East-hist-msg – 11/16/13 Histories of the East Kingdom in the SCA. NOTE: See also the files: SCA-hist1-msg, SCA-stories1-msg, placenames-msg, vanity-plates-msg, you-know-msg, border-stories-msg, AEthel-hist-msg. ************************************************************************ NOTICE - This file is a collection of various messages having a common theme that I have collected from my reading of the various computer networks. Some messages date back to 1989, some may be as recent as yesterday. This file is part of a collection of files called Stefan's Florilegium. These files are available on the Internet at: http://www.florilegium.org I have done a limited amount of editing. Messages having to do with separate topics were sometimes split into different files and sometimes extraneous information was removed. For instance, the message IDs were removed to save space and remove clutter. The comments made in these messages are not necessarily my viewpoints. I make no claims as to the accuracy of the information given by the individual authors. Please respect the time and efforts of those who have written these messages. The copyright status of these messages is unclear at this time. If information is published from these messages, please give credit to the originator(s). Thank you, Mark S. Harris AKA: THLord Stefan li Rous Stefan at florilegium.org ************************************************************************ The East never recovers from anything. Each new Great Screaming Control Issue just moves the others further backward in the baggage train. -- -- Jadwiga Zajaczkowa, Knowledge Pika From: salley at niktow.canisius.edu (David Salley) Newsgroups: rec.org.sca Subject: Re: Gay Consort. Date: 28 Jul 94 21:43:53 GMT Organization: Canisius College, Buffalo NY. 14208 Kenit McGregor > Say a gentleman wins the crown tourney (if your local group goes for them) > and instead of wanting a lady to sit with him as King/Queen, he wishes for a > male friend to sit with him. (please no joke about King/Queen, grin). It's been tried. First of all, you have to declare who you're fighting for _before_ you fight in the Crown or Coronet Tourney. When this occurred during the reign of Prince Yngvar, here in AEthelmearc, Yngvar publicly told him, "If it's okay with the BoD, it's okay with me." It was NOT okay with the BoD. To quote the response, "One biological male, one biological female, we don't care who fights for who." Which also takes care of your second question. - Dagonell SCA Persona : Lord Dagonell Collingwood of Emerald Lake, CSC, CK, CTr Habitat : East Kingdom, AEthelmearc Principality, Rhydderich Hael Barony Internet : salley at niktow.cs.canisius.edu USnail-net : David P. Salley, 136 Shepard Street, Buffalo, New York 14212-2029 Newsgroups: rec.org.sca From: fridrikr at world.std.com (tom irelanddelfs) Subject: Re: guatemala Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA Date: Sat, 30 Jul 1994 12:32:58 GMT ALBAN at delphi.COM writes: >Peter G. Rose | Azelin, of Wishford Hall asks: >>Just out of curiosity, who or what is the Captain- >>general of Guatamala, and what's he/she/it doing >>at the bottom of the EOP? >Well, son, many, many years ago, far away in the >mists of memory of our forefathers, yea, verily, >further than the memories of man runneth to the >contrary....er, ah, well, about 15 years ago, there >was a MidRealm Crown Tourney. One of the entrants >(I believe it was Naitan? Nathan? My spelling has >gone downhill with my memory...) had very recently >gotten back to the States from an extended tour of >duty with a certain military group in Guatemala (in >other words, damned if I can remember which >group). Crown Tourney, the day he entered, was >particularly hot and humid, to the point where a lot >of the fighters were panting, sweating, and >generally suffering. A couple even had to drop out >of the tourney from heat prostration (not actually >"drop", but it did come close...) Our hero, Nathan, >having survived that type of weather for the >previous year or two, thought it was wonderful; he >had no trouble staying in, and in fact enjoyed the >temps and humidity so much he actually *won*. >During the course of his princedom, and later his >kingship, he, ummm, suffered? enjoyed? lots of >shtick about why he'd won. This is why, to this day, >the MidRealm claims Guatemala as its own, and >why there are occasional references to the Road to >Guatemala. I believe Nathan is also the C-G of >Guatemala for this reason. >alban, who thinks there should be a book of sca- >related stories such as these. we need to get our >*own* history back. anyone wanna hear why the >people in the barony of three rivers used to toast, >at every feast, "to the queen's moustache"? Oh, Alban, you were told BAD information. In the East, also many years ago (16? I know I was there!) there lived one Algernon Hartesmond, seneschal of Concordia, defender of the faith, slayer of the evil James the Usurper - but that's another story - and, after a bit, Peace Corp volunteer in, guess where, yep you got it. Anyway, upon his imminent departure the Crown awarded him the title you have so neatly lifted for Nathan. It still appears at the end of the EK Precedence March - so there's a fossilized artifact for you. And you can ask him (Algernon) himself. FRIDRIKR From: steffan at world.std.COM (Steven H Mesnick) Newsgroups: rec.org.sca Subject: Capt.-Gen. of Guatemala Date: 31 Jul 1994 23:37:51 -0400 This comes up up regularly. Maybe we need an FAQ on it %^) .... Azelin asks what the Captaincy-General of Guatemala is. This is traditionally the very last entry on the Eastern Order of Precedence. Baron (then Lord) Algernon Hartesmond was a well-known Easterner. He was the founder of Concordia-of-the-Snows (Albany, NY), a Hordesman, and a bard of note. And then he disappeared, having joined a mundane order called the Peace Corps and gone on a mission far to the South, to a place called Nicaragua. One day, he returned, and appeared at the Court of the King of the East, the renowned Gyrth Oldcastle. Gyrth was pleased to see his friend and subject, and asked him where he had been, and on what business. Algernon told him he had been far to the South, in lands claimed by none of the Laurel kings (of which there were but five at the time). Now, Gyrth was (and is) a most wise and learned man, and he knew that these lands had of old been claimed by the King of Spain, who had placed them under a viceroy, styled the Captain-General of Guatemala (for such was the whole land known in those days, which is now many sovereign nations). And he knew that the office had been in abeyance for many long years. He therefore determined to assert his claim to the lands his subject had explored, and called the Captaincy-General out of abeyance in his own right, naming Algernon to that office. Algernon resigned the office at the coronation of Siegfried I of glorious memory, but the office remains in the gift of the Eastern crown -- the claims of the Outlands to all lands south of Ansteorra notwithstanding. (Sounds to me like a good excuse for a war....). Baron Algernon Hartesmond has not been seen in the Knowne Worlde for many years, but the rune of his philosopher's engine is thus: dryfoo at athena.mit.edu . Steffan ap Cennydd Sometime Royal Eastern Historian From: Kim.Salazar%em at mailgw.er.doe.GOV Newsgroups: rec.org.sca Subject: Re: SCAthian authors/artists Date: 29 Aug 1994 15:43:54 -0400 Rumor from the past: The Hagar the Horrible's artist was rumored to be SCA-literate after a series of strips circa 1978, which contained a Knight of Incredible Size and Prowess, who just happened to be sporting the arms (if the rumor is to be believed) of the immortal Sir Paul of Bellatrix. Other rumored SCA-friends (and probably members) of the time: The brothers Hildebrandt, illustrators of SF/fantasy fame. I believe they did the art for the original Sword of Shinerra (sp). At the time many gentles swore that those illustrations contained familiar faces. And finally: If the C.S. Friedman, active SF/fantasy writer, is indeed the same Celia S. Friedman I roomed with at college (highly likely!), she was known as Lady Adrienne of Huntington. Along with Lady Ariel she co-founded Fenmere, (Brandeis University group circa 1974-1979). She also fenced for the college team, and was of the early popularizers of fencing in the East. Kim Brody Salazar/Ianthe d'Averoigne, OR, OL Forever a Carolingian salazark%em at mailgw.er.doe.gov From: folo at prairienet.org (F.L. Watkins) Newsgroups: rec.org.sca Subject: Re: newcomer querys Date: 26 Sep 1994 22:38:30 GMT Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana Back in the reign of Finnvarr and Caellyn, the curia set out 500 as the beginning date. It was never set into law and has, for the most part, been neglected. I still think it's a good idea. Yrs, Folo -- Damin de Folo - F.L.Watkins - folo at prairienet.org Baron Wurm Wald (MidRealm) - Commander Baldwin's (NWTA) From: Neil Maclay Newsgroups: rec.org.sca Subject: Re: History of SCA fighting Date: 18 Nov 1994 17:43:21 GMT Organization: Planning Systems, Inc. (PSI) In article <1994Nov17.155159.37047 at taurus.bsuvc.bsu.edu> Shop Smart...Shop S-Mart!, 00pfpogue at bsuvc.bsu.edu writes: > I'd like to hear, through posts or email, what opinions all of you on the > bridge have on this subject, whether the persons named be Society-wide > phenomenons or Kingdom legends. All I ask is that you generall believe that > this person had something of an influence on the way your entire kingdom or the > Society itself fought. I'm hoping to gain at least a general idea of how our > unique martial art came to evolve over the years. > In the East Kingdom I believe that Mistress Morgan Allandris (SP?) was important in the early development of organized group tactics. Also in the East Sir Sigfried von Holstearn is famous as an individual fighter and as a leader. In Atlantia Sir Gyrth Oldcastle developed a distinct sword and shield style that has proven to be very successful in tournament fighting over the years. He has also written a small book describing his style. Does anyone know if this book is still available and how to get it? If so please post. Also in Atlantia, Sir Strykar, Sir Baschamp Paul, and Sir Steffan of Wolfshaven developed the "three stooges style" of fighting. This style includes a highly developed style of two sword and of greatsword fighting emphasizing footwork and circularity of movement. These elements also dominate the "stoogic" styles of sword and shield. I would consider Sir Gyrth and Sir Strykar the two main theorists of fighting in Atlantia though their are many others who teach fighters to fight well. Master Malcolm MacMalcolm, Marshal mka Neil Maclay Barony of Storvic - Atlantia mka Wash. D.C. area Newsgroups: rec.org.sca From: v081lu33 at ubvms.cc.buffalo.edu (TRISTAN CLAIR DE LUNE/KEN MONDSCHEIN) Subject: Re: History of SCA fighting Organization: University at Buffalo Date: Fri, 18 Nov 1994 22:58:37 GMT Morgan Elandris (AKA Our Lady Saint Morgan Elandris, but if you tell her I said that she'll rip my head off) was instrumental in teaching the East how to fight as a unit, especially the Rhydderich Hael barony. She also trained a whole slew of knights, including a Duke or two (Hanno, for one...) She's also in the real-life military, has horses, and does all sorts of cool stuff. And makes nice cloaks. I think I'll make her a Peer once I win Crown :) --Tristan From: David Schroeder Newsgroups: rec.org.sca Subject: Re: SCA Authors Date: Tue, 13 Dec 1994 21:36:27 -0500 Organization: Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA Margaret Fraser, author of the Sister Frevisse mysteries, (The Novice's Tale, the Outlaw's Tale, her new book, The Bishop's Tale, et cetera) is a pseudonym for Mary Monica Pulver and a co-author whose name I always forget (help me out Nordskogen folks!). And the brothers Hildebrandt attended the coronation of Gyrth and Melisande in the ancient days of the East (I was site autocrat). I'm not sure if they came to any other events, though. My best -- Bertram From: zkessin at ppp3253.wing.net (Zach) Newsgroups: rec.org.sca Subject: Re: Odin Akbar Date: 30 Dec 1994 10:26:22 GMT Organization: Wilder Internet Gateway, Boston, MA Akbar was also the an early King of the East. He bears the distiction of being one of the few (if not the only one) to have been prince while his biological father was king. (And Vice versa) Guiliam Collector of odd Trivia From: salley at niktow.canisius.edu (David Salley) Newsgroups: rec.org.sca Subject: Re: A historical perspective... Summary: Myrkfaellin Date: 23 Apr 95 19:04:34 GMT Organization: Canisius College, Buffalo NY. 14208 [Hal posting from Dorothy's account....] writes: > FROM THE SCA, INC.: > (from _The Page_, September AS IX) > At the July meeting, actions included the passing of the above; > confirmation of Richard of Alsace as Seneschal of the Middle Kingdom; > a provision that a member of the Order of the Laurel may petition to > receive a Pelican in its stead, should he so desire; note taken that > T.I. #28 was ready to be mailed; and the acceptance of new branch, to > be called Myrkfaellin (in which Kingdom they don't say). The Dominion of Myrkfaellin is within the Kingdom of the East, Principality of AEthelmearc. Note that I say `within', not `part of'. It was Myrkfaellin that caused the BoD to re-write a lot of their New Group Procedures. The petition was written in authentic Old Icelandic. One of their members earned his doctorate in Old Icelandic studies. No translation was provided. The document stated they were in fealty to King Osborne(?) of the East, not to the King of the East in general, just Osborne! When he stepped down, the Dominion proclaimed that they were NOT in fealty to anyone, they were analogous to the Vatican City in Italy, they were surrounded by, but NOT a part of the East Kingdom. Events in Myrkfaellin do tend to be `interesting' ;-) ;-) If you're not from the Dominion, your feast token is a passport. If the King wants to come, he has to negotiate as if visiting a foreign power. I'm sure Purple will fill in details I missed. - Dagonell (who was once given the Queen of the East as a present by John the Pell while in Myrkfaellin ;-) SCA Persona : Lord Dagonell Collingwood of Emerald Lake, CSC, CK, CTr Habitat : East Kingdom, AEthelmearc Principality, Rhydderich Hael Barony Internet : salley at cs.canisius.edu (Please use this, reply may not work.) USnail-net : David P. Salley, 136 Shepard Street, Buffalo, New York 14212-2029 Newsgroups: rec.org.sca From: fridrikr at world.std.com (Thomas W Delfs) Subject: Re: Longest-active SCA members Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA Date: Mon, 12 Jun 1995 22:19:44 GMT djheydt at uclink.berkeley.edu (Dorothy J Heydt) writes: >In article <1995Jun12.122422 at blah.bsuvc.bsu.edu>, >The Morgenstern Under the Mountain wrote: >> >>...Who, as far as anyone knows, is the longest-running member of >>the SCA? .... Are any of the attendees of the original >>event of May, 1966, still active at all in the SCA? >These are all in the West Kingdom. >I still see Mistress Elfreida of Greenwalls (Marion Zimmer Bradley) >fairly often, but she doesn't do SCA any more. But she still lives >in Berkeley. >Any Dinosaurs still active in other Kingdoms? >Dorothea of Caer-Myrddin Dorothy J. Heydt >Mists/Mists/West UC Berkeley >Argent, a cross forme'e sable djheydt at uclink.berkeley.edu I suspect that at 19+ years, both Baroness Daedra MacBeth a Gryphon and I rank as "very ancient newbies" of the East. Count Sir Jehan de la Marche and Sir Garanhir of Ness are still active in AEthelmearc, and Duke Asbjorn has been known to show at practices and events in Sterlyng Vayle (Binghamton, NY) from time to time. FRIDRIKR From: aa101159 at dasher.csd.scarolina.edu (Virginia Gray) Newsgroups: rec.org.sca Subject: Re: Longest-active SCA members Date: 13 Jun 1995 16:47:17 GMT Organization: Univ. of South Carolina, Columbia Let's not forget Sir Trude (or is it Trudy?), who's first event was A.S.I anniversary. I know she lives in East kingdom, but I'm not sure exactly where. I met her at an Atlantian event a couple weekends ago. Ldy Rachel Wallace Newsgroups: rec.org.sca Subject: Re: Longest-active SCA members From: una at bregeuf.stonemarche.org (Honour Horne-Jaruk) Date: Wed, 14 Jun 95 09:11:25 EDT fridrikr at world.std.com (Thomas W Delfs) writes: > I suspect that at 19+ years, both Baroness Daedra MacBeth a Gryphon and I > rank as "very ancient newbies" of the East. Count Sir Jehan de la Marche > and Sir Garanhir of Ness are still active in AEthelmearc, and Duke > Asbjorn has been known to show at practices and events in Sterlyng Vayle > (Binghamton, NY) from time to time. > > FRIDRIKR Respected friend: Hiya, kid! I celebrated my 21st SCA anniversary last december 27th- and I _think_ Jarl Aelfwine has me beat. The East used to have "Sabre-tooth Tygers"... people who were active here before the first king of the East was crowned. Marion of Edwinstowe _might_ be one. Yours in service to the Society- (Friend) Honour Horne-Jaruk R.S.F. Alizaunde, Demoiselle de Bregeuf C.O.L. SCA Una Wicca (That Pict) From: salley at niktow.canisius.edu (David Salley) Newsgroups: rec.org.sca Subject: Re: The Status of Myrkfaelen, is it really ruled by Aethelmarc? Date: 23 Jun 95 12:46:29 GMT Organization: Canisius College, Buffalo NY. 14208 Viscount Edward Zifran of Gendy, KSCA, OL, OP, ETC (E. F. MORRILL) writes: > (Bryan Maloney) writes: > {previous remarks deleted} >>Myrkfaelen is most certainly NOT part of the Principality of Aethelmarc, nor >>is it in any way part of the East Kingdom. Myrkfaelen is an Independent >>Dominion, holding alliegence to no Crown, nor King, nor Prince. > Allow me to suggest, that if that is true, Then why is it it seems, that > no-one in Mykfaelan seems to turn down an East Kingdom award, if one is > offered? The reality is that Mykfaelan "Is"part of the East. Are you kidding? It took six men to carry John the Pell into court and force him to his knees in front of the king to be made a member of the Chivalry. And that was _after_ he had turned it down FOUR times! And he still chose Master rather than swear fealty. - Dagonell SCA Persona : Lord Dagonell Collingwood of Emerald Lake, CSC, CK, CTr Habitat : East Kingdom, AEthelmearc Principality, Rhydderich Hael Barony Internet : salley at cs.canisius.edu (Please use this, reply may not work.) USnail-net : David P. Salley, 136 Shepard Street, Buffalo, New York 14212-2029 From: mittle at panix.com (Josh Mittleman) Newsgroups: rec.org.sca Subject: Re: The Status of Myrkfaelen, is it really ruled by Aethelmarc? Date: 23 Jun 1995 11:21:39 -0400 Organization: PANIX Public Access Internet and Unix, NYC Greetings from Arval! Orlando Alvarez wrote: > In an earlier post, Supillilumous forgot to mention that John the Pell > turned down a Court Barony (in the same event that Sup.. turned down his > OTC) for similar reasons. I was court herald at that court, and I would swear that it was an AoA that Sup. refused. Cariadoc quoted someone (sorry, I missed the name), talking about the Myrkfaelinn charter: > I would think then that you might remind those folks that the Charter > also says, in one form or another, that they shall hold those lands > until, and only until the Crown that granted it shall arise again. No, I'm afraid that's just local interpretation of the charter. All the charter actually said was that Myrkfaelinn swore allegiance to the king, Asbjorn, rather than to the kingdom. Dagonell wrote: : Are you kidding? It took six men to carry John the Pell into court and : force him to his knees in front of the king to be made a member of the : Chivalry. And that was _after_ he had turned it down FOUR times! I'm pretty certain, Dagonell, that legend has been inflating this story. I don't think it was four times. It might have been once. But he was certainly carried bodily into court, and not for the first time. Arval. From: mittle at panix.com (Josh Mittleman) Newsgroups: rec.org.sca Subject: Re: Resignations & procedures Date: 2 Aug 1995 15:56:56 -0400 Organization: PANIX Public Access Internet and Unix, NYC Greetings from Arval! Mikjal wrote: > Unfortunately, the Board has a rather shaky record WRT to dealing with > the "Society" side of things. Matters that *should* be dealt with in a > limited, localized fashion seem to inevitably lead to intrusive, > Society-wide restrictions, regulations, and prohibitions, affecting large > numbers of participants completely unrelated with the original > incident. ... While I recognize the desireability of having a "court of > last resort" similar to the U.S. Supreme Court, that "court" should also > be able (and willing) to say to the involved parties "Not within our > scope or jurisdiction - case returned to lower court for decision". To be honest, the Board does that in many cases. Not often enough, but it does. One problem is that the Board, by its own policy, prefers to deal with "issues" rather than specific problems. The unfortunate result of this apparently-admirable policy is that when a director encounters a problem that he feels _needs_ Board action, he has to cast it as a general issue, formulate a general solution, and apply that solution globally, even if the problem is isolated and specific. I call this problem "using a sledge hammer where a jeweler's mallet will do." When Sedalia was EK seneschal, she was particularly guilty of this error. For example, early in her tenure she was faced with a problem with a local seneschal. She felt that the seneschal really needed to be removed from office, for a variety of reasons. But she felt that she could not simply remove him; she needed a Policy. So she instituted a kingdom-wide term limit on local seneschals, with complicated procedures for applying for a waiver. Every branch in the kingdom had to deal with the fallout from a problem in a single shire. A second, and more fundamental problem, is that the SCA's structure, by its nature and by statute, does not allow _anyone_ except the Board to make a binding decision. Corpora tells us that _any_ decision can be appealed all the way to the Board. And so, of course, people appeal. This has two negative effects. First, simple local problems are escalated to the national level when they ought to be handled closer to home. Second, officers can act recklessly without having to worry about taking responsibility for their actions; they can always blame someone else for not making use of the appeal proccess. Arval Newsgroups: rec.org.sca From: levey at netcom.com (Don Levey) Subject: Re: Worst Garb or Armor???? Organization: NETCOM On-line Communication Services (408 261-4700 guest) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 1995 15:34:54 GMT In article <3v81tf$e3 at newsbf02.news.aol.com>, IMAsgard wrote: > > A collection of the worst armor in the Known world can be seen in >Trimaris, in the possession of Duke Erin. That is to say, he is the >curator of the museum of "horrible helms". This collection was started ---snip--- > > HRH Baldar/A. Cooley Nothing (in my mind, at least) would compare to the official "Great Helm of Carolingia." This helm has an ancient and venerable history, most of which I am sure to get wrong (but that's the fun with legends, isn't it?). Seems in the early days of the East, when there were but two groups (Ostgardr and Carolingia), some folks from Carolingia wanted to go to a real tournament. Now, they had heard about this fighting stuff, and with great eagerness prepared for the long trip down to NY from Boston. Since they had heard that the fighters hit each other with something bamboo-like, they did a bit of practicing and also made armor. The crowning piece, if you will, was the afforementioned helm: lovingly crafted from state-of-the-art fibreglass at MIT. Then it was padded with open-cell foam, and brought to NY for the tourney. The Marshal in charge looked at this thing, and decided that perhaps it was not safe. After all, fibreglass is likely to crack, isn't it? He therefore put said helm on the ground and gave it a good whack with his rataan. Sproing!! as it flew away. It was retrieved, and whacked again. Sproing!! as it flew once again. And lo, it did not crack, for he did not count on the skill of the Mitgaard craftsman. With a shrug, he passed it, but seeing the sort of abuse both the helm and head inside it would need to take, the wearer exercised the better part of valor and chose instead to watch the tournament. I'm sure that there are corrections to be made here. However, the helm itself (which I have seen and indeed worn) would deserve a place in such a museum. What it lack in aesthetic offensiveness is more than made up by the concept. -Don Newsgroups: rec.org.sca Subject: Re: Cloved Fruit From: una at bregeuf.stonemarche.org (Honour Horne-Jaruk) Date: Thu, 14 Dec 95 10:18:11 EST gl8f at fermi.clas.Virginia.EDU (Greg Lindahl) writes: > Mary Spila wrote: > >Could/would someone PLEASE give me a brief history of how the game of passin > >cloved fruit was introduced to the SCA. I am doing a brief class on the gam > >(emphasizing "Don't be a jerk") and would like some more information than wh > >I already know. > > I've never heard anyone claim that they knew the origin of this game, > other than vague rumblings that it originated 15+ years ago in > Carolingia. It does seem to have died out in Atlantia. There was one > attempt to revive it last weekend, but I don't think it was very well > received. And my lady threw out this lovely pomander that the queen > herself gave me, the nerve! > > Gregory Blount Respected friend: I know the origins. It was invented out of whole cloth. I did it.* I'm sorry. (check out the Feb. issue of Re-creating History magazine for an article on more authentic kissing games.) }:-> By the way, it started in Canton of the Towers, which is a canton of, but is two days older than, Carolingia. Sigh... *(Lisa Goldenstar helped.) Honour, known societally as Alizaunde, Demoiselle de Bregeuf; or Una Wicca (That Pict) From: djl at telerama.lm.com (Don Luby) Newsgroups: rec.org.sca Subject: Re: Pennsic War Points Date: 13 Mar 1996 12:39:29 -0500 Organization: Telerama Public Access Internet, Pittsburgh, PA DAVID RAZLER (david.razler at compudata.com) wrote: > Seriously, I question the need and the desirability to allow any > area to succeed from the East. If you lived in AEthelmearc, you'd understand why there has been a need, for some years now, for us to go our own way, separate from the East. It's unfortunate that some gentles in the remainder of the East wish us to stay, but it's well past the point of happy reconciliation. > We have lost much of our land already, > and the establishment of a couple of additional principalities to cover > the entire kingdom should ease these insane quests to chop apart our > tradition. Here's fallacy: there is no one singular 'Eastern tradition', especially in the places that have (or want to) go kingdom. There may be a 'core' Eastern tradition in the areas in a direct line from Bhakail to Ostgardr to almost-Carolingia (who have their own traditions, which pre-date the East's), but even along there there is much variation, the farther you get from Otsgardr. This is largely because when there groups got started, they played their own way because they were so far away from the center of the kingdom that they *had* to do that to survive, even if they amalgamated bits of core Eastern tradition later when they got more active on a kingdom-wide scale. As an example (based on a conversation had a post-revel after Ice Dragon this past weekend): When most of the 'founding fathers of AEthelmearc' joined the SCA, ~20 years ago, there was a total of one knight in all of what is now AEthelmearc (and he moved out of kingdom shortly thereafer), let alone peers of any other kind. Travel time to the 'central East' (Ostgardr, Bhakail, Carolingia) was 8+ hrs by car, and so there was little direct contact between the groups, except by various brave individuals. Once there were a few chivalry (and royal peers), this opened up more, but there was a strong local idea of what the SCA was like, independent of core Eastern tradition, and since that was what was believed by the (then-) old-timers, that's what the newbies were brought up to believe as well. So what you have is 5 - 10 SCA generations' worth of AEthelmearc tradition, which is stronger in AEthelmearc than core Eastern tradition, and is a main reason why we want / need to have our own kingdom ("We are our own nationality; we deserve our own nation" - Benj. Franklin). > The East has lost far too much of its populace and land over the years. And it's happening to every other large (geographical) kingdom in the known world: Lochac is next in line (I think) after AEthelmearc, especially due to geographic distances; the Middle will lose Ealdormere and possibly Northshield after that; and Atenvelt may lose Artemesia. Not to mention all of the proto-principailty movements all over the known world. BTW, except for Drachenwald, which had been waiting since its inception to go kingdom, and went as soon as they had the native population and total numbers, the East has only ever 'lost' Atlantia, and that was 15 yrs ago! > I can see it now, first AEthelmearch, then Carolingia, etc. > until the East consists entirely of the current Wetlands Confederation. Actually, from what I've been led to believe, if the Northern Region principality movement ever gets off the ground, and does go kingdom, the East will then consist of the Phila - NYC - Hudson Valley corridor, with some bits off to the side in both diretions (Delaware, eastern PA, NJ, eastern upstate NY, Connecticut). While that's a far cry from what the size of the East used to be (or will used have been), you're still talking about the most densely populated part of the country, and it will still have a population to rival any kingdom in the known world. > Of course, if we would do away with the current method of selecting our > royalty, it might reduce the desire of those who want their own king (or > mainly, to *be* king), etc. to divide the land. AEthelmearc's desire for freedom has little to do with this, it has largely due to the fact the East is too big, and being out on the relative fringes, we feel the effects from it even more. And even then, it'll still be a problem for both of us: Now, from Port Oasis to Ruantallan is a ~35 hr drive; afterwards, Port Oasis to Coppertree will still be 15+ hours, and Blak Rose to Ruanatallan will still be 20+ hours. > In Service to the East and crying Death! to its enemies > both internal and external, > Aleksandr the Traveller > [david.razler at compudata.com] > A "Free" AEthelmearc be Damned Cardon ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Don Luby Magariki Katsuichi no Koredono djl at telerama.lm.com CSC, CM, CTC http://www.lm.com/~djl/home.html Yama-kaminari-ryu Pittsburgh, PA Cour d'Or, Debatable Lands, AEthelmearc, East From: Tom Courtney Newsgroups: rec.org.sca Subject: Re: Kingdom Annexation! Date: Sat, 31 Aug 1996 17:55:09 +0000 Organization: Living Paper Morgoth wrote: > What keeps Baronies from moving over to another Principality or Kingdom? Only the will of the residents. It happens occasionally. Myrkwood moved from the East to Atlantia, where it eventually became Lochmere (I'm abreviating a lot of history here.) Tom Courtney aka Vissevald Selkirksson From: greycat at tribeca.ios.com (Greycat Sharpclaw) Newsgroups: rec.org.sca Subject: Re: Kingdom Annexation! Date: Sun, 01 Sep 1996 00:42:53 GMT Emrys sends greetings onto all upon this bridge: There is an allegation that Morgoth wrote: >What is to keep a person from winning more than one crown tourney, one in >say AnTir and another in the West, and then to combine the Two Crown, how >far could he/she do it, and what keeps it from happening? and Why not? Well, don't most kingdoms have residency requirements for their monarchs? Of course, moving after crown complicates things. Also, in the East, the law would forbid a King/Queen or Crown Prince/Princess from entering crown. Do other Kingdoms have a similar law? Of course, there _was_ the incident that helped make the law. King Michael of Bedford (of the East) entered then-principality's Atlantia's first crown tourney, and won. About a month after he crowned Sigfried as his successor in the East, Sigfried crowned him to make Atlantia independent. Lord Emrys Cador David M. Mann Barony of Settmour Swamp greycat at tribeca.ios.com Eastrealm From: greycat at tribeca.ios.com (Greycat Sharpclaw) Newsgroups: rec.org.sca Subject: Re: Bad Crowns Date: Sat, 07 Dec 1996 04:03:59 GMT Organization: IDT robnbrwn at gnn.com (Robin Brown) wrote: >In article <588b44$bjd at nnrp4.farm.idt.net> Greycat Sharpclaw wrote: >>It does require all participants to preregister for the tourney (by >>submitting "letters of intent"), thus a king can bounce an >>unacceptable fighter before hand, under various provisions. >What kind of provisions? I mean, obviously, one must be in compliance with >membership and similar rules, but are the other provisions for exclusion >written or merely traditional? >Robin Well, as I said in my origional post, I know of no case that this was done. I do not know that it has occured, but that may only mean that (1) it is uncommon, and (2) was never widely pubically debated. It is written that the contestants must "be acceptable to the crown". But usually this clause is used by the crown to add requirements for eligibility *beforehand*, beyond those in copora and kingdom law. A specific rejection of an individual would, as I judge the attitudes of my fellow Easterners, be seen as an extreme action requiring an extreme reason. Any one who has personal knowledge of such a rejection is encouraged to jump in here. .. BTW... there is an old incident in the East where a fighter was removed during a crown, and replaced in the list. The replacement won the tourney. There is much Eastern history based on the resulting controversy, but as I have only stories to go on, I'll not risk repeating any errors here. But a key point is that this occured *during* the tourney... it is not a precident (in the East or elsewhere) for nullifying the result, nor for rejecting a contender. And there was a crown nullified when the winner was found to not be legal under the rules. But again, this is a case totally unlike Atenveldt's current one. .. But there was a case of a territorial prince being removed in the East... naturally that one ended up before the BoD shortly thereafter. (The king ruled that the Prince had tried to rig Coronet, and *demanded* abdication, under threat of repeating the demand in open court.) The BoD - finding the rules on the subject vague - backed the king's right to make his own interpretation of the (vague) rules. This *may* serve as precident for the Atenveldt case. I stress "may" - if the rules here are more precise, there is less room for free interpretation by the crown. Lord Emrys Cador David M. Mann Barony of Settmour Swamp greycat at tribeca.ios.com Eastrealm From: dickeney at access1.digex.net (Dick Eney) Newsgroups: rec.org.sca Subject: Re: "Indestructable" shields Date: 24 Jan 1997 12:40:06 -0500 Organization: Express Access Online Communications, Greenbelt, MD USA Bryan J. Maloney wrote: >timbeck at ix.netcom.com(Tim Beck) wrote: > >> coat of gesso. All in all SCA shields work a lot like the historical >> ones. There are refernces to tourney shields that were built to fall > >Ah, but are they struck full-force with sharp, steel weapons? How to >simulate the effects of real weapons upon shields when the weapons used >are rattan and some even padded? Tamar the Gypsy (sharing account dickeney at access.digex.net) here writes: In the early years of the East Kingdom, a fighter who had really good shield work caught all his opponents' blows on the same place on the edge of his round shield; halfway through the tourney, the rattan blows had "dented" the plywood all the way to the handgrip. This being the early years, the fighter reversed his grip and held the shield the other way around. By the end of the tourney, the same had happened again, and the shield had been cut in two by repeated blows of rattan. Since then, edge strengthening has been an important part of constructing a shield. =Tamar the Gypsy (sharing account dickeney at access.digex.net) Date: Sat, 12 Dec 1998 21:22:06 -0500 From: Philip & Susan Troy Subject: SC - OT - Crown Province > and I keep reading Adamantius' signature to declare him crown >prince of Ostgardr. > >Rhiannon Cathaoir-mor >South Downs, Meridies Okay, here's the deal. I don't live in a Barony, I live in a Province, specifically a Crown Province. For practical purposes, in the SCA a landed Baron is given the land as his fiefdom, to hold for the Crown. A Crown Province is the Crown's land, held by the Crown, and a representative of the Crown rules. Instead of having a Baron and Baroness, we have a Viceroy and Vicereine. In theory, we're sorta kinda the capital of the East Kingdom, and its oldest group. Once upon a time, we _were_ the East. In practice, now, we're pretty much like any other barony. Maybe someone who actually has been a Prince(ss) or other monarch-y type can provide corrections or additional info. Adamantius A Resident of the Crown _Province_ of Østgardr, in the East Kingdom Subject: ANST - Fw: [MercInn] Home groujps and fighting for pay. Date: Wed, 14 Apr 99 06:56:02 MST From: "Cody Chezem" To: ----- Original Message ----- From: Blackburn, Eric To: Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 1999 9:21 AM Subject: [MercInn] Home groujps and fighting for pay. > The Mountain Confederation was formed by a number of fighters in central > Pennsylvania when these people were completely ignored by the people on the > east coast where most activity was, in those days. (This was before I > joined). As the crowned heads of the East Kingdom decided that the > inhabitants of Nithgard, Abian Ciac Glas (forigve the spelling) and other > groups were not worthy of notice, the founders of Confed decided to return > the favor. They sent the word: "You want us to fight for you, you pay us." > > The word came back, "Fat chance." > > Things changed after the first few battles. Then the East started making > offers. Some years have been good, with lots of beer, ice, firewood and > baubles. Other years have been bad, with offers which were insulting. Some > kings refused to hire mercenaries from their own kingdom. > > And awards were fewer, recognition faint, scorn great. When I received my > invitation to join Confed, it was phrased as "Do you want to give up any > chance for advancement in the SCA?" to which I replied 'Hell yes!" > > Some years ago, however, Prince Lucan of AEthelmearc gave us our official > charter, recognizing us as a free household who owed fealty only to honor. > He also made us a, well, "princely" offer to fight for him in the field > battle at Pennsic. He wasn't disappointed. > > Now AEthelmearc is a kingdom. And we are spread across several kingdoms, as > some of us have moved. > > We have no home group. I do fighter practice with Steltonwald, and > occasionally with the Debatable Lands. These fighters realize that we might > be on different sides in the next battle, and they tease me about it. I > return the favor. > Jebediah ap Hwyl of the Mountain Confederation Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2000 06:54:07 -0500 From: Philip & Susan Troy Subject: Re: SC - troll vs. gate Stefan li Rous wrote: > Ok, so do the East Kingdom laws use the word "troll" or "gate"? I think they use "troll". The justification, last time I saw this discussed, was that certain terms, among them being "autocrat" and "trollbooth", were mandated by Corpora (whether this is still the case, or ever was, I don't know) and while this was considered regrettable, it wasn't worth making a fuss over _that_ particular issue. Adamantius Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2001 14:54:23 -0400 From: Philip & Susan Troy Subject: Re: SC - Profit was Opinions? > Having been a Barony ourselves for nigh in 20 years we have experience > with what you are saying and have learnt quite a while ago that "talk" > doesnt pay the Piper. Solving this problem was quite easy....reserve > with payment. Period. Don't know about other Cantons but this has been > the norm here in Ealdormere for as long as I can remember. If in fact > this is what you qualify as "lean times" then we have slogged thru this > one, as Im sure every area has, a few times. I dont really see this as > the lean times but rather a unique setback that doesnt occur often. > > Micaylah I believe the Eastern Crown Tourney where the nearly universal tradition of "the only reservation is a paid reservation" was born was in A.S. IX. Adamantius Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2001 22:04:22 -0400 From: Philip & Susan Troy To: sca-cooks at ansteorra.org Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] Marzipan roses Seton1355 at aol.com wrote: > Wow!!! > >>Amalric Blackhart 07/89 >>Argent, goutty de sang, a stag rampant and a chief sable. 03/90 >>SCA: Count 4/1/2000 >>SCA: Knight, Order of Chivalry East 8/18/1994 >>East: Companion of the Tygers Combattant East 7/25/1992 >>SCA: Award of Arms East 5/13/1989 >>SCA: Augmentation of Arms 8/17/1997 >>Atlantia: Companion of the Shark's Tooth 4/5/1997 His Excellency is also the man who challenged me to a duel when I listed the wrong name instead of his own for contact info on a fighter practice in Ostgardr (I had already copiously apologized, both to him personally and in the newsletter), and when I agreed to meet him on the field in the spring, we found ourselves working together in the kitchen at 12th Night. I was busy removing the chine bones from 27 whole pork loins (simple: you hold them up in your left hand, and chop through the rib bones with your Chinese cleaver in your right, and the spinal bone structure falls off the piece of meat to the sound of your loudest roar of "TIIIIIIIIIMMBERRRR!!!"). His Excellency watched this for a bit, appeared to swallow a couple of times, walked over and said, apropos of nothing, that he hoped I knew he'd been joking about that fight we were supposed to have... I imagine he's mellowed some since then. Adamantius Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2002 13:25:53 -0500 To: sca-cooks at ansteorra.org From: Philip & Susan Troy Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] EK Cooks' Guild >Does anyone know how I can get in touch with the East Kingdom Cook's Guild, >if such a thing still exists? They have a registered badge, so they must >have existed at some point, but they're not listed on the EK website. > >Avraham The East Kingdom Cooks' Guild would have been active in around AS IX or X, or, rather, prior to. Their charter can be found somewhere in the Ostgardrian cooking pages at ostgardr.org, but it hasn't been active for a long time. The trouble is that the guild's organization, works pretty well when your population is a couple of hundred, but when it exceeds several thousand, its effectiveness wanes a bit. Looking at the charter now, some of its stated purpose, the ranking system, etc., seem kind of dated. What I would rather see installed is an ongoing Collegium with a group of cooks whose purpose is to be the culinary Triple-A, or, as Countess Brekke has been known to call them, "Have Knives, Will Travel". They could keep a database of worked-out recipes, etc. Ostgardr has, in the past, held well-attended Cook's Collegia, but sort of dropped the ball when other groups asked to host it (IMO the response should have been, "Sure, hold a Cook's Collegium, ours is in May,") and either mismanaged the events or simply never held them. Adamantius Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2003 21:35:26 -0400 From: "Carol Eskesen Smith" Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] Aten Policy: The only reservation is a PAID reservation. (long) To: "Cooks within the SCA" Ah, the memories this brings back... Manymany years ago I cooked a Twelfth Night feast in Bakhail, in the East Kingdom. One week before the feast, we had 90 "reservations", half of them paid. Over 200 people arrived at our door expecting to be fed. The Chief Troll did check with the head cook (me) at every 10 or 15 people, and I foolishly thought we could do it. Only 15 more? Ya, sure, we can do it. NOT! And I did this EVERY TIME! Can anyone say "brain dead"? This after an oven fire destroyed half our Pies of Parys the night before. We were doing roast lamb, in honor of our King (His Grace, Sir Cariadoc of the Bow), and had a 20-lb lamb in the oven. Let me tell you all, 20 lb of lamb doesn't go anywhere NEAR as far as 20 lb of roast pig! And although we made lots more sausage (much of it never saw casings), we didn't come close to feeding the starving hordes. At any rate, as head of the Kingdom Cooks Guild, I made it official policy that at any event involving the Guild, a phoned reservation wasn't worth the paper it was written on, and if the reservation didn't come complete with check, it wasn't a real reservation. By the time this got published in Pikestaff (the next issue), I was Crown Princess, so it had a LOT of weight behind it, and became kingdom policy for many years. It might be a good idea to re-institute it; we do well with it in Ostgardr, right, Master A? Regards, Brekke (older than dirt) From: "Phil Troy / G. Tacitus Adamantius" Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] food on St Val's day To: Cooks within the SCA Also sprach Linda Anderson: > I don't know the author pilloried earlier but enjoyed the idea that > no one could figure out how "That accent came from Brooklyn" as > priceless. Ah. Back in the old days, when the SCA was a couple of groups on the West Coast of the US and a group in New York City shortly thereafter, one of the first things an East Coast SCAdian cook did was go to the bookshop at the Metropolitan Museum of Art and get a copy of "Fabulous Feasts". Well-meaning friends would award copies for birthdays, Christmas gifts, etc., because when people found out about your weird hobby, that was the only book they could find on the subject. People began to use stacks of "Fabulous Feasts" to hold up the coffee table with the broken leg. Made a good doorstop... It actually has a fair amount of good information on medieval eating habits, but the adaptations of period recipes are pretty dreadful, probably because the author didn't (and still doesn't, I'm told) actually know how to cook, and saw no need, since she was not specifically catering to the needs of reenactors, _not_ to go for a rather fanciful approach, one which posits that a drab-looking dish can be brightened up with a bit of color, so dressing it up with some shredded red licorice whip candy is an excellent idea. Never mind that a period cook would have solved this problem, if a problem were in fact perceived, in a totally different way. There are also some recipes, allegedly, made up out of whole cloth, as it were, with no foundation in any extant period recipe. New York City SCAdians (such as myself, for example) have more reason than those above to find the lady fairly silly: for years she helped run the annual Cloisters Medieval Faire (at the Cloisters, the series of relocated and reconstructed medieval European monasteries now owned and run by The Metropolitan Museum of Art in uptown Manhattan). She made herself fairly unpleasant to SCAdians trying to do demos at that fair, doing things like cancelling parking privileges for SCAdians at the last minute, so people had to park their cars about a mile from the fighters' lists and lug their armor in and out. And then there was the time she cancelled the SCA's entire demo one year about fifteen minutes before it was scheduled to begin, and decided to read from Chaucer with E.G. Marshall instead. She used to hold medieval feasts for various organizations, and trained her servers, as well as the diners, with the little speech I paraphrased in my earlier post, about eating with the manifold extensions to the hands, thah finnngaaaaaahhhs. She ingratiated herself especially to my lady wife, who, while enrolled in a class on Chaucer at the City College of New York, was told by Professor Cosman that nobody without an English heritage (my wife is of Chinese ancestry) could fully appreciate the subtlety of Chaucer's language, so taking her class would be a waste of everyone's time... her own heritage consisting of birth into, and growing up in, a Polish-speaking Jewish community in Brooklyn, where her grandfather's name (originally something like Pielzcsnewsky, later changed by a clerk at Ellis Island) had become Pellner. Currently, I understand she's made a fortune selling medical practices, starting with that of her husband, when he passed away, and expanding this into a sort of brokerage. And she really does talk funny... Adamantius Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2004 21:47:00 -0500 From: Jadwiga Zajaczkowa / Jenne Heise Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] "Banned Foods" sortof still is: "Kingdom" National Dishes To: Cooks within the SCA >> But, as one of our Once and Future Dukes learned to his sorrow, if you >> peeve the cook, you won't get your steak and potato no matter how >> childishly you demand'em in your whims. > > Ooo, ooo, do tell... > > I am just interested as a matter history, of course. Not much to tell, really. The Royal Who Shall Remain Nameless To Protect The Guilty had requested steak and potatoes at every feast. The head cook worked at a restaurant, and had been hoarding (freezing and hoarding) steak tips for this feast, and ha baked some potatoes as well. However, the RWSHRNTPTG had 1) not sampled his savory toasted cheese, 2) paid no attention to the care lavished on the first course, and 3) been rude to the servers. The cook, tired and cross, declared that since the Royals didn't appreciate his cooking, they wouldn't get their steak and potatoes. The cleanup crew got the filet mignon tips instead. :) So, our battle cry became "How can you have your potatoes if you won't eat your Savory Toasted Cheese?" :) -- -- Jadwiga Zaaczkowa, Knowledge Pika jenne at fiedlerfamily.net Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2004 22:34:56 -0500 From: "Phil Troy / G. Tacitus Adamantius" Subject: Re:[Sca-cooks] Whey To: Cooks within the SCA Also sprach Martin G. Diehl: > (2) Also found in the Kingdom of the East, Crown Province > of Ostgardr -- Canton of Whyt Whey. Originally the Incipient Canton of the Grate Whyte Whey (thank you, Sir Edward Zifran -- would the good people of a proposed Brooklyn canton accept my suggestion of the name, Canton of Ebbet's Field? Nooooooewwwwww!!!). Once upon a time, it is rumored, the prevailing method of spelling the name "Østgarr" was translatable in two ways. Depending on which Scandinavian language you assumed it to come from, it meant either "Eastern Fortress" (or some such), or "Cheese Farm". We all got into the habit, when the aroma of political mendacity hit the air, of saying, "Leave us out of this: We're only simple cheese farmers..." The Canton of Whyt Whey is, of course, Manhattan Island. Adamantius Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 11:57:28 -0500 (GMT-05:00) From: Robin Carroll-Mann Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] Re: ATTN Jedwiga has PMS To: Cooks within the SCA From: iasmin at comcast.net > YAY! I hear tell that a vigil will be sat at an event called > "Mudthaw" (intriguing name, that) This March will see the 26th annual celebration of The Thawing of the Mud in the ancient and honorable Barony of Settmour Swamp. The "Swamp" part of our name comes from The Great Swamp, which is located in the heart of the Barony. http://www.njskylands.com/odswamp.htm Naturally, when Spring comes, we rejoice to see the mud of our homeland released from Winter's icy grip. Mudthaw is our biggest annual event, one of the first major tourneys of the season. (Sometimes the fighters battle on a muddy field, and sometimes they're up to their greaves in snow.) Mudthaw is usually a Royal Progress event, but TRM are unable to attend this year -- they have to preside over the birth of a barony at the other end of the Kingdom. > Iasmin Lady Brighid ni Chiarain Barony of Settmour Swamp, East Kingdom Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 11:36:54 -0400 From: "Phil Troy / G. Tacitus Adamantius" Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] Title of an ex-Viceroy To: Cooks within the SCA On May 23, 2006, at 11:05 AM, Karin Burgess wrote: > Q: What is a Viceroy/Vicereine? > A: According to the Oxford English Dictionary, a Viceroy or > Vicereine is "One who acts as the governor of a country, province, > etc. in the name and by the authority of the supreme ruler; a vice- > king." Originally, as the "Seat" of the East Kingdom, Ostgardr was > ruled directly by the Crown; for the past few decades it has been > ruled by a Viceroy and Vicereine as representatives of the Crown. > According to Kingdom law, the Viceroy and Vicereine of Ostgardr > outrank all other landed barons, regardless of their dates of > elevation, and indeed take precedence over all but royal peers. > Within the Crown Province (at least according to one knowledgeable > source), they take precedence over royal peers as well, except the > current King, Queen, Crown Prince, and Crown Princess. > (Summarized from information provided by Yosef ben Lazar, Seahorse > Pursuivant, and Master Ian, Viceroy of Ostgardr.) > > From :http://www.ostgardr.org > > So it seems it is a unique title. I guess someone could contact > the current Viceroy or Viceriene of Ostgardr, see what They will be > called :) I just got the Viceregal Answering Machine and left a message punctuated with much uncontrollable laughter. I'd bet anything they're going to be Baron Ian and Baroness Katherine, Barons of the Court, Master/Mistress of the Pelican, Laurel and Pelican, respectively, and the Third Viceroy (I think) and First Vicereine of Ostgardr > This information pertains to just this example though. other places > may use it differently. Like Reeve/ess or Vicor/ess. At least here > in Caid, the term Reeve/ess is used for the acknowledged heirs to a > Barony. Though when my husband and had been chosen, we had been > given a choice to use either. Feeling that Vicro/ess had too much > of a religious feel to it, we stayed with Reeve/ss. I know that > Vicor/ess in other areas is used for someone who has been asked to > step in when things go wrong in a Barony (that was another reason > we didn't want to use it) Things don't have to be wrong here for a vicar to be installed. At one point a couple of years ago, Ian and Katherine were suspended for a reign [illegally, as it turned out; the Crown had every right to suspend them per terms in Law which, ultimately, never even came close to being met], the Crown tried to appoint a vicar, and nobody would touch the job with a ten-foot pole. Subsequently, when this couple decided it was time, for the well- being of both the group and themselves, to retire after some 26 years on the job, there was talk of installing a vicar to function as titular head of the group and oversee the election of a new Viceroy and/or Vicereine, until it was made clear to the Crown that, as per Law, the vicar could not then run for election to the post himself. Once again, nobody wanted the job, and our Kingdom seneschal, who happens to live in Ostgardr, is theoretically overseeing the election. We have no vicar, but then the Viceroy and Vicereine are still on the job until the investiture of their replacement/s, so we don't need one. Adamantius Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 19:00:07 -0400 From: "Phil Troy / G. Tacitus Adamantius" Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] 9/11 SCA cooks To: dailleurs at liripipe.com, Cooks within the SCA On Sep 11, 2006, at 5:55 PM, Anne-Marie Rousseau wrote: > we call that the "natural fiber test!" in the circle of geeks I > hang out with ;) > > --AM, who presumes the viceroy was ok, or else folks wouldn’t be > giggling so much? ;) Yes, he's fine, apart from a silver-dollar-sized hole in some of his garb. What actually happened was this (from another account): > the new Viceroy, Alexandre, was making a passionate plea for people > to help clean the kitchen since there had had to be some > reallocation of human resources. He's trying to stress the need for > help, and I spot something odd about his back. I walk out of the > kitchen doorway and start pulling on his sleeve. He's like, "C'Mon, > I'm talking here." "Excellency..." "I mean it, can we talk later, > I'm tryin' a get you folks a cleanup crew!" "Excellency, you're on > fire." "My lords and ladies..." "HEY!!! Your Excellency!!! You're > burning! Your chaplet...thingy...wotzit is on fire!!!" > > It was. They were all seated in front of a high fireplace and > mantel, and there were little candles in low glasses lit on the > mantelpiece. He had, in fact, risen to speak, stepped too close to > the candles and set his garb on fire (he's quite tall), which > burned with a small, slow, steady, clear blue flame. Looked like > Sterno ;-) > > So, a surreal time was had by all, we all sang the Talking Heads' > "Burning Down the Viceroy!" in the kitchen. Three-hun-dred-six-ty-five-de-grees! Burnin' down the Viceroy! This was Brekke's feast, and a very good one; I just happened to be standing very close when the Elevation Conflagration, or the Investiture Immolation, occurred. There were other assorted Portents, Omens and Signs at this event, including a very sudden and violent thunderstorm during Royal Court, and the Investiture ceremony itself being visited by a blue heron, who flew over and essentially strafed the participants. Adamantius Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 11:16:59 -0500 From: "Phil Troy / G. Tacitus Adamantius" Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] A question sure to cause controversy To: Cooks within the SCA On Feb 19, 2009, at 10:21 AM, Susan Lin wrote: <<< Do people prefer Chef de Cuisine (or some version thereof) or is Feast-o-crat okay? I know people who absolutely despise F-O-C and can be verbally violent about it. I came from the East where it seemed to be routinely used but now in the Outlands I've had to watch what I say. >>> I remember that term becoming popular in the mid-to-late 80's in the East (I remember a lady from Meridies referring to me by that term, and I didn't really know at the time what it meant), and I live in the group that, at one time, _was_ the East. Yes, you still occasionally hear the term, but I think a lot of people are trying to avoid it (also autocrat), since there are several terms that can be used which not only describe the role more accurately, but also in a manner more consistent with the goals of a group attempting to portray history. It needlessly removes the person you're describing from a role in period society, and that is somewhat akin to standing in the lists at a Crown Tourney and loudly calling the finalists, stick-jocks, or fencers, wire-weenies. Yes, one could argue it's an accurate description [one could also argue to the contrary]; it's just not as good a description as we're capable of using. Adamantius From: Mark Schuldenfrei Date: May 10, 2010 2:38:45 PM CDT To: CALONTIR at listserv.unl.edu Subject: Re: [CALONTIR] Precedence of Territorial Barons and Baronesses Fernando Vigil wrote: <<< The Baronages don't normally handle the toasts. Of course if you go back far enough into our history a number of our barons/baronesses were amount the highest ranking folks - but due to their Peerages, not the baronial rank. >>> Eastern Difference - it is the case that local Barons and/or Baronesses in their own territory toast the Crowns and Heirs, whether they are present or not. Tibor From: Mark Schuldenfrei Date: September 15, 2010 1:09:57 PM CDT To: CALONTIR at listserv.unl.edu Subject: Re: [CALONTIR] history question I'd like to add one: in the Kingdom of Calontir, who was the oldest person to win Crown? In the East it was Bjorn, at age 50. Tibor From: Mark Schuldenfrei Date: May 14, 2011 7:26:38 PM CDT To: CALONTIR at listserv.unl.edu Subject: Re: [CALONTIR] A small questoin of History On 5/14/2011 6:48 PM, Dorcas or Jean wrote: > Whether or not there ever was such a rule, I don't know. There absolutely was. Circa some 40 years ago, at least. Back in its early founding days, the East Kingdom was New York City, and environs within 50 miles. Then, along came "Boston", and it was NYC plus 50 miles - oh, and Boston. Carolingia was a Barony as a result. Tibor Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 19:18:26 -0400 From: Carol Smith To: Cooks within the SCA Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] Ostgardr - slightly OT, and probably more than anyone wants to know. I'm going to go all pedantic on you. :) Per East Kingdom law, page 18, section F, Baronies, "In all circumstances, The Crown Province of Ostgardr will be treated as a barony." (Kingdom can spell "Ostgardr" correctly, but my computer won't give me the fancy fonts necessary. The "O" actually has a line through it, and the "D" is actually a "thorn".) We are indeed the Crown Province of Ostgardr, but that's because we were the first group of the East, and since at one time there was a law stating that the King had to live within 50 miles of Manhattan, we at first did not need other titular heads. All lands not part of another group were considered Crown Lands and part of "The Crown Province", and the King was considered our titular head for a good many years. That's probably how we became a Province, and when we began to need a head other than Their Majesties, we probably decided to distinguish ourselves from other groups by becoming "Crown Province", with viceroy/vicereine speaking for Their Majesties. I remember when we were "the Nameless Province" - and Brigantia threatened to make it stick unless we actually chose a name. Devra, you were there, too, no? And you were probably there for the first Viceregal elections, as well. (I had an attack of Real Life (TM) and was away from the SCA during this time, so Devra will have to fill in that history. Master A, when did you come in? It was when I was away, I know.) Brekke From: mark at SCHULDY.ORG Subject: Re: [CALONTIR] gifts for wandering bards? Date: June 27, 2011 12:52:51 PM CDT To: CALONTIR at listserv.unl.edu On 6/27/2011 1:45 PM, Andrew O'Brien wrote: <<< It might just be me, if I'm honest. A couple of years back, there was a movement to try and make the East a "kingdom who sings." >>> Yeah, I bounced off that too: but I tried. Calontir treats singing like something you'd do in church: everyone sings, the best get solos, but it's part of everyday life. :-) (If you go to church. I'm more of a atheist-in-the-synagogue-choir, but I digress...) The East, in general, tends to treat singing like theater - the best get to put on a concert, and all the good people attend, and applaud, and think little of the lesser minded-people that don't appreciate "culture". It's not to say that people don't appreciate really good authentic music: they love it, they dance to it, they listen to it. But they don't DO it, by and large. It ought to be an everyone-participate contact sport, but it isn't. I do think that it puts Calontir in greater touch with its roots: because the songs make more sense if you know the stories. Tibor Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 00:39:57 -0700 (PDT) From: Stephen Kiefert To: atlantia at seahorse.atlantia.sca.org Subject: [MR] daily kingdom history fact 5 Atlantia has not always been a kingdom. By 1976, the East Kingdom was seen as too big geographically and administratively, so it was divided into Northern and Southern regions with a deputy kingdom seneschal for each. William de Montegilt was the southern one covering the current kingdom plus West Virginia. It was soon decided that a principality for the southern area would be a better governing mechanism and it was approved by the Board of Directors, with the first coronet tourney being held November 20, 1976. Atlantia officially came into being as a principality within the East Kingdom on April 29, 1977 with the coronation of Alaric and Yseult as first Prince and Princess. The SCA continued to grow rapidly, with the East going from 39 groups to 69 during1977-1979. By 1979 the East kingdom curia was discussing the framework for the future split. There were 7 more pairs of Prince and Princess until May 2, 1981, when Atlantia became an independent kingdom with the coronation of Michael and Carissa as the first King and Queen. Stefan of Cambion Kingdom Historian Edited by Mark S. Harris East-hist-msg Page 27 of 27