theater-msg - 2/12/12 Period theater. SCA re-creations. NOTE: See also the files: theater-bib, puppets-msg, jesters-msg, bardic-msg, juggling-msg, story-sources-msg, masks-msg. ************************************************************************ NOTICE - This file is a collection of various messages having a common theme that I have collected from my reading of the various computer networks. Some messages date back to 1989, some may be as recent as yesterday. This file is part of a collection of files called Stefan's Florilegium. These files are available on the Internet at: http://www.florilegium.org I have done a limited amount of editing. Messages having to do with separate topics were sometimes split into different files and sometimes extraneous information was removed. For instance, the message IDs were removed to save space and remove clutter. The comments made in these messages are not necessarily my viewpoints. I make no claims as to the accuracy of the information given by the individual authors. Please respect the time and efforts of those who have written these messages. The copyright status of these messages is unclear at this time. If information is published from these messages, please give credit to the originator(s). Thank you, Mark S. Harris AKA: THLord Stefan li Rous Stefan at florilegium.org ************************************************************************ From: perkins at msupa.pa.msu.EDU ("corpusculorum velocium perexiguorum Date: 24 Jul 91 06:20:01 GMT Jeremy de Merstone greets the folk of the Rialto, and adds to the discussion of the lives and roles of players in period times the name of a reference which may be of interest to the serious researcher: _The_Theatre_in_the_Middle_Ages_, by William Tydeman, Cambridge University Press, 1978. Lib of Cong code PN2152.T9; Dewey Dec Sys 792.0902; ISBN #s: hardcover 0 521 21891 8, paperback 0 521 29304 9. It's clearly written, extensively discusses many aspects of the topic (including a chapter called "The Performers", the tie-in to this thread) and has a good bibliography of other reference material on the subject. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Jeremy de Merstone George J Perkins perkins at msupa.pa.msu.edu North Woods, MidRealm East Lansing, MI perkins at msupa (Bitnet) --------------------------------------------------------------------- From: KGANDEK at mitvmc.mit.EDU (Kathryn Gandek) Date: 25 Jul 91 21:28:07 GMT My two favorite medieval theatre books have now both been mentioned as sources by other people. However, I'll go ahead and add my two cents. _The_Medieval_Theatre_ by Glynne Wickham (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987) is a very good book for providing a comprehensive and logically organized overview of theatre. He explains where it comes from, how it developed, includes theatrical activities that might not meet the 20th century definition of theatre, and defines all of it well. What is particularly excellent about this book is the way he organizes the information. It is particularly clear and well thought out--a vey good approach for a reader who has only a little background. His lack of numerous quotes and specific examples helps this, although it also is a deficiency if the reader is trying to do serious research Also, Wickham esposes his theories as almost facts, and there are scholars who have very viable and very counter theories. _The_Theatre_in_the_Middle_Ages by William Tydeman (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978) Tydeman organizes his informantion in a way that I suspect will be a bit confusing for someone looking for a general introduction. It is full of many more quotes, examples and exceptions. It's a good next level up book. One of his sections is on "The Players", and it's a good example of Tydeman's style. If you're looking for a general statement on the status of players, you won't find it. If you would like numerous examples of their different permeutations through the Middle Ages, then it's a great read. To add two more names: _Early_English_Stages_ by Glynne Wickham (3 volumes, 4 books published in England and the US over a variety of dates) If you're interested in specific and detailed information about theatre history in England (although he occassionally overlaps into other countries) this is great! It's detailed, scholarly, crammed full with information and prohibitively expensive even if you could find a full set for sale some place. (If you do, let me know :-) Try a library. _The_Mediaeval_Stage_ by E.K. Chambers (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1903) (Two volumes) This is a classic. Sure a lot of the theories are outdated, but the information is great. To paraphrase a dance historian I know, it's just one of those things that you've got to have in your library. Columbia University Press did a reprint sometime in the last ten years or so, but it's sold out. This book has got direct quotes (there's so much Latin!) and complete, uncut looonnngg passages and I found it indispensible when trying to recreate mummings. One volume is Chambers' prose (with of course quotes from primary sources) and the second volume is just primary sources reprinted. For information on players, try the section in Tydeman. Reading all of Wickham wouldn't hurt :-) And Brockett (which Heather gave the info for) is always a good overview. Catrin o'r Rhyd For Kathryn Gandek Barony of Carolingia Boston area East Kingdom kgandek%mitvmc.bitnet at mitvma.mit.edu Newsgroups: rec.music.early,rec.org.sca,rec.arts.dance From: dfader at leland.Stanford.EDU (Donald James Fader) Subject: Re: Q: ballo choreographies Organization: DSG, Stanford University, CA 94305, USA Date: Mon, 8 Nov 93 20:55:22 GMT Concerning the request for information about choreography in balli at the Medici court c.1600: As far as I know (and I've done a little research on this question), no such choreographies exist. The Italians were not so painstaking as the French were in their notation of dance steps. You can find information about dance in the Medici courts from various indirect sources, however. A major piece of archival work on musical and theatrical happenings at the Medici court is: Solerti, Angelo. Musica, Ballo e Drammatica alla Corte Medicea dal 1600 al 1637. (1905--sorry I don't have the publisher handy) This organizes the records of the court by year and gives large-scale quotes of source material pertaining to music and dance. A somewhat more recent article about the subject: Ghisi, Francesco. "Ballet entertainments in the Pitti Palace, Florence, 1608- 25." Musical Quarterly 35(1949): 421 See also Groves "Ballo", "Balletto" A general idea about choreography can be had from 2 period dance manuals: Caroso, Fabritio. Nobilita [with accent] di dame (1600). Ed and trans. by Julia Sutton (NY: Ox U. Press, 1986). (a reprinting of his Il Ballarino (1581)). Negri, Cesare. Le Gratie Amore (1602), reprinted as Nuove Inventione di Balli (1604). You may be able to find more about this in dance publications--this is what I gleaned from a fairly quick survey of the field in musicological writings in the process of working on something else. Hope it is helpful. Don Fader From: HAROLD.FELD at hq.doe.GOV Newsgroups: rec.org.sca Subject: *Good* dress up at Pennsic Date: 24 Mar 1994 10:19:51 -0500 Unto all who read these words, greetings from Yaakov. With all the comments about Vampires, etc., it should be recalled that there are good examples of period mummings that take place at Pennsic. A few examples over the years: 1) The Fool's Parade held by Meriwald. While there is much in it that resembles our Twentieth century 'Macy's Day' parade, I saw a fair number of Period satire/morality play done. The Jesus, carrying the cross and being scourged by centurions, struck me as a wonderfully period piece. 2) Catrin O'h Rhyrd For's mumming several years ago at Pennsic, based on a documented mumming from (I think) Richard II's coronation. This was very elaborate, with over 50 participants (exact numbers escape me) and a host of costumes/props made by the ever-helpful and talented John McGuire of Carolingia (who will no doubt be commissioned on Judgment day to help through up the Throne at the last minute). 3) The mock stag hunt that went through the Pennsic marketplace last year. I'm not sure who arranged that one. 4) Ditto the Japanese fertility rite. (Although I'm less sanguine about non-Eurpoean stuff, it was a well documented recreation.) Yaakov From: gray at cs.umass.edu (Lyle Gray) Newsgroups: rec.org.sca Subject: Re: *Good* dress up at Pennsic Date: 24 Mar 94 12:14:30 Organization: Dept of Comp and Info Sci, Univ of Mass (Amherst) The stag hunt that Yaakov makes reference to was performed by a group from Bergental, East Kingdom. It recreates the Abbotts' Bromley Horn Dance of England, which has been performed continuously from the medieval period (the antlers used in England have been carbon-dated to some time in the 12th c.). Lyle FitzWilliam ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Lyle H. Gray Internet (personal): gray at cs.umass.edu Quodata Corporation Phone: (203) 728-6777, FAX: (203) 247-0249 From: dmeehan at HUEY.CSUN.EDU Newsgroups: rec.org.sca Subject: Re: Period Theater Date: Mon, 4 Apr 1994 07:24:28 Organization: Information Resources and Technology silbrmnd at acf4.nyu.edu (The Dark Mage) writes: >From: silbrmnd at acf4.nyu.edu (The Dark Mage) >Subject: Period Theater >Date: 1 Apr 1994 06:08:34 GMT >Greetings to all who are gathered on this bridge... >I have to write a paper for my Civ and Culture of hte Middle Ages class >on "something that interests me", and I'm thinking of doing it on the >history of theater in the middle ages... I know it basically started in >the church around the 11th or 12th c. with the mystery plays, and I know >that by the end of (SCA) period you had the Commedia dell' Arte, and >Shakespeare was in the middle there... Could someone out there point me >towards some helpful (and interesting ;) sources? The course is very >eurocentric, and will probly only get up to around the 14th c... Try looking into 'the Chester Fair.' this was a place in 13th cent. England where dramas were put on. Look up Hildegaard of Bingen. She wrote a morality play in the 11th cent. called (I think) 'Novo Ordo Virtutum'. That's all I know. If I remember, I'll go home and find the phone number for someone in our Guild of St. Genisius - that't the medieval drama group here in Caid. Good luck! Damien of Baden Altavia/Caid From: laityna at ucbeh.san.uc.edu Newsgroups: rec.org.sca Subject: Re: Medieval theatre sources Date: 5 Apr 94 01:23:45 EST Organization: Univ of Cincinnati Academic IT Services A good book about the Commedia del'Arte is called "The Italian Comedy" and is published by Dover Books. I don't know who the author is, but it is a large, illustrated orange book. Another interesting Dover book is "A Source Book of Theatrical History" by Nagler. It is a collection of extant essays about the theatre from the Greeks on. I don't remember how much medieval stuff is in it, but it is full of "the real thing". Tangwystel vyrgh Gwythenek From: kathy.duffy at buckys.com (Kathy Duffy) Newsgroups: rec.org.sca Subject: Early plays Date: Wed, 9 Nov 1994 12:41:00 GMT Organization: *Bucky's BBS* (609)861-1131 There are some plays by Roswitha or Hrovithia (same person) written in a German (before it was Germany) convent to amuse the byzantine princess of Otto (I or II). Several of them could be easily performed. Our library had a book containing a collection of them in a series of small green books called the "Medieval Library" [the series name] and published by Cooper Union Press [I believe but memory by be faulty there] around 1966. If you need more precise bibliographic date send a private e-mail and I will check at work. Lady Deirdre Ui Mhaille EK, Shire of Barren Sands Newsgroups: rec.org.sca From: kgandek at world.std.com (Kathryn GandekTighe) Subject: Re: Research Question -- Stage scenery Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA Date: Fri, 4 Aug 1995 17:10:08 GMT STEWART (ms7539 at conrad.appstate.EDU) wrote: : Currently, I am researching period techniques for stage : scenery and presentation... : Secifically I am looking to documemt what is modernly known : as the stage 'flat'... A wooden frame covered in canvas that : is painted... : For the middle ages I am reading through the works of several : Italian designers and architects of the 16th century... : Can anyone point out something that I may have overlooked? : Research on the first Globe, and the Swan have shown that much of : the Elizabethan stage was bare... But what about when the : Globe was rebuilt? : : Direction to resources, titles and authors will be greatly : appreciated... I'd rather not reinvent the wheel... Some books you might find useful: The Elizabethan Stage by E.K. Chambers - specifically, you want to look at Volume III, which includes a hefty section on Staging at Court, Staging in the Theatres of the Sixteenth Century, and Staging of the Theatres in the Seventeenth Century. One warning though - while Chambers' works are classics on the subject of period theater and contain great material directly quoted from period sources, some of his theories are now out of date. I love to use them for their direct quotes of material; I always check more current sources regarding theory. The set I have was printed in Oxford by Clarendon Press in 1965 and are a reprint of the originals printed in 1923. Chambers volumns entitled The Mediaeval Stage (also classics) were reprinted by Columbia more recently, so they may also have reprinted The Elizabethan Stage. There is not a section in The Mediaeval Stage specifically on staging, although you could look through it. Since I've used it primarily when researching mummings, I can't recall reading anything about backdrops. Glynne Wickham wrote a very comprehensive series entitled Early English Stages 1300 to 1660. Much to my regret, I only own Volume III, Plays and their Makers, so I can't tell you where to look in the series. However, I've always found an answer to my questions when I drool over them in one of the local academic libraries. They are very academic, and you'll probably have to go to a college library to find them. (For Chambers' books you just need an old library :-) I'd happily pay for the other books in the Wickahm set if I could ever get my hands on them. They're real gems. If you can't find Early English Stages, you could try Wickham's The Medieval Theatre (my copy is Cambridge University Press 1988). It's more general, but still could be useful. If you have access to it, it wouldn't hurt to take a quick look at William Tydeman's The Theatre in the Middle Ages. It's a general survey book, but I've found useful bits in it. A quick glance at my copy makes me think you could find some details in there. My copy was printed by Cambridge University Press in 1988. There used to be someone selling copies of it at Pennsic. Catrin o'r Rhyd For Kathryn Gandek-Tighe Carolingia, East Kingdom kgandek at world.std.com From: IVANOR at delphi.com Newsgroups: rec.org.sca Subject: Research Question -- Stage scenery Date: 6 Aug 1995 00:18:25 GMT Quoting ms7539 from a message in rec.org.sca >From: ms7539 at conrad.appstate.EDU (STEWART) >Newsgroups: rec.org.sca >Subject: Research Question -- Stage scenery >Date: 3 Aug 1995 15:08:14 -0400 >Currently, I am researching period techniques for stage >scenery and presentation... >Secifically I am looking to documemt what is modernly known >as the stage 'flat'... A wooden frame covered in canvas that >is painted... >I already have documentation on the pinake, a stage 'flat' >which was used in ancient Greek theater... and I have info. >on the Italian baroque period. >For the middle ages I am reading through the works of several >Italian designers and architects of the 16th century... That's late Renaissance, not medieval. As much Medieval drama was done on wagons, with a different wagon for each scene, they didn't need flats... if they wanted scenery, they made permanent sets. Theatres were revived in the Renaissance. Hunningher, in _The Origin of the Theater_ refers doubters to Loomis, Roger S., "Were there Theatres in the Twelfth and Thirteenth Centuries?" with comm. by Gustave Cohen, _Speculum_, 1945,XX,1; under the same title denied by Dino Bigongiari in _Romantic Review_, Oct. 1946. There was an excellent CA a couple of years ago about Medieval drama and its presentation, complete with illustrations of the stage wagons. Carolyn Boselli, Host of Custom Forum 35, SCAdians on Delphi From: liversen at physiology.medsch.ucla.edu (Lori Iversen) Newsgroups: rec.org.sca Subject: Re: Theatre History--Elizabethan era question Date: 10 Jan 1996 17:14:43 GMT Organization: UCLA slsbc at cc.usu.edu says: >I would appreciate any and all information regarding the >history of the theatre in this time period, and not just English theatre. My >teacher is emphasizing more of the buildings/architecture and effects from this >time period and things of a similiar nature. > Hopefully yours, > ALIX of Cote du Ciel I recall reading in an L.A. Times article several years ago that the guys who are excavating the original Old Globe site knew they'd finally found the right place because mixed in with the foundation were piles of filbert shells! Evidently, Elizabethan theatergoers scarfed filberts in much the same way that modern cinemagoers scarf popcorn. I would have thought that the sound of all that hammering and shell cracking would distract the players... And that is the Jeopardy trivia ("I'll take Elizabethan theater for 500, Alex") for today. -- Alexis, ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Round up the usual disclaimers.  From: besears560 at aol.com (Besears560) Newsgroups: rec.org.sca Subject: Re: Theatre History--Elizabethan era question Date: 11 Jan 1996 23:42:38 -0500 yi-time magazine just did an article on the reconstructed globe theater. barre fitzrobert of york dragonsspine From: kkozmins at mtholyoke.edu (Kim C Kozminski) Newsgroups: rec.org.sca Subject: Re: Theatre History--Elizabethan era question Date: 12 Jan 1996 18:57:37 GMT Organization: Mount Holyoke College The two favorites of most Theatre departments are Oscar Brockett's History of the Theatre and AM Nagler's "A source-book in Theatrical History" You can probably find second-hand copies at any college book-store were Theatre history is taught, or check you local library. Have fun! Roen Date: Wed, 6 Jan 1999 11:29:29 -0600 From: "I. Marc Carlson" To: sca-arts at raven.cc.ukans.edu Subject: RE: Theatre > >Anyway, my question is three fold. >1. Could someone suggest a book of plays by people other than >Shakespeare or Marlowe THere are a number of them out there (usually under titles like Elizabethan Drama). You might try such authors as Ben Jonson, Thomas Dekker (His "The Shoemaker's Holiday" is a person favorite), Francis Beaumont, John Fletcher, John Webster, Philip Massinger, Nicholas Udal, Thomas Norton (another favorite), George Gascoign, Thomas Preston, George Peele, Robert Greene, John Lyly, Thomas Kyd, Thomas Heywood, John Marston, George Chapman, and so on. If you can not find ANYTHING in your local library listing these names, contact me offlist and I'll see if I can't dig you up something for you to Interlibrary Loan or purchase. >2. Please share any experiences with producing plays for SCA. ... Marc/Diarmaid Date: Wed, 6 Jan 1999 17:46:32 EST From: To: sca-arts at raven.cc.ukans.edu Subject: Re: Theatre slaine at stlnet.com writes: >1. Could someone suggest a book of plays by people other than >Shakespeare or Marlowe > > 2. Please share any experiences with producing plays for SCA. > > 3. I would be interested to see any plays written by SCA folk. Item #1 has already been answered, but I couldn't resist adding these names: Catharine Trotter, Aphra Behn, Delariviere Manley, and Mary Pix. Yes, there were female playwrights! (Although they do fall towards the latter half of the 17th century). But I also have some SCA theatre experience to share. Our shire formed a group of players that wrote and performed original works based on period themes. Our style was a little like the Commedia Del Arte, in that performers were free to "ad lib" based on audience reactions, and stock characters reappeared in different plays. Themes generally revolved around mistaken identities, jealous husbands, and scheming daughters, etc. We performed at Pennsic years ago (anyone remember the Oldenfeld Players, at Pennsic 19 or so?) Eventually, the individuals involved moved on and the group dissolved. Judith Date: Wed, 6 Jan 1999 15:51:26 -0800 From: domus at juno.com (Kenneth J Mayer) To: sca-arts at raven.cc.ukans.edu Subject: Re: Theatre Can't help much with the first item, but I heartily recommend AVOIDING *Ralph Roister Doister* by Nicholas Udall ... it's horrible. >2. Please share any experiences with producing plays for SCA. http://www.mindspring.com/~hirschv/gsplay/gstags.htm >3. I would be interested to see any plays written by SCA folk. Video tapes of the Golden Stag Players productions can be gotten by contacting me -- check out the website above ... (The GS Players have been doing plays in the West Kingdom for 7 years now ...) Hirsch Date: Wed, 6 Jan 1999 19:55:11 EST From: To: sca-arts at raven.cc.ukans.edu Subject: Re: Theatre suggestions jadeyale at hotmail.com writes: > I have also been interested in getting together a theater group in my > Shire. if anyone has any experience or suggestions this would be > wonderful! > > Joia I think the first thing to do is decide on your script(s). You should know what parts you need before assembling your troupe. If you all love it and decide to perform regularly, it's important to keep in mind that everyone may not get to perform in every play. Hold auditions if you can. Give the ones who really, Really can't act work as stage hands (fetching props, being props, etc.), or remind them that you also need an audience. Comedy is easier than tragedy to do well. It's also more popular. If you have your heart set on performing a great tragedy, it will be even more important to say "no" to bad actors. I am mentioning saying "no" several times because it can be hard to do so without hurting feelings, but bad performers will ruin the show. Certainly we don't expect Broadway-type skill, but they need to be able to put _some_ feeling into it! Rehearse, rehearse, rehearse. Make sure everyone knows their lines, and can project well. It's no fun to the people in the back if they can't hear. If you are doing Commedia Del Arte, then memorizing lines is more optional, but then the actors must be able to improvise. Get the autocrat to advertise the play in the flyer (assuming you are performing at an event) to build up your audience. Actually, in my experience, getting people to show up the first time is easy. After that, you may have to work to keep them coming. It will take some work, but can be loads of fun for everyone. Keep trying, and eventually you will succeed! Judith Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1999 11:05:03 -0500 (EST) From: Jenne Heise To: sca-arts at raven.cc.ukans.edu Subject: Re: Theatre On Wed, 6 Jan 1999, Kenneth J Mayer wrote: > Can't help much with the first item, but I heartily recommend AVOIDING > *Ralph Roister Doister* by Nicholas Udall ... it's horrible. Yes! Tovah's group struggled manfully (and womanfully) with it, but it was extremely difficult, not only because it is long, but it is difficult to memorize and difficult to produce well. A piece of advice from a former theatre tech geek: if you choose to produce plays in the SCA, you must be willing to be a bitch/bastard about memorizing lines, learning blocking, etc. I don't know why SCA directors struggle so much with this, but they do. You have to remember that community theatre directors force people to memorize and they keep coming back anyway... Jadwiga Zajaczkowa (Shire of Eisental; HERMS Cyclonus), mka Jennifer Heise jenne at tulgey.browser.net Date: Fri, 8 Jan 1999 17:11:49 -0800 From: domus at juno.com (Kenneth J Mayer) To: sca-arts at raven.cc.ukans.edu Subject: Re: Theatre "Jennifer Thompson" writes: >Well, I'm definately not afraid of the work or stepping on toes (just a >little of course!). I'm a theater geek myself who loves directing. My >only real concern is the (unfortuanatly) lack of help, actors, and time. >But I know that just comes with the job. Thanks for the advise from all. This is the hardest part, but ... keep trying. I recommend starting small. That's how the GS Players got started -- some smaller plays and we worked up to the larger productions we're doing now (we have 10+ actors in a show, which is pretty good -- add a stage manager -- necessary at that point and the director, and maybe some stage hands (if you're lucky and/or need 'em) and things get pretty crazed. ) All the work really does pan out -- the GSP have been together for over 7 years and we're still going strong ... and despite all the work, the fatigue just before the show, etc., the performances have been up, and the audience reactions have been great ... Hirsch Date: Thu, 18 May 2000 20:54:45 -0700 From: "James F. Johnson" Subject: Re: SC - Medieval Times Just a brief note concerning erroneous history when it comes to entertainment. From my own history and anthropology studies, I came across examples in the Middle Ages and Renaissance where the concept of change in styles over historical eras did not exist. One late period example is English theatre during the reign of Elizabeth I (Shakespeare and contemporaries). There were two types of constume. Street wear (basically, the mode of the day, if not their own personal clothes) used for any contemporary plays (Twelfth Night, Much Ado About Nothing, Doctor Faust,) and 'ancient' dress, which was toga-like robes for plays like Corialanus, Titus, Pericles, Julius Caesar). Basically, it was generic "old" clothes. The assumption being _everybody_ wore those clothes _back then_, and at some undetermined time, they started wearing trunk hose and doublets. I'd say it is a fair guess to say that most decent SCA clothiers know more about clothing in the high Middle Ages than the folks did living only two hundred years later. The distinctions between 11th Century Moorish Spain, and 14th Century Bavaria, and 16th Century London are lost on most 20th century folks. Just not relevant to their lives, just to the historophiles like us. So they are happy with Medieval Times as it is, and Medieval Times is happy to provide it. Seumas Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2000 08:38:26 +1300 From: Maggie Forest To: sca-arts at raven.cc.ukans.edu Subject: Re: Medieval Theatre? Anna asked: >I'm interested in Medieval and Rennaiscance theatre and I'm especially >trying to find some short plays. Are there any on the Net? I'd also love to >get some book recommendations :-) Well, Machiavelli wrote a short and comedic play called 'the Mandrake Root'. A good edition of his works should include it. /maggie Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2000 00:43:02 -0500 (EST) From: To: sca-arts at raven.cc.ukans.edu Subject: Re: Medieval Theatre? On Thu, 9 Nov 2000, Anna Troy wrote: > I'm interested in Medieval and Rennaiscance theatre and I'm especially > trying to find some short plays. Are there any on the Net? I'd also love to > get some book recommendations :-) Well, the third edition of the Harcourt Brace Anthology of Drama (ed. W.B. Worthen) has a couple of good short plays from Medieval and Renaissance England. The non-Shakespearean plays would include -- "The Wakefield Second Shepards' Pageant" (anonymous); "Everyman" (anonymous); and "Doctor Faustus" (Christopher Marlowe). Kate H. Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2000 12:27:17 -0800 From: Heather Rowe To: sca-arts at raven.cc.ukans.edu Subject: Re: Medieval Theatre? I have a copy of "Everyman and Other Medieval Miracle Plays". I don't remember who the editor is at the moment, and I've misplaced it on my bookshelves, but it is a Penguin book, and contains several plays that I haven't seen elsewhere. I also have stage copies of a couple of other miracle plays from the middle ages (we had a wierd director who decided to do something that most people hadn't ever seen before). I'm nor sure the Penguin is still in print, but it's a very good book with references to other sources in it. Li Ban Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2000 19:30:19 -0500 From: Carol Thomas To: sca-arts at raven.cc.ukans.edu Subject: Re: Medieval Theatre? The publisher is Everyman, appropriately enough, and it is in print at $5.95. >I have a copy of "Everyman and Other Medieval Miracle Plays". I don't >remember who the editor is at the moment, and I've misplaced it on my >bookshelves, but it is a Penguin book, and contains several plays that I >haven't seen elsewhere. Carllein Small Churl Books catalog: Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2000 09:35:10 -0500 From: "Erik Dutton" To: Subject: RE: Medieval Theatre? (long) Following are the volumes I have, with bibliographic citation and content listing. Parenthetical note following each play indicates the cycle it comes from, or the author in the case of some of the very late plays. Di vos incolumes custodiant, Rhodri ap Hywel, OPE House Andover, Barony of the Sacred Stone, Atlantia -- "Early English Plays 900-1600", ed. Schweikert, H. C. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich 1928 (no ISBN) Contents: intro to the history of theatre, from Classical Greece to Elizabethan Quem Quaeritis (liturgal trope) Banns (Ludus Coventriae) The Fall of Lucifer (Ludus Coventriae) Noah (Wakefield) Abraham and Isaac (Brome MS) The Second Shepherds' Play (Wakefield) The Judgment Day (York) Everyman Robin Hood and the Friar (folk play) Saint George and the Dragon (Oxfordshire folk play) Ralph Roister Doister (Nicholas Udall) Gorboduc (Thomas Sackville and Thomas Norton) Endymion (John Lyly) The Old Wives Tale (George Peele) The Honorable History of Friar Bacon and Friar Bungay (Robert Greene) The Spanish Tragedy (Thomas Kyd) Tamburlaine the Great, parts I & II (Christopher Marlowe) Doctor Faustus (Christopher Marlowe) Every Man in His Humour (Ben Jonson) The Shoemaker's Holiday (Thomas Dekker) "Everyman and Medieval Miracle Plays", ed. Cawley, A. C. Everyman's Library #381 1956 (no ISBN) (published in England by Dent & Dutton) Contents: The Creation; The Fall of Lucifer; The Creation of Adam and Eve (York Pageant of the Cardmakers) The Fall of Man (York Pageant of the Coopers) Cain and Abel (N. Town Cycle) Noah's Flood (The Chester Pageant of the Water-Leaders and Drawers in Dee) Abraham and Isaac (Brome MS) The Annunciation (Coventry Pageant of the Shearmen and Tailors) The Wakefield Second Shepherds' Pageant (Towneley Cycle) Wakefield Pageant of Herod the Great (Towneley Cycle) The Woman Taken in Adultery (N. Town Cycle) The Crucifixion (York Pageant of the Pinners and Painters) The Harrowing of Hell (Chester Pageant of the Cooks and Innkeepers) The Resurrection (York Pageant of the Carpenters) The Judgment (York Pageant of the Mercers) Everyman Death of Pilate (Cornish Trilogy) Full listing of contents of the Chester, York and Towneley cycles "Medieval Mysteries, Moralities and Interludes", ed. Hopper, V. F. and G. B. Lahey Barron's Educational Series, 1962 (no ISBN, LoC Catalog # 61-18362 Contents: Abraham and Isaac (bible story followed by the Brome MS play) Noah's Flood (bible story followed by the Chester play) Second Shepherds' Play (story from Luke followed by the Wakefield play) The Castle of Perseverance Everyman Johan Johan the play called The Four PP includes staging notes for several of the plays. "English Mystery Plays", ed. HappÈ, Peter Penguin English Library, 1975 ISBN 0 14 043.093 8 Contents: The Fall of Lucifer (Chester) The Creation, and Adam and Eve (Chester) The Killing of Abel (Towneley) Noah (Towneley) Noah (Chester) Abraham and Isaac (Chester) Abraham and Isaac (Brome MS) Moses (York) Balaam, Balak and the Prophets (Chester) The Parliament of Heaven, the Salutation and Conception (Ludus Coventriae) Joseph (Ludus Coventriae) The Nativity (Ludus Coventriae) First Shepherds' Play (Towneley) Second Shepherds' Play (Towneley) Introduction to The Three Kings (York) The Adoration (York) The Flight Into Egypt (Towneley) The Purification, and Christ With the Doctors (Chester) The Death of Herod (Ludus Coventriae) The Shearmen and the Tailors' Play (Coventry) John the Baptist (York) The Temptation of Christ, and the Woman Taken in Adultery (Chester) Lazarus (Towneley) Passion Play I: Council of the Jews; Last Supper; Betrayal (Ludus Coventriae) The Buffeting (Towneley) The Dream of Pilate's Wife (York) The Scourging (Towneley) The Crucifixion (York) The Death and Burial (York) The Harrowing of Hell (York) The Resurrection (Towneley) Christ's Appearance to the Disciples (Ludus Coventriae) The Ascension (Chester) Pentecost (York) The Assumption and Coronation of the Virgin (York) Judgment Day (York) Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 10:36:13 -0500 (EST) From: Subject: [SCA-AS] LIIWEEK: English Folk plays To: , Arts and Sciences in the SCA Most of these are not documented to period, but mumming as a practice definitely is: (review from LIIWEEK:) English Folk Play Research Home Page This extensive resource focuses on English folk plays, also called Mummers' Plays, that are "short traditional verse sketches performed at Christmas, Easter and other annual festivals and taken round pubs and private houses." Find background, news, scheduled performances, research indexes and catalogs, scripts, reading lists, related links, and more. Searchable. From the Traditional Drama Research Group at the University of Sheffield. http://www.folkplay.info/ -- Pani Jadwiga Zajaczkowa, Knowledge Pika jenne at fiedlerfamily.net Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2007 16:05:17 -0600 (CST) From: jenne at fiedlerfamily.net Subject: [SCA-AS] [Fwd: TMR 07.10.30 Streitman and Happe, Urban Theatre (Symes)] To: "East Kingdom A&S List" , "Arts and Sciences in the SCA" ---------------------------- Original Message ---------------------------- Subject: TMR 07.10.30 Streitman and Happe, Urban Theatre (Symes) From: "The Medieval Review" Date: Mon, October 29, 2007 8:08 am To: tmr-l at indiana.edu bmr-l at brynmawr.edu -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Streitman, Elsa and Peter Happe, eds. Urban Theatre in the Low Countries, 1400-1625. Medieval Texts and Cultures of Northern Europe, 12. Turnhout: Brepols, 2006. Pp. xii, 320. €70.00. ISBN: 9782503517005. Reviewed by Carol Symes Department of History, University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign symes at uiuc.edu The essays gathered in this volume make an important contribution to the related studies of theater and urban life. Many open windows onto a world in which scripted drama was only one manifestation of a culture that was inherently performative and representational, and the cumulative effect of this scholarship (some of which has never been accessible in English before) is to demonstrate that the understanding of plays and pageantry is inextricably bound up with the history of communities and their modes of communication. Indeed, the very richness of the Low Countries' historical record stands as a challenge to conventional narratives of theater's history, which tend to reify modern generic categories, national boundaries, and temporal divisions. The mere fact that one cannot describe this region and period using familiar geographic and historiographic terminology is instructive. Readers whose knowledge of the Netherlands and its theater has hitherto begun and ended with the Middle English translation of Elckerlijc (Everyman ) will be enlightened. Although its editors assert that the book's "chronological scope is extensive" (24), most essays deal with the role of Chambers of Rhetoric (rederijkerskameren) in the production and publication of plays over a century and a half, from the early sixteenth to the mid-seventeenth centuries. This period certainly deserves close attention, but the editors' suggestion that it can be taken as normative is problematic, for it conveys the misleading impression that there was little theatrical activity in the region earlier on, and that only four surviving antecedents of early modern drama deserve consideration (Lille's annual procession on Trinity Sunday, first attested in 1270; the so-called Maastricht or Ripuarian Passion Play from the fourteenth century; and two surviving Marian pageants from fifteenth-century Brusssels). On the one hand, this narrow focus fails to account for the urban theater of cosmopolitan Arras, which was producing and preserving a wide spectrum of vernacular entertainments as early as the twelfth century and which had a demonstrable impact on other towns in the region, notably Bruges, Gent, Saint-Omer, Cambrai, Tournai, Valenciennes, Mons, and-- farther afield-–London and Paris. (Arras is firmly situated on the book's excellent map but is mentioned only fleetingly in the text).[1] On the other, it obscures the age-old connection between dramatic formulae and the traditions of forensic and didactic rhetoric so ably dissected by Jody Enders, whose Rhetoric and the Origins of Medieval Drama (Ithaca, 1992) receives a lonely mention in a single essay. The volume's implicit argument would have been more forcefully advanced by a forthright acknowledgment that the Low Countries' theatrical vocabulary had long been rooted in political, social, and economic realities. As Galbert of Bruges observed in 1127, the peaceful governance of Flanders not only fostered trade but led its urbane inhabitants to devise "all manner of ingenious and studied arguments," so that "it came about, in fact, that everyone became proficient in rhetorical skills, some by diligent study and some by nature." [2] The book is divided into five sections. The first, "Precursors," opens with Carla Dauven-van Knippenberg's "Borderline Texts: The Case of the Maastricht (Ripuarian) Passion Play ." The text under reconsideration (Den Hague, Koninklijke Bibliotheek 70 E 5, fols. 233v-247v) furnishes a wonderful illustration of the chauvinistic contortions performed by modern academics at the expense of medieval artifacts: probably not from Maastricht, possibly not a Passion play, and only partially scripted in the Ripuarian dialect of the Lower Rhine. Assigned by nineteenth-century Dutch philologists to Germany (specifically Cologne) and by German philologists to the Limburger town of Maastricht in the Netherlands, it has since been firmly replaced in its manuscript context by J. Peter Gumbert, who demonstrated that the play was deliberately copied alongside a collection of Middle Dutch homilies known as the Limburgse Sermoenen in the early decades of the fourteenth century, and that it also shares space with vernacular sermons and mystical writings testifying to the influence of Hadewijch of Brabant (fl. c. 1250) and Beatrijs of Nazareth (c. 1200-1263). The codex itself thus invites renewed consideration of the play's participation in a contemporary culture of vernacular piety. In addition, the political circumstances of its composition can be teased out of the macaronic mixture of German and Dutch elements, most strikingly apparent in the Middle Dutch ballad sung by Mary Magdalene, which strongly resembles lyrics composed by Duke Jan I of Brabant (c. 1254-94), the victor in the War of the Limburg Succession (1280-1288). Hence, Dauven-van Knippenberg theorizes that it may have been inserted into the play by German- speaking supporters on the losing side, as a comment on the decadence of the Brabantine court. Puzzlingly, however, she concludes that this new understanding of the play's codicological and historical contexts unfits it for study as drama--that somehow the fact that it is "not just" a play must mean that it was not intended for performance (49). That "we have no corresponding records of performance" and that "the manuscript shows no signs of having been used for performance" are hardly damning proofs of antitheatricality, however; the same could be said of nearly every extant play text prior to 1400. In this case, as in so many others, one cannot expect medieval dramatic documents to exhibit the characteristics "usual" in the scripts of later eras. The other designated "precursor" of urban theater in the Dutch vernacular is discussed by W.M.H. Hummelen in "Pausa and Selete in the Bliscapen," with reference to the first and last installments of what was originally a seven-year dramatic cycle celebrating the Seven Joys (bliscapen) of Mary, inaugurated in Brussels in 1448 and performed by the Archers' Guild in the Grote Markt after a festive procession held annually in honor of the Virgin. Hummelen mines the texts of these two plays (first "discovered" in 1962 and 1882, respectively) for insights into the meaning of two seminal terms which occur very frequently in later scripts, and performs a clever analysis of the directorial interventions added to the rubrics of one original manuscript. He concludes that selete was used to designate occasions when singing alone was called for, while pausa indicated a need for instrumental music--as distinct from occasions when stage directions call indiscriminately for either one or the other, or both. He also stresses the fact that all of these musical interludes would have been executed ad libitum, with only occasional descriptors guiding musicians or metteurs-en-scène in the selection of appropriately "beautiful" or "joyous" material. His careful use of textual sources shows how conventions changed over time, and calls attention to the important fact that much of what we would like to know about medieval staging practices was never written down. The first article in section two, "Politics and Religion," is Gary K. Waite's "Rhetoricians and Religious Compromise during the Early Reformation (c. 1520-1555)," a satisfying account of the methods used by rederijkers factors (the playwrights of the Chambers of Rhetoric) to help "their lay contemporaries understand the issues" that were being hotly debated--and occasionally more hotly punished-- in the first decades of the Reformation. He argues, compellingly, that these influential dramatists, who were often "lay experts on religion," used the public sphere of their late-medieval towns to present ideas and doctrines tailored "to fit the unique culture and economy of the urban landscape of the Low Countries" (79-80). The result was an array of subtle plays that facilitated debate within communities where "political peace, economic growth, and religious tolerance ranked at least as highly as the call for religious change" (102). He suggests, indeed, that the influential reformer David Joris was nurtured within the thriving Rhetoricians culture of Bruges, where his father had been an actor, and that he brought that tradition of composition and performance with him to Antwerp and to his theological writings. Here is an essay that exemplifies how much a deep contextualization of dramatic fictions can reveal about reality. Complementing Waite's study is Wim Husken's "'Heresy' in the Plays of the Dutch Rhetoricians," which also emphasizes the eclecticism of Dutch reform movements. It reveals that Rhetoricians reacted creatively and courageously to the increasingly strident but largely ineffectual attempts to ban their activities, which culminated in the official prohibition of 26 January 1560 and which may have spurred even more subversive performances. Examining the scripts made available in print prior to that date, Husken inventories some of the techniques used by playwrights to express controversial opinions even in this relatively regulated medium, concentrating on accusations of 'heresy' that can actually be read as referring to representatives of the Church and not (as has been assumed) to Protestant reformers. He thereby calls for closer and more sophisticated readings of the surviving texts, which may reveal even more powerful strains of religious dissent than have hitherto been uncovered – and which may have befuddled contemporary censors as well as modern scholars. In the lead essay of section three, "Literary Traditions of Rhetoricians Plays," Bart Ramakers offers a radical re-assessment of what allegorical drama was, how it functioned, and how it was received by contemporaries. In "Dutch Allegorical Theater: Tradition and Conceptual Approach," he questions some fundamental assumptions about medieval dramatic genres, which (he rightly asserts) cannot be understood as separate from the genres of public oratory and argumentation, notably preaching and disputation (it is he who cites Enders). As he points out, all are based on monologue and dialogue, the building blocks of "everything that is said on stage"--and, for that matter, in real life (128, 133). Furthermore, allegory's visual impact must also be understood in terms of public display. In short, Ramakers argues against the stubborn notion that allegory is essentially a lesser form of dramatic representation, both less immediate and less theatrical. He makes a passionate case for the intellectual demands and payoffs of allegory--for playwrights, actors, and audiences--and for its place in the "public oratory of the town." The remaining two essays in this section are devoted to drama's literary relationships. Peter Happe's "Pyramus and Thisbe: Rhetoricians and Shakespeare" compares and contrasts the treatment of Ovid's story as lampooned in Shakespeare's A Midsummer Night's Dream (first printed in quarto in 1600) and as moralized in two earlier Dutch plays: the spel van sinnen performed by the Haarlem Rhetoricians around 1518 (extant in their manuscript collection of plays) and the illustrated Pyramus ende Thisbe first printed at Antwerp around 1520 (and reprinted at Gent in 1573 and at Rotterdam in 1612 and 1616). Happe shows how the Dutch playwrights of the sixteenth century expanded on both classical and Christian treatments in strikingly different ways and, in turn, shows that Shakespeare's more famous version of the story is part of a long tradition--as are his play's performers. Elsa Streitman's "God, Gods, Humans and Sinnekens in Classical Rhetoricians Plays" further demonstrates that many Dutch playwrights were experimenting with Christian interpretations of classical material, using humanist- inflected allegory in ways that bear direct comparison to contemporary English dramas like John Heywood's The Play of the Weather<\> or John Redford's Wit and Science. Clearly, further comparison of the urban theaters that flourished in England and the Low Countries during this period could reveal some surprising links and borrowings, fostered by shared commerce and shared political objectives and increasingly facilitated by shared printing presses. The fourth section of the book, "Urban Dramatic Culture," features articles by three prominent Anglophone scholars of Continental medieval drama. Alan Knight's "Guild Pageants and Urban Stability in Lille," the fruit of many years' research in the archives of that border town, provides a much-needed perspective on the development of urban theatrical traditions over a relatively longue duree. "Rhetoricians and the Drama: The Francophone Tradition," by the late Lynette R. Muir, is a fitting testament to its author's lifelong engagement with the drama of French-speaking lands, and brings together some of the scattered evidence for the composition, organization, and production of late-medieval plays. In "Worthy Women of the Old Testament: The Ambachtsvrouwen of the Leuven Ommegang," Meg Twycross looks closely at the extraordinary cavalcade performed annually at Leuven on the Feast of the Nativity of the Virgin (8 September) and recorded for posterity in the local history of Willem Boonen in 1593-94. Working from Boonen's description and drawings of this remarkable event, which featured thirty-four Old Testament heroines and their entourages on horseback, Twycross explains how spectators were "enticed into a mode of interactive reading" which invited them to "crack" the code of its riddling iconography (238). The final section, "Performance and Material Culture," consist of two essays: "Accommodation and Possessions of Chambers of Rhetoric in the Province of Holland" by Th. C. J. van der Heijden and F.C. van Boheemen, and Femke Kramer's "Producing Late Medieval Dutch Plays Today." The former surveys what can be known about the actual chambers in which Rhetoricians met, the furnishings of those rooms, and the other properties they contained. (In addition to printed and manuscript collections of plays, many groups owned Bibles and works of history, both vernacular and Latin. Somewhat surprisingly, the Latin translation of Josephus's Jewish Wars appears to have been a staple reference.) The latter surveys recent productions of medieval Dutch plays. Overall, this valuable collection of essays is not well served by its introduction, as I have already indicated. Given its intended audience, it should have attempted to define Dutch terms with accuracy; for example, factor would be more faithfully rendered "wright" or "playwright" than "official poet" (15); and spelen van sinne are not the same as English "moralities" (16), as Waite (101) and Ramakers (133-134) show. The introduction should also have explained what the Chambers of Rhetoric were, how they came into being, and how they governed themselves (the few sentences on page 12 are too brief and too sketchy to be helpful). Instead, it consists largely of an "Historical Prologue," featuring an inadequate and confused summary of high politics and religious debates in a place and time where, admittedly, politics and religion were notoriously complicated. And it makes several troubling assertions about the relationship of plays in performance to plays in manuscript, and about the relationship of dramatists to the printed publication of their works, repeating canards (e.g. "The Reformation was predicated upon the spread of print," 13) that have been challenged by many scholars, including some of the volume's own contributors. It would have been better to have used this space to deal thoughtfully with the larger questions raised by a book for which the editors otherwise deserve praise. These questions are important: the very "nature of the drama produced by this urban society" (9), the relationship between what was written down and what was performed, the reception of plays in production and in print, the interaction between theater and lived reality, the effects of entertainment on public policy (and vice versa), the shared techniques and ambitions of both dramatic and political actors. Happily, English-speaking scholars interested in such questions now have access to an urban milieu that is both similar to that of neighboring territories and strikingly distinctive: in its social porousness, its political indeterminacy, its spiritual diversity, its susceptibility to public opinion, and its resistance to categorization. NOTES [1] Carol Symes, A Common Stage: Theater and Public Life in Medieval Arras. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 2007. [2] Galbert of Bruges, De multro, traditione, et occisione gloriosi Karoli comitis Flandriarum, ed. Jeff Rider, Corpus Christianorum continuatio medievalis, 131 (Turnhout, 1994), c. 1 (7). "Qua pacis gratia legibus et justitiis sese regebant homines, omnia ingeniorum et studiorum argumenta ad placita componentes ut in virtute et eloquentia rhetoricae unusquisque se defensaret cum impetitus fuisset, vel cum hostem impeteret qua colorum varietate oratorie fucatum deciperet. Tunc vero habuit rhetorica sua exercitia et per industriam et per naturam." A similar observation is made still earlier, in the Disputatio de rhetorica attributed to Alcuin and dedicated to Charlemagne (c. 794): see The Rhetoric of Alcuin and Charlemagne, ed. Wilbur Samuel Howell (New York, 1965), 68-70 (cc. 2-3). -- -- Jenne Heise / Jadwiga Zajaczkowa jenne at fiedlerfamily.net From: Dorcas or Jean Date: November 25, 2009 10:02:01 AM CST To: CALONTIR at listserv.unl.edu Subject: [CALONTIR] Shakespeare-era archive goes online http://www.guardian.co.uk/culture/2009/nov/25/archive-shakespeare-goes-online?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter This link goes to an article in the Guardian, a British newspaper, about an archive of the papers of Elizabethan era theatre owner and entrepreneur Philip Henslowe, and his actor son-in-law Edward Alleyn. In the article there is a link to the Henslowe-Alleyn Digitisation Project. Oh, I guess I could put that link here, too. http://www.henslowe-alleyn.org.uk/index.html Dorcas Edited by Mark S. Harris theater-msg Page 21 of 21