryside, from morris dancing to May poles, all of which are ceremonies for personal fertility (and weddings are linked to the agricultural fertility ceremonies) as well as calendar events. There are songs, dances, and feasts that all have peculiarities of the villages which performed them. No single rule of what they consist of applies to all, but you may wish to research these in the folklore section of a good college library. --- * Origin: Don't be nervous or I'll have you beheaded! (1:135/99) From: dolata at lead.uazaic.arizona.edu (Dolata) Date: 14 Jul 91 22:15:13 GMT Organization: University of Arizona AI Chemistry Lab, Tucson, AZ Dearest Gentles, If I may be allowed to insert a comment about tailoring fees; In 1982 my Dear Lady and I decided to be wed in Rennaisance fashion. We hired Dorothy Breen (daughter of Marion Zimmer Bradly) as our seamstress. We bought the material, and paid her for the immense amout of work necessary to construct two very authentic Court Dress of the style of the court of Henry VIII of England. At that time the cost was about $500. Apart from two small problems, the clothing has served us well and faithfully through the years. (Problem #1, the sleeves on her dress were not 100% correct. Problem #2, where DID these 25 extra pounds come from????) Over these years we have come to feel that the fees were modest, and a good investment. After all, nowadays I spend about 2/3 of that just on a boring 2 piece pin-stripe suit! Yes, the cost of tailoring may seem very high. But good material and good craftsmenship will last, and if you amortize that over 20 years... the cost becomes minimal. I hope you receive as good as of value as we did, and remain Yours in Service Thomas Ignatius Perigrinus Minister of Arts and Sciences (brewing! now there's an art I College of St. Felix can support!!!!) From: BERDANJ at YALEVM.BITNET (Alejandra Mercedes de Rosanegra) Date: 22 Aug 91 13:08:03 GMT Organization: The Internet Greetings to the Rialto and to Alessandra Francesca Chiarmontesi (who has a nice first name!) In regards to the query as to information on Italian Renaissance (especially Venetian) weddings, information on marriage itself in Venice may be found in both: _Civic Ritual in Renaissance Venice_ by Edward Muir ISBN 0-691-10200-7 _The Boundaries of Eros_ by Guido Ruggiero ISBN 0-19-505696-5 Among other things, it seems that whether one was actually married or not was a bit unclear to many, particularly among the lower classes; rather like modern common-law marriage. A description of a mid-fifteenth-century Florentine wedding ceremony may be found in _Giovanni and Lusanna_ by Gene Brucker ISBN 0-520-06328-7 but it is a description of a somewhat clandestine marriage (and the book focuses on the resulting "palimony" suit filed by Lusanna against Giovanni.) Hope this is of assistance! Alejandra Mercedes de Rosanegra From: whheydt at PacBell.COM (Wilson Heydt) Date: 22 Oct 91 18:40:17 GMT Organization: Pacific * Bell, San Ramon, CA In article <9110211929.aa20656 at mc.lcs.mit.edu>, BERDANJ at YALEVM.BITNET (Alejandra) writes: Did those of you who are attached meet your spouse/whatever through the SCA? I met my Lady Wife at the first event I attended. We were married about 14 months later at one of the earliest SCA weddings. --Hal Hal Ravn, Province of the Mists, West Kingdom Wilson H. Heydt, Jr., Albany, CA 94706, 415/524-8321 (home) From: samlb at optilink.UUCP (Sam Bassett) Date: 31 Oct 91 19:13:22 GMT Organization: Optilink Corporation, Petaluma, CA From article <29420 at nntpd.lkg.dec.com>, by norteman at tnpubs.enet.dec.com (Karen J. Norteman): >a large >scroll describing the particulars of the wedding and balanced with >lots of space at the bottom for guests' signatures. I've seen this done a number of times, and made two of them myself for SCAdian friends' weddings. And I often do the same thing for weddings I perform -- the official State of California/local county Marriage Certificates are horrors, so I usually make the couple a "Wall hanger" in my Fine Italic Hand . . . -- Sam'l Bassett -- System Administrator (among other things) Work: DSC, 1310-C Redwood Wy, Petaluma 94975; 1-707-792-7253 Home: 7 Gothic Court, Novato CA 94947; 1-415-897-7424 UUCP: uunet!optilink!samlb; Internet: samlb at well.sf.ca.us From: mongo at maple.circa.ufl.edu Newsgroups: rec.org.sca Subject: Re: Religion in the SCA (long) Date: 13 Mar 1993 13:58:20 GMT Organization: Center for Instructional and Research Computing Activities The more extensive, obvious, and public the expression, the more uncomfortable I feel. I'm not sure I have ever been at a religious ceremony where, at some point, the congregation has not been asked to pray --- at this point, I have been asked to become a participant, and I feel very uncomfortable. If the reason is good enough, I put up with this discomfort. I would probably feel different about a religious knighting ceremony where the congregation was never expected to pray. (Is this period? I have no idea.) But at all ceremonies I can recall attending, and I believe this includes the few religious weddings, I was asked, at least implicitly, to be a participant. This strikes me as a very different thing than to associate with those of different beliefs. First off, let me say that I'm merely an interested bystander. I'm not a member of the SCA (nor do I play one on TV), but I number about a dozen friends who are, and being a minister, a ex-doctoral history student, a self-taught herald, and a fair-minded man, I'm often called upon to mediate disputes...not that that's what I plan to do here, much... Being a minister in a very tolerant, non-denominational, NON-CHRISTIAN religion (of our own local founding, and using vaguely Anglican and RC titles and phrases to keep the Good Ol' Boys in this town happy), I have been placed in the position of writing and performing wedding and baptism ceremonies that, while religious, are non-demoninational. For instance, my first parishoner (the first man to actually seriously introduce me, 22-year-old scruffy earringed baggy-eyed-from-lack-of-sleep lout that I was, as his minister) is nominally Southern Baptist. His wife is Wiccan, after years of being raised as a Seventh-Day Adventist. Do you know how HARD it is to write a ceremony that won't offend anyone? But it can be DONE...If anyone's interested, I have the text to both the "standard" wedding and baptism ceremonies somewhere on disk. The fact is that a ceremony doesn't have to be offensive to ANYONE unless you deliberately go out of your way to find any public display of faith offensive on the grounds of sheer principle. But that's not the belief I've seen expressed in this newsgroup. From: bloodthorn at sloth.equinox.gen.nz (Jennifer Geard) Newsgroups: rec.org.sca Subject: SCA as Game Date: Mon, 31 May 93 06:42:37 GMT Organization: Lethargy Inc. Payn le Chaunster to Sister Kate, Greetings! "Subculture" seems to fit the SCA well. At the same time, and although I'm not sure what definitions of religion have surfaced in the Thinkwell discussion, I've often thought that heavy involvement with the Society fulfils many of the same social, cultural and psychological needs as religion. Perhaps that's because religious groups can be subcultures too. Which doesn't really lead on to my next point, but hey... Last year I looked into the regulations regarding marriage celebrants in New Zealand, since two SCA people were planning a deeply SCA wedding and would have liked an SCA celebrant. There are two classes of marriage celebrants in New Zealand: generic civil marriage celebrants (with a huge waiting list to become one), and marriage celebrants appointed by one of the groups on the list of government-approved groups-which-can-appoint-celebrants. At present that list consists almost entirely of religious denominations, but the wording of the relevant Act of Parliament also allows groups with certain sorts of cultural and humanitarian aims to apply. I had a chat to the Registrar of Births, Deaths and Marriages about it: he brought up the group option and suggested that the SCA *might* be eligible, and that the only way to find out how the Act would be interpreted was to apply. This potentially- interesting test-case was stillborn after the betrothed couple worked out that they were better off if they didn't legally wed. It raised some questions for me, though. Would the SCA be interested in being the sort of organisation which could appoint marriage celebrants? At first I was quite enthusiastic about this (every well-equipped group needs a celebrant ;-), but then there came a range of niggling doubts. The initial appointment of a group and single celebrant is one thing: the group's power from then on to submit a list of celebrants is quite another, especially in light of the drastic changes of personnel to which SCA branches seem prone. Then there was the fact that although officially this would be something between the New Zealand SCA (which would probably have had to incorporate for the purpose) and the New Zealand Government, positions in the local hierarchy of would-be celebrant-appointers are subject to the approval of people in California. It had the potential to get Very Messy. I'm still interested, though, at least in talking about it. Has anyone else looked at the possiblities for this sort of thing? Is it compatible with the aims of the Society? Would it be desirable? __________________________________________________________________________ Jennifer Geard bloodthorn at sloth.equinox.general.nz Christchurch, New Zealand Newsgroups: rec.org.sca Subject: SCA as Game From: bloodthorn at sloth.equinox.gen.nz (Jennifer Geard) Date: Tue, 01 Jun 93 22:40:12 GMT Organization: Lethargy Inc. Payn to Andrew, Greetings! [SCA NZ and marriage celebrants] > I wonder if this wouldn't destroy the legal standing of the Society in both > CA (where it was incorporated as an -educational- organisation) and the US > Federal system, where we 'enjoy' a similar status. Considering the furour > currently visible/audible w.r.t. the separation of Church and State in the > US, I think that it might well be a Bad Idea for the US corporation to be > seen as sponsoring a 'religion'. Some clarifications first: a New Zealand marriage celebrant is a person authorised to conduct legal marriages and do the paperwork for them. The State appoints all marriage celebrants. As well as warranting individuals as civil celebrants, the State warrants groups which then send the State an annual list of people they'd like as marriage celebrants for that year. Currently all of those groups are religious denominations, but the criteria for warranting groups (which involve them promoting either religious beliefs or philosophical or humanitarian convictions) would *very probably* cover groups such as Greenpeace, Rotary, and even the Diabetes Society. No-one's yet tried it, and there's interest in a test-case. The application would be made *not* as a religious group, but as a group which promotes certain philosophical convictions (the ideals of courtesy and chivalry come to mind), has its own subculture such that it would benefit from having a sympathetic person to cater to the needs of the group, and has a certain solidity and respectability which never hurts when doing this sort of thing. In Christchurch, where the SCA has done more than a few demo:s for Council events, we could put together a reasonable case. DISCLAIMER: There are no plans afoot to do this at the moment, and I'm talking about it merely because I found the idea intriguing and wondered how others saw it. In order to apply we'd need a local SCA couple who wanted to be legally married by an SCA celebrant but were prepared to wait a year, a proposed initial celebrant who could get good character references from people inside and outside the SCA, "character references" for the SCA in NZ, NZ Inc. status or equivalent, and someone nutty enough to take the case through. > I think it should well be discussed in light of the differences in corporate > law between the US (and the People's Republic of California ) and New > Zealand. Perhaps incorporating the SCA there would be suffcient distancing > for the American legal entities not to fly up into the bows, but I rather > doubt it, given their track records. The SCA would have to be a legal entity in NZ before the procedure even began, and NZ legal independence would become an issue. I strongly doubt that anything done by an independent entity (which happened to have a similar name) in another country would affect the SCA US, but US law is a mystery to me. RESTATED DISCLAIMER: No, we're not planning it at the moment. I looked into it when a couple of friends were planning their wedding, but they decided against a legal marriage and I decided the SCA was probably better kept out of this sort of thing. (NB: I talk about "legal marriage" a lot. There are reasons, but they're probably more relevant to a soc.* group. I've just been on the phone to the Registrar of Births, Deaths, and Marriages (again) who described some of the situations where they've helped people put together weddings which are quite intentionally *not* legal marriages. Inter-country anthro.) ________________________________________________________________________ Jennifer Geard bloodthorn at sloth.equinox.gen.nz Christchurch, New Zealand From: AYLWIN at HOLONET.NET Subject: Re: SCA as Game Organization: HoloNet National Internet Access System: 510-704-1058/modem Date: Wed, 2 Jun 1993 08:04:31 GMT MI>On Cariadoc's third hand, performing marriages is quite clearly outside the MI>purposes of the SCA, Inc.. In the period which we study, all marriage MI>ceremonies _were_ religious. We have chosen to exclude religion from our MI>official activities. The only marriage ceremony which could be an MI>appropriate activity to be sponsored by the SCA would be a period one, MI>which would be a religious one, which would conflict with our policy MI>choices. I must beg to differ. My Lady and I combined our Society wedding with our legal one, which was made possible by an old Montana law allowing two people to marry as long as they get a couple of witnesses together and have everyone sign a letter to be later filed with the authorities. No minister, no Justice of the Peace, just some friends who can later say, "Yep, they went and announced that they was hitched." All of this is leading up to the fact that I did a bit of research into medieval marriage customs, so that we might be historically accurate in our ceremony. What I found was that weddings evolved over time. In early period, weddings were often strikingly similar to the above law - the couple announced their vows before friends, and that was that. A little later, they still wedded before friends, but then went to the local church to repeat their vows on the building's steps, before the priest. As time went on, the church ceremony became more important, and moved into the chapel, while the civil ceremony dropped out of use. The preceeding was very quick and rough, and omitted many details. It does, however, touch on the point that, at least early on, weddings were not strictly religious affairs. Sir Aylwin the Flamehaired Barony of Sentinels' Keep / Artemisia aylwin at holonet.net Atenveldt From: sclark at epas.utoronto.ca (Susan Clark) Subject: Re: Marrages, Life Events and Re: SCA as Game Organization: University of Toronto - EPAS Date: Thu, 3 Jun 1993 22:47:13 GMT Greetings.... All this talk about marriages makes me remember all that canon law I play around with..... In brief, marriage was (and still is, I think) the only sacrament performed BY THE PARTICIPANTS. That's right, marriage is celebrated by the couple, no priest or no witnesses officially needed. Now, both Church and secular officials came to frown on clandestine marriages, mostly because of inhetance and legitimacy issues, so gradually mostly civil and a few church strictures were applied to marriages so as to encourage public ceremonies done before a priest. As to how to do "real" marriages in the SCA, I have met many a couple who have had two or three ceremonies for different groups of people. One thing I discovered while preparing to get hitched myself was that in Ontario,a civil ceremony may only be held in a judge's chambers, thus necessitating some sort of religious offical (even if they do a generic, non-sectarian ceremony) if the wedding is held anywhere else. Now the group of folks who can perform these ceremonies is quite wide (it includes, for instance, the Wiccan Church of Canada)....but still, this could really restrict anyone wanting to have an SCA wedding and still observe the no relgious ceremonies thing....however, almost every SCAdian I have met who has had a garbed wedding has done it as a PRIVATE event (albeit one where herds of SCA folk are invited and where the format is nearly indistinguishable from an SCA event) Regards Nicolaa de Bracton of Leicester sclark at epas.utoronto.ca Susan Carroll-Clark From: hjfeld at acs2.bu.edu (harold feld) Newsgroups: rec.org.sca Subject: Re: SCA as Game Date: 8 Jun 93 18:22:10 GMT Organization: Boston University, Boston, MA, USA In article <1uvtsd$qim at usenet.pa.dec.com>, haslock at rust.zso.dec.com (Nigel Haslock) writes: |> |> Greetings from Fiacha, |> |> Tadhg says |> |> > Actually, you were correct: all marriage ceremonies *were* religious, |> > although not necessarily under the purview of the Christian church;... |> |> I can accept this only if you admit that certain cultures allowed, if not |> encouraged, cohabitation for the purpose of raising children without a need |> for the partners to be 'married' in a religious sense. |> |> As far as I can tell, the Irish were such a culture. |> |> Fiacha There is also the rather difficult problem of distinguishing between the legal and religious consequences of marraige. for example: In Medieval England, after primogeniture became the mandatory law of inheritance, the question of whether a legal marraige took place or not was crucial. Now, while inhereitance was determined at law in the Court of Common Pleas, the determination of marraige could *only* be made by the local ecclesiastical court. Nevertheless, certain questions (such as matters of consanguinuity or whether the factual pattern of a marraige or ravishment had taken place) where held to be legal matters determined by putting the "question to the country" (trial by jury). So, assume Adam has a son, Fulk, by Matilda. Adam then has another son, John, by Elizabeth. On the death of Adam, both claim the estate. Fulk claims to take by primogeniture, by John claims that Matilda and Adam were consaguinous, and therefore the original marraige to Matilda was void and Fulk is a bastard. John claims consaguinity because Matilda's sister, Anne, slept with Adam's brother, Arthur. Now, the Jury determines whether the fact pattern claimed by John is true (assuming Fulk issues a general denial, which I'll assume he does or things start to get a little complicated. :-)). If the jury decide that John is telling the truth, the case then goes to the Ecclesiastical court to determine if such a relationship is consanguinous and makes a legal determination whether Fulk is a bastard. (It is unclear whether the change in court allows Fulk to re-argue the facts found by the Jury. By Elizabethan, times, its clear the answer is "no", and would result in a writ of error against the church court). If the ecclesiastic court finds consanguinuity, then the case goes back to common pleas on the question of whether Fulk can inhereit (answer: no, but we need to enter it as an official verdict). My point? The modern concept of "marraige" is complicated, having both religious and secular consequences. In discussing what various cultures did or did not recognize as marraige, it is important to state how you mean the question. In Service, Mar Yaakov Subject: Re: period wedding From: Linda Peck, lspeck at indirect.COM Date: 11 Aug 1993 05:09:11 -0400 In article <9308110907.AA03603 at indirect.com> Linda Peck, lspeck at indirect.COM writes: LIBLBM at orion.DEpaul.EDU (MURPHY LORI) writes: >: Does anyone know of any books that contain information on middle >: eastern weddings? I/we want to renew our vows and want to do it >: in a period middle eastern style. So far, I have only found >: small references to henna that the bride applied the night before. >: Any information will be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance. >: Sahar Ardelys responded: >I don't know if this was done in period or not, but there are a number >of current Muslim wedding practices that include the bride having >intricate designs painted in henna on her hands and feet the night before the wedding. [...] At the last Estrella, I had the pleasure of being invited to one of these parties, in period or course. The idea was to paint the brides hands and those of any participant available. Also there was refreshments (it is customary for the women to make a big deal of any gathering, especially this one) and stories of how to treat the new husband as relates to money. (usually in the form of gold-modern-or silver-period), work, and of course fathfulness. - Please understand that the bride and groom were doing a pretend wedding therefore this was a pretend party, but that didn't stop the gossip or suggestions. - The party was a blast. It was held in the afternoon before the wedding. The wedding BTW was a 12th century shepardic recreation. Very well researched and performed. If you are going to Pensic find the current Queen of the Outlands, Elisheva. It was her head Lady in waiting who put on this party, she will be there as well. If you do find HM Elisheva give her a hug from Rhianwen. Wish I could go too. Oh yes. There was another tradition used at this party. I believe it was Turkish. A silver coin was placed in right (i believe) palm of the bride. It was covered with henna . . .lots of henna. Then wrapped so the hand was covered. The next morning when the hand was un wrapped if the coin had left a mark (IOW a white spot in the middle of a red blob) then the bride would be prosperious otherwise, not. There was a white spot in the dark red blob. For weeks on end. Imagine explaining that to your boss. ------------------------------------------------------------- Rhianwen Subject: Re: period wedding From: Ed Kreyling 6966, kreyling at lds.loral.com Date: Wed, 11 Aug 1993 13:15:48 GMT In article <1993Aug11.131548.18254 at lds.loral.com> Ed Kreyling 6966, kreyling at lds.loral.com writes: In article <9308110907.AA03603 at indirect.com> lspeck at indirect.COM (Linda Peck) writes: >LIBLBM at orion.DEpaul.EDU (MURPHY LORI) writes: >>: Does anyone know of any books that contain information on middle >>: eastern weddings? I/we want to renew our vows and want to do it >>: in a period middle eastern style. So far, I have only found >>: small references to henna that the bride applied the night before. >>: Any information will be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance. >>: Sahar Greetings Lori, My wife's apprentice has done extensive research in Middle Eastern customs. She was gratious enough to give me a large list of references which I could upload later but for now she said that the following two sources were the best for what you want: COMBS-SHILLING,M.E. "SACRED PERFORMANCES: ISLAM,SEXUALITY, AND SACRIFICE" Columbia University Press, N.Y. 1989 (ISBN: 0231 06974-x-1989) Chapters 6,10,11,13,15. KANAFANI, "AESTHETICS AND RITUALS IN THE UNITED ARAB EMIRATES," rest of bio unavailable as she only has copies of sections of the book. I hope this is of some help. Erik. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Ed Kreyling | Master Erik of Telemark O.L.,O.P. kreyling at world.lds.loral.com | Shire of Brineside Moor Sarasota,Fl. USA | Kingdom of Trimaris, SCA ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Newsgroups: rec.org.sca From: AYLWIN at HOLONET.NET Subject: Re: Ceremonies in the SCA Organization: HoloNet National Internet Access System: 510-704-1058/modem Date: Fri, 6 Aug 1993 08:19:22 GMT BO>[It's been argued that 'secular' weddings are okay. IMHO, the nature of a BO>'wedding is just too deeply involved in religious rites to ever divorce the BO>two... :^) ] For what it's worth, my Lady and I held our legal wedding as an SCA event. There was no mention of any religion or higher powers, and involved the current Prince and Princess joining us in wedlock (such things are legal in Montana). We modeled everything, near as we could, upon secular ceremonies that were originally held in addition to the church ceremony. What worked for us, though, won't work for everyone. Sir Aylwin the Flamehaired Barony of Sentinels' Keep / Artemisia aylwin at holonet.net Atenveldt Newsgroups: rec.org.sca From: waltz at mprgate.mpr.ca (Marina Waltz) Subject: Re: period wedding Organization: MPR Teltech Ltd., Burnaby, B.C., Canada Date: Fri, 6 Aug 1993 20:55:06 GMT LIBLBM at orion.DEpaul.EDU (MURPHY LORI) writes: : Does anyone know of any books that contain information on middle : eastern weddings? I/we want to renew our vows and want to do it : in a period middle eastern style. So far, I have only found : small references to henna that the bride applied the night before. : Any information will be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance. : Sahar I don't know if this was done in period or not, but there are a number of current Muslim wedding practices that include the bride having intricate designs painted in henna on her hands and feet the night before the wedding. The bride's friends frequently paint one of their own palms or another friend's also. I have participated in these night-before evenings on three occasions and they are a great deal of fun. It is usually a professional woman who comes in and paints the bride's hands and feet, and the designs are really beautiful. The henna is mixed with water and lemon juice, and is applied with something like a cake decorator for making fine lines. The bride's friends usually use toothpicks to paint their designs. A solution of lemon and sugar and some clove oil is frequently patted onto the henna to help it stick to the hands (it flakes off quite easily once it is dry). The participants go to sleep without washing the henna patterns off if they want the designs to last for awhile. The patterns are usually visible from one to two weeks afterwards. I don't know if this information is any help to you or not, but if you are looking through books and see pictures of women with fancy patterns on their hands and feet, you'll know that they are newleyweds, and that patterning was done back then. If you decide to go ahead with this I'm sure you'll really enjoy it - it was lots of fun. (On another note - Many of the women I used to work with were Indian, but our boss wasn't. She hated it whenever any of them got married. She used to say it looked like we had a palmful of worms. As they say, beauty is in the eye of the beholder.) Regards, Ardelys Newsgroups: rec.org.sca Subject: Asking for a lady's hand. From: bettina.helms at channel1.com (Bettina Helms) Date: Sat, 18 Sep 93 21:34:00 -0500 Organization: Channel 1(R) * 617-864-0100 Info * 617-354-7077 Modem MA> A question has arisen as to the proper way to ask for MA>a lady's hand. Prior to asking the lady for her hand, MA>does the suitor need her baron's leave to ask the lady? MA>Further if she is a member of a House, does the suitor MA>need the leave of the head of the House? If the MA>permission of both the baron and the head of the House MA>are needed, which gentle is asked of first? Different places, situations and personas, different customs. In the East, the local Baron (if there is one) is at most requested to give the pair his official blessing after all other permissions (including the lady's) are obtained. Am not sure what the situation is regarding households, and it may differ even from one Household to the next - so you may as well start by discussing with the head of the Household what formalities are involved. If the lady's persona is early Norse or early Celt, you ask *her* first, and anyone else involved *after* she has agreed to your suit! -- Katja, who is a person in her own right and no man's chattel! :-) From: David Friedman Newsgroups: rec.org.sca Subject: Re: Asking for a lady's hand... Date: 19 Sep 1993 15:16:07 GMT Organization: Cornell University Mark writes: > A question has arisen as to the proper way to ask for >a lady's hand. Prior to asking the lady for her hand, >does the suitor need her baron's leave to ask the lady? >Further if she is a member of a House, does the suitor >need the leave of the head of the House? If the >permission of both the baron and the head of the House >are needed, which gentle is asked of first? I think in principle the person whose permission you must ask is her father or, failing that, her guardian. In period, wardship was an important matter. When Henry II wanted to express his appreciation for William the Marshall's services, he did so by promising him the wardship of Isabel of Pembroke, daughter and Heiress of the Earl of Pembroke and (through her grandfather, Dermot) heiress to about a quarter of Ireland. Henry died, Richard acted on the promise, and William promptly married Isabel, converting himself from an almost landless knight to one of the wealthiest and most powerful barons in England. So you should first find out whose ward she is, then ask him. I'm sure the gentlemen who married my last three wards must have done so, but at my age memory is not entirely reliable. I'll have to make sure next time. David/Cariadoc From: pyotr at halcyon.com (Peter D. Hampe) Newsgroups: rec.org.sca Subject: Re: Minister seeks help for medieval-style wedding Date: 4 Oct 1993 18:55:51 -0700 Organization: Northwest Nexus Inc. I missed the first post but ... HH> I'm posting this request on behalf of a Unitarian minister who HH> is stuck out in the middle of Illinois. She has been asked to HH> devise and officiate at a wedding ceremony for two SCA members HH> with 11th - 12th century medieval European personae. They wish HH> to have a "medieval style" wedding suitable for their period. The HH> minister is at a loss for sources for such a ceremony, so I'm HH> asking in probably the most likely newsgroup! Any help would HH> be appreciated. The quick and dirty way is to find a Book of Common Prayer (pre 1551 ed, the 1549 is deemed to be borderline 'suspect' it says 'ere. :-) ) And go from there - the rubrics hadn't been changed that much from Roman PRactice. So you can do a rather straight wing it. Of course, a Unitarian might have trouble with a Trinitarian source book, but that's life. Customs surounding the nuptial mass varied from town to town - that's going to be a harder trick to pull off. good louck and good fortune. chus pyotr -- pyotr at halcyon.com Pyotr Filipivich, sometimes Owl. From: Caitlin.Nic.Raighne at f350.n280.z1.fidonet.org (Caitlin Nic Raighne) Newsgroups: rec.org.sca Subject: Politics and Weddings and such Date: Wed, 08 Dec 1993 23:18:00 -0500 RL> My Lady is a Lombard Circa 1200, I am a Late Celt/Early Scots RL> persona. RL> we were considering doing the celebration in early Tudor, or RL> perhaps in RL> 14-15 century houplands (excuse spelling please). RL> Come on, hasn't ANYBODY ever done and SCA wedding? My lord husband and I had an SCA wedding last summer (1992) to commemorate our 20th wedding anniversary. We had a late 15th century Scottish Highland wedding. The Shire made it a kingdom event. There was a tournament of love earlier in the day, and A&S competition with a Celtic theme, and a feast of three removes for 100 people. Since the Prince and Princess were in attendance, a court with the wedding ceremony performed before them. Our local Seneschal was the officiator. The ceremony consisted of Anlon's "clan leader" (a friend who agreed to dress and act the part) leading he and his assistants into the court. The assistants were carrying his bride price which consisted of bolts of material, spices, bottles of mead, a shepherd to refer to his herd of sheep, and a bag of "gold". (He has a merchant persona). Then the "clan leader" and his wife (my father and mother) entered leading me and my assistants who were carrying my dowry. It consisted of hand made quilts, baskets of homemade bread, a loom, a person to refer to the marvelous horse I brought to the household, ownership of a parcel of land in far off Meridies, and our then 16 year old son to prove my ability to produce a male heir! (We wanted to involve him in the ceremony in some way and this seemed a good way to do it!) Baron Charles basically based the ceremony on the Brehon laws of handfasting. There is a beautiful scroll that Baroness Graidhne ni Ruaidh calliged and illumined. The reading of it was basically the entire ceremony. If you like I can give the text in a later message. I made all the garb for Anlon, Seamus and myself as well as for my parents since they are not SCA. I wore a Tudor dress in light green velvet with the turned back sleeves lined in light green damask. Anlon wore a kilt and a doublet made of the same damask. His Tudor shirt was silk. Seamus wore a Tudor silk shirt, kilt and a leather doublet. My father wore trews and a cotton Tudor shirt with a brat brooched on one shoulder. (There was no way her would wear a kilt!). My mother wore a dress with a Spanish Surcoat over it. I know it wasn't exactly the same period but since she wears the same size I do, and she's not in the SCA, I made something else I wanted to own! This ceremony was a lot of work but it was a whole lot of fun for not only us but everyone who attended. We had about 150 people in attendance. Not bad for an event that was solely based on the wedding of two relative un-knowns in our kingdom! Oh yes, I forgot to mention that the winner of the tournament received a chainmail hauberk that was made and donated by a member of our shire. My son, Seamus made the site tokens. They were cast pewter celtic crosses. He made 175 and those we didn't give away on site I have since given away as gifts. I still get comments about those sight tokens. Forgive the rambling note. I hope some of this is helpful. I enjoyed the remembrance of a wonderful day. None of this could have been done without the help of an exceptionally helpful and hardworking shire! Beannachd leibh, Ly Caitlin nic Raighne Chatelaine, Shire of Dun Ard, Calontir From: Karen.Moon at f555.n387.z1.fidonet.org (Karen Moon) Date: 07 Jun 94 19:14:00 -0500 Newsgroups: rec.org.sca Subject: Re: Norse Weddings Organization: Fidonet: Cygnus I.I.N. / San Antonio, TX / 210-641-2063 Good Lady, I have participated in two weekend long Norse weddings in my group. The research was done in the main by HL Gunnora Hallakarva, who is at the moment engaged in putting this info in book form to be published hopefully this year. She is always glad to share her information. The ceremony she has reconstructed works quite well (each time was a bit different but both were neat). If you will be so kind as to send me your Snail Mail address, I'll have her send you the info. If you can't get me on E-mail -- this is an echo I'm getting -- send your address w/ (with a letter reminding me who you are *smile*) to Mari, 2935 Nacogdoches Rd #217, San Antonio, TX, 78217. Yours, Mari ferch Rathtyen --------- Fidonet: Karen Moon 1:387/555 Internet: Karen.Moon at f555.n387.z1.fidonet.org From: ifdz176 at utxsvs.cc.utexas.edu (Amanda Shields- Queen of the Smurfs) Newsgroups: rec.org.sca Subject: Re: Period Wedding advice Date: Fri, 09 Sep 1994 18:58:25 -0600 Organization: University of Texas at Austin In article <34q3cl$r10 at search01.news.aol.com>, rhiannon5 at aol.com (Rhiannon5) wrote: > My finace and I are planning a period outdoor wedding, and are looking for > information on a suitable ceremony. Any help would be appreciated. > > Rhiannon ne BrennenDate: Fri, 09 Sep 1994 18:16:29 -0600 From: ifdz176 at utxsvs.cc.utexas.edu (Amanda Shields- Queen of the Smurfs) Subject: Re: Period Wedding advice Organization: University of Texas at Austin In article <34q3cl$r10 at search01.news.aol.com>, you wrote: Gee, I just happened to have run across the perfect book in the library on customs regarding births, marriages, and death. I do not have it with me at the moment, but I can give you the gist of what I can remember it having said. The wedding gown need not necessarily be white. That custom got started around the eighteenth century (in other words, OOP). The wedding dress was much like a court dress (but as fancy a court dress as one could afford), except it had a train. The maid of honor would bear this train. The less popular wedding headgear was the headgear of the period. What was the more popular wedding headgear was letting one's hair go long, and wearing a crown on top of it. Anne Boelyn's (?) wedding crown had sprigs of fresh rosemary in it. NOTE: During the time period when hennins were in fashion, and women tended to shave their heads, the woman wore her hennin, not a baldie-shine and a crown :) ) The groom would wear what amounts to his best court gear (all new, of course), but again, this is the absolute finest stuff he owns. Best embroidery, gem-studded, the whole schmeer on both the bride's and the groom's outfits. From all the stuff running around from the time that guy found that medieval gay wedding ceremony a few months back, it was said weddings would take place on the steps of the church, possibly with a celebration of the Eucharist afterwards (I do not know your religious affiliation) During Elizabethan times, the wedding ring would be worn on the thumb. All other time periods show the wedding ring in its more traditional position, or even on the right hand. Poesy Rings (plain bands with some sort of love poem inscribed on the inside) were popular as wedding rings in the sixteenth century. Also, James Avery has a replica of Martin Luther's wedding ring in both silver and gold, for both men and women. If you don't have a ring yet, y'all should check this out. This is all I can remember for now, but if you would like to e-mail me for more details, the address is ifdz176 at utxsvs.cc.utexas.edu I hope I have been of some help to you. Congratulations, and good luck! Anagret (or Anne Margarethe-whatever the Heralds will pass) von Bayern From: archmonk at news.gate.net (John W. Missing) Newsgroups: rec.org.sca Subject: Re: Period Wedding advice Date: 25 Sep 1994 06:42:05 -0400 Subject: Re: Period Wedding advice M'Lady, It is good to hear from you again. R>In article <199409201849.OAA63102 at hopi.gate.net>, archmonk at gate.NET R>writes: R>::I must ask a few questions to be able to answer your question properly. R>::Is this to be a real (legal) wedding? Precisely what period (there is R>::quite a difference between 7th Century and 17th Century)? What are the R>::nationalities of the personae? Finally and very importantly, what R>::religion? R>It will be a legal wedding. We are looking at a time period between 11th R>and 14th centuries. We are both of Celtic personae. And I'm pagan and R>he's ex-catholic. Thanks for the help. Are these the religions of your personae? Or your mundane ones as well? If you have a Catholic service (and in your period it was not unusual for a pagan to have a public church wedding and a very secretive pagan ritual) , the Nuptial Mass hasn't changed significantly from the 12th or 13th century up to Vatican II, but you should have a priest if it is to include Mass. However, if it is the wedding only, in most states it would be valid as long as any cleric or notary performs the service. If on the other hand you want a pagan service, I'm sure there are knowledgeable pagans who could supply the service and even perform it. However, in some states they might have to be a notary or otherwise certified for it to be valid. If you have trouble locating the service you want, I can probably locate it for you. I'll have to leave it to you to find an officiant. Blessings. Œ sinful monk Diormid, priest. rka Father Joseph mka John Missing Œ R>Rhiannon ne Brennen --- From: greg at bronze.lcs.mit.edu (Greg Rose) Newsgroups: rec.org.sca Subject: Re: Period weddings Date: 13 Jan 1995 10:56:46 -0500 Organization: Guest of MIT AI and LCS labs Greetings to all, from Angharad ver' Rhuawn. Everard asks, >I am going to get married in the near future (June) and we would like a >vaguely period wedding for England circa 12th century. Unfortunately, I >have had little luck in my research and less time to do further. We are >shooting for as religiously neutral as possible (We're not Christian but >our families are). It's going to be outdoors and casual (at least the >guests-I'll be in a formal tunic). Obviously, if I'm asking for help >on the Rialto, I'm desperate :{). I'm afraid that what you want is either trivial or impossible. There are two aspects to marriage in about the 12th C, as I recall my reading: the act that actually caused the people to be married, and the stuff people did around that. What actually caused the marriage was a public statement of a present intention of being married. That could be accomplished as simply as joining hands in front of witnesses -- normally including a priest -- and saying something that came down to "I take you for my husband/wife." "Early on" this tended to take place outdoors in front of the church. "Later" it moved inside. I don't recall what dates correspond to "early" and "later". That bit is trivial, and because it is trivial, it will have no more a 12th C flavor than a 20th C one. Then there's what you normally did next: went inside and attended a mass. That's a pre-tridentine Roman Catholic Mass, than which few things are less religiously neutral, and whichwould be nontrivial to get even if one of you were Catholic, and probably impossible if neither of you is. If you want a vague sense of the sorts of things people said and did in the trivial bit, I suggest Gies & Gies, _Marriage and the Family in the Middle Ages_. Like most of the Gies & Gies books, it is shallow, and not the best scholarship, but for what you are looking for, it is probably enough. Cheers, -- Angharad/Terry From: sclark at blues.epas.utoronto.ca (Susan Carroll-Clark) Newsgroups: rec.org.sca Subject: Re: Period weddings Date: 14 Jan 1995 00:14:18 GMT Organization: University of Toronto -- EPAS Greetings-- English weddings in this period were two-fold: Part was done outdoors, at the church door, where the groom would publicly announce which portion of his property would be his wife's should he die (this was called "dower property" and was only for the wife's use during her lifetime). Afterwards, they'd go inside for a nuptial mass. If you want to avoid the obviously religious stuff, I think you could make a nice production of announcing your bride's dower rights (which you could make either appropriate to your persona, your modern self, or both--i.e., "she shall have use of the manor at Thorncliffe" if you live on Thorncliffe Park Dr. In lieu of a church door, any archway will do. The actual ceremony could then be a very simple version of the modern marriage service--cutting out the scripture readings, and focusing on the vows. Since at this period, a priest was not technically required to make a marriage valid (it's the only sacrament performed by laymen, and it's valid if even only they know, though not for inheritance purposes), you might wish to say the vows directly to each other, without prompting from the officiating minister/priest. I would say that the presentation to the community afterward would be a vital part of the ceremony as well. Hope this helps! Nicolaa/Susan Canton of Eoforwic sclark at epas.utoronto.ca From: svartorm at netaxs.com (Emil Stecher) Newsgroups: rec.org.sca Subject: Re: Period weddings Date: 16 Jan 1995 05:24:45 GMT Organization: Netaxs Internet BBS and Shell Accounts Joe Bethancourt (locksley at indirect.com) wrote: : David Sanda (everard at netcom.com) wrote: : : I am in need of a little assistance. : : I am going to get married in the near future (June) and we would like a : : vaguely period wedding for England circa 12th century. Unfortunately, I : : have had little luck in my research and less time to do further. We are : : shooting for as religiously neutral as possible (We're not Christian but : : our families are). : The Form of SOLEMNIZATION OF MATRIMONY : Drawn From The Book of Common Prayer of the Church of England : As Promulgated by Elizabeth I, I pray that Master Ioseph will forgive me for disagreeing, but I believe that the ceremony he describes is not at all suitable for Everard's purposes. When my wife and I were to be married we tried to research the form of a medieval civil ceremony, as we are of differing religious backgrounds, and came to much the same conclusions that the most excellent scholars, my ladies Angharad and Nicolaa have already presented. We therefore had the following as our SCA ceremony: The Baron convened his court, and the Herald called upon my lady and me to present ourselves, which we did, along with our families and supporters. The Herald then read the terms of the dowry and bride price.The Baron then inquired of each party whether they were satisfied with the terms, of each of our parents whether they granted their permission, and of my liege lady whether she gave her permission. Once these permissions were given, the Baron pronounced us to be married and signed the Wedding Certificate, as did all the guests. Since this all took place in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, to the best of my understanding, it would constitute a legal marriage as long as at least three of the people who signed the Wedding Certificate would legally acknowledge their signatures (But I wimped out and made her stand up in front of a JP, just to be sure she couldn't get away.) My suggestion, therefore, is to set up something similar, with your Baron or some local pointy hat officiating and a mundane JP who is willing to keep his bit down to "By the power vested in me by the state of...I now pronounce you man and wife". The JP could be called in to court by the Herald and requested by the pointy hat to administer and witness the appropriate oaths in accordance with the laws (Gee, wish I'd thought of this part for my own wedding, instead of hassling with a seperate trip). Or you could save the money for the JP by just doing the deed at Pennsic after obtaining the appropriate license Emil M Stecher svartorm at netaxs.com Newsgroups: rec.org.sca From: rayturne at cln.etc.bc.ca (Raymond Turner) Subject: Re: Period weddings Originator: rayturne at cln Organization: Education Technology Centre of B.C. Date: Mon, 16 Jan 1995 21:23:44 GMT Just wanted to add my $.02 worth on this topic. My lord is a licensed Anglican (Episcopalian in the US) minister, and has performed weddings both mundanely and in the SCA, and I believe some of the SCA weddings were legally binding (recognized by civil law). Anyway, my understanding has been for a long time that the Church did not need to be involved in marriage, as it was considered to be a civil matter, more to do with property and inheritance than anything else. This was true up until late in our period. SOme folk chose to be married in the church, but many did not. I just finished reading the Six Wives of Henry VIII by Alison Weir, which I believe was well-researched and documented (not my field, so I can't say for sure) and she was very specific that even in Henry's time, marraige was considered a private matter, and was primarily civil rather than religious. The choice of ceremony would therefore be up to the individuals concerned. The betrothal was the big thing, with the actual nuptials merely a followup. This said, I would venture to guess that during the 12th century, the average couple would have any ceremony that felt right to them and their families (usually the declaration of dower, or a reading of the betrothal or nuptial agrement), even to the almost-legendary jumping over a broomstick, followed by a mass, and of course by a party. My lord, whose persona is 15th-16th century Scots-English, and I, who am tenth century Welsh, chose as our SCA service to be handfasted by a pagan friend of ours. As my lord is Christian, and I'm a Baha'i (totally non-period!), and we'd had both of those mundanely, we felt this was the best and most historically plausible compromise. Friends of ours told us later that they'd used virtually the same ceremony in their SCA wedding, and they are mundanely very devout Anglicans with a decided pre-Reformation bent. BTW, the service my lord uses for SCA weddings is taken from the prayerbook of Edward VI, a bit earlier than ELizabeth I, but identical in most respects to the Book of Common Prayer. If he celebrates the Eucharist (privately, of course!) at events, he uses a version of the Celtic Canon from before the split between Rome and England. Hope this helps, and doesn't confuse matters more! In service, Olwen Pen Aur, AoA Shire of Appledore, Kingdom of An Tir From: greg at bronze.lcs.mit.edu (Greg Rose) Newsgroups: rec.org.sca Subject: Re: Period weddings Date: 16 Jan 1995 20:14:13 -0500 Organization: Guest of MIT AI and LCS labs Greetings, all, from Angharad ver' Rhuawn. Olwen pen Aur writes, > Anyway, my understanding has been for a long time that the >Church did not need to be involved in marriage, as it was >considered to be a civil matter, more to do with property and >inheritance than anything else. This was true up until late in >our period. SOme folk chose to be married in the church, but many >did not. >I just finished reading the Six Wives of Henry VIII by Alison Weir, >which I believe was well-researched and documented (not my field, >so I can't say for sure) and she was very specific that even in >Henry's time, marraige was considered a private matter, and was >primarily civil rather than religious. The choice of ceremony >would therefore be up to the individuals concerned. The betrothal >was the big thing, with the actual nuptials merely a followup. I believe that you have confused two separate issues: the reasons why people married, and what constituted a legal marriage. Your remarks are true of the former; but it is the latter that determines the structure of marriage ceremonies. Had the _legal_ issue been primarily civil, Henry's life would have been _immensely_ simplified, divorcing Katharine (and for that matter, Anne later) would have been trivialized, and England would never have broken with Rome. (BTW, even _Henry_ didn't think the legal issue should be civil: he agreed with the Catholic Church that marriage was a sacrament, and that the dissolution of a marriage required a cause recognized in religious doctrine. He just thought that he'd found good enough causes, and that the Pope shouldn't stand in his way. Not an entirely consistent man....) People _contracted_ marriages for reasons of property and inheritance, and viewed what was behind the marriage, and what went on in it, as private. From the point of view of families forming alliances, what you say about the emphasis on betrothal is correct. But ultimately, the betrothal is worthless without a legally valid wedding, and in that matter, the Church _did_ play a central role. From _very_ early in period, the absolute arbiter of what constituted a valid marriage was the Church. Now, the Church always held that the essence of marriage was consent, and in that sense, a priest was not necessary. But for a number of reasons (one of them being that the Church was called upon, from time to time, to assess the validity of existing marriages, usually in royal cases where a king wanted to dump a wife, and it was very hard to do this with any semblance of validity unless there were witnesses), the Church began to require public witnesses on its behalf, and to move toward the requirement that a priest to be present and the marriage be formally acknowledged and recorded. Hence what you say next: >This said, I would venture to guess that during the 12th century, >the average couple would have any ceremony that felt right to >them and their families (usually the declaration of dower, or a >reading of the betrothal or nuptial agrement), even to the >almost-legendary jumping over a broomstick, followed by a mass, >and of course by a party. is simply not so. What they did had to satisfy the Church's requirements of the time, and in particular, had to satisfy the Church's witness that the requirement of serious present intent was fulfilled. Also, even today, tradition plays a tremendous role in setting ceremony; and in the middle ages, there is every evidence that it did so more, since religious conformity (denial of which is the basis for a huge percentage of modern variations) was the overwhelming rule. Finally, the SCA normally assumes that its members are upper class. In the High Middle Ages, there are upper class Jews and Muslims as well as Christians in parts of Europe at various times. One might on rare occasion even find someone who professed himself openly to be atheist. But by that point, there are _no_ openly admitted upper class pagans in Europe. _All_ members of the upper classes paid at least lip service to one of the major religions. Hence any rite that smacks of paganism is not only unlikely to be acceptable to the Church's witness, but it is also unlikely to have been acceptable to any of the participants, let alone the guests. So far as I am concerned, people can get married any way they want to, and they should certainly feel free to satisfy their personal religious preferences. However, they should realize that if those preferences do not fit the mold of Christianity, Judaism, or Islam, then they are not compatible with the wedding practices of 12th C Europe, and the choice to get married in that fashion rules out a ceremony that is appropriate to that time and place. -- Angharad/Terry From: CARMEN.BOYLES at rook.wa.com (carmen boyles) Newsgroups: rec.org.sca Subject: Re: Period weddings Date: Sat, 28 Jan 1995 04:33:11 GMT Organization: Knight-Line! (206) 565-0594 Ar> |-------------------------------------| Ar> All that I see here is one person's opinion. Ar> + sinful monk Diormid, priest. rka Father Joseph mka John Missing + Ar> (archmonk at gate.net) there are several books by georges duby on the subject of medieval marriage, i only have one of them with me now. it's title is "medieval marriage, two models from 12th century france". another is called "the knight, the priest, and the lady". both of these, and several others he has written, deal with the church's reluctance to become involved with the act of marriage. it is not 'one person's opinion'. melusine d'argent From: michael.mccollum at dazed.charleston.sc.us (Michael Mccollum) Newsgroups: rec.org.sca Subject: RE: PERIOD WEDDINGS Date: 21 Jan 95 17:14:00 GMT Organization: Dazed & Confused BBS - Ladson, SC - 803.873.5797 Hiya David, DS> I am going to get married in the near future (June) and we would like DS> a vaguely period wedding for England circa 12th century. DS> Unfortunately, I have had little luck in my research and less time to DS> do further. I did some research for a class I was giving on this subject just before we had our medieval wedding. You didn't specify in what areas of medieval weddings you wanted the research on, so I'm giving you what I've got. Good luck & Congratulations! Katie 1. The Origin of the bachelor dinner This appears to have had its source in Sparta. A Spartan groom always invited his close friends to a supper on the eve of his wedding. The custom is very old and many believe it originated simultaneously in many different lands. 2. From what tradition did engraved invitations or announcements stem? Many centuries ago the monastic schools kept marriage books for the royalty. These records were made in the very beautiful handwriting of the monks. Later, formal invitations were issued by Royalty in the handwriting referred to as 'script'. In 1620 copper plate engraving of script writing was first achieved and gradually the custom evolved of engraved rather than hand written invitations to weddings and other formal affairs. 3. What is the origin of the trousseau? The trousseau can be directly traced back to the barter-price, purchase-price and dowry systems. It was customary for a bride to come to her husband well-provided with a dowry, so that the man might be compensated for his expenses in caring for the children of his wifes lineage. 4. What was the origin of the members of the bridal party? During the 'marriage by capture' era, the loyal tribesmen and close friends of the groom within the tribe aided him to invade the enemy territory to capture his bride. While he dashed off with her, his friends stayed behind to fend off or fight the brides outraged relatives. Such were the first ushers and best man. The maid of honor and the bridesmaids, as they are known today, can also be traced back through the centuries to Saxon England. The senior among them would attend the bride for several days before the wedding. She was especially responsible for the making of the bridal wreath, the decorations for the wedding feast, and for dressing the bride. 5. What was the origin of the processional? In Medieval times, the processional was especially colorful. Gaily dressed minstrels sang and piped at the head of the procession. Next came a young man bearing the bride-cup, which was a chalice or vase of silver or silver-gilt, decorated with gilt, rosemary and ribbons. Then the bride walked, attended by two bachelors, and a dozen or so knights and pages. Next came maidens carrying bride cake, followed by girls with garlands of wheat. The bridegroom then appeared, led by two maidens, and walked in the midst of his close friends, including his "best man". The relatives walked after him, and these were followed by less intimate friends. 6. What is the tradition of wedding gowns? In early Saxon days and through the 18th century, it was the poorer bride who came to her wedding dressed in a plain white robe. This was in the nature of a public statement that she brought nothing with her to her marriage and that therefore her husband was not responsible for her debts. Colors used for wedding dresses reflected the values that were ascribed to certain colors. Blue was used to show constancy. Green was an indicator of youth. A blue ribbon on the shoulder symbolized purity, fidelity and love. Two colors not used much in medieval wedding gowns were yellow and gold, the first because it symbolized jeolousy and the second because it symbolized avarice. 7. What is the origin of the veil? The introduction of the veil into Europe came through returning crusades. In early wedding tradition in Europe the bride was bargained for through her father. She was swathed in a bridal veil, and revealed to her mate after the ceremony. In Anglo-Saxon times, the bride wore her hair hanging loose as part of the wedding ritual. 8. How did flowers become associated with weddings? The wearing of a wreath of ornage blossoms as a crown on the bridal veil was a Saracen custom introduced by returning Crusaders. Orange blossoms were so expensive that only the wealthy could afford them and poorer brides resorted to artificial ones. Flowers also carried special meanings. Apple blossoms - better things to come. Clematis - love vine. Ivy - good luck. Rosebud - a promise. Myrtle - lover's flowers. Laurel - peace. Again, there were flowers that wouldn't normally be used. Yellow flowers - jeolousy. Tulips - infidelity. 9. What is the tradition concerning the tossing of the bridal bouquet? Originally, it was not a bouquet but a garter that was tossed. This custom originated in 14th century France. However, even when the bride left it dangling around her ankle in order to make the snatching easy, she was considerably mauled. Finally, some bride thought of tossing her bouquet and this custom has been followed ever since. Some grooms still like to follow the old garter tossing custom, so that ushers as well as the bridesmaids may know who among them will be next to marry. 10. What is the origin of wedding gifts? The tradition is closely related to the brides dowry. In all societies and in all centuries, the celebrations attending the marriage ceremony included the exchange of gifts, even if only of food. By Saxon and Elizabethan times, it was customary to bestow upon the bride various items of hardware which she carried in her belt, such as bodkins, knives, scissors, pinchers, scales, etc. There are records of wedding gift giving as far back as the Norman conquest. 11. What is the origin of the wedding reception and refreshments? Marriage feasts have been in existance nearly as long as marriage ceremonies. The early Greeks had a feast at the end of the wedding procession when the bride was conducted to her new home at night. Although the Greek custom was not to include women at their banquets, they were invited to wedding feasts. 12. What is the origin of the wedding cake? This was alwasy an important part of any wedding feast. Where or when it first originated cannot be told, it is so ancient. The Romans broke a cake made of salted meal over the bride's head as a symbol of abundance. Many peoples of various nationalities customarily dropped wheat flour or cake upon the bride's head, then ate these offerings for good luck. The early Britons baked large baskets of small dry crackers for weddings and every guest took 1 home - thus the tradition of taking wedding cake home to "dream on". The small cakes gradually increased in size and richness, and, so the story is told, a French chef in London finally had the idea of icing the mass of cakes together - the first English-French wedding cake, during the reign of Charles II. 13. What is the origin of the honeymoon? In the caveman era, once the man had abducted his bride, he kept her carefully hidden until her father's tribesmen gave up the pursuit and permitted their tempers to cool. Among certain northern European peoples in early centuries, a newly married couple drank wine made of mead and honey, known as, metheglen, for a month after their marriage. A month was then a "moon", and therefore the month during which the wine was drunk became known as the honeymoon. 14. What is the origin of throwing rice, old shoes, etc? The rice-throwing is closely related to the wedding cake itself - in fact, throwing grain preceded the baking of cakes and the cake developed from the earlier practise. The throwing of grain seemed to involve two symbols; good luck and fertility, or abundance. Among ancient Assyrians and Jews, when a bargain was made, a man gave his sandal as an indication of good faith. A show was the symbol of authority. When the Anglo-Saxon hurled a shoe, it indicated that authority had been transferred. I hope this gives you plenty of ideas. If you were looking for something entirely different, please post back and give us a better idea of what you're looking for! Katie Newsgroups: rec.org.sca From: tccg at netcom.com (Tim McDaniel and Other Users) Subject: Miss Manners, SCA Wedding Organization: NETCOM On-line Communication Services (408 261-4700 guest) Date: Fri, 10 Mar 1995 06:30:28 GMT I sometimes wondered what Miss Manners would think of an SCA wedding. Now I know. Her article of 8 March 95 has a long letter on the subject. Rather than commit total copyright violation of clari. feature.miss_manners, losing Netcom access, possibly losing Netcom's access to Clarinet, and possibly losing Clarinet access to Miss Manners (as happened with Dave Barry, a curse on the man who caused that!), I will attempt to summarize. I do encourage people to buy a paper witht this article. Miss Manners has lots of little witty bits that I have to remove here. (I love her style and sensibility.) A mother is writing about her daughter and her daughter's fiance, "who met in an organization that studies and re-creates medieval and renaissance culture". The couple plan to have an Italian Ren wedding at a church. There will be - the normal service, but 16th Century music - the wedding party weariing Italian Ren, from Raphael secular paintings - banners and such for the dinner in the community hall - the "first dance" will be the wedding party doing a period dance. This mother's husband is outraged and insulted at this "circus". The daughter points out that the usual wedding clothes are also much different from normal clothes, and that they're just following an older tradition. The mother herself is only worried about what people will think of the wedding pictures in the future. Miss Manners replies that she dislikes "theme weddings", but doesn't think this is distasteful. For the argument against: Miss Manners points out that, despite the argument about wearing different clothes mundane wedding clothes "are ... nevertheless traditional to our time and place." [But what if the society in which you live is the Society? My personal suggestion might be to get a life. - TMcD] She also points out (though not in such language) that an in-persona wedding "encourages the idea" that this is merely an in-persona wedding, not "a solemn event" committing the couple "in everyday life." "Never mind that clever argument about the 'older' tradition -- Miss Manners can think of even older traditions that would bring the house down." However, she relents on several grounds. * "they are connecting the style with a serious interest that they and their friends share. And no, that doesn't mean that Miss Manners will put the stamp of good taste on a Trekkie wedding." * The "theme" is restricted. The ceremony itself is usual; it's the party afterwards that gets the decorations and the dance. * Italian Ren is not "freakish in a modern context": "And even the clothes could pass for a version of today's evening clothes." [I think she was thinking about a woman's dress, not the men's clothing! -- TMcD] * "Miss Manners doubts that friends who know of the couple's interests will be 'insulted' by these details." * No matter what is worn, the grandchildren will laugh at the clothing in the wedding pictures anyway. -- Daniel de Lincoln Tim McDaniel Dallas, TX -- 214 380-4876 From: Sharon Saroff Newsgroups: rec.org.sca Subject: Re: Renaissance Wedding Date: Wed, 15 Mar 1995 09:04:07 -0500 Organization: ErieNet I have seen mention of a wedding bread from the Island of Crete. I have given this as a gift to several friends and I plan to have one at my SCA wedding this Pennsic. It is Braided and decorated w/ dough in the shapes of moons, stars,etc. and dried and candied fruits and peels. It contains many spices (cinnamon, nutmeg, ginger, coriander, clove, allspice, and anise), rum, almond flavor, orange peel, lemon peel, citrine, and orange flavor. It is supposed to smell and taste like the sweetness of the wedding and the love shared by the bride and groom. I'll see about digging up the recipe. Another item of note: There is a custom in the Pacific Islands of dropping agate beads in the shell drining vessels of the bride and groom. When this is done, the following is pronounced: "As these two beads at the bottom, so you will go together and not apart." Sindara From: Kirsti Thomas Newsgroups: rec.org.sca Subject: Re: Period Wedding Date: Fri, 5 May 1995 10:49:23 -0700 Organization: Seattle Pacific University Here's hoping that the newsreader will actually post to the outside world this time. GRRR!!! > In article <3o3hf6$vih at news.nevada.edu>, akersl at nevada.edu (LAURA AKERS) says: > > > >My fiance and I are planning a medieval (late 13th/early 14th century > >western Europe) wedding and are having a hard time locating resources. > >Can anyone recommend books on costuming, ceremonies, and family life? > >Any help would be appreciated. > > > >Laura Check the following subjects at your local public and/or research library: Marriage customs and rites Marriage services Weddings Sacraments Betrothal Courtship Marriage--(place) Costume--History--Medieval, 500-1500 Wedding costume (Place)--Social life and customs I'm working on putting together a bibliography, but don't anyone hold their breath. In the meantime here's one book to take a look at: Stevenson, Kenneth (Kenneth W.) Nuptial blessing : a study of Christian marriage rites / Kenneth Stevenson.--New York : Oxford University Press, 1983, c1982. kirsti kst at paul.spu.edu From: bj at alpha1.csd.uwm.edu (Barbara Jean Kuehl) Newsgroups: rec.org.sca Subject: Creating FAQsheet for Medieval-style Weddings Date: 17 Jul 1995 16:37:14 GMT Organization: Information & Media Technologies, University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee The subject of medieval/Renaissance weddings arises frequently enough on this newsgroup (as well as other groups which discuss related topics, i.e., alt.fairs.renaissance, alt.wedding, soc.couples.wedding) that I have volunteered to put together a FAQ sheet (possibly a web site) on the topic since I've got a little spare time this summer and more than a passing interest in the subject (my own wedding was medieval in style). The categories in which I gathering ideas and anecdotes include (but are not limited to) the following: attire music flowers food decorations reception activities invitations/announcements traditions sites vows/readings favors handfasting As an example of a wedding summary, I am posting a description of my own medieval wedding just to give you some ideas. If anyone has had or has attended a medieval style wedding and would like to offer their story or ideas, or if you can think of categories I have missed, please email me directly or post to this newsgroup. Information on historical accuracy is appreciated but not mandatory as it is the medieval ambience from the royal court to the peasantry that I am hoping to capture. -BJ (aka Barbary) SUMMARY OF MY MEDIEVAL-STYLE WEDDING June 11, 1994 For invitations, we bought prefolded parchment stationary from a graphics supply store, and we designed and printed them on Tim's McIntosh with color printer. We used a variety of medieval fonts and a lot of Hear Ye's and Prithee's. Our announcements were similar but were printed on parchment scrolls, rolled up and sealed with red wax, ribbon and family seal. We were married in an evening candlelight ceremony in a historic church in downtown Milwaukee. I lined the pews with candlesconces, hung grapevine wreathes on the doors, and used tons of English ivy and seasonal white flowers. We chose not to adorn the church with any other decorations because the church itself was ornate enough. I wore a long green A-line dress (white was NOT traditional during medieval times) with a white lace shawl and a wreath of fresh ivy for a tiara. I carried a bouquet of ivy and white sweetpeas which I tied together with trailing white and green ribbons. My two daughters (from previous marriage) served as my bridesmaids. They wore long green crushed velvet dresses and carried candles. Tim dressed as a medieval huntsman, wearing green velvet britches, knee-length leather mocassins, white shirt and leather tunic. The groomsmen were similarly dressed (except they did not wear tunics). As a wonderful surprise, Tim's parents rented medieval robes from a costume shop. His mother wore a beautiful red and gold brocade dress, and his father wore a red and gold brocade jacket, white tights, and a bard's cap with a long white feather! Our guests signed in on a parchment scroll using either a BIC or a quilled ink pen (their choice). Tim chose all the wedding music which was played on full pipe organ. We lit a unity candle from the two candles carried down the aisle by my bridesmaid daughters. We hired no photographer (we later chose our photos from amongst the many taken by our guests), and my FBIL videotaped the ceremony unobtrusively from the balcony. Tim and I exchanged matched wedding bands which we had designed for us. The rings were made to look like wreaths of ivy. My matching engagement ring included a diamond nestled amongst the leaves. Following the ceremony, we were met at the church door by a horsedrawn carriage which whisked away the wedding party to a nearby Hyatt Regency hotel where our reception lay awaiting in the executive ballroom. Earlier that day, we had decorated the ballroom with medieval banners, a suit of armor, baskets of ivy and white roses, and votive candles set in gold cups with medieval designs punched in them. A buffet table was laid out (decorated with ivy vines) with vegetables, fruits, nuts, sausages, and cheeses. The bartender served soda, wine and champagne punch. The background music (on tape) was a combination of Celtic tunes featuring hammered dulcimer, Celtic harp, lute, flute, etc. We cut the three-tiered white and green wedding cake with two long swords and toasted each other with long-stemmed pewter goblets. We heard no negative remarks about our untraditional wedding. In fact, the most common comment was "This is the way weddings are supposed to be". Newsgroups: rec.org.sca From: ojid.wbst845 at xerox.com (Orilee Ireland-Delfs) Subject: Re: Creating FAQsheet for Medieval-style Wedd Organization: Xerox Corporation, Webster NY Date: Thu, 20 Jul 1995 17:07:21 GMT When my protege got married, she asked me to be autocrat-in-charge for the day, since she made all of the other arrangements in advance. I'll just summarize the highlights: The wedding was outside in her sister's backyard with pavilions set up to provide shade for the wedding itself, the cooks, and for the guests to dine under. The main pavilion was decorated with large baskets of flowers and an aisle was created with flowered garlands on poles and large standing wooden candle holders. She wore a cream brocaide dress (a bit of fantasy here - it was modeled after one in the Princess Bride) with her hair uncovered. Her bridesmaids each wore a dress in a jewel tone to match their own persona: one was in a deep red tudor, another in emerald green cotehardie. She also made matching outfits for her parents and his parents (the fathers discovered how much fun tights can be - we complimented them on their legs quite regularly!) Guests were encouraged to wear garb (altho the SCA guests wore garb as a matter of course : ) The groom, being Irish, wore a saffron yellow tunic with embroidery and went barefoot most of the day. The reception was "catered" by our best SCA cooks and consisted of SCA-type fare: salads, fresh fruit, chicken, etc. (I'll get the menu if you really want it). The wedding cake was a castle with a marzipan bride and groom at the gate. The wedding was conducted by a justice of the peace. The afternoon activities consisted of a tournament for the bride's garter (the winner of the tourney won her garter), a fencing tournament, archery, and a small court conducted by the bride and groom before they left. Orianna From: ashaw at consultronics.on.ca (Aaron Shaw) Newsgroups: rec.org.sca Subject: Re: bereavement Date: 31 Jul 1995 21:44:38 GMT Organization: Consultronics Limited ALBAN at delphi.COM says... >Solveig Throndardottir said: >>It seems to me that the society should soon begin evolving >>death and berievement customs similar to those practiced by >>the masons. I do believe that the society forms a significant >>part of the lives of many who belong to it. >i agree with solveig: i think it's about time people started >researching **and doing** other types of ceremonies - birth >parties (for babies, not birthdays, although it'd be really spiff to >see what period birthday celebrations were like), wedding >showers, bachelor parties, baptisms and equivalents (like bris's), >engagements, recovery-from-great-illness parties, spring >planting and fertility celebrations, fall harvest fairs, >housewarmings, barn raisings (with obligatory branch tied to last >rafter raised), shrovetide pancake races, my-eldest-son-just- >caught-the-biggest-fish-of-the-year parties. . . i am _not_ >intending to downplay the idea of bereavement customs; they >are a vital party of any successful culture. but so are a lot of other >life-affirming customs, ones that i think the sca and its >membership would do well to investigate more fully and >recreate more often. It was along this spirit that the Venshaven encampment (especially Ragnar Thorbergsson) and my brother Siggurd helped me to throw a Norse wedding feast and ceremony for my fiance Eyrny at War last year. We received invaluable assistance from a lady in Texas (i think it was texas - i can't remember exactly) who had done the research on the appropriate ceremonies. Our friends from all around rallied to our assistance to make the day go wonderfully. We requested that all guests attempt to garb themselves in the Norse manner, which most were able to accomplish, greatly helping the atmosphere. There were many parts of the whole day & evening that made the historical aspect strike home, too many to attempt to talk about here. One of these was when Ragnar gifted unto us a small farm plot of land in England, complete with tenants, and a silver mark as thier first year's rent paid for, that he would monitor and collect rent for us yearly. Since this time, we (as Hoskuld & Eyrny) conduct ourselves as married. Our more modern selves will actually do modern, legal paperwork in Aug'96. Anyone who is interested in getting a copy of the research for this ceremony should e-mail me privately, and I will foward the name & e-mail address of the original source to you. Hoskuld Thorleiksson Middle Kingdom Principality of Ealdormere hoskuld at consultronics.on.ca Newsgroups: rec.org.sca From: hopkins at hopkins.rtp.dg.com (Edward Hopkins) Subject: Re: Menu ideas for medieval wedding reception Date: Tue, 1 Aug 95 00:01:03 GMT Organization: Data General Corporation. RTP, NC. bj at alpha1.csd.uwm.edu (Barbara Jean Kuehl) writes: > >1) What kinds of foods might one see on the menu of a wedding banquet > during the early medieval age (the Dark Ages, Arthurian fantasy, etc.)? > >2) What kinds of foods might one see on the menu of a wedding banquet > during the mid-medieval age (the Crusades, Robin Hood fantasy, etc.)? > >3) What kinds of foods might one see on the menu of a wedding banquet > during the late medieval age (the Renaissance, Elizabethan age, etc.)? > >I'm looking for menu ideas (not specific recipes) on the types of foods >which one might actually have seen on the banquet tables during these >periods. I'm also interested in how the foods were laid out and/or >served. > >Thanks for any help you can give. I suggest that you look for a book showing the paintings of Pieter Brueghel (also known as Pieter Breugel), a Dutch painter of the Fifteenth Century (I think, maybe; well definitely in the Period). He did at least one delightful paintings of a wedding feast. -- Alfredo hopkins at dg-rtp.dg.com From: hrjones at uclink.berkeley.edu (Heather Rose Jones) Newsgroups: rec.org.sca Subject: Re: Wedding feast during the Dark Ages Date: 4 Aug 1995 03:51:07 GMT Organization: University of California, Berkeley Barbara Jean Kuehl (bj at alpha1.csd.uwm.edu) wrote: : I am attempting to write a description of how a wedding feast might have : looked during the Dark Ages, specifically during the time of King Arthur : ( at 600 AD Britain) and Beowulf ( at 700 Scandinavia). Can anyone help me : as to the types of clothing, music, foods and traditions one would : probably encounter at these two points in history? For the first, try reading the descriptions of weddings (and feasts in general) in the Mabinogi. Although the tales were probably first written down (or at least codified in the present form) around the 10-11th century, the era they describe is significantly earlier (when it isn't "timeless"). I won't go so far as to say that it is "correct" for 6-7th century Britain, but it is probably one of the best approximations you'll find. It's a bit light on clothing and music descriptions. Mostly you get a bare-bones description like "At Aberfraw they began the [wedding] feast and sat them down. This is how they sat [seating arrangements omitted]. ... And they began the carousal. They continued to carouse and converse. And when they perceived that it was better for them to seek slumber than to continue the carousal, to sleep they went. And that night Matholwch slept with Branwen." Perhaps surprisingly, to modern pre-conceptions of the time, good conversation is _always_ mentioned as essential to a successful party. A bit more detailed is the wedding of Pwyll and Rhiannon in the First Branch. "He set off for the court of Hefeydd the Old, and he came to the court, and a joyous welcome was given him; and there was much gathering of folk and rejoicing and great preparations against his coming; and all the resources of the court were dispensed at his direction. The hall was made rady, and they went to the tables. This is how they sat: Hefeydd the Old [the bride's father] on one side of Pwyll, and Rhiannon the other side; thereafter each according to his rank. They ate and caroused and they conversed. And at the beginning of carousal after meat [a stranger enters the hall, asks a boon, which Pwyll foolishly agrees to grant before hearing it. Many adventures ensue. A year later, the wedding feast is resumed.] And they went to sit at table; and as they sat a year from that night, they sat each one that night. They ate and caroused and time came to go to sleep. And Pwyll and Rhiannon went to their chamber, and they passed that night in pleasure and contentment. And on the morrow in the youth of the day, 'Lord,' said Rhiannon, 'arise and begin to content the minstrels, and refuse no one today who may desire a gift.' 'That will I gladly,' said Pwyll, 'both today and every day whilst this feast may last.' Pwyll arose and had silence proclaimed, to call on all suitors and minstrels to declare themselves, and had them told how all should be contented according to their wish and whim; and that was done. That feast was preoceeded with, and none was denied while it lasted. And when the feast was ended [the bride and groom return to his home.]" There are more examples, but best you should buy a copy for yourself. Tangwystyl verch Morgant Glasvryn From: djheydt at uclink.berkeley.edu (Dorothy J Heydt) Newsgroups: rec.org.sca Subject: Re: Wedding feast during the Dark Ages Date: 4 Aug 1995 15:21:08 GMT Organization: University of California, Berkeley In article <3vqt5r$eob at uwm.edu>, Barbara Jean Kuehl wrote: >I am attempting to write a description of how a wedding feast might have >looked during the Dark Ages, specifically during the time of King Arthur >( at 600 AD Britain) and Beowulf ( at 700 Scandinavia). Can anyone help me >as to the types of clothing, music, foods and traditions one would >probably encounter at these two points in history? > I haven't got the text here at work, but look up a book with a title something like "Earliest English Law Texts" (or search for subject, early english law, etc.) till you get hold of a copy of the laws of Ine, King of Wessex, 8th century or so. These laws include a list of what was included in "feorm"-rent (what you paid to the king for the land you held of him, to put it in later-period terms). Roughly: 1 steer's worth of beef a couple of wethers' worth of mutton a pig or two, I think lots of salmon hundreds of loaves of bread lots of honey lots and lots of "clear ale" and "Welsh ale" No vegetables are mentioned, but that isn't to say they wouldn't have been served in season, and described as "worts." Now maybe you sent this in to the King's house, if it was convenient, but more likely you had him and his huscarles as guests for a couple of days, as they traveled around from place to place. I dare say they took the leftovers with them. Dorothea of Caer-Myrddin Dorothy J. Heydt Mists/Mists/West UC Berkeley Argent, a cross forme'e sable djheydt at uclink.berkeley.edu PRO DEO ET REGE From: bj at alpha1.csd.uwm.edu (Barbara Jean Kuehl) Newsgroups: rec.org.sca Subject: Catalogs for the medieval wedding faq Date: 4 Aug 1995 18:18:55 GMT Organization: Information & Media Technologies, University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee The following is a list of catalogs which have been suggested for inclusion in the Medieval and Renaissance Wedding Faq as sources of clothing and/or items with medieval flavor. I am currently in the process of attempting to attain these catalogs so that I can check them out but, in the meantime, if anyone has one of the catalogs or has ordered from them, I would like to hear from you as to the quality and types of items offered by the catalog company. For medieval clothing, patterns and items: Raiments P.O. Box 93095 Pasadena, CA 91109 Renaissance Herald (was Renaissance Shopper) P.O. Box 422 Riverside, CA 92502 Amazon Vinegar & Pickling Works 2218 East 11th Street Davenport, IA 52803 Exclusively Weddings 1301 Carolina Street Greensboro, NC 27401 1-800-759-7666 Harriet's, ETc Millwood Crossing 381 Millwood Avenue Winchester, VA 22601 Museum Replicas Ltd 2143 Gees Mill road Box 840 Conyers, GA 30207 1-800-883-8838 The Noble Collection P.O. Box 831 Merrifield, VA 22116 1-800-noble-8 (was given as phone # but this is obviously incorrect) Hedgehog Handiworks 8406 Flight Avenue Los Angeles, CA 90045 Dancing Dragon 5670 West End Road, #4 P.O. Box 1106 Arcata, CA 95521 1-800-322-6041 Past Times 280 Summer Street Boston, MA 02210-1182 1-800-242-1020 Atlanta Cutlery ANYONE HAVE AN ADDRESS? For paper products, parchment, invitations, and gifts: Colorful Images 1401 South Sunset Street Longmont, Co 80501-6755 1-800-458-7999 Earth Care ANYONE HAVE ADDRESS? 1-800-347-0070 Paper Direct ANYONE HAVE ADDRESS? 1-800-272-7377 If you know of any other catalogs which should be included in the Medieval and Renaissance Wedding Faq, please send me their names, addresses and 1-800-#s. BJ From: Karen Vicker Newsgroups: rec.org.sca Subject: Re: Catalogs for the medieval wedding faq Date: Fri, 4 Aug 1995 13:39:38 -0700 Organization: University of Washington On 4 Aug 1995, Barbara Jean Kuehl wrote: > > Past Times > 280 Summer Street > Boston, MA 02210-1182 > 1-800-242-1020 My aplologies for this lengthy return to the question, but when I visited the Past Times outlets in Oxford, Edinburgh and London this spring I was impressed with their medieval selection, small though it may be. Most of the store was OOP, but the selection of Celtic jewelry and such was very nice, and they had some very good reference material (basic, but good) for those interested in research. This is a good source! From: bj at alpha1.csd.uwm.edu (Barbara Jean Kuehl) Newsgroups: rec.org.sca Subject: More catalogs for the medieval wedding faq Date: 4 Aug 1995 18:53:05 GMT Organization: Information & Media Technologies, University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee Oops, I forgot to include the following catalogs in the list of catalogs suggested for the Medieval and Renaissance Wedding Faq. The same request applies...if you have a copy of any of these catalogs or have ordered from the companies, I would be interested in hearing from yu as to the quality and types of merchandise offered. BJ Whole Costumer's Catalog PO Box 207 Beallsville, PA 15313 Carolina Stitches in Time Box 10933 Winston-Salem, N.C. 27108 (919) 764-0790 Chivalry Sports PO Box 18904 Tucson, AZ 85731-8904 Inquires (602) 722-1255 Orders 1-800-730-KING JAS Townsend & Son P.O. Box 415 Pierceton, IN 46562 (800) 338-1665 Mediaeval Miscellanea 6530 Spring Valley Drive Alexandria, VA 22312 (703) 642 - 1740 and Fax: (708) 237-1374 The Queens Thimble 515 S. Evergreen Dr. Mira Loma, CA 91752-1577 (909)360-6041 Sterling Silks/Sterling Cloth Company 701 Cleveland Avenue Southwest Canton, Ohio 44702 (216) 456-0653 MacKenzie-Smith 9600 Business Park Dr. Suite 2 Truckee, CA 95734 (916) 587-5974 Campbells RD 1 Box 1444 Herndon, PA 17830 (717) 425-2045 Alice Stephenson 2734 Mountain View W. Tocoma, WA 98466 (206) 565-2893 House Morning Star 11246 S. Post Oak Rd. #217 Houston, TX 77035 (713) 729-7990 An anotated bibliography of pre-1650 costume sources (including books and periodicals) is available from: Puffs and Slashes c/o L. R. Fox P. O. Box 443 Bloomington, IN 47402-0443 $2.50 per copy From: Kirsti Thomas Newsgroups: rec.org.sca,alt.wedding,soc.couples.wedding Subject: Medieval/Renaissance Wedding Bibliography Date: Tue, 15 Aug 1995 19:22:52 -0700 Organization: Seattle Pacific University The rough drafts of bibliographies of articles and books have been loaded onto my homepage. http://paul.spu.edu/~kst kirsti kst at paul.spu.edu From: djheydt at uclink.berkeley.edu (Dorothy J Heydt) Newsgroups: rec.org.sca Subject: Re: Period greenery for a wedding Date: 7 Dec 1995 18:04:33 GMT Organization: University of California, Berkeley In article <49nlop$5n at sphinx.gsu.edu>, Jennifer Aiello wrote: >A friend of mine who is a rather active member of SCA is getting married >in a few weeks and I've been asked to decorate the reception hall. Does >anyone know of any herbs/plants/assorted greenery that would be >appropriate or particularly meaningful for this? ... Well, the bad news is--some people in our area were asked this question a while back and did the research--that it is not period at all to decorate the interior of a building with vases of flowers. That is a *Victorian* practice; our people even came up with the name of the lady who first did it, but I've forgotten it. The good news is that almost nobody knows this. You *could* do whatever you think looks nice and you can afford. I would suggest cutting evergreen branches and decking the rafters with them, and garlands of flowers for the heads of the wedding party. The most impressive way to decorate the reception hall, IMNSHO, is to borrow everybody's personal banners, those of your group and neighboring shires, etc., and deck the walls with those. Lotsa color. For my wedding (25 years ago) we decked the church (ugly bare concrete) with banners and put garlands on the heads of the wedding party; the reception was held outdoors. But this was California in May. Dorothea of Caer-Myrddin Dorothy J. Heydt Mists/Mists/West UC Berkeley Argent, a cross forme'e sable djheydt at uclink.berkeley.edu PRO DEO ET REGE From: Gretchen Miller Newsgroups: rec.org.sca Subject: Re: Scottish Weddings Date: Mon, 26 Feb 1996 13:22:53 -0500 Organization: Computer Operations, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA My husband and I based our wedding on period Scottish practice as described in the book "Virgins and Verigos", a book about women in Scotland from 1200-1700 (this book used to be available from Unicorn, Ltd. I highly recommend it) The period Scottish marriage was prefaced by the making of a marriage contract. That we cut out. On the day of the marriage, the couple and witnesses appear before a priest, declare that there is no hinderance to their getting married, and say "I, name, take, you name, as my husband/wife, in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost". And that's it. We added a piper to pipe us and our attendants in. Since this is Pennsylvania, where you can get a Quaker license (ask me for details if you're interested), we didn't need/have a priest/officiate. We used the declarations and phrase above, then exchanged rings. Then the piper piped us back up the aisle. Short, sweet, and very very nice. (Also, very period) toodles, margaret From: s.krossa at aberdeen.ac.uk (Sharon Krossa) Newsgroups: rec.org.sca Subject: Re: Scottish Weddings Date: Tue, 27 Feb 1996 04:32:46 +0000 Organization: Phuture PhuDs In article <4gmfuu$a6a at heathers.stdio.com>, maney at heathers.stdio.com (Fredrich P. Maney) wrote: >Lyon (lyon at infi.net at infi.net) wrote: >: My fiance and I are getting married in Oct and although we are not having an >SCA >: wedding we are trying to incorporate some Scottish elements, the groomsmen are >: wearing full-dress highland, we have a celtic band ect. We are now looking >for >: some Scottish traditions to make the ceremony more unique. Any ideas? >: Giovanna Mancuso >: andreah at cpsnet.com > >Umm... offhand I'll mention this. You should incorporate a blacksmith >with anvil and hammer, as well as a Piper. The blacksmith is actually an *English* tradition -- coming from the English couples running away to Scotland to get married (because until about 1940 all you had to do was consent to marriage in words of the present tense to get married in Scotland) and stopping at Gretna Green (one of the most southerly border villages) and snagging the blacksmith as a witness. *Scottish* couples didn't go to gretna green and its famous blacksmith, because they could get married anywhere they wanted to. Of course, this was an irregular form of marriage -- perfectly legal and binding, but the authorities still did their best to make you solemnize it properly afterwords (ie, do the banns and church thing, even though you were already married). It really has little to do with a formal, especially church, wedding. Sharon Krossa, who can't seem to escape from the section on marriage in her thesis skrossa at svpal.org (permanent) -or- s.krossa at aberdeen.ac.uk (until June 1996) From: "'Jherek' W. Swanger" Newsgroups: rec.org.sca Subject: Re: Scottish Wedding Ceremonys and Viking Dances Date: Tue, 26 Mar 1996 13:49:05 -0800 Organization: University of Washington On 25 Mar 1996, Greg Williams wrote: > Does anybody have any information on Scottish Wedding ceremonies from > period Stop by the Medieval/Renaissance Wedding Page [http://paul.spu.edu/~kst/bib/bib.html] and take a look at the bibliographies. I would especially recommend trying to get your hands on the following books and articles: Searle, Mark, and Kenneth W. Stevenson. Documents of the Marriage Liturgy. Collegeville, Minn.: Liturgical P, 1992. Stevenson, Kenneth W. Nuptial Blessing: a Study of Christian Marriage Rites. New York: Oxford UP, 1983. Muirhead, I.A. "The Forme of Marriage: 1562 and Today." Scottish Journal of Theology 6 (Mar. 1953): 31-42 It is more or less impossible to find information on marriage ceremonies before the 10th-11th centuries. This is partially due to the fact that marriage was considered a secular, civic contract rather than a sacrament for much of church history and so the priests and monks who were writing things down, weren't too concerned with it. Towards the beginning of the Middle Ages, a priest *could* be present at a wedding ceremony to bless the couple, but it wasn't until the Council of Trent in the 16th century that the Church absolutely required a clergyman to officiate. In many cases, the only thing required to marry the couple was the exchange of vows (as simple as, "Will you marry me?" "I will.") and some sort of token (rings, a piece of fruit, etc.) in front of a witness. This seems to have held on in Scotland for a very long time. It wasn't until the early 20th century that Scottish law *required* an officient to marry the couple; prior to that you could get married by simply stating in front of witnesses that you were wed. kirsti (not jherek) Organization: University of Maine System Date: Wed, 27 Mar 1996 10:40:14 EST From: Newsgroups: rec.org.sca Subject: Re: Scottish weddings In response to the inquiry regarding Scottish weddings: Within the last month there has been discussion on scottish.culture newsgroup about Scottish weddings. I don't recall exactly who, but someone is working on a FAQ. While I do not expect to see any specific references (yet) to the middle ages time period, this is probably a good jump point to learn more about medieval Scottish weddings. I found this posting today from Craig Cockburn of Edinburgh, Scotland. I hope it helps. I have not yet checked out this site. -- Lady Bryn MacLachlan (Lisa Tyson) Shire of Endewearde Kingdom of the East =============================================== >From: Craig Cockburn >Newsgroups: soc.culture.scottish,soc.culture.celtic, >soc.couples.wedding >Subject: Updated info on Scottish weddings >Date: Sat, 23 Mar 1996 16:28:22 +0000 >Organization: Mo dhachaidh > >I've updated my WWW pages, URL below. > Included in this update: > > More info on Scottish weddings > Expanded info about organisations, Edinburgh Folk Festival, Fringe > Festival, Adult Learning Project etc. > various other changes and bugfixes. > > Craig Cockburn (pronounced "coburn"), Edinburgh, Scotland > Web pages at http://www.smo.uhi.ac.uk/~craig/ comments welcome > Sgri\obh thugam 'sa Gha\idhlig ma 'se do thoil e.. From: djheydt at uclink.berkeley.edu (Dorothy J Heydt) Newsgroups: rec.org.sca Subject: Re: Cake Tops Date: 19 Jul 1996 20:05:28 GMT Organization: University of California at Berkeley In article <31EEF5CF.58BA at huskynet.com>, Beowulf wrote: >I am getting married this fall and I would like to have two >different cake tops. > > 1) A castle > 2) A knight (perferably on horseback) > > Anyone know of any good places to find something like this. I can >find plenty of things like this in perwter but I was hoping for glass or >some other material. Anyone? Well, when I got married, and it's 25 years ago, I went to a bakery in Berkeley that no longer exists, alas; and I started saying to the clerk, "I want a wedding cake that looks like this..." and after half a paragraph she said, "You'd better talk to the baker." So I did, and the baker was most enthusiastic. I showed him a picture of a thirteenth-century ivory plaque showing knights attacking the Castle of Love, and ladies defending it with flowers. I had managed to find plastic knights and ladies about two inches high in my local dime store. This clearly depends on whether you make your Serendipity roll when you go shopping! Maybe you could paint your pewter figures with nontoxic paint? Anyway, of all the variegated sizes of cake pan he had available for baking wedding cakes, the baker made one layer of the largest size he had, and about five layers of the smallest, for the tower. He frosted the tower to look like masonry, and the bottom layer to look like grass. Then he made frosting flowers in the hands of (well, on the fronts of) the ladies, and several knights were shown to have just received a flower, splat! right in the kisser. Other flowers were scattered around the landscape. Try your local dime stores.... if that doesn't yield suitable plastic stuff, try painting your pewter and taking all the figures *OFF* the cake before it's cut, wrapping them up and putting them away, so no little kid decides to try a nibble. Good hunting. Dorothea of Caer-Myrddin Dorothy J. Heydt Mists/Mists/West UC Berkeley Argent, a cross forme'e sable djheydt at uclink.berkeley.edu PRO DEO ET REGE From: Linda Cox Newsgroups: rec.org.sca Subject: Re: Cake Tops Date: 23 Jul 1996 16:32:26 GMT Organization: CR&D Beowulf wrote: > I am getting married this fall and I would like to have two > different cake tops. > > 1) A castle > 2) A knight (perferably on horseback) > > Anyone know of any good places to find something like this. I can > find plenty of things like this in perwter but I was hoping for glass or > some other material. Anyone? Often you can find castles, knights, etc. done in ceramics at gift shops or at role-playing stores. These are fairly heavy, but they can be used as cake toppers as follows: get a piece of heavy card- board or light particleboard and cut it about 1/2" smaller than the top layer. Ice it with the same icing used on the cake. Insert straws or dowels in the top layer as for the other layers (to support the tiered cake, dowels or straws are inserted into each layer -- your baker will know) and rest the cardboard circle on top. Place your figurines on the circle and decorate the edge so it doesn't show; you can support quite a bit of weight this way. If the figurines have felt bottoms, the felt can be covered with carefully trimmed saran wrap to keep them clean. Felicitations on your upcoming marriage, Lady Signi Bjornsdottar From: jeffebear1 at aol.com (JeffEBear1) Newsgroups: rec.org.sca Subject: Re: Cake Tops Date: 28 Jul 1996 11:41:26 -0400 In article <31EEF5CF.58BA at huskynet.com>, Beowulf writes: >I am getting married this fall and I would like to have two >different cake tops. > > 1) A castle > 2) A knight (perferably on horseback) DragonMarsh carries the cutest knight on horseback with a lance that comes out of the hand. It's about 4 " tall and made of pewter. I placed 2 "Jousting" each other on a cake and it was cute. I believe they also have a glass cake top available of a castle. Along with a lord/lady pewter top. Call (909) 276-1116 and ask for misty. From: s.krossa at aberdeen.ac.uk (Sharon Krossa) Newsgroups: rec.org.sca Subject: Scottish Marriage (was: Scottish Personas Help!!!) Date: Fri, 18 Oct 1996 02:42:58 +0000 In article <4mKdB5e00UjUM5VUkD at andrew.cmu.edu>, Gretchen M Beck wrote: >Excerpts from netnews.rec.org.sca: 7-Oct-96 Re: Scottish Personas >Help!!! Bryan J. Maloney at cornell (558) > >> Handfastings were not weddings, nor were they "pagan"--they were a result >> of the fact that the Christian priests of the day had to act as "circuit >> riders", and one couldn't always have a priest handy to do a marriage >> whenever. Thus, you had a "handfasting", and the matter was then >> solemnized/rendered official when the priest made it 'round. > >Technically, and especially in Scotland, you don't need a priest, or a >handfasting--all that's required is the agreement to a wedding contract >between the two individuals involved. In Scotland, for most of period, >if you agreed between the two of you that you were married, you >were--this also applied to England (see the issue of whether Anne Boleyn >or Catherine Howard had secretly arranged a marriage before their >marriages to Henry). No, technically (at least in Scotland) all you needed was to exchange consents in the present tense. No priests, no witnesses (though that would make it hard to prove), no marriage contracts. "I take you for my husband" "I take you for my wife" Hey, presto, another married couple. >Usually the procedure went like this: the parties involved (or rather >their parents/guardians) arranged a marriage contract, in which the >various goods/monies/services each party would provide to the marriage >were spelled out. Bans were posted so that anyone claiming a prior >contract could come forward. If none introduced a prior claim, then the >couple declared themselves married before witnesses--usually, though not >necessarily, in front of a priest. No, this is not how it worked (least not in Scotland) What happened, if you were going to do it properly, parental consent and all, was 1) They (usually the parents) arranged the marriage contract. 2) Often, there was a handfasting at which the couple was betrothed (that's what handfastings are, betrothals, getting engaged to be married). This is usually when the marriage contracts were signed/witnessed/whatever. 3) The banns were posted/read/whatever. This would not only give notice for prior marriages to be made known, but also of any other impediments (like consanguinity, etc.) to be made known. For all I know, however, there may (also) have been a totally different motivation for the banns. I can't really say, as I don't know. But people didn't do banns unless they intended to have a church wedding. 4) The couple went to church, and, in the precense of the priest, at the door of the church, they exchanged consents in the present tense. (In order to do this church door and priest thing, the banns were required -- at least from a certain council whose date I forget) 5) At this point, things varied. A blessing might be given, a nuptial mass was often celebrated, etc. However, this was just extra icing -- the thing that *married* the couple was the consent by words of the present -- not anything that came before, nor anything that came after. The above is the normal form of marriage. Other forms worked, but if you were going to all the bother of marriage contracts, etc, then this was the most common form. This was the only form in which priests were supposed to involve themselves. Effric neyn Kenyeoch vcHarrald mka Sharon Krossa, growing weary... skrossa at svpal.org (permanent) -or- s.krossa at abdn.ac.uk (until Nov 1996) Medieval Scotland Web Page (including information on names & clothing): http://www.abdn.ac.uk/~his016/medieval_scotland.html Date: Mon, 21 Oct 1996 00:44:22 -0500 To: ansteorra at eden.com From: gunnora at bga.com (Gunnora Hallakarva) Subject: Wedding Rings in Period Here's another interesting tidbit I gathered from the Historical Costuming news list. Gunnora Hallakarva Herskerinde ==================================== Date: Sun, 20 Oct 1996 15:31:49 -0700 From: Trudy Subject: wedding rings i happened to find a book yesterday which discuessed (only a little) wedding rings and on which finger they were worn...i just wrote down some notes, so i'm only paraphrsing here: during the period of george I in england, the wedding ring was usually worn on the thumb (although it was placed on the fourth -- i guess what we consider the ring -- finger during the ceremony). apparently very large wedding rings were fashionable which necessitated waering them on the thumb. in france from the 11th to the 15th centuries, they wre usually on the right hand, middle finger; s in some areas they were on the fourth finger. the guals and the britons of the 1st century wore the ring on the middle finger (didn't say which hand). the order of matrimony in england, pre-freformation said that men should wear their wedding ring on their right hand, women on the left. chirlandajo's frescoes in the curch of santa croce in florence show the betrothal of the ivrgin (make that virgin...no backspace c key here) mary -- the ring is placed by joseph on mary's fourth vinger, right hand. during the betrothal of lucrezia borgia with giv ARGH make that giovanni sforza on feb. 2, 1493, the wedding (engagement) ring was placed on her fourth finger, left hand. and finally, an idea that might explain the custom of wearing the wedding ring on the thumb -- the second digit of the thumb was dedicated to the virgin mary. this is all from "rings for the finger", by george frederick kunz, dover press, 1917 (repreinted i believe late 1940s). i found thi s book used at Green Apple Books on Clement St. in San Francisco (i didn't buy it so it's still there ) if any bay area people are interested. -Kendra Van Cleave From: roggenbk at river.it.gvsu.edu (Karin Bear) Newsgroups: rec.org.sca Subject: Re: weddings Date: 30 Jan 1997 16:16:19 GMT Organization: Grand Valley State University Tara L Wilbur (wilbutl at mail.auburn.edu) wrote: : yet, but I would appreciate any advice/info anyone has on medieval/early : Renaissance weddings/clothes/food/traditions/flowers/etc. Tara, first, congrats! Second, there are a few resources that could help you, though unfortunately I don't have the addresses handy for either one. The first is the SCA's own Rialto files. (Lots of documents and threads relating to various subjects). [Now called Stefan's Florilegium. You are now reading the file mentioned] Someone here should be able to tell you where to find them, or just search for either Rialto or SCA on an engine. The other is the FAQ for soc.couples.weddings. There are several sections on there pertaining to medieval weddings complete with flowers, food, dress (catalog names and ideas!) and I think favours too. This is posted monthly to either soc.couples.weddings, alt.wedding and a few other NG's too. Dejanews should be able to help you find it. (FWIW, I got a lot of my ideas out of it, as I too am planning a period wedding) -- Karin (and Kevin) sometime in '99 Date: Wed, 19 Mar 1997 22:41:13 -0600 From: kst at paul.spu.edu Subject: Re: 15th century wedding Newsgroups: rec.org.sca > From: dederick at clark.edu (David Eric Sletten) > I am a welsh archer/merchant. I just got engaged to a 15th century Itailan > concubine. She expect a large wedding from her home land. I need help. If > you have any info or know where I should look I woould really appreciate it. You might want to stop by the Medieval/Renaissance Wedding Page at http://paul.spu.edu/~kst/bib/bib.html I would especially suggest looking at the bibliography of books. In my research, I did run across a fair deal of information on Italian weddings. Some of the ones you will probably want to get your hands on (talk to the Interlibrary Loan Dept. at your library) include: Altieri, Marco Antonio. Li nuptiali. Rome, C. Bartoli, 1873. Ed. Enrico Narducci. (If you can read Italian, this seems to be one of the best primary sources on Italian Renaissance wedding rituals. Originally written around 1509, it was reprinted in 1873 and does not seem to have appeared in print since.) Centro italiano di studi sull'alto Medioevo. Il Matrimonio Nella Societa Altomedievale: 22-28 aprile 1976. Settimane di studio del Centro italiano di studi sull'alto Medioevo 24. Spoleto : Presso la sede del Centro, 1977. Gerstfeldt, Olga von. Hochzeitsfeste der Renaissance in Italien. Esslingen: P. Neff, 1906. Klapisch-Zuber, Christiane., Women, Family and Ritual in Renaissance Italy. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1985. Searle, Mark, and Kenneth W. Stevenson. Documents of the Marriage Liturgy. Collegeville, Minn.: Liturgical P, 1992. (_The_ book to read for copies of the vows themselves. Includes a Jewish ceremony and a number of Christian liturgies from the Early Middle Ages to the present) Stevenson, Kenneth W. Nuptial Blessing: a Study of Christian Marriage Rites. New York: Oxford UP, 1983. (Chapter 2 is a good source for various rituals and ceremonies, while Chapter 3 deals with marriage customs during the Reformation) Bolton, Brenda, et al., eds. Women in Medieval Society. Philadelphia: U of Pennsylvania P, 1976. Klapisch-Zuber, Christiane. "Zacharias; or, The Ousting of the Father: the Rites of Marriage in Tuscany from Giotto to the Council of Trent." Ritual, Religion and the Sacred. Ed. Robert Forster and Orest Ranum. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 1982. From: djheydt at uclink.berkeley.edu (Dorothy J Heydt) Newsgroups: rec.org.sca Subject: Re: Flowers for mideaval wedding Date: 15 Apr 1997 00:04:29 GMT Organization: University of California at Berkeley Hilary of Serendip did some research a while back and found that the whole concept of decorating the interior of a building with cut flowers seems to have come in in Early Victorian times. (She actually mentioned the name of the lady who started it, but I've forgotten it.) So in that sense no flower arrangements would be strictly period. Flower wreaths on your heads, however, would be. You could scatter rushes [if you can find any], herbs, and stray blossoms over the floor--or over the tablecloth on which you serve the food. Dorothea of Caer-Myrddin Dorothy J. Heydt Mists/Mists/West Albany, California PRO DEO ET REGE djheydt at uclink From: Philip & Susan Troy Date: Wed, 07 May 1997 23:21:41 -0400 Subject: Re: SC - Announcement and question The Cheshire Cat wrote: > As a result of this recent turn of events, could anyone please tell me what > type of dishes were served at a period wedding feast? > > -Sianan For what it's worth, there's a complete wedding feast menu in Le Menagier de Paris. I don't have it in front of me at the moment, but I recall it is pretty standard 14th-century French foods: in other words, not too shabby! Adamantius From: gfrose at cotton.vislab.olemiss.edu (Terry Nutter) Date: Wed, 7 May 1997 23:05:55 -0500 Subject: Re: SC - Announcement and question Concerning wedding feasts: there are surviving menus reproduced in Austin at the end of the first manuscript and, I believe, in the Menagier. The ones in Austin are from 14th and 15th C England (not all the menus are weddings, but some are); the Menagier's, presumably, would be 14th C France. - -- Katerine/Terry From: Stephen Bloch Date: Thu, 8 May 1997 21:57:24 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: SC - Announcement and question > could anyone please tell me what > type of dishes were served at a period wedding feast? There is a recipe in _Manuscrito Anonimo_ (a 13th-century Arabo- Andalusian cookbook) specifically described as "served among us at wedding feasts in the Algarve". At least, that's my recollection. I can't find it on my hard disk right now, and I have no memory of what the dish was. mar-Joshua ibn-Eleazar ha-Shalib Stephen Bloch sbloch at panther.adelphi.edu http://www.adelphi.edu/~sbloch/ Math/CS Dept, Adelphi University Date: Mon, 14 Jul 1997 07:22:17 EDTFrom: kathe1 at juno.com (Kathleen M Everitt)Subject: Re: SC - Wedding Cake L Herr-Gelatt and J R Gelatt writes:>Aoife here, in a small quandry. Friends of mine are having a "period">wedding, during a public demo---they want it to be truly historical, >and are researching all the necessary historical details--and have >asked me to make the "cake". >Problem 1: They're 5th century Christianized Celts (so that>gives us bannocks, right?). >Problem 2: Modern wedding cakes are not "period">by any concievable stretch of the imagination.>Lady Aoife FinnGee, I can't remember if I kept the research I did before my SCA weddingmany years ago, but I'll look for it.If I remember correctly, I read that guests brought some sort of cake asa symbol of fertility and presented it to the couple. They were stackedon a platter at the wedding feast. Can't remember the period, but it waslate. Later (out of period) someone got the idea to put icing on thispile of cakes and the tiered wedding cake was created. That's one story.Another was that cakes were brought as fertility gifts but thrown at thebride. Any that landed on her were a sign of children to come. I thinkthat was earlier than the stacking the cakes, but again, I can'tremember. Later that custom became the rice that we throw at weddingstoday. That's all I remember. Hey, it was 18 years ago next week! I'll lookaround and see if I can find any of the references that I used when Iplanned the wedding.Julleran Date: 14 Jul 1997 09:27:37 -0700 From: "Marisa Herzog" Subject: Re: SC - Wedding Cake I remember some mention of a very rich fruit cake (yes fruit cake can be delicious) as a medievel wedding food in a book about wedding cakes. Can't remember the book though :( brid Date: Wed, 06 Aug 1997 09:11:11 -0400 From: karen at georesearch.com (Karen Green) To: sca-arts at raven.cc.ukans.edu Subject: Re: Medieval Wedding 2 Jennifer wrote: > I would appreciate any other suggestions that would fit in with the > above and how to place it so that it seems real. As well I have no idea > what to serve for the reception that will not scare my guests. To some > people medieval cusine is a little frightening. Thank you My husband, Lord Gruffudd ap Cadfael, and I got married "medievally" last April. Originally we were going to have the ceremony and reception in the stone lodge of a local country club, but two weeks before the wedding, the club called to cancel on the lodge; we went with a picnic pavillion on the club's property instead, and while it was a bit chilly, there was plenty of space and the view (of the valley, Bull Run, and the Blue Ridge Mountains) was absolutely gorgeous. Some of the things we did to make the wedding seem more medieval: - The entire wedding party (us too!) were garbed in 14th/15th century costume. My gown was a full-length light ivory brocade cotehardie which laced up the back; it was trimmed with a gold looped braid which I accented with garnets and pearls. My husband wore a burgundy-colored houppelande lined with black brocade, trimmed with a gold-and-burgundy trim. - The wedding invitations (the "Medieval Fantasy" invitatation with the knight and lady riding to a castle which can be found in several wedding invitation catalogs) included the line "Medieval attire admired, but not required." A lot of the guests (even the non-SCA folks!) got dressed up. Even my grandmother! :) - We didn't do the "marching out of the hall under a whole mess o' swords" bit as both of us are reasonably tall -- could have been quite a mess ;) That and we got married under a chuppah (Jewish wedding canopy) held up by the groomsmen and best man, so they would have had to chuck the chuppah (which would have been an absolute tragedy, as it was handpainted silk and made by a very dear cousin) and fetch their swords. - For the ceremony and dancing at the reception, we had a local SCA music group play (they charged a far too reasonable fee) ;) While you may not have the opportunity to go with an early music group, you may want to look for some CD's of early music to have played during the ceremony. You may like some of the CD's put out by a group called "Cantiga" -- very pleasant medieval-sounding instrumental music. :) - In terms of food, we had hired the catering branch of the country club, and selected a menu that would "feel" medieval without being icky -- London broil, veggies, etc. We also had vegetarian lasagne for the herbivore crowd. - For the wedding cake, we again went with what the catering branch could offer. It tasted nummy :) The cake topper depicted a little pair of doves in flight. (Lady Rafn's daughter Chryston asked if she could eat the candy doves; Lady Gwen explained that they were plastic.) :) There is a cake-topper of a castle out there but neither my husband nor I liked the look of it very much. I've seen pictures of medieval weddings where the cake was figured to look like a castle; this fits in with the idea of a "subtlety" dessert in wedding feasts. - You may want to research period wedding feasts -- it's fascinating to see how they celebrated weddings in this period. :) We are also from different backgrounds (I am Jewish, and he was brought up Lutheran) but we went with a loosely Jewish ceremony. Even had an illuminated ketubah (kind of a Jewish wedding contract thingie -- and it's GORGEOUS!) :) Please let me know if I can be of any further help -- in the meantime I remain Yours in Service to the Dream, Karen Larsdatter Barony of Ponte Alto, Atlantia (mka Mrs. Karen Harris) :) Date: Wed, 06 Aug 1997 09:41:38 -0500 From: Gunnora Hallakarva To: sca-arts at raven.cc.ukans.edu Subject: Medieval Weddings To add another source of information to the discussion of medieval weddings, you can dlaso check out my research on the Viking Wedding located at: http://www.realtime.com/~gunnora/wedding.htm Gunnora Hallakarva To: markh at risc.sps.mot.com Date: Thu, 18 Sep 1997 18:00:14 -0700 From: Kathi Subject: weddings For those wanting to do the "traditional" wedding cake for their Medieval/Renaissance wedding(I know, it's not really "period), finding an appropriate cake-topper can be a problem. Fellowship Foundry makes a nice one(http://www.ffoundry.com/cgi-bin/catalog.cgi?Type=Wedding), and also have goblets and other accesories for weddings. In absence of this, you can get the regular toppers, and use a bit of leftover material from the bride and grooms outfits. Just cut them to fit, glue them on (you can even take a snip of hair to make it look more like you), and you have an reasonable replica of the bride and groom to place on the cake. Caitlinn Ingen Brigt/Kat Date: Tue, 14 Apr 1998 13:20:01 -0400 From: "Karen Lyons-McGann" Subject: SC - Okay - here goes! > I am having a medieval wedding on June 21st. There will be >approximately 200 or more people there. >snip< >We really don't have much money - it was suggested that we have >people bring food to share instead of gifts, but I think that sounds >kinda tacky. If we're having a wedding, we supply the food - (and with >our friends, the guests supply the entertainment!) >Cessara ni Rannall I would suggest that since you know some friends are willing to provide the entertainment (the tournement) please consider that some guests would adore to provide at least part of the food, as a gift to you. Really. I would be highly complimented if someone was impressed enough with a dish to ask me to bring enough to feed their friends and relations. For non-traditional weddings, a request that so and so bring enough of (their specialty) to feed X guests in lieu of a gift is not uncommon. If it really bothers you, offer to defray the costs of groceries. It might be best to ask someone familiar with feasts and your friend's specialties to coordinate the catering effort for you. They could cater the whole thing. Or they could simply coordinate the various cooks, dealing with requesting the dishes and offering grocery money if doing so makes you feel awkward. Do beware that a non-SCA friend of relative may hear of the idea and want to bring Watergate Salad for 200. Smile and be gracious. Anne Subject: Re: ANST - Fwd: Help Date: Fri, 20 Nov 98 13:01:56 MST From: "Casey&Coni" To: I've done a good deal of research on Italian and German weddings in the 14th and 15th c. I found that the following books were fine 'starters' with enough basic information to reconstruct a fairly accurate picture of how the events unfolded: Marriage and the Family in the Middle Ages, Gies&Gies 1987 A History of Private Life vol. II, Aries & Duby 1988 Other people you might wish to consult with are Jovian Skleros seddy at vvm.com and Lady Zaharra domino7 at texas.net who are both stewing in research on this very subject from the Greek Orthodox and Spanish viewpoints, respectively. Dieterich Subject: Re: ANST - Fwd: Help Date: Sun, 22 Nov 98 09:59:59 MST From: "Mary Temple" To: ansteorra at Ansteorra.ORG Another book that might be helpful is: Giovanni and Lusanna Love and Marriage in Renaissance Florence by Gene Brucker. (disclaimer: while I DO own it, I have not yet read it. Something about mundanity getting in the way.) Katerine Rowley Bryn Gwlad, Ansteorra From: drgnflydsn at aol.com (DrgnflyDsn) Newsgroups: rec.org.sca Subject: Re: Period Weddings Date: 26 Jan 1999 20:09:48 GMT >Greetings to all, My Lady and I are getting married on April 24th-we are >doing a "periodish" wedding. Meaning our SCA friends come in garb and >our >friends and family who are not in the SCA, come in Mundane garb. Our >outfits are circa 1400. Can anybody outthere give any ideas on some >ceremonies or music etc. >Thank You >Padraig Ruadh Cille Chainnigh >(Phil Sheridan) Renaissance magazine had an excellent wedding issue last year that is still available at http://www.RenaissanceMagazine.com You can also try the Medieval wedding links page at http://www.spu.edu/~kst/bib/vendors.html Ronda ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dragonfly Design http://members.aol.com/DrgnflyDsn Masks, Historical Clothing Patterns, Garb Date: Wed, 10 Feb 1999 12:07:56 +0000 From: "William T. Fleming" To: sca-arts at raven.cc.ukans.edu Subject: Re: Help needed with Scottish Marriage Customs > My daughter (who currently lacks access to the net) is doing research on > Scottish marriage laws and customs. She's focusing on the similarities and > differences between Roman Catholic and Protestant practices in the late > medieval and renaissance periods. Any help or pointers to available > materials would be appreciated. > > Mikhail I recomend glancing at Scottish Lore and Folklore by Ronald MacDonald Douglas. Scotland still recognizes ancient "irregular" forms of marriage which other nations outlawed after the Council of Trent. For irregular marriage, no clergy is neccesary all one needs to do is to declare mariage in front of two witnesses, promise marriage before intercourse, or live with someone as man and wife and gaining the repute of marriage. --Ruaidhri Date: Wed, 10 Feb 1999 12:12:23 -0500 From: rmhowe To: sca-arts at raven.cc.ukans.edu Subject: Re: Help needed with Scottish Marriage Customs Luznicky wrote: > My daughter (who currently lacks access to the net) is doing research on > Scottish marriage laws and customs. She's focusing on the similarities and > differences between Roman Catholic and Protestant practices in the late > medieval and renaissance periods. Any help or pointers to available > materials would be appreciated. > > Thank you > > Mikhail http://www.electricscotland.com/history/social/sh7.html Scottish Weddings http://www.scot.demon.co.uk/scotfaq.html http://www.spu.edu/~kst/bib/bib.html http://www.geocities.com/SoHo/Studios/5160/weddings.html http://www.pbm.com/~lindahl/rialto/idxweddings.html http://metalab.unc.edu/gaelic/ http://www.dalriada.co.uk/site.htm search under weddings (3) http://etext.lib.virginia.edu/etcbin/browse-mixed-new?id=DunMari&tag=public&images=images/modeng&data=/lv1/Archive/mideng-parsed http://www.abdn.ac.uk/~his016/medieval_scotland.html http://search.miningco.com/scripts/query70.asp?terms=Weddings&Action=+go+&TopNode=3783&Site=Scottish+Culture&Trail=2544%2B2725%2B2745&SUName=scottishculture&COB=home http://reenactment.miningco.com/msub29.htm?terms=Weddings&COB=home http://www.spu.edu/~kst/bib/mrwed.html http://www.spu.edu/~kst/bib/faqintro.html http://www.spu.edu/~kst/bib/faq1.html Magnus Date: Sat, 13 Feb 1999 04:49:32 -0600 (CST) From: "J. Patrick Hughes" To: sca-arts at listproc.cc.ukans.edu Subject: Re: Help needed with Scottish Marriage Customs I am sorry It took me so long to answer this request. Much is possible but questions need to be addressed first. The first thing to determine is where, when, and at what social level she is interested in a Scottish wedding. If it is in the Highlands (post Viking period) then is should be according to Brehon Law and not religious at all. If it is in the lowlands then should it be Catholic or Protestant? Is it to be modeled on a royal wedding (state pageantry evolved) or on a more folksy family affair on the borders? If Highlands, there is a deal of information on the Irish-Scottish institutions of marriage and they are not at all like other church based ceremonies. We have actual marriage rites in the prescribed liturgies of both the Catholic Church and the Protestant Reformed Church. While I do not have such in my personnel library I would expect to find them at either a good academic library or at the library of the respective religions seminaries. If it is a Royal model then the book on City Marriage and Tournament already mentioned is a start point. Finally for simple lowland family gatherings there is information on marriage practices in the books on the history of Scottish dance. I hope this helps. Charles O'Connor Subject: Re :ANST - Norse Weddings Date: Thu, 01 Jul 1999 18:22:56 MST From: "C. L. Ward" To: ansteorra at Ansteorra.ORG Ld. Seamus MacDuff asked: >Does anyone have information on Norse Weddings, if so it would be most >appreciated. Yes, in fact I do. I did a comprehensive research project on the subject of Norse weddings which has since been used twice that I know of to perform weddings. The full text of the paper is located on the Medieval and Renaissance Weddings Webpage, or better yet you can access it from The Viking Answer Lady Webpage in the Daily Life Section: [The new link is: http://www.VikingAnswerLady.com - Stefan] Wæs fiu Hæl (Waes Thu Hael) ::GUNNORA:: Gunnora Hallakarva, OL Baroness to the Court of Ansteorra From: jdmiller2 at students.wisc.edu (Jennifer/Yana) Newsgroups: rec.org.sca Subject: Re: medieval confetti? Date: 10 Sep 1999 19:34:59 GMT Organization: University of Wisconsin - Madison >A visitor to my site, having a medieval wedding in a few months, has asked >me if there is a period equivalent to confetti to throw weddings. Would rice >have been used in period? Was anything at all thrown? > >Marguerite de Bordeaux >mka Michelle Roberts In late-period Russia, the couple was showered with hops and money (coins) twice, before the ceremony by the groom's mother and then after the ceremony by the bride's mother. See my Lord's article on the subject of Russian weddings at: http://www.sit.wisc.edu/~jdmiller2/tiart.html ************************************************************************* Ilyana Barsova (Yana) jdmiller2 at students.wisc.edu http://www.sit.wisc.edu/~jdmiller2 Slavic Interest Group http://www.uwplatt.edu/~goldschp/slavic.html From: Cynthia Virtue Newsgroups: rec.org.sca Subject: Re: medieval wedding dress Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2000 06:45:53 -0500 Organization: Virtue Ventures http://www.virtue.to > dress that could be worn again at an event as court garb,,with as > little changes as necissary. If anyone has any information I would > greatly appreciat it. There are two options that I see, depending on what you want for your dress: 1: Make it in "normal" late-period colors and wear it as a wedding dress (white dresses being a relatively recent phenomenon) 2: Make it of fabrics that take dye well, but in white, and have it professionally dyed after the wedding. You could have removable bits, such as fur or trim, that wouldn't go in the dyebath, and would be reapplied later. I recall hearing of one woman who found an elizabethan-style white wedding dress at a discount store, and had it professionally dyed: instant garb! From: "john hentges" Newsgroups: rec.org.sca Subject: Re: medieval wedding dress Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2000 00:23:01 GMT Genevieve wrote > I am looking into making a wedding dress for a wedding in a year or > so. My SCA persona is late period French, and I was hoping to make a > dress that could be worn again at an event as court garb,,with as > little changes as necissary. If anyone has any information I would > greatly appreciat eit. Thank you! I lost my argument with mother dear about a PURPLE wedding dress (Good Heavens! You DO realize what your grandmother would have to say!) and now I wish I had stood my ground. For my sister's third wedding (same guy, different guests) she wore an evergreen cothardie and dove grey cyclas. This was the mundane "family" wedding. My advice is to make that most excellent court garb you have dreamed of for years (which would be most in period in attitude) and allow yourself to enjoy YOUR wedding. Not your mother's or anyone else who tries to get behind the reins of the affair. One last thing, though. The first time I had a good argument for sticking to my guns - We had just spent a week at a friend's house in July, in Middle Tennessee, without air-conditioning, working on the taffeta/satin ivory princess cut dress with purple gores and tippetts. Then her husband's first comment was "Why did you make a floor-length Father Ryan High School cheerleader's uniform?" Luckily, I did not hit him, she was faster. Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2000 14:11:14 EDT From: Seton1355 at aol.com Subject: Re: SC - non-member submission - Medieval Wedding Sites Phillipa http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Shire/5079/renwed.html" Mire's Renaissance Wedding Links http://www.drizzle.com/~celyn/mrwp/mrwp.html" Medieval and Renaissance Wedding Page http://members.tripod.com/adm/popup/roadmap.shtml?939858726330" Medieval & Renaissance Wedding Rites http://www.midnightgarden.com/wedding/" The Medieval & Renaissance Wedding Site http://tncweddings.women.com/tc/forbride/dedre/00wdse11.htm" Town & Country Weddings: Find the Dress of Your Dreams http://aolsearch.aol.com/dirsearch.adp?knf=1&query=wedding+dresses" AOL Search: Results for wedding dresses http://www.bridalzine.com/dress.html" A perfect dress - choosing your wedding dress Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 19:47:03 -0800 From: lilinah at earthlink.net Subject: SC - New book available April 2001 Coming soon to a book vendor near you... Daniel Diehl and Mark Donnelly. Medieval Celebrations : How to Plan for Holidays, Weddings, and Reenactments With Recipes, Customs, Costumes, Decorations, Songs, Dances and Games. Stackpole Books. April 2001. ISBN: 0811728668. Now as you can see, this is not yet available - but you can see a picture of the cover on amazon.com, bn.com, etc. The author also wrote these SCA perennials: 1. Constructing Medieval Furniture : Plans and Instructions With Historical Notes, 1997. 2. Medieval Furniture: Plans and Instructions for Historical Reproductions, 1999. 3. Siege : Castles at War, 1999. From: Adrienne R. Ferrell [aferrell at texas.net] Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 9:42 PM To: ansteorra at ansteorra.org Subject: [Ansteorra] White wedding gowns late 1800s >I also have a question - what colour did Spanish women wear for weddings? >White is a modern tradition... > >Elysia >(Who needs to know these things... kinda in a hurry!) Dear Elysia, I think that this web site might help you "A Brief History of the Wedding Dress in Britain " http://www.geocities.com/e2davies/brides.html. Although it is the English customs I believe that the bride would wear the most expensive dress she (her family) could afford. (some things never change) "It is a tradition for Spanish brides to carry orange blossoms in their bouquet. The significance of this dates back to medieval times. According to Georgina O'Hara, in her book The Bride's Book: A Celebration of Weddings (Michael Joseph Ltd., London, 1991), "The inclusion of orange blossom in the bridal wreath or as part of a bouquet dates back to the Saracens, according to some sources. It came to Europe with the returning Crusaders who are believed to have witnessed the custom of a bride wearing a garland - a symbol of maidenhood - of orange blossom on her hair. Orange blossom stands for chastity and purity and, because the orange blossom tree is an evergreen, it also stands for everlasting love.""from: http://www.weddingbells.com/yqa/ethnictraditions.html Some other links that may be of interest: Ethnic Wedding Customs http://members.aol.com/Mjkarl/ethnic.htm Marriage during the Middle Ages http://www.medieval-weddings.net/ Seraphina Edited by Mark S. Harris weddings-msg Page 61 of 62