Home Page

Stefan's Florilegium

recorders-msg



This document is also available in: text or RTF formats.

recorders-msg - 1/20/15

 

Medieval recorders. playing, buying.

 

NOTE: See also the files: instruments-msg, flutes-msg, song-sources-msg, p-songs-msg, bagpipes-msg, trumpets-msg, trumpet-build-art, SI-songbook1-art.

 

************************************************************************

NOTICE -

 

This file is a collection of various messages having a common theme that I have collected from my reading of the various computer networks. Some messages date back to 1989, some may be as recent as yesterday.

 

This file is part of a collection of files called Stefan's Florilegium. These files are available on the Internet at: http://www.florilegium.org

 

I have done a limited amount of editing. Messages having to do with separate topics were sometimes split into different files and sometimes extraneous information was removed. For instance, the message IDs were removed to save space and remove clutter.

 

The comments made in these messages are not necessarily my viewpoints. I make no claims as to the accuracy of the information given by the individual authors.

 

Please respect the time and efforts of those who have written these messages. The copyright status of these messages is unclear at this time. If information is published from these messages, please give credit to the originator(s).

 

Thank you,

    Mark S. Harris                  AKA:  THLord Stefan li Rous

                                          Stefan at florilegium.org

************************************************************************

 

From: andrew at bransle.ucs.mun.ca (Andrew Draskoy)

Newsgroups: rec.org.sca

Subject: Recorders (was Irish Music)

Date: 5 Apr 1994 19:22:11 GMT

Organization: Memorial University of Newfoundland

 

sj6070f90 at auvax1.adelphi.edu wrote:

> but it is ok to use a plastic recorder in place of a wooden one

 

If you are interested in differences between period music and modern,

you should note that there's another, even bigger difference.  As far

as we can tell from the one-and-a-half extant ones, Medieval recorders

were quite different beasts from the baroque-based modern recorders

that we use now.  For one thing, the bore was cylindrical, not

conical.  It also appears that the instruments were stopped, not open,

at the bottom.  I'm no luthier, but I think the former difference means

a slightly reduced range and a louder tone, and the later would drop

the pitch by an octave.  There are other differences as well.

 

Hunt, Edgar: The Recorder and its Music, Eulenberg, London, 1977

 

_The New Grove Dictionary of Musical Instruments_, vol. 3, p. 207

 

Weber, Rainer: "Recorder Finds from the Middle Ages, and Results

        of their Reconstruction,", _Galpin Society Journal_ vol. XXIX

        (May 1976) Pp. 35-41

--

Miklos Sandorfia of Ar n-Eilean-ne

andrew at bransle.ucs.mun.ca

 

 

From: sbloch at ms.uky.edu (Stephen Bloch)

Newsgroups: rec.org.sca

Subject: Re: Recorders (was Irish Music)

Date: 9 Apr 1994 00:37:31 -0400

Organization: University Of Kentucky, Dept. of Math Sciences

 

Andrew Draskoy <andrew at bransle.ucs.mun.ca> wrote:

>If you are interested in differences between period music and modern,

>you should note that there's another, even bigger difference.  As far

>as we can tell from the one-and-a-half extant ones, Medieval recorders

>were quite different beasts from the baroque-based modern recorders

>that we use now.

 

Even this "one-and-a-half" is putting a good face on it, since (if I

remember right) the "one" had obviously undergone major modifications and

less-than-successful repairs before it was lost for 500 years.

 

>For one thing, the bore was cylindrical, not conical.

>It also appears that the instruments were stopped, not open,

>at the bottom.

 

!!!??? This is the first I've heard of such a drastic difference.  I'm

reading Antique Sound Workshop's catalogue description of reconstructed

medieval recorders, and it mentions "extremely wide cylindrical bores" but

makes no mention of stopped bottoms.  I'll have to check those references

Andrew cites.

 

>I'm no luthier, but I think the former difference means

>a slightly reduced range and a louder tone, and the later would drop

>the pitch by an octave.

 

In my experience with "Renaissance-style" recorders (which also have

cylindrical bores), the bore makes the low end of the range a little more

solid (anybody who's ever learned the recorder has struggled to develop

the breath control to get the bottom note or two without overblowing),

at the expense of several notes at the top end.  It also seems to produce

a windier, less bell-like tone.

 

Wind instruments with stopped tubes do tend to play an octave lower than

instruments the same size with open tubes, but you can't just take a

recorder and stop the end to take it down an octave. (I just tried this

with my alto, and it worked beautifully for the bottom note, but if any

holes are open the effect is lost.)

--

                              mar-Joshua ibn-Eleazar ha-Shalib

                                      Stephen Bloch

                                  sbloch at s.ms.uky.edu

 

 

Newsgroups: rec.org.sca

From:  <lucinda_lundin at cl_63smtp.gw.chinalake.navy.mil>

Subject: Re: Searching for a wooden flute

Organization: NAWS, China Lake, CA

Date: Wed, 11 Jan 1995 17:32:02 GMT

 

wpeloqui at medar.COM (Willie Peloquin) wrote:

 

> I am looking for a merchant who sells wooden musical

> instruments. I would prefer a flute or something

> similar. Would a flute be in period? I know I can

> purchase a wooden recorder locally, it must be

> special ordered.

>

> Willie

 

I have purchased three recorders from von Huene Workshop, Inc.

and have been very happy with their service.  They also sell other

woodwinds, period and modern. If you have a credit

card, they will send you several instruments and will charge you

when you make your choice.  Two of my instruments came from their

extensive consigment selection.  They also sell period music and have

a small catalog/brochure.

 

Their address is:

von Huene Workshop, Inc

65 Boylston St.

Brookline, MA 02146

617/277-8690

vonhuene at world.std.com

 

Yours,

Lucinda

 

 

From: shermand at mindspring.com (Dennis R. Sherman)

Newsgroups: rec.org.sca

Subject: Re: Medieval toys -Specificly Musical Instruments - the recorder

Date: Fri, 12 Jul 1996 13:50:05 GMT

Organization: MindSpring Enterprises

 

Greetings to the Rialto from Robyyan.

 

Aleyse (Chantal Pecourt <cpecourt at mhv.net>) wrote:

 

>recently saw a Kutch Sophrano recorder. It says Swiss made and is all

>wood. It looks in near if not perfect condition. I know nothing about

>recorders but really want to learn how to play one. They are asking $48

>for it, is that expensive? SHould I buy a wooden one or go for the

>cheaper plastic ones? And how hard are they to learn to play??

 

I've been playing recorder for >15 years (and other winds for >30).

I've never heard of the Kutch brand, but there are *lots* of recorder

makers out there...  IMHO, you are better off buying a plastic Yamaha

300 series soprano recorder, if soprano is what you want.  Not just

any plastic recorder, but this specific one.  It will cost about $20,

and is a very fine instrument.  Don't let outdated opinions on plastic

vs. wood sway you -- the design of the instrument is far more

important to the sound than the material the instrument is made of.

At higher prices, with custom and hand built instruments, the material

makes a difference.  But you need to start at several hundred dollars

for a soprano before that becomes a consideration. Especially for SCA

use, plastic is a far better choice -- much more durable, much more

forgiving of haphazard maintenance.

 

As far as difficult to play... well, it varies.  Like any other

instrument, it takes practice.  You can get to mediocre pretty easily.

There are none of the problems of oboe, clarinet, flute, or any of

the brass instruments, with learning to make a sound, which is a great

advantage.  The fingerings are pretty straightforward, and anyone who

has played any wind instrument is going to feel fairly comfortable

pretty quickly.  Getting to be good is more work... :-)

 

Here's two suppliers I've used and am happy with for Early Music

things -- I know they both carry the Yamaha plastic recorders.  BTW,

the Yamaha 300 series is available in sizes from sopranino through

bass, and all are good instruments.

 

Von Huene Workshop, Inc.  

59-65 Boylston St.

Brookline, MA   20146

617-277-8690

 

Kelischek Workshop

Rt. 1 box 26

Brasstown, NC   28902

704-837-5833

 

If anyone is interested in more discussion of wood vs. plastic, I'll

be at Pennsic with both, and happy to help train other people's ears.

:-)

 

Robyyan Torr d'Elandris                     Dennis R. Sherman

Kapellenberg, Windmaster's Hill, Atlantia   Chapel Hill, NC

robyyan at mindspring.com                     dennis.sherman at mindspring.com

http://www.unc.edu/~sherman/robyyan.html   http://www.unc.edu/~sherman/

 

 

From: cyberspace at midlink.com

Newsgroups: rec.org.sca

Subject: Re: Medieval toys -Specificly Musical Instruments - the recorder

Date: 12 Jul 1996 14:10:30 GMT

Organization: Cyberspace

 

In article <31E5A53A.6549 at mhv.net>, Chantal Pecourt <cpecourt at mhv.net>

wrote:

>Hello

>       While musical instruemnts are not specificly "toys" I took the

>term in a generic sense to mean what we as adults like to play with. (

>that and I cannot figure out how to start a post, forgive me ). I

>recently saw a Kutch Sophrano recorder. It says Swiss made and is all

>wood. It looks in near if not perfect condition. I know nothing about

>recorders but really want to learn how to play one. They are asking $48

>for it, is that expensive? SHould I buy a wooden one or go for the

>cheaper plastic ones? And how hard are they to learn to play??

>many thanks

>Aleyse

 

Oh, goody! Something I know about! <BG>

$48 is very reasonable for a soprano recorder--it's what mine cost 7 yrs

ago.  How easy it is to learn depends on how much music experience you

already have, what books you can get, and how much--if any--help you can

get if you want it.  There are many people in the Society who play

recorders of various types and would be willing to teach, I being

one--however I got into a medieval music group in college, learned about

the SCA at a ren faire we were to perform at and then joined :).  

Two very helpful self-teach books are: the _Hugh Orr Basic Recorder

Technique(soprano/alto)_, and the _Von Trapp Family Book on the Soprano

Recorder_--I lent out my copy and can't remember the exact name.

If you can get into an ensembe, do.  I miss the challenge of playing one

part that needs to blend with several.

 

Hope this helps!

 

In Service to the Dream,

          Erzsebet

 

 

From: uggpfr0008 at mtvms2.mtech.edu (Frank Reinart)

Newsgroups: rec.org.sca

Subject: Re: Medieval toys -Specificly Musical Instruments - the recorder

Date: 13 Jul 1996 17:03:45 GMT

Organization: Montana Tech

 

In article <31E5A53A.6549 at mhv.net>, Chantal Pecourt <cpecourt at mhv.net> writes:

>Hello

>       While musical instruemnts are not specificly "toys" I took the

>term in a generic sense to mean what we as adults like to play with. (

>that and I cannot figure out how to start a post, forgive me ). I

>recently saw a Kutch Sophrano recorder. It says Swiss made and is all

>wood. It looks in near if not perfect condition. I know nothing about

>recorders but really want to learn how to play one. They are asking $48

>for it, is that expensive? SHould I buy a wooden one or go for the

>cheaper plastic ones? And how hard are they to learn to play??

 

Speaking from the perspective of a recorder player, I believe that you will

find a recorder a very easy instrument to pick up. I've taught several

people to play before, and had an easy time of it, even when those people had

never played an instrument before.  It also benefits as a fairly common

instrument, with plenty of music out there and available for it.  Of course,

there are also benefits to playing live music at SCA dancing, rather than

relying on the crutch of a bard-in-a-box (nothing is more annoying than to

have to stop a Hole In the Wall dance because the blasted tape was finished

:)   ).

 

$48 seems to me to be pretty inexpensive for most of the wooden recorders I've

seen (one reason why I don't own one right now).  I don't know how much of

a reflection that is on the quality of the instrument, so it might be good to

find a good recorder player in your area to check the instrument out before

you buy it.

 

As far as wooden versus plastic, that's a little at your discretion.  Wooden

recorders, of course, look period, while most plastic ones do not.  But that's

really a pretty moot point to me. I've played both at SCA events and not had

any comments about the lack of authenticity surrounding the plastic recorder.

Rather, most people are just glad for live music, no matter where it's coming

from (and for those that do have an authenticity problem, I've been to a wide

variety of events, and seen far more bards-in-a-box at SCA dancing then I've

seen live recorder music).  Wooden recorders are far more difficult to upkeep,

and you'd want to have someone show you how that is done.  Moisture, somewhat

common at outdoor SCA events can also ruin a wooden recorder, despite your

best efforts to preserve it.  Plastic is somewhat susceptible to temperature,

but I've never had a serious problem with that (and I've played in a wide

variety of temperatures).  Really, if it's a good recorder, I'd pick up that

wooden one, because $48 seems a reasonable price to me (and cheaper than a

lot I have seen), but pick yourself up a $3 some plastic recorder too, for

those times when a wooden one isn't appropriate to play.

 

If you have any questions you'd like to ask me, feel free to email me.  I

won't have that address passed the end of July though.

 

In the Service,

Edmund Snowden

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

*   Frank D. Reinart                             uggpfr0008 at mtvms2.mtech.edu   *

*   Montana Tech                                                              *

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

 

 

From: uggpfr0008 at mtvms2.mtech.edu (Frank Reinart)

Newsgroups: rec.org.sca

Subject: Re: Medieval toys -Specificly Musical Instruments - the recorder

Date: 13 Jul 1996 17:07:02 GMT

Organization: Montana Tech

 

In article <4s5mcm$o2p at news.paonline.com>, cyberspace at midlink.com writes:

>Two very helpful self-teach books are: the _Hugh Orr Basic Recorder

>Technique(soprano/alto)_, and the _Von Trapp Family Book on the Soprano

>Recorder_--I lent out my copy and can't remember the exact name.

 

The basic recorder book published by Mel Bay is another really good book.

It's the one I learned from, and the one both I and Lady Aoife teach others

from.

 

In the Service,

Edmund Snowden

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

*   Frank D. Reinart                             uggpfr0008 at mtvms2.mtech.edu   *

*   Montana Tech                                                              *

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

 

 

From: barbanis at vnet.ibm.COM (George Barbanis)

Newsgroups: rec.org.sca

Subject: Recorders

Date: 15 Jul 1996 02:47:27 -0400

Organization: The Internet

 

While on the subject of the recorders, you may want to check this web

page out: http://www.iinet.net.au/~nickl/recorder.html

It has excellent material on recorders, including very detailed fingering

charts etc.  No, I have not written that page, but I wish I had :-)

In Service

Alexios Macedon

 

 

Newsgroups: rec.org.sca

From: bq676 at torfree.net (Kristine E. Maitland)

Subject: Re: Medieval toys -Specificly Musical Instruments - the recorder

Message-ID: <DuMELu.9EM.0.sheppard at torfree.net>

Organization: Toronto Free-Net

 

4ru033$3up at pith.uoregon.edu> <31E5A53A.6549 at mhv.net>:

Organization: Toronto Free-Net

 

Chantal Pecourt (cpecourt at mhv.net) wrote:

: Hello

:       While musical instruemnts are not specificly "toys" I took the

: term in a generic sense to mean what we as adults like to play with. (

: that and I cannot figure out how to start a post, forgive me ). I

: recently saw a Kutch Sophrano recorder. It says Swiss made and is all

: wood. It looks in near if not perfect condition. I know nothing about

: recorders but really want to learn how to play one. They are asking $48

: for it, is that expensive? SHould I buy a wooden one or go for the

: cheaper plastic ones? And how hard are they to learn to play??

 

While I know nothing about good wood recorders (i.e. what is a good brand

to purchase) I can say that to start out, a plastic one will do just

fine.   Most people start with a soprano recorder but frankly, I prefer

the tone of an alto or tenor.  If you've played clarinet then you'll find

that the alto will not be difficult as the fingerings are practically the

same.

 

Are they hard to learn?  Well, i got my first recorder when I was seven

or so -- the first things I taught myself to play was The Theme from the

Friendly Giant (or "Early one morning) and the theme from M*A*S*H ( or

"Suicide is Painless").

 

Trust me, you'll be playing bransles in no time.

 

cantana

Ines Carmen Maria de Freitas

 

 

From: chimera at dove.mtc.net.au

Newsgroups: rec.org.sca

Subject: Re: Medieval toys -Specificly Musical Instruments - the recorder

Date: Wed, 17 Jul 1996 01:50:55 GMT

Organization: Microtronics Information Systems

 

uggpfr0008 at mtvms2.mtech.edu (Frank Reinart) wrote:

 

>As far as wooden versus plastic, that's a little at your discretion.  Wooden

>recorders, of course, look period, while most plastic ones do not.  But that's

>really a pretty moot point to me

 

Well, my sister played one for years before she took up the flute but

hated the white plastic look, so I used acrylic paints to create faux

finishes ranging from generic wood to tortoiseshell. The acyrlics

didn't affect the plastic, and were eacy to touch up if they chipped

around the fingerholes. I would advise using black rather than white

recorders, because that way you can leave the mouthpiece unpainted

without it being glaringly obvious, unless you are creating a faux

bamboo instrument for an eastern persona . . .

 

Books on all kinds of paint finishes, including marble, are readily

available, and its worth looking them up and experimenting. You can

also buy small kits suitable for table-sized projects. Most kits use

oil finishes, but you can experiment and adapt the techniques to dry

poster paints and acrylics.

 

I do not advocate using them everywhere, but they look less glaring

that steel poles on a tent (or wood-grained contact for that matter)

and a faux sepentine inset on a feasting box is a lot cheaper than the

real thing. When they don't work out perfectly, I take comfort in The

Candle-light Factor : almost everything looks passable halfway through

a candle-lit feast, and at least you've /tried/.

 

Guimora Peverel

 

 

From: sbloch at adl15.adelphi.edu (Stephen Bloch)

Newsgroups: rec.org.sca

Subject: Re: Medieval toys -Specificly Musical Instruments - the recorder

Date: 18 Jul 1996 12:58:36 GMT

Organization: Adelphi University, Garden City, NY

 

Chantal Pecourt (cpecourt at mhv.net) wrote:

>: I recently saw a Kutch Sophrano recorder. It says Swiss made and is all

>: wood. It looks in near if not perfect condition. I know nothing about

>: recorders but really want to learn how to play one. They are asking $48

>: for it, is that expensive? SHould I buy a wooden one or go for the

>: cheaper plastic ones? And how hard are they to learn to play??

 

A wooden soprano recorder for $48 is probably not very good: the most

likely problem is that it won't play in tune, either with itself or

with other instruments.

 

For less money you can get an excellent plastic recorder, which is less

affected by temperature, humidity, etc.  Look for the brands Yamaha,

Aulos, or Zen-On.  (If you're buying a tenor or larger, I think Yamaha

is the only decent choice.)

 

I almost always recommend plastic recorders to beginners; in addition

to the above reasons, I wouldn't buy a wooden recorder without personally

giving it a good workout first, and a beginner doesn't know enough to do

that.  Every wooden recorder is different, even the same model from the

same maker; every plastic recorder of a given model and maker is pretty

similar.  If you're worried about _looking_ period, at least one of the

aforementioned makers has wood-grain finishes that will pass the

ten-foot test.

 

Kristine E. Maitland <bq676 at torfree.net> replied:

>While I know nothing about good wood recorders (i.e. what is a good brand

>to purchase) I can say that to start out, a plastic one will do just

>fine.   Most people start with a soprano recorder but frankly, I prefer

>the tone of an alto or tenor.

 

Agreed.  Altos and tenors cost more, but they're easier to play in tune

with one another, and you can practice them late at night without

annoying your neighbors and roommates.  (Well, not as much :-)

 

Once you've gotten good enough on the recorder that the warmer tone

color of wood is worth the added hassle, you have a number of decisions

to make.  Most commercially available recorders are "Baroque-style",

optimized for playing Baroque solos.  Most of these have a bunch of

ornamental turnings.  For medieval and Renaissance music, especially in

consort, I prefer a "Renaissance-style" recorder, which has various

construction differences that add up to a less reliable high range, a

more solid low range, and a less piercing tone; these are generally

plainer in appearance.

 

As for makers of wooden recorders, I have a very nice Gill Baroque

soprano that only cost me $60 (after I played a minute or two on every

one of the dozens of wooden soprano recorders at that particular store).

I have a Moeck Renaissance soprano that cost me $100 used; it's OK

by itself, but doesn't play in tune with other instruments. I have

a Mollenhauer Renaissance alto that cost me $275; it's an excellent

instrument, if you don't mind a somewhat windy tone. We have several

Kobliczek Renaissance recorders, which are also excellent and a little

sweeter in tone; their prices are comparable to Mollenhauers.

All of the above instruments are years old, and would probably cost

twice as much new today.  They're also all at least partly "factory-made";

top-notch hand-made recorders can run $600 for a soprano, and more for

larger instruments.

 

So recorders CAN eat big bucks, if you're willing to spend them.  But

again, you can get an excellent plastic instrument for under $50.  Don't

worry about the wooden ones until you basically know how to play, and

then get advice from a reputable early-musical-instrument dealer like

the New England Early Music Shop, the Boulder Early Music Shop, or

Courtly Music Unlimited.  Also go to early-music workshops and get

advice from the teachers and more experienced students.

 

As for "how hard are they to learn to play", the trickiest part is

breath control.  Ken Wollitz's _The Recorder Book_ has a whole chapter

of breath-control exercises that help both beginners and experienced

players, in addition to fingering charts, a chapter on buying and

maintaining a wooden recorder, and a bunch of other advice.

 

                                        mar-Joshua ibn-Eleazar ha-Shalib

--

                                                 Stephen Bloch

                                           sbloch at panther.adelphi.edu

                                         http://www.adelphi.edu/~sbloch/

                                        Math/CS Dept, Adelphi University

 

 

From: FPAGNIEL at UGA.CC.UGA.EDU (Frederick Pagniello)

Newsgroups: rec.org.sca

Subject: Re: Playing the Recorder

Date: Thu, 13 Mar 97 18:36:27 EST

Organization: University of Georgia

 

In article <5g93fk$ics$1 at cathedral.cerc.wvu.edu>

ewhite at cs.wvu.edu (Elliott White III) writes:

>2) Is the soprano the only actually period one? I myself am thinking

>of playing the Alto so that my wife and I could do some nice duets,

>however, I don't want to sink the $30 into buying the alto to have

>people walking up to me all the time telling me that it isn't period.

No.  Period recorders ranged from the sopranino to the bass (I've seen

a picture of a period bass of about 7 feet in length, but I do not know

its nomenclature).  You shouldn't have any problem with selection.  Indeed,

hopefully you will become proficient in a range of recorders.

The only complaint one could make against you is that you are playing a

baroque-style recorder.  Now, if some does this, then say to them that

you will be more than happy to play a period recorder....just fork over

the $$$$ (tell them you want a Von Huene or a Morgan).

By the by, seek out the players of other period instruments, such as the

violaists.  You will be pleasently surprised by the results.

>3) Where can we find some nice books of sheet music for period songs?

>Our local store has a wonderful book of Elizibethan songs written for

>duet: Soprano and Alto, which I think I am going to pick up for my

>wife and myself if the Alto is "period enough"

 

Try the following:

                 Von Huene Workshops,

                 59-76 Boylston Street,

                 Brookline, MA 02146.

                 (617) 277-8690.

                 Courtly Music Unlimited,

                 1-800-2-RICHIE

Either should be able to assist you in your search for music, and they do

mail-order.

Gnaeus Valerius Sidero.

 

 

From: dlblanc at earthlink.net (Donald L. Blanchard)

Newsgroups: rec.org.sca

Subject: Re: Playing the Recorder

Date: Fri, 14 Mar 1997 07:51:21 GMT

 

On 13 Mar 1997 14:37:40 GMT, ewhite at cs.wvu.edu (Elliott White III) wrote:

 

>Hello, my wife and I have both decided to take up the recorder and

>have been having awonderful time playing it.

>We have a few questions though we were hoping someone could answer us:

>1) Is the only difference between a German and a Barouque recorder the

>fingering difference for the Low F?  That seems to be the only

>difference listed in our Mel Bay: Basic Recorder Method book.

 

Frankly, I am not familiar with a 'German' recorder, although I do recall some

fingering differences.  The only true period recorders that I know of were made

in one piece, which means not tunable.  The standard 'Baroque' recorder was made

in three pieces, and is technically not period.  For practicality (i.e. playing

with other musicians), I highly recommend a two piece recorder, period or not.

 

>2) Is the soprano the only actually period one? I myself am thinking

>of playing the Alto so that my wife and I could do some nice duets,

>however, I don't want to sink the $30 into buying the alto to have

>people walking up to me all the time telling me that it isn't period.

 

Definitely not.  I have seen references (Henry VIII, if I remember right) to a

consort of four recorders, the highest of which was a tenor, with bass,

contra-bass, and something else below that.  Of course, all four recorders in a

period consort were manufactured - and pitched - together; there were no

guarantees if you mixed sets!

 

I would recommend that you acquire, and learn to play, as many different pitches

as your budget will allow.  This allows you a lot more freedom in choosing

material to play.  BTW, there were at least two pitches of recorder above the

soprano, as well (although you might be asked to leave the room if you try to

play them in public).  BTW, cheap recorders usually don't sound THAT much worse

than expensive ones; I suggest you learn to play them well before shelling out

big bucks.

__

Louis leBlanc, O.L.      |  Donald L. Blanchard

Barony of Caerthe        |  dlblanc at earthlink.net

Kingdom of the Outlands  |  Denver, Colorado, USA

 

 

From: dwbutler at mtu.edu (Daniel W. Butler-Ehle)

Newsgroups: rec.org.sca

Subject: Re: Playing the Recorder

Date: 18 Mar 1997 19:54:47 -0500

Organization: Michigan Technological University

 

Louis leBlanc (dlblanc at earthlink.net) wrote:

: On 13 Mar 1997 14:37:40 GMT, ewhite at cs.wvu.edu (Elliott White III) wrote:

:

: >1) Is the only difference between a German and a Barouque recorder the

: >fingering difference for the Low F?  That seems to be the only

: >difference listed in our Mel Bay: Basic Recorder Method book.

: >

: Frankly, I am not familiar with a 'German' recorder, although I do recall some

: fingering differences.

 

As I understand it, German fingering was invented early in this century

during the great early music revival either due to a misunderstanding

of of the Baroque-era instruments or as an intentional simplification of

the fingering.  It avoids the split-finger formation of the low F on

the soprano (German-fingered recorders are almost exclusively sopranos).

But as you may notice, some sharps and flats are split-fingered, so the

value of this simplification is dubious.  It's not in use much outside

of primary school classrooms.

 

: The only true period recorders that I know of were made in one piece,

: which means not tunable.  The standard 'Baroque' recorder was made

: in three pieces, and is technically not period.  

 

Yes, the period Renaissance recorder was a different animal from its

Baroque successors.  But start with a Baroque recorder anyway.  And

learn about the differences so that you will at least be able to

recognize your anachronisms.  *Then* get a Renaisance-style instrument

if you're still so inclined.  [It would be neat if someone made three-

piece Baroque recorders (inverse conical bore, perhaps a curved windway,

etc.) that had the outward appearance of their Renaissance counterparts.]

 

(I must admit, I'm hardly familiar with Renaissance fingering, but I

would suspect that having a cylindrical bore prevents it from having

fingering identical to Baroque recorders. Anyone?)

 

: For practicality (i.e. playing with other musicians), I highly

: recommend a two piece recorder, period or not.

 

I second the recommendation. A two- (or three-)piece Baroque recorder.

I would also add that if your budget limits your choices to either a

bottom-of-the-line wooden recorder or a similarly-priced plastic model,

you should consider the plastic one.

: I have seen references (Henry VIII, if I remember right) to a

: consort of four recorders, the highest of which was a tenor, with bass,

: contra-bass, and something else below that.  

 

As I understand it, the modern names are:

 

c" Gar Kleine Sopanino (Recoder Piccolo) (rare and annoyingly shrill)

f' Sopranino

c' Soprano (Descant)

f  Alto (Treble)

c  Tenor

F  Bass

C  Great Bass

F' Contra Bass (about 7 feet tall)

 

(I probably screwed up the pitch notation. In any case, the Tenor

starts at middle C on a piano.)

 

How come there's no "Baritone" voice in early instruments?

 

Ulfin

Principality of Northshield, M.K.

 

 

Date: Sat, 22 Mar 1997 13:23:37 -0500 (EST)

From: "Daniel W. Butler-Ehle" <dwbutler at mtu.edu>

To: "Mark S. Harris" <markh at risc.sps.mot.com>

Subject: Re: Playing the Recorder

 

On Sat, 22 Mar 1997, Mark S. Harris wrote:

> Hmm. I still have the wooden recorder I played back in second grade,

> long before the plastic ones came out.

 

I believe plastic recorders have been in the classroom since the

early 60s.  Probably polystyrene at first, now they're ABS.

 

> I've assumed it was a soprano model.

 

Safe assumption.  Beginning a student on another size is quite

unusual (unless fingerspan is a problem, then maybe they might

teach sopranino, but I'm just speculating).  (This assumes that

it was taught as the student's introduction to instrumental

music.  If the student is already an instrumentalist, and the

teacher is assembling a consort, then certainly they might begin

with a different size as needed.)

 

> How do I identify a "German-fingered" recorder?

 

On an English (Baroque) recorder, the fourth hole (from foot to

fipple) is smaller than the fifth hole.  Vice versa with German

fingering.  

 

True Baroque fingering (as if it was ever really standardized)

had a few small differences from English fingering, which is its

modern variant/interpretation.  But they are close enough that the

terms are usually interchangeable. Or so I've read. I've never

seen a fingering chart for antique Baroque recorders. Indeed,

I even have several modern recorders that differ slightly from

one another on the fingering of some notes (particularly in the

second register).

 

Ulfin

 

 

From: lindahl at pbm.com (Greg Lindahl)

Newsgroups: rec.org.sca

Subject: Re: Recorders : Wood vs Plastic, Medieval vs Modern

Date: 20 May 1997 13:24:10 GMT

 

"Jeff Foehringer" <jjf100 at ccia.com> writes:

>        I am looking to purchase a soprano recorder in the next month.  At

> first,  I considered the Yamaha plastic model. Basically, I don't have

> over a hundred dollars to spend, and I have heard that a good plastic

> recorder is better than a cheap wooden one.

 

Even if you buy an expensive wooden one, it's handy to have a cheap

plastic one to let your friends borrow, and take out in inclement

weather.

 

>     However, the Antique Sound Workshop webpage contains four wooden

> recorders that they claim are the best in the price range.  I was wondering

> if any good gentles have any experience with any of these models.

 

I have friends who own these. They are about the only wooden recorders

in that price range, and they really aren't that much better or worse

than the cheap Yamaha. Fortunately, they don't cost an arm and a leg,

so if you have the cash, please yourself.

 

Neither the Yamaha or the Kung is very renaissance-ish, though. For a

renaissance recorder you want a wide, cylindrical bore and large

finger holes. I have a "Ganassi" alto in G made by Robert Turner, and

it's definitely different from the Kung and plastic, although your

average listener wouldn't know.

 

-- gb

 

 

From: ncb at my-dejanews.com

Newsgroups: rec.org.sca

Subject: Re: medieval recorder music

Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1998 18:01:29 GMT

 

> > hi!  I just got  a recorder for my birthday (thanks, ric!) and I'd like

> > to know what to play on it.

snip

> Also, there's a music publisher called Sweet Pipes (23 Scholar Lane,

> Levittown, NY 11756) that publishes sheet music for the recorder.  Don't

> know if they have a web site or not.

 

For recorder sheet music, you should definitely check out

http://www.sheetmusicplus.com because they list over 7,000

titles just for recorder.

 

 

From: Daniel W. Butler-Ehle <dwbutler at mtu.edu>

Newsgroups: rec.org.sca

Subject: Re: medieval recorder music

Date: 18 Nov 1998 22:58:11 GMT

Organization: Michigan Technological University

 

Esther Mendes <celyn at drizzle.com> wrote:

: On 14 Nov 1998, Pel1inore wrote:

: > hi!  I just got  a recorder for my birthday (thanks, ric!) and I'd like

: > to know what to play on it.

 

: Also, there's a music publisher called Sweet Pipes (23 Scholar Lane,

: Levittown, NY 11756) that publishes sheet music for the recorder.  Don't

: know if they have a web site or not.

 

They also publish (I probably don't have a name quite right) the

_Sweet Pipes Recorder Book: a method for adult students_. It skips

the basic stuff on how to read music (assuming you know already

or can figure it out on your own without all the hand-holding

common in methods designed for children).  It's available in two

versions: one for Soprano (and other C recorders, I s'pose) and

one for Alto (and sopranino and bass, etc.).  

 

The C book and the F book use the same fingerings for the same

lessons, the music is just transposed.  I was kinda disappointed

by that; I think it would be fun for a group of beginners to

start out as a consort. (Not that the difference in keys would

sound bad when played together, but I would like to have some

multi-part stuff that is really simple but isn't entirely

parallel.)

 

On that thought, does anyone have any suggestions for forming a

novice-level consort?  I would like to start a group to play

common SCA dance tunes. Anyone know where I might look for

simpler-than-average three-part versions of such music?

 

Ulfin

 

 

From: Jeffrey Clark <jmclark85 at gmail.com>

Date: February 14, 2012 10:48:15 PM CST

To: "Kingdom of Ansteorra - SCA, Inc." <ansteorra at lists.ansteorra.org>

Subject: Re: [Ansteorra] buying recorders (was: iso dance)

 

Stefan,

 

There is a lot of strange (outdated?) advice in the buying recorders thread. As a professional recorder player and teacher, I would say that the only recorder that an entry-level player should consider purchasing is a Yamaha 300 series. Most of my teachers have one or two knocking around and use them as practice instruments, and many, many other professionals have them.

 

Until you are ready to spend >$500 on an instrument, you cannot go wrong with the Yamaha 300.   I cannot tell you how many recorder players I've seen who had purchased an off-brand plastic or a cheap wooden recorder and had the inferior instrument hold them back or kill their enjoyment altogether.

 

Also, if anyone will be at Elfsea defender -- I will be there, and am willing to give lessons/classes/play for dancers. I'm usually very easy to spot.

--AS Zorzi

 

 

From: ledonna mcgowan <ledmcgowan at gmail.com>

Date: February 15, 2012 8:24:15 AM CST

To: "Kingdom of Ansteorra - SCA, Inc." <ansteorra at lists.ansteorra.org>

Subject: Re: [Ansteorra] buying recorders (was: iso dance)

 

What are the more popular dance songs?  I have a copy of Master Avatar's

music "Early Period and Popular Dance Music" and want to work out some of

the alto and tenor parts as well as soprano.

 

Delphina

 

BTW:  If you took my recorder class at the last King's College I need to

warn you that Lyons has changed the way they make their recorders and they

are no longer in tune through out the registers.  Not worth the money any

more.

 

 

From: Adalia <adalia.nyx at gmail.com>

Date: February 15, 2012 11:05:16 AM CST

To: "Kingdom of Ansteorra - SCA, Inc." <ansteorra at lists.ansteorra.org>

Subject: Re: [Ansteorra] buying recorders (was: iso dance)

 

This is a GREAT starter recorder.  Eventually, you'll need some recorder grease to put the pieces together and allow for tuning to play with otherinstruments (it comes in a little tub similar to carmex lip balm).  This is exactly what I recommend when I start teaching someone to play. I will say that you can sometimes find the same recorder in a more neutral color scheme so that it doesn't stand out quite so much when playing at events, but even that is a minimal consideration.  :)

 

<<< Would you agree with the recommendation for the Yamaha 300 series

then?  And to all of you, if one was just wanting to tip one's toe

into things (and not buy the set of four recorders), which recorder

would be the best to start with?  Something like this C-Soprano?

 

http://www.amazon.com/Yamaha-3-Piece-C-Soprano-Recorder-Brown/dp/B0002EB5U8/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&;qid=1329324910&sr=8-2

 

--Antoine >>>

--

HL Adalia VonderBerg

 

 

From: ledonna mcgowan <ledmcgowan at gmail.com>

Date: February 15, 2012 11:44:58 AM CST

To: "Kingdom of Ansteorra - SCA, Inc." <ansteorra at lists.ansteorra.org>

Subject: Re: [Ansteorra] buying recorders (was: iso dance)

 

Yes... Yamaha makes some great recorders... here is another site with free shipping..

 

http://www.wwbw.com/Yamaha-YRS-302B-Professional-Soprano-Recorder-with-Baroque-Fingering-460046-i1142351.wwbw

 

My alto is a tudor and my tenor is an aulos and both are nice instruments for a good price.  Also found at www.wwbw.com

 

Delphina

 

 

From: Jennifer Smith <jds at randomgang.com>

Date: February 15, 2012 11:55:59 AM CST

To: "Kingdom of Ansteorra - SCA, Inc." <ansteorra at lists.ansteorra.org>

Subject: Re: [Ansteorra] buying recorders (was: iso dance)

 

I would add that if you're going to buy a recorder (and I heartily second the recommendations for the Yamaha 300 series), buy an alto. It's around $35 or so, but for that extra price over a soprano, you will be more able to blend into a group. Usually in any group of musicians, you only need one, maybe two, soprano instruments (particularly recorders).

 

-Emma

 

 

From: Zach Most <clermont1348 at yahoo.com>

Date: February 15, 2012 11:56:57 AM CST

To: "Kingdom of Ansteorra - SCA, Inc." <ansteorra at lists.ansteorra.org>

Subject: Re: [Ansteorra] buying recorders (was: iso dance)

 

The Yamaha 300s are great.   Most ensembles have an abundance of soprano recorders, and the over all sound of the group tends to be better with all the parts covered, and the lower parts double covered.  Because of the frequency response of our ears, tenor recorders in particular are pretty quiet.  Their parts tend to be easier too.  The tenor is an octave lower than the soprano, so you'd only have to learn one mapping for a fingering to a note if you'd like to hop to playing a lead line later.  For these reasons I'd nudge you toward a tenor if you can.  Altos are great too.  They tend to have a pleasant voice, they're a great compromise since you can play lots of harmonies and many lead parts if you'd like, and they fit better for folks with smaller hands than a tenor does.  Alto and sopranino are an octave apart.

 

  Gaston

 

 

From: Jeffrey Clark <jmclark85 at gmail.com>

Date: February 15, 2012 12:31:22 PM CST

To: "Kingdom of Ansteorra - SCA, Inc." <ansteorra at lists.ansteorra.org>

Subject: Re: [Ansteorra] buying recorders (was: iso dance)

 

I always start my students on the alto. Really, the soprano recorder is almost un-period for consort use. An alto will always sound better than a soprano, and a good alto player can play almost all of the SCA literature -- I've hit maybe three dances that I just could not play on the soprano.

 

My recommendation cor purchasing entry-level recorders goes to the Antique Sound Workshop ( aswltd.com ) , they tine and voice each instrument they sell. You should also find a teacher. The American Recorder Society should have a list of teachers near you. Don't just take random advice from people, find a serious recorder player -- we have quite a few here in Texas. This is doubly true if you don't have a background in music: a little proper instruction goes a LONG way.

 

-- AS Zorzi

 

 

From: ledonna mcgowan <ledmcgowan at gmail.com>

Date: February 15, 2012 12:57:31 PM CST

To: "Kingdom of Ansteorra - SCA, Inc." <ansteorra at lists.ansteorra.org>

Subject: Re: [Ansteorra] buying recorders (was: iso dance)

 

It's not the spread that will keep you from making it... I have some 5th graders that love playing the tenor and their hands haven't stopped growing yet but my co worker doesn't like the tenor at all... it hurts her wrist.

 

If you are anywhere close to Loch Soilier/Stargate area we can meet and you are welcome to try a tenor and alto before you buy it.. smile.

 

Delphina

 

 

From: Jennifer Smith <jds at randomgang.com>

Date: February 15, 2012 3:00:54 PM CST

To: "Kingdom of Ansteorra - SCA, Inc." <ansteorra at lists.ansteorra.org>

Subject: Re: [Ansteorra] buying recorders (was: iso dance)

 

Cynthia, if you can get up to Mooneschadowe's area sometime (we have an

event in Stillwater this weekend!) or at some other Northern event, let me know and I'll bring my Yamaha tenor recorder so you can see. Some tenors are better than others for spacing for fingers and wrists; I find mine okay if I'm in practice, but finger-cramping if I'm not.

 

As for reading music in C, yes -- I think most of us do! I certainly can't transpose in my head. The alto recorder, while an F instrument, is frequently taught in C with different fingerings. So for example, a G on a soprano/tenor is the same fingering as a C on a alto. It's possible to learn both 'sets' of fingerings, and make the mental switch when you switch instruments...most of the time! Occasionally I'll catch myself playing the wrong set on the wrong instrument.

 

-Emma

 

 

From: Jeffrey Clark <jmclark85 at gmail.com>

Date: February 15, 2012 4:08:24 PM CST

To: "Kingdom of Ansteorra - SCA, Inc." <ansteorra at lists.ansteorra.org>

Subject: Re: [Ansteorra] buying recorders (was: iso dance)

 

Alto, always alto. The alto recorder has always been the favoured recorder for just about everything.

 

On Feb 15, 2012, at 15:50, Stefan li Rous <StefanliRous at austin.rr.com> wrote:

<<< Several people have recommended a recorder other than a soprano, when being used in a group of people playing.

 

But I've seldom seen more than one or two recorders being used at an SCA event. What about when you have a single recorder player and perhaps a singer, making the rounds of the bardic circles? Which type of recorder would you recommend for them?

 

Thanks for the interesting thread.

Stefan >>>

 

 

From: Jeffrey Clark <jmclark85 at gmail.com>

Date: February 15, 2012 4:18:32 PM CST

To: "Kingdom of Ansteorra - SCA, Inc." <ansteorra at lists.ansteorra.org>

Subject: Re: [Ansteorra] buying recorders (was: iso dance)

 

As a point of comparison, during the course my studies I have bought one sopranino, 4 sopranos and 7 altos two tenors and one bass. I currently carry 3 sopranos and 5 altos, and I do 90% of my recitals/concerts/auditions on the alto.

 

The tenor and bass recorders are better off being replaced by a buzzy or a string, and it takes a fine amount of skill to play a soprano in tune, whereas the alto is more forgiving and has a richer tone to begin with. Also, most SCA venues are just unkind to the lower recorders anyway.

 

Alto recorders read in C. Don't try to think of them as being in F, just learn the alto as an alto and all will be fine. I routinely go between recorders in C, D, F, and G without a problem -- it's quite doable with a little practice and a little patience.

 

--AS Zorzi

 

 

From: Laura Young <laura.young.9191 at gmail.com>

Date: February 15, 2012 4:14:26 PM CST

To: "Kingdom of Ansteorra - SCA, Inc." <ansteorra at lists.ansteorra.org>

Subject: Re: [Ansteorra] buying recorders (was: iso dance)

 

On Feb 15, 2012, at 1:38 PM, Jeffrey Clark wrote:

> You'll find a lot of SA SS and AA stuff for you.

<<< Huh?

 

Could you please translate this for me?  And other new or non-musicians?

 

Stefan >>>

 

SA = soprano/alto duet

SS = soprano/soprano duet

AA = alto/alto duet

 

 

From: Jeffrey Clark <jmclark85 at gmail.com>

Date: February 15, 2012 9:59:52 PM CST

To: "Kingdom of Ansteorra - SCA, Inc." <ansteorra at lists.ansteorra.org>

Subject: Re: [Ansteorra] recorders

 

The side of the whistle part of the recorder, and the level of exactness with which it was made affects how well it sounds and responds to the player. The finger holes also need to be very specific sizes and shapes in order to vent the correct amount of air. If the tone holes are not right, it affects how well certain notes play in tune. This can mean that if you play a low C and a high C, one of the two might be sharp/flat even if everything else is correct. A properly made recorder will be very consistent about how it speaks and how much air it needs throughout its range.

 

This is where the choice of a first instrument really matters. I picked up a recorder in a music shop and it was so out of tune with itself that there were a few notes that were just unusable. I also had a lady come to the last recorder class that I taught with an instrument that -- try as I might-- I could not get to play in the second octave due to the labium being cut wrong.

 

If you are purchasing your first instrument (be it a recorder, trumpet,

oboe, whatever) you should never try to just pick one out.  You might get lucky, but you may also get a lemon, and that bad instrument might end up ruining your enjoyment of music (I've seen it happen more than a few times). Seeking the advice of someone who has been playing for awhile and knows what to look for in an instrument (even a $20-$35 recorder) can go a long way to helping you get something you will enjoy playing.

 

--AS Zorzi

 

On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 4:38 PM, ledonna mcgowan <ledmcgowan at gmail.com>wrote:

<<< Not all of the notes are in tune when you play low and high on this

recorder.  So if the high notes are in tune then the low notes.  In tune means that it sounds the same when everyone is playing the same fingerings or note.

 

If that didn't help let me know... it's harder to put into words than I

thought it would be... much easier to play out of tune to show you...

smile.

 

Delphina >>>

 

 

From: Jeffrey Clark <jmclark85 at gmail.com>

Date: February 15, 2012 10:10:47 PM CST

To: Zach Most <clermont1348 at yahoo.com>, "Kingdom of Ansteorra - SCA, Inc." <ansteorra at lists.ansteorra.org>

Subject: Re: [Ansteorra] buying recorders (was: iso dance)

 

<<< At Candlemas on Feb 4th there were five people playing recorders at

various times.  The alto is extremely versatile.  The Yamaha 300s are an economical choice that will weather camping conditions well. I try to only play wooden instruments at SCA events, but happy music from a plastic instrument is better than none at all, or a boom box.  You can get a great buzzy (double reed) sound from a Glastonbury pipe for a low price. They're quiet, but not hard to learn on if your relative pitch is decent.

 

Gaston >>>

 

Sir Gaston,

 

The problem becomes that most wooden recorders you'll find floating around on the market aren't worth the wood they're made of. There is a glut of post-WWII recorders on the market that are just horrible, and many other wooden instruments from that time period aren't much better. I wasn't kidding when I said that until you are ready to spend $300+ on purchasing your recorder from a specialist, you are better off with the 300. I have yet to find a commercial, wooden recorder for <$150 that my plastic 300 didn't outclass. It is the sad state of things, but Yamaha has sunk a good deal of time into perfecting the 300 and most of the cheaper wooden models weren't made by people who knew what they were doing.

 

For wooden recorders for SCA use, my vote would go to the Mollenhauer

"Dream" recorders. Breukink is a genius, and the Dream recorders are

wonderful instruments -- just make sure that you warm it up before you

really start playing on it.

 

--AS Zorzi

 

 

From: Derek Harris <eats.bugs at gmail.com>

Date: February 15, 2012 3:58:00 PM CST

To: "Kingdom of Ansteorra - SCA, Inc." <ansteorra at lists.ansteorra.org>

Subject: Re: [Ansteorra] recorders

 

<<< I'm sorry, I may own a recorder, but I'm not sure I understand what you are saying. Maybe that's why I can't/don't play my recorder. :-) But what do you mean by "in tune through out the registers"?

 

Stefan >>>

 

It refers to whether each note is in tune with its cousin an octave higher or lower, and how much you have to adjust the instrument or notes to make it line up with a a=440 tuning frequency. That might be too technical.

 

Derek Harris (via iPhone)

 

 

From: ledonna mcgowan <ledmcgowan at gmail.com>

Date: February 16, 2012 6:57:54 AM CST

To: "Kingdom of Ansteorra - SCA, Inc." <ansteorra at lists.ansteorra.org>

Subject: [Ansteorra] Alto Recorder

 

After playing my alto for more and a few pieces that my kids play I would not recommend the Tudor.  It's great if you don't need a quick response in the lower notes.  I'm going to order a Yamaha soon... smile.

 

Delphina

 

 

From: ledonna mcgowan <ledmcgowan at gmail.com>

Date: February 16, 2012 6:45:27 AM CST

To: "Kingdom of Ansteorra - SCA, Inc." <ansteorra at lists.ansteorra.org>

Subject: Re: [Ansteorra] buying recorders (was: iso dance)

 

<<< I wouldn't think it would matter so much what sort of recorder you use if you can sound good (good tuning, balances, no one louder than another). If you have an alto recorder when the music calls for soprano, you may need to transpose. But it really just means you need to know what your music calls for. If all the key signatures look the same, you have like instruments and/or singer. If its different, you're probably looking at mixed voices.

 

Derek Harris >>>

 

Most people don't transpose with recorders like they do with say clarinets and trumpets.  You just learn a different fingering for the alto/bass recorders and everyone reads in C ... just like voices would.

 

I transpose for my kids because I want to focus on making music rather then them learning a new fingering system.  Musicality is more important to me. We talk about why we have the extra notes on the music and how if they really want to be good they will learn the other fingerings and I have a few that can transpose parts but not many.

 

Delphina

 

 

From: Jeffrey Clark <jmclark85 at gmail.com>

Date: February 16, 2012 7:35:27 AM CST

To: "Kingdom of Ansteorra - SCA, Inc." <ansteorra at lists.ansteorra.org>

Subject: Re: [Ansteorra] buying recorders (was: iso dance)

 

Choosing the right instrument can go a long way to helping tuning and balance, and there is a reason most professional recorder players will avoid playing soprano unless they absolutely have to. Unless you have a very well-made soprano recorder, it is very hard not to sound shrill, and it takes some seriouls control to play a soprano recorder in tune with other instruments.

 

Early instruments do not transpose. Everything is read at sounding pitch. Actually, I was looking at a facsimile of a manuscript for one of Purcell's orchestral works, and I noticed that the "flute" part was transposed, after a moment I realised why: it was so that someone playing on a soprano recorder could play the part reading it as if they were playing an alto. So, apparently Purcell's recorder player didn't play soprano that much....

 

--AS Zorzi

 

On Feb 15, 2012, at 16:04, Derek Harris <eats.bugs at gmail.com> wrote:

<<< I wouldn't think it would matter so much what sort of recorder you use if you can sound good (good tuning, balances, no one louder than another). If you have an alto recorder when the music calls for soprano, you may need to transpose. But it really just means you need to know what your music calls for. If all the key signatures look the same, you have like instruments and/or singer. If its different, you're probably looking at mixed voices.

 

Derek Harris >>>

 

 

From: ledonna mcgowan <ledmcgowan at gmail.com>

Date: March 1, 2012 7:34:19 AM CST

To: "Kingdom of Ansteorra - SCA, Inc." <ansteorra at lists.ansteorra.org>

Subject: Re: [Ansteorra] buying recorders (was: iso dance)

 

Just got my new alto Yamaha 312B and it's wonderful. Clear, clean tones all the way thought.  Can get the very high notes (E2) without any of the fuzz that the Tudor gets up there. Just went and ordered a soprano and tenor.

 

Delphina

 

 

From: Jeffrey Clark <jmclark85 at gmail.com>

Date: March 1, 2012 4:04:02 PM CST

To: "Kingdom of Ansteorra - SCA, Inc." <ansteorra at lists.ansteorra.org>

Subject: Re: [Ansteorra] buying recorders (was: iso dance)

 

There is a while array of techniques on the instrument that rely on being able to shade a hole to varying degrees without fully covering it. It just takes practice and familiarity with the instrument, and an instrument that is well-made enough to respond.

 

It's not a dumb question, there are many facets of recorder playing that aren't commonly talked about in modern method books. Shading is usually done to control intonation for one reason or another, it is also more common on earlier recorders.

 

--AS Zorzi

 

<< Okay, yes this may be a stupid question but are you saying that you get some notes by only partially covering some of the holes on the recorder? Sounds rather imprecise and tricky, and difficult to do consistently.

 

Stefan >>

 

On Mar 1, 2012, at 8:25 AM, Jeffrey Clark wrote:

<<< Glad to hear that you like it. It should be able to get up to high B, but I haven't quite gotten the c to speak (needed for one of the Telemann sonatas). I you can get up to a g (half of the thumb, 1-3|1-3 and a little of 4) you can play most of the SCA dance tunes where they lie.

 

--AS Zorzi >>>

 

 

From: Zach Most <clermont1348 at yahoo.com>

Date: March 1, 2012 4:42:12 PM CST

To: "Kingdom of Ansteorra - SCA, Inc." <ansteorra at lists.ansteorra.org>

Subject: Re: [Ansteorra] buying recorders (was: iso dance)

 

<<< And if you think about it, covering a hole partially on a recorder isn't that much less precise than where to place your finger on a stringed instrument like the violin.  I truly appreciate musicians with the talent to play instruments well.

 

Liliana >>>

 

The analogy holds well to a degree.  If a string player is a little off with their finger position they'll be a little sharp or flat, and folks might not notice.  There's a steep roll off point particularly with the thumb hole on a recorder where a small mistake can make some dramatically unexpected sounds- you may be an octave off, which isn't the end of the world, or it can get squeaky, or play two notes at once.  It's not as unforgiving as double reeds tend to be.  Bagpipes are harder than they look.

 

  Gaston

 

 

From: ledonna mcgowan <ledmcgowan at gmail.com>

Date: March 1, 2012 3:31:16 PM CST

To: "Kingdom of Ansteorra - SCA, Inc." <ansteorra at lists.ansteorra.org>

Subject: Re: [Ansteorra] buying recorders (was: iso dance)

 

<<< Okay, yes this may be a stupid question but are you saying that you get some notes by only partially covering some of the holes on the recorder?

Sounds rather imprecise and tricky, and difficult to do consistently.

 

Stefan >>>

 

It's not a stupid question.

 

Yes there are some notes that are played by partially covering some of the holes and yes it is imprecise and tricky and difficult to do consistently but it's music... it's suppose to be from the soul... smile. That's why it's important to have an instrument that responds well so that you eliminate as much of the chance as possible.

 

Delphina

 

<the end>



Formatting copyright © Mark S. Harris (THLord Stefan li Rous).
All other copyrights are property of the original article and message authors.

Comments to the Editor: stefan at florilegium.org