Home Page

Stefan's Florilegium

jams-jellies-msg



This document is also available in: text or RTF formats.

jams-jellies-msg - 3/5/11

 

Period fruit jams, jelly, preserves, marmalades, conserves and butters.

 

NOTE: See also the files: marmalades-msg, jellied-milk-msg, aspic-msg, molded-foods-msg, suckets-msg, wine-jelly-msg, candied-fruit-msg, Period-Fruit-art, sugar-msg.

 

************************************************************************

NOTICE -

 

This file is a collection of various messages having a common theme that I have collected from my reading of the various computer networks. Some messages date back to 1989, some may be as recent as yesterday.

 

This file is part of a collection of files called Stefan's Florilegium. These files are available on the Internet at: http://www.florilegium.org

 

I have done a limited amount of editing. Messages having to do with separate topics were sometimes split into different files and sometimes extraneous information was removed. For instance, the message IDs were removed to save space and remove clutter.

 

The comments made in these messages are not necessarily my viewpoints. I make no claims as to the accuracy of the information given by the individual authors.

 

Please respect the time and efforts of those who have written these messages. The copyright status of these messages is unclear at this time. If information is published from these messages, please give credit to the originator(s).

 

Thank you,

    Mark S. Harris                  AKA:  THLord Stefan li Rous

                                          Stefan at florilegium.org

************************************************************************

 

From: Philip & Susan Troy <troy at asan.com>

Date: Tue, 20 May 1997 10:16:45 -0400

Subject: Re: SC - An Introduction and a question.

 

DdreMacNam at aol.com wrote:

> What I need to know is how

> period are preserves and jelly? Also what types of fruit would have been

> used? One last thing does anyone have recepies or redactions?

 

Fruits preserved in various sugar and/or honey preparations are

exceedingly period. They range from  fruit in spiced syrup, through

myriad varieties of stamped, sliceable, fruit "marmalades" (kind of like

a stack of fruit leather), to, in late period, the jams and jellies we

know today.

 

Ellinor Fettiplace's receipt book (AGAIN!) has quite a few recipes for

all of these, and they are late enough in period style to be used as

working recipes by relatively novice cooks.

 

Tops on the list of fruits would be those known to medieval/renaissance

Europeans (obviously), especially those that are high in pectin. Quinces

are quite common for this reason. Apples and pears only slightly less

so. Raspberries, strawberries, barberries, and gooseberries all appear

in several sources. Oranges and lemons appear, but generally as candied

peel or some kind of suckets.

 

Apart from the use of honey substituted for part or all of the sugar in

some recipes, particularly the early ones, the technology for making

pectin set by combining it with sugar and acid hasn't changed over the

years, so most of the period recipes are quite straightforward and

easily interpreted by modern cooks with some experience with making jams

and jellies. Generally you won't find, for instance, that much less

sugar being used to make a sweet fruit jelly than is used today, just

because sugar was expensive. If you don't use enough, you run the risk

of the fruit not setting until it is cooked to death and devoid of color

and flavor. So, most of the recipes are pretty similar to modern ones,

although you'll find a somewhat greater variety of styles than is

generally practiced today.

 

Adamantius

 

 

From: Philip E Cutone <flip+ at andrew.cmu.edu>

Date: Tue, 20 May 1997 12:27:43 -0400 (EDT)

Subject: Re: SC - An Introduction and a question.

 

The domestroi mentions various ways fruits are preserved/cooked.

 

It mentions that Jellies may be given to the servents on sundays. (51)

 

preserve apples, pears, cherries, and berries in brine (63)

 

(66)it talks also of watermelons, melons, Kuzmin apples (seeming to be the

origin of candied apples, pour honey  syrup over whole apples),

quinces and appls (fermented in a bucket with honey syrup), Mozhaisk

cream (not mashed. soak apples and pears in a blended syrup, without

water. (not sure what they mean))

 

berry candy (66)(bilberries, rasberries, currants, strawberries,

cranberries, "or any other kind of berry". here is a quick rundown of

the instructions:

        Boil and strain through a fine sieve add honey and then steam

        the mixture till VERY thick, stiring so as not to burn. pour

        onto a board. smear the board repeatedly with honey. as

        mixture sets, add a second and third layer and twirl it around

        a tube. dry it opposite the stove.

my quick interpretation:

        cook the berries (use minimal water, or reserve the juice for

        mead/drinking later) Puree them and strain to remove

        seeds.(opt) add honey to your taste.  simmer on very low heat

        till thick. then pour onto a honeyed marble pastry board.

        let dry a bit (perhaps in oven, not sure if this is good for

        marble) then add a second and third layer, letting set up some

        between layers.  dry in oven on lowest setting. cut as is or

        roll it and then cut it. die of sugar shock.

 

apple candy(66): about the same as berry candy, but it appears to be left

        "softer" (don't dry out in oven)

 

the parenthesized numbers are chapters, for the interested.

 

please note this was from a very quick browse through.... and typed

rather quickly as well...

 

BTW it also mentions that pears and apples may be preserved in syrup

or kvass. (45)

 

In Service to never letting the kvass thread die :)

Filip of the Marche

 

 

Date: Tue, 17 Jun 1997 07:41:15 -0400

From: Margo Lynn Hablutzel <Hablutzel at compuserve.com>

To: A&S List <sca-arts at raven.cc.ukans.edu>

Subject: Period Jellies

 

I have a cookbook dated 1604 which has a number of Jelly recipes, mostly as

a prelude to candy (suckets) but some really jelly, or you simply

undercook and stop when they are spreading consistency.  It is called "Mrs.

Fettiplace's Recipe Book" and I got it at Bargain Books last year.

 

                               --- Morgan

 

 

Date: Tue, 17 Jun 1997 20:26:17 -0400 (EDT)

From: ALBAN at delphi.com

To: sca-arts at raven.cc.ukans.edu

Subject: Re: Period Jellies

 

Morgan said

>It is called "Mrs. Fettiplace's Recipe Book"

 

Er, ah, not exactly, if your book's the same as mine. It is called, I believe,

Elinor Fettiplace's Receipt Book. Author is Hilary Fettiplace.

 

Alban

 

 

Date: Tue, 17 Jun 1997 09:47:10 -0400 (EDT)

From: Mark Schuldenfrei <schuldy at MATH.HARVARD.EDU>

To: sca-arts at raven.cc.ukans.edu

Subject: Re: Concord Grapes

 

  I _think_ it's a sort of jelly, since he mentions that in the same sentence,

  but I'm not sure.  Tibor? What's a quiddony?

 

Alban, as near as I could figure, it was a jelly, but not quite made in the

usual way.  I haven't made it in years, and my notes aren't here, but you

cut and boil the fruit in water, squeeze out the juice and pulp through a

cloth, and then boil with sugar, and set.  It came out halfway between jelly

and fruit leather.

 

It was a method of preserving fruit through the winter months.  I kept it

out on the shelf for about 4 years, until it was gone from occassional

tastes.  It was quite nice.

 

My notes, and my books, are packed away until the kitchen rennovations are

completed.  Sorry.

 

        Tibor

 

 

Date: Wed, 18 Jun 1997 10:59:13 -0400 (EDT)

From: Mark Schuldenfrei <schuldy at MATH.HARVARD.EDU>

To: sca-arts at raven.cc.ukans.edu

Subject: Re: Period Jellies

 

  Morgan said

  >It is called "Mrs. Fettiplace's Recipe Book"

  

  Er, ah, not exactly, if your book's the same as mine. It is called, I believe,

  Elinor Fettiplace's Receipt Book. Author is Hilary Fettiplace.

  Alban

  

Author Hilary Spurling.

 

        Tibor

 

 

Date: Fri, 2 Jan 1998 14:01:12 -0600

From: "Decker, Terry D." <TerryD at Health.State.OK.US>

Subject: RE: SC - Apricot recipes?(was Byzantine Cooking)

 

Since I have Martha Washington's Booke of Cookery in front of me, here

are some recipe's from it.

 

Bear

 

TO MAKE APRICOCK CAKES

 

<see fruits-msg>

 

TO CANDY GREEN APRICOCK CHIPS

 

<see fruits-msg>

 

TO PRESERUE DAMSONS OTHER PLUMS OR APRICOCKS TO KEEP ALL Ye YEAR IN A

QUACKEING JELLY

 

Take a pinte of apple water & boyle 2 pound of sugar in it, till it is

thoroughly dissolved & is in a perfect sirrup.  then take 2 pound of yr

fairest & ripest plums, & put into it, & let them boil very leasurely

till they are very tender, then set them aside to coole, & let them

stand in ye sirrup 3 days. then take them out & boyle ye sirrup by it

selfe, & as it riseth, scum it of very clean, & put to it yr plums, or

yr plums to it, & they will keep all ye year very well, & ye sirrup will

be A quacking Jelly.

 

Note:  Apple water is that water in which apples have been poached.  To

prepare it, pare and core green apples, cover them with water and scald

(cook just below a boil) them for 3 hours.  Remove the apples and use

the water.

 

TO MAKE OF PLUMS PEARS OR APRICOCKS A PASTE Yt SHALL LOOK CLEAR AS AMBER

 

Take white pear plums of faire yellow Apricock[s].  pare & stone them,

then boyle them on a chafing dish of coles till they be tender.  then

streyne them and dry the pulpe in a dish.  then take as much sugar as ye

pulp dos weigh & boyle it to a candy height, with as much rose water as

will wet it.  then put your apricocks or pear plums in ye sugar, & let

them boyle together & keep it stirring.  then fashion it upon A leaf of

glass into halfe apricocks, & put ye stone into ye syde.  then put them

into a stove or warme oven, & ye next day turn them & close 2 of them

together, & then put ye stones into them betwixt ye hollows.  soe dry

them out, & box them.

 

TO MAKE A QUIDONY OF APRICOCKS OR PEAR PLUMS

 

Take 2 pound of apricocks or pear plums & put them into a deep dish

withe a pinte of fair water, in which boyle them tender.  yn wring ye

liquor from them thorough a fine cloth into A basin, & put into it a

pound of sugar well clarified, & let it boyle in a [posnet] till it

comes to its full thickness, then [put it in yr] moulds, and soe box it.

 

 

Date: 30 Apr 1998 10:32:13 -0700

From: "Marisa Herzog" <marisa_herzog at macmail.ucsc.edu>

Subject: Re:  SC - Dried currents

 

<snip>Are they the same fruit currant jelly is made from, or is that real

currants?

Renata

 

Currant jelly is from real currants- the red ones are beautiful tiny red

berries that are really tart. We had a couple bushes when I was little.

Usually between me and the birds my mom did not get enough to make anything

out of!  "Creme de Cassis" liquer is made from the black currants, and I think

goose-berries are related, but I am not sure...

So... if currants in period recipes are the little grape raisins, were *real*

currants (red or black) used in period?  and if so how were they refered to?

- -brid

 

 

Date: Thu, 04 Jun 1998 19:11:17 -0500

From: Philip & Susan Troy <troy at asan.com>

Subject: Jams not period??? (was SC - Mulberry question)

 

From: kat <kat at kagan.com>

> So then, what is the accepted general belief on the use of preserves in reenacting period cooking?

> I have been happily placing my father's prizewinning apricot, berry and plum preserves on my breakfast buffets and have never heard any objection...

> ... I have always felt that his were "more period" than storebought; if only for the fact that he often grows the produce himself and uses less sugar than commercial jams...

> so... should I cease serving preserves, break my heart though it would?

 

Hey! Do you really think I would tell you to do something like that?

 

Okay. Here's the deal. You can either

 

a) cook your preserves (beyond the normal point where they seem done,

that is) quickly, in a wide pan like a deep skillet, until you can draw

a spoon through it and it forms clean walls -- thick enough to hold

stiff peaks, more or less. Watch out for burning, and for burns: this

stuff is hotter than boiling water, and could splash. Kinda like napalm.

When it's done (you don't need no steenking saucer pectin test) pour

into oiled molds for a marmalade or fruit cheese, which is eaten in

slices, or in wide flat drops on wax paper, for cakes or pastilles.

Pastilles are eaten drier and firmer. Serve either with bread or

biscuits (as in biscotti, not "cat-heads") and cheese. Earlier period

versions of this type of fruit paste were often made with honey.

 

b) serve your fruit poached in a spiced wine syrup, a reasonably similar

approach to what often was done with fruits like pears.

 

c) serve the preserves as you have been doing, and if anyone asks if

they are period, tell them the truth, and say, but hey, this is good

stuff, isn't it?

 

Adamantius

 

 

Date: Fri, 5 Jun 1998 22:03:45 EDT

From: RuddR at aol.com

Subject: Re: Jams not period??? (was SC - Mulberry question)

 

I find in _The Closet of Sir Kenelm Digby Opened_ (1669) receipts for "Jelly

of Currants" and "Marmulate of Cherries" at least (This is only a quick

glance).  These seem to be straight-up fruit preserves, little different from

your father's prizewinning varieties.

 

Rudd Rayfield

 

 

Date: Sat, 06 Jun 1998 09:52:48 -0500

From: Philip & Susan Troy <troy at asan.com>

Subject: SC - Re: Jams not period???

 

>  > so... should I cease serving preserves, break my heart though it would?

> I find in _The Closet of Sir Kenelm Digby Opened_ (1669) receipts for "Jelly

> of Currants" and "Marmulate of Cherries" at least (This is only a quick

> glance).  These seem to be straight-up fruit preserves, little different from

> your father's prizewinning varieties.

 

I guess the real issue here is the efficacy of the preservative process.

Jams, jellies, and what we call preserves today, are usually sealed up

in preserving jars of some kind, or cans, or what have you. This is

necessary to avoid molds and other decay. One possible solution that

seems to have been employed in later period (and after) is some kind of

vessel (maybe a ceramic jar) topped with a brandy-soaked disk of

parchment, and covered with melted lard or beeswax. More commonly, in

period, fruits were preserved in sweet, spiced syrups of wine and sugar

or honey, or in the form of solid marmalades. The former method is found

in sources from Apicius on up, and the latter is found in, at the very

least, several of the 14th-century sources. The problem with accepting

Digby as a source typical of even late period for SCA purposes is his

date, even when you take into account the fact that his book was

published posthumously, and shave as many as ten years off 1669. Also, I

don't recall there's much reason to assume Digby's recipes are for

anything other than the slicing jellies and marmalades. I just think

Digby is assuming his reader will place the current, prevailing

definition of a fruit jelly or marmalade on the recipe, which is exactly

what his 20th-century readers often do, too.

 

> Surely this culinary process did not just appear full-blown in the seventeenth

> century.  There must be antecedants, even if unrecorded.  Are there earlier

> sources?  What's the earliest date that can be put on a recipe for sweet fruit

> preserves?

 

As I say, I think there's one or more recipes for fruit preserved in

wine, honey, and spices, in Apicius, roughly 1st - 3rd century CE

(there's some question as to the identity, and therefore the date, of M.

Gavius Apicius). The next time they seem to crop up, in the sources I'm

familiar with, is in the 14th century.

 

Based on the availability of recipes (which isn't always the best

benchmark, but currently most of what we have to go on) the jams,

jellies, and marmalades we know today don't _seem_ to have been common

until the late 18th - early 19th century, which, coincidentally, seems

to be when canning technology made significant leaps.

 

Adamantius

 

 

Date: Sun, 7 Jun 1998 09:24:02 EDT

From: LrdRas at aol.com

Subject: Re: SC - jam vs. jelly

 

stefan at texas.net writes:

<< What is the difference between a jam and a jelly?  >>

 

Jam is produced from crushed whole fruit. Jelly is produced from the juice

strained  off of whole crushed fruit. For all intent and purposes, Jam is

thickened fruit. Jelly is thickened fruit juice. The thickening and sweetening

in both are the same or similar.

 

Ras

 

 

Date: Sun, 7 Jun 1998 23:11:47 -0500

From: allilyn at juno.com (LYN M PARKINSON)

Subject: Re: SC - jam vs. jelly

 

Stefan,

 

The adding of sugar, to preserve, and to make palatable, is common, and

the cooking, to destroy microorganisms--even before they knew about

those, they figured out that if you cooked food well and sealed it, it

didn't spoil.  Here are the differences:

 

whole or half or large chunks in the finished product=preserves

crushed fruit left in the spread=jam

fruit juice strained thru fabric (linen or cotton 'jelly bags') so that

resulting jelly is clear=jelly.

 

Now, just to confuse you, ;-) things can be added to a jelly, as chunks

of cooked meat and vegetables can be added to a meat jelly for a

galentine.

 

Allison

 

 

Date: Mon, 8 Jun 1998 19:29:20 -0500

From: vjarmstrong at aristotle.net (Valoise Armstrong)

Subject: Latwerge (Was Re: SC - Jellies vs. aspics)

 

Adamantius asked:

>Latwerge, huh? This wouldn't be made from plums, would it? There is a

>thick plum butter found in Poland, I believe, called lekvar. I wonder if

>there's some etymological cognate voodoo going on here...

 

Well, I don't know Polish or Polish cooking, but Latwerge refers to the

conserve/fruit paste in general. I guess you could make it from plums, but

the only recipes I could find at the spur of the moment were for quinces

and pears. And I swear I thought I saw a cherry recipe somewhere, but I

can't find it now that I want it.

 

Valoise

 

 

Date: Fri, 26 Jun 1998 19:14:22 EDT

From: LrdRas at aol.com

Subject: SC - Will's- more recipes

 

Here are the few recipes my co-feastocrat at Will's Revenge, His Lordship

Thorstein, was willing to share. :-) Sorry for the lack of documentation but

this isn't my work. Enjoy. They are wonderful. :-)

 

Rødgrød med Fløde

1 1/2 pounds of fresh raspberries or strawberries, or a combination of the two

(or substitute 2 ten-ounce packages of frozen berries)

2 tablespoons of sugar

2 tablespoons of arrowroot powder

1/2 cup cold water

slivered almonds

1/2 cup light cream

 

Remove any hulls from the fresh berries, then wash the berries quickly in a

sieve, drain and spread them out on paper towels, and pat them dry.  After

cutting the larger berries into quarters, place in the container of an electric

blender.  Blend at high speed for 2 or 3 minutes until they are puréed. If you

are using frozen berries, defrost them thoroughly, then purée  them in the

blender - juices and all

 

To make rødgrød by hand, rub the contents of the packages or the fresh

berries through a fine sieve that is set over a large mixing bowl.  Place the

berry purée (which should measure about 22 cups) in a 1 to 1* quart

enameled or stainless-steel saucepan and stir in the sugar.  Bring to a boil,

stirring constantly.  Mix the 2 tablespoons of arrowroot and the cold water to

a smooth paste,  and stir it into the pan.  Let the mixture come to a simmer

to thicken the jelly (do not let it boil), then remove the pan from the heat.

 

Pour into individual dessert bowls or a large serving bowl.  Chill for at least 2 hours.  Before serving the rødgrød, decorate the top with a few slivers of

almonds and pass a pitcher of light cream separately.

 

<snip of other recipes>

 

 

Date: Thu, 2 Jul 1998 15:23:00 -0500

From: allilyn at juno.com (LYN M PARKINSON)

Subject: SC - Re: gooseberries + jelly

 

>>Gooseberries.   Find me a period recipe (primary source only please)

that uses them.<<

 

I was looking through some of my books for your sauce, as I did not

remember seeing one when I did my sauce research.  Still did not find any

gooseberry sauce,  (Yes!  See below)  but have come across 'gelee of

gooseberries' in _The French Cook_, Francis deLaVarenne, 1653.  This is

out of our period, but as we recently had a thread on jellies, I thought

it interesting.  In period, the clear jellies are meat and fish based and

just 50 years later, the clear fruit jellies that we know are being

published.  Raspberry jelly is made the same way.  OOP, but not to be a

'spoon tease', here it is:

 

How to make gelee of gooseberries.  Take some gooseberries, press them,

and strain them through a napkin; measure your juice, and put near upon

three quarters of sugar to one quart of juice; seeth it before you mixe

it, and seeth again together; after they are mixed, try them on a plate,

and you shall know that it is enough, when it riseth off.  That of

Rasberries is made the same way.

 

As for other gooseberries, aside from a late period paste, and a

gooseberry verjuice, everybody seems to have preserved them and nobody

ate them!  When the Brit museum continues excavating London, they will

surely find many, many pots of preserved gooseberries!  Could it be that

someone tried to make paste in a rainy summer, and it wouldn't dry out?

"Here, eat this anyhow"  "I can't pick it up!"  "Well, put it on some

bread, then"  "Oh, boy!"

 

As an antecedent to the mackeral/gooseberry combo, some fish sauces are

definately tart: they contain sorrell, lemon and other piquant tastes, so

your combo in in line with prevailing tastes, just not currently

documentable.  Fruit jellies are so popular with meats in Europe, that

tart jellies may sometimes have taken the place of tart sauces.

 

Jeff says that European gooseberries are prickly.  Do the prickles wash

off? Do they cook down to be non-prickly? Our landlord grew them, but I

never handled them.  Would the prickles make them more or less likely to

appear in sauces, jellies, etc.?

 

Whoa!!! Hold!!! Just found something else in LaVarenne!

 

62.  Fresh mackerells rosted. Rost them with fennell, after they are

rosted, open them, and take off the bone; then make a good sauce with

butter, parsley, and gooseberries, all well seasoned; stove a very little

your mackerells with your sauce, then serve.

 

Have just glanced at a number of her fish sauces; none seem to have cream

or milk added, yet.  Is 'short broth' a reduced cooking liquid, do you

think?

 

Allison

 

 

Date: Tue, 07 Jul 1998 09:33:50 +1000

From: Robyn Probert <robyn.probert at lawpoint.com.au>

Subject: Re: SC - Re: gooseberries + jelly

 

Adamantius wrote

>I understood "jelly" in British English usage to mean a hand-held sweet.

>Do all you Americans recall Chuckles? Something along those lines...

 

Jelly has 3 meanings for "British English" speakers:

 

1. A dessert also made with fruit juice and gelatine which you set in the

fridge. Cheap variety is made with "jelly crystals" - basically gelatine,

flavour and colour. Common child dessert (aka sweet, pudding).

 

2. Sweets (candies), usually fruit flavoured and transluscent. The good

quality ones are made with real fruit juice and gelatine - these are soft

(about like a ripe persimmon) and usually covered in sugar (aka fruit

pastilles). The cheap variety are artificially coloured and flavoured and

are very chewy. You can buy jelly snakes, frogs, rats etc.

 

3. The clear type of jam previously described on the list.

 

Rowan

 

 

Date: Fri, 25 Jun 1999 08:04:28 -0500 (CDT)

From: alysk at ix.netcom.com (Elise Fleming)

Subject: SC - Re: Fruit Conserves

 

Karin wrote:

 

>Basically, the fruit seems to have been saturated with sugar, until

>it attains an almost tough jelly like state ( jelly bean rather than

>jello ), sometimes it is then shaped into small fruit shapes, other

>times it still seems to be the basic fruit. The texture is still quite

>'solid' which seems to me that the fruit hasn't been pureed and

>reformed, but that it is done by a similar method to candying peel.

 

I'm not sure about the not-pureeing and then being boiled up like candy

peel.  However, there are a number of fruit pastes which give a "tough

jelly" or a nice paste, depending on one's skill, etc.  Here are two

I've used successfully (sometimes tough, sometimes nice paste,

sometimes it didn't set). Also, it seems that one can't really

substitute different fruits in certain recipes.  I don't recall the

fruits now (it was a few years back) but the substituted fruit didn't

set up into the paste as the original fruit did.

 

Sir Kenelm Digby, The Closet of Sir Kenelm Digby Opened, 3rd edition,

1677

 

Sweet-Meats of my Lady Windebanks

 

She maketh a past of Apricocks (which is both very beautiful and clear,

and tasteth most quick of the fruit) thus.  Take six pound of pared and

sliced Apricocks, put them in a high pot, which stop close, and set it

in a kettle of boiling water, till you perceive the flesh is all become

a uniform pulp; then put it out into your preserving pan or possenet,

and boil it gently till it be grown thick, stirring it carefully all

the while.  Then put two pound of pure Sugar to it, and mingle it well,

and let it boil gently, till you see the matter come to such a

thickness and solidity, that it will not stick to a plate.  Then make

it up into what form you will.  The like you may do with Raspes or

Currants.

 

Redaction from 'Banquetting Stuffe' edited by C. Anne Wilson, chapter

4, Rare Conceits and Strange Delightes by Peter Brears.  (Edinburgh

University Press, Edinburgh, 1986, ISBN 0 7486 0103 1)

 

8 oz (225 g) (when prepared) peeled and stoned apricots

3 oz (75 g) sugar (Alys: 1/2 cup; 1 lb. apricots to 1/3 lb. sugar)

 

Place the apricots in a heatproof jar, seal the top with a piece of

cooking foil, and stand in a covered saucepan of boiling water for an

hour.  Pour the apricots into a small saucepan and gently boil,

stirring continuously until the paste is extremely thick, then add the

sugar and continue stirring. When it is so thick that it has to be

spread across the bottom of the pan with a spoon, it may be turned on

to a lightly greased plate, worked into a shallow square block, and

allowed to cool.  It has a deep orange colour, and is every bit as good

today as Sir Kenelm found it three centuries ago.

 

Alys Katharine's revision: (1 lb. apricots to 1/3 lb. sugar.   Ten

apricots (2-2 1/2") are slightly under one pound when peeled and

stoned.)

 

Slice the apricots, place in cooking container (Corningware 1 3/4 quart

pan holds a little over 2 lbs. of apricots).  Seal with foil and rubber

band for extra security. Place in large pot, or larger Corningware

container.  If you put a lid on the outer container you needn't top it

off with boiling water as quickly.  Add boiling water and set on burner

at simmer for a good two hours.  The apricots should have fallen into a

mush by then.

 

To peel apricots easily, place them in boiling water for about two

minutes and then remove them. The skins should peel off easily with a

knife or your fingers.  If you let them stay in the boiling water too

long they begin to cook and get mushy under the skin.  You can also

just slice the apricots without peeling them.  After they have cooked

for two or more hours, puree them in a blender.  It is best to use a

thick pan for cooking the pureed apricots and sugar.  If you simmer

them on a low heat you need not stir them continuously until the

mixture begins to thicken and erupt into "burps."  This "cooking down"

process can take 4 hours or so depending on the amount of apricots you

use and the temperature of the heat.  You will need to stir the mixture

more and more as it gets thicker.  The apricots are done when you can

drag your spoon through the mixture and it leaves a trail.  It should

also be pulling away from the sides of the pan at this time.

 

While this recipe doesn't call for a sugar syrup, you can make one by

taking an amount of sugar, wetting it enough to dissolve the sugar, and

heating it to hard crack stage.  Add it to the apricots, stirring as

you add it.  Then cook the mixture down over low heat until you can

make a trail with your spoon. Pour into shallow, buttered pans and

allow to cool.  You can cut them into squares or into shapes using

small cookie or canape cutters.  Store between waxed paper or parchment

paper.   With proper storage they will keep for a year or so.

 

TO MAKE A PASTE OF PEACHES, #S112, A Booke of Sweetmeats Martha

Washington's Booke of Cookery, transcribed by Karen Hess, Columbia

University Press, New York, 1981, ISBN 0-231-04930-7Take peaches &

boyle them tender, as you did your apricocks, & strayne them.  then

take as much sugar as they weigh & boyle it to candy height.  mix ym

together, & make it up into paste as you doe yr other fruit.  soe dry

them and use it at your pleasure.Peel and slice peaches.  Bring them to

a boil over medium heat in a thick pan.  Cover pan, stirring

occasionally.  Add a little rosewater if desired.  (The previous recipe

for apricots includes rosewater.)  Cook for approximately two or two

and a half hours until they are fully soft and "tender."  I have pureed

them in a blender but that leaves a good deal of water to cook off.

Try pouring off the excess liquid through a sieve or strainer.  Puree

the remaining pulp.  (Save the liquid for other uses.)  Weigh the pulp

and take the same amount in sugar.  (Approximately 2 1/4 cups

granulated sugar equal one pound.)  Gently boil down the pulp until it

is thick.  When the pulp is as thick as it can get and not burn, boil

up the sugar with a small amount of water.  Hess identifies candy

height as soft ball or 220 F. A modern recipe for fruit paste says to

boil to hard ball or 260 F. I have found that hard ball or even to

almost hard crack works best. Pour the sugar syrup into the cooked

pulp and stir until thoroughly mixed.  Continue cooking the paste until

it leaves the side of the pan and you can draw a line in it with the

spoon.  Be careful that it doesn't burn at the final stages, nor that

you burn yourself with splatters of boiling pulp.  Pour it onto a

buttered cookie sheet with sides and let it cool.  If it doesn't

solidify to a paste that you can cut try one of the following.  Let it

sit for several days to dry out.  Put it into a warm oven to dry out.

Scrape it all back into a pan and re-boil to drive off more water.  You

can also make up more sugar syrup, but be sure to go to the hard crack

stage before adding it to the paste.

 

 

Date: Sat, 26 Jun 1999 20:25:58 -0700

From: "Robert C. Lightfoot" <celtcat at almatel.net>

Subject: SC - Re: sca-cooks V1 #1455

 

> The recipes,  yes, please.

> Raoghnailt

> > Have you thought of fruit butters and cheeses? --snip--  

> > This comes out like the commercial applets and cotlets.

> >

> > I can look up my recipes if anyone's interestes.

> > Siobhan

 

Here goes. These are from various cooking/preserving cookbooks I've collected over the years.

_Your Country Kitchen_ by Jocasta Innes

 

Damson Plum Cheese

4 lbs. plums

1 & 1/4 c. water

Sugar

 

Rinse the plums, place in a kettle with the water and simmer gently until quite soft. mashing occasionally. Strain/sieve pulp. Weigh the pulp, and measuring oput 1 & 1/2 c. sugar to every pound of pulp -- DO NOT COMBINE YET. Put the sugar where it will stay warm. Return the pulp to the kettle and cook very gently until thick, with no visible liquid. Pour in the warmed sugar, stirring hard to dissolve it, then turn upop the heat a little and continue cooking and sturring until pressing the spoon down on top of the mixture leaves a mark. This gives a cheese a firm enough texture to be turned out of a mold.. For a very firm, almost jellied consistency, go on cooking until a spoon drawn across the kettle parts the mixture and the bottom shows. Turn into oiled molds and seal/cover with a peice of wax paper pressed over the hot preserve. Cover with palstic wrap and close. This should keep in a cool place for several months.

 

Cranberry Cheese

2 lb cranberries

1 quart water

4 c. sugar.

 

Pick over the cranberries then rinse the. Simmer the berries in a kettle with the water until quite sift. Cook as for the Damson cheese, but stop at the first sppon stage. Pot and seal.

 

Siobhan

 

 

To: sca-cooks at ansteorra.org

Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] Re: lavender sugar

From: "Christina L Biles" <bilescl at okstate.edu>

Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2001 08:27:03 -0600

 

I said:

> If you accidentally forget to add pectin, it makes a great syrup for

> waffles.  ;>

 

Stefan said:

>>>I assume from this, that this little tidbit was learned from practical

experience. Is there some reason you can't heat this syrup back up and

then mix the pectin in at that point?<<<

 

If you try to add pectin after the sugar, you get a really strange texture

and it doesn't jell well, if at all.  The end result still tastes good,

and can be incorporated into banana bread and muffins or other baked

goods, but isn't something I'd want to spread on toast.

 

-Magdalena d.C.

 

 

From: "Olwen the Odd" <olwentheodd at hotmail.com>

To: sca-cooks at ansteorra.org

Subject: RE: [SCA-cooks] Fruit Paste Question

Date: Tue, 06 May 2003 18:51:01 +0000

 

Bring it to room temperature and from there slowly heat it back up.  If you

shock it it will burn the sugar.  It should finish nicely from there. I

used to make fruit leather and it can be finicky but if you don't rush it

you end up with a quite nice result. I trust you are using a heavy pan,

preferrably an enamaled one or corningware/visionware.

Olwen

 

> I have a technical question for the food scientists here:

> This past Sunday I was messing around with one of the fruit paste recipes

> from Granado.  This one calls for five pounds of pears, one and a half

> pounds of quince, and five pounds of sugar.  The fruit gets cooked and

> mashed through a strainer, then the sugar gets added and the whole business

> gets cooked down until a spoon leaves a clear path across the bottom of the

> pan.  I cooked the stuff for several hours, but I had to leave the house

> before it was to the recommended point.  I put the stuff in the fridge to

> cool down.  It's a lovely deep rose-red from the quince, and has the

> consistency of jam, but it's not as stiff as I'd like.  I was thinking it

> would be more along the lines of a cotignac.

> Anyway, can I keep cooking it down after cooling it, or should I just put it

> in jars and eat it on toast?

> It's actually quite yummy...

> Vicente

 

 

Date: 16 May 2004 08:03:24 -0000

From: "Volker Bach" <bachv at paganet.de>

Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] Jams and Jellies in period

To: Cooks within the SCA <sca-cooks at ansteorra.org>

 

On Sat, 15 May 2004 21:53:34 EDT, Varju at aol.com wrote :

> A question came up on a message board I'm on about if there was anything

> similar to modern jam or jelly in the Middle Ages.   I wasn't able to find any

> in the small group of cookbooks I have, so I was wondering if you fine people

> could give me a more definitive answer than that.

 

In German cookbooks, there are 'Mus' recipes that come somewhat close -

basically boiled or baked and mashed fruit that are sweetened and thickened

for storage. There is also one recipe that calls for boiling fruit juice

with sugar until it thickens and sets. The result can be used in 'pieces

the size of a walnut', so I assume something like an old-style jelly. It's

in an untranslated source, though.

 

Renaissance 'Confect' are also somewhat like that - fruit or juices boiled

with sugar, then poured into boxes to cool and set. Sometimes the jam/jelly

is poured over whole fruit. Rumpoldt and de Rontzier both have those, but I

recall similar things from British and French cookbooks, too. They are

pretty international.

 

A still life by Georg Flegel (1566-1638, probably dates to almost exactly

End-of-Period) shows what they looked like. It really looks like someone

poured jam into a box. Unfortunately I have no electronic medium of this.

It is titled 'Grosses Schauessen' (Great Show Banquet) and may be found at

the Alte Pinakothek, Munich.

 

Giano

 

 

Date: Sun, 16 May 2004 02:41:19 -0700 (PDT)

From: Huette von Ahrens <ahrenshav at yahoo.com>

Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] Jams and Jellies in period

To: Cooks within the SCA <sca-cooks at ansteorra.org>

 

--- Varju at aol.com wrote:

> A question came up on a message board I'm on

> about if there was anything

> similar to modern jam or jelly in the Middle

> Ages.   I wasn't able to find any in

> the small group of cookbooks I have, so I was

> wondering if you fine people

> could give me a more definitive answer than that.

> Noemi

 

This is the book you need:

 

Wilson, C. Anne.

The book of marmalade : its antecedents, its

history, and its role in the world today,

together with a collection of recipes for

marmalades and marmalade cookery / C. Anne

Wilson.  Rev. ed. Philadelphia : University of

Pennsylvania Press, 1999.

184 p. : ill. ; 22 cm.

0812217276 (alk. paper)

 

Here is a website that has the Queen's Delight,

Or the Art of Preserving, Conserving and Candying.

 

http://www.bib.ub.es/grewe/showbook.pl?gw020

 

> From "A Proper Newe Booke of Cokerye" [circa

1557-1558]:

 

¶. For to make wardens in Conserue.

 

Fyrste make the syrope in this wyse,

take a quarte of good romney and putte a

pynte of claryfyed honey, and a pounde or a

halfe of suger, and myngle all those

together over the fyre, till tyme they

seeth, and then set it to cole. And thys

is a good sirope for manye thinges, and

wyll be kepte a yere or two. Then take

thy warden and scrape cleane awaye the

barke, but pare them not, and seeth

them in good redde wyne so that they

be wel soked and tender, that the wyne be

nere hande soked into them, then take and

strayne them throughe a cloth or through

a strayner into a vessell, then put to them

of this syrope aforesayde tyll it be almost

fylled, and then caste in the pouders, as

fyne canel, synamon, pouder of gynger

and such other, and put it in a boxes and

kepe it yf thou wylt and make thy

syrope as thou wylt worke in

quantyte, as if thou wylt

worke twenty wardens

or more or lesse as

by experience.

 

The Good Huswifes Jewell [1596]

 

To make Marmelat of Quinces

 

You must take a pottle of Water, and foure pound

of Suger, and so let them boyle together, and

when they boyle, you must skumme them as cleane

as you can, and you must take the whites of two

or three Egges, and beat them to froth, and put

the froth into hte pan for to make the skum to

rise, then skimme it as cleane as you can, and

then take off the Kettle and put in the Quinces,

and let them boyle a good while, and when they

boyle, you must stirre them stil, and when they

be boyled you must bore them up.

 

Huette

 

 

Date: Sun, 16 May 2004 10:01:12 -0400

From: "Daniel  Phelps" <phelpsd at gate.net>

Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] Jams and Jellies in period

To: "Cooks within the SCA" <sca-cooks at ansteorra.org>

 

Was written:

>> From "A Proper Newe Booke of Cokerye" [circa 1557-1558]:

 

I've translated this line by line as follows:

 

> ¶. For to make wardens in Conserue.

     For to make pears in a conserve

> Fyrste make the syrope in this wyse,

First make a syrup in this wise

> take a quarte of good romney and putte a

take a quart of good romney and put a

> pynte of claryfyed honey, and a pounde or a

a pint of clarified honey and a pound or a

> halfe of suger, and myngle all those

half pound of sugar, and mingle all those

> together over the fyre, till tyme they

togeather over the fire, until they

> seeth, and then set it to cole. And thys

Seeth (boil?) and then set to cool.  And this

> is a good sirope for manye thinges, and

is a good syrup for many things, and

> wyll be kepte a yere or two. Then take

will keep a year or two.  Then take

> thy warden and scrape cleane awaye the

the pears and scrape away their

> barke, but pare them not, and seeth

peel, but leave them whole and seeth (boil?)

> them in good redde wyne so that they

them in good red wine so that they

> be wel soked and tender, that the wyne be

are well permeated and tender, the wine is

> nere hande soked into them, then take and

permeated in to the pears, then take and

> strayne them throughe a cloth or through

strain the pears through a cloth or through

> a strayner into a vessell, then put to them

a strainer into a vessel, then put over them

> of this syrope aforesayde tyll it be almost

the syrup previously mentioned until the almost

> fylled, and then caste in the pouders, as

full and then put in as powders

> fyne canel, synamon, pouder of gynger

fine canel, cinnamon, powder of ginger

> and such other, and put it in a boxes and

and such other, and put it in boxes and

> kepe it yf thou wylt and make thy

keep it if as you will and make the

> syrope as thou wylt worke in

syrup as you would to work in

> quantyte, as if thou wylt

in quantity so that if you would

> worke twenty wardens

work 20 pears

> or more or lesse as

or more or less

> by experience.

by experience

 

I've a few questions:

 

It does not seem as if the syrup is reduced very much but just brought  

to a boil?

 

"good romney"

I think that this is a wine but is it red or white, sweet or dry? What  

would be a good modern reasonable substitution?

 

"fyne canel, synamon, pouder of gynger and such other"

I thought that canel and cinamon were essentially the same spice?  What  

other spices might be added?  I can think of clove, nutmeg and/or mace  

and cardamon but I'm not sure if cardamon is period.

 

Daniel

 

 

Date: Sun, 16 May 2004 17:57:44 -0700 (PDT)

From: Huette on Ahrens <ahrenshav at yahoo.com>

Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] Jams and Jellies in period

To: Cooks within the SCA <sca-cooks at ansteorra.org>

 

--- Danel  Phelps <phelpsd at gate.net> wrote:

> I've a few questions:

> It does not seem as if the syrup is reduced

> very much but just brought to a boil?

 

True.  But the honey is already thick.  I think

the boiling is just to break down the sugar

so it would ot be so grainy.  It really doesn't

need more thickening, IMHO.

 

> "good romney"

> I think that this is a wine but is it red or

> white, sweet or dry? What would be a good

> modern reasonable substitution?

 

According to Cindy Renfrows glossary:

 

Rompney, Romenay, Rumney, Romney, etc. = a sweet

wine

 

In another glossary they equate Romney wine with

Rhenish wine or Rhine wine.  Since the Rhine

wines I know of are white and sweet or semi-sweet

I would say that a reasonably modern substitute

would be a GermanAuslese or another sweet white

wine.

 

> "fyne canel, synamon, pouder of gynger and such other"

> I thought that canel and cinamon were

> essentially the same spice?  What other spices

> might be added?  I can think of clove, nutmeg

> and/or mace and crdamon but I'm not sure if

> cardamon is period.

 

Cardamom is period.  Its origins are from Sri

Lanka and India.  It is allspice that is New

World.

 

Huette

 

 

Date: Mon, 17 May 2004 21:38:53 -0400

From: Elaine Koogler <ekoogler1 at comcast.net>

Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] Kiri's feast

To: Cooks within the SCA <sca-cooks at ansteorra.org>

 

> Wow Kiri,

> Your menu sounds totally delicious!! Can ou please share the recipe

> for the Alaju, in particular.... it sounds just wonderful!!!

>

> Phillipa

 

Thanks for your kind words.

 

Here is the recipe for the Alaju:

Manual de mugeres translated by Meistrine Karen Larsdatter (a 16th C.

Spanish manuscript)

 

  Recipe for making a conserve of alajú (a delicacy of Arabic origin,

basically a paste made of almonds, walnuts, or pine nuts, toasted

breadcrumbs, spices, and honey).

 

Knead together well-sifted flour with oil and water. And leave the dough

somewhat hard and knead it well. And make thin cakes and cook them well,

so they can be ground; and grind them and sift them. And then take a

celemín of ground cleaned walnuts, and two pounds of ground toasted

almonds. And while you crush the walnuts and almonds, mix them. Put a

well-measured azumbre of honey to the fire, and the best that you can

find, skim it and return it to the fire. And when the honey rises, add

the walnuts and almonds in it. And cook it until he honey is cooked.

And when it is, remove it from the fire and put with it a half a celemín

of the grated flour cakes, and mix it well. And then add a half-ounce of

cloves and another half (ounce) of cinnamon, and two nutmegs, all

ground-up. And then repeat the stirring a lot. And then make it into

cakes or put it in boxes, whichever you desire more.

 

My redaction (with the assistance of Mistress Rose of Black Diamond):

 

1 cup breadcrumbs

1 cup Walnuts, ground

1 cup almonds, toasted and ground

1cup honey

/8 tsp. cloves, ground

1/2 tsp. cinnamon, ground

1/4 tsp. ground nutmeg

 

Toast almonds.  Grind almonds and walnuts together.

Heat honey until it boils up.  Add the almond/walnut mixture and

continue cooking until 250º on a candy thermometer.

Add the breadcrumbs, cloves, cinnamon and nutmeg.  Mix together well.

Press into molds or a pan, and turn out to finish drying.

 

  Made 3 doz. Small heart cakes.

 

Hope you enjoy it!

 

Kiri

 

 

Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 14:09:52 -0700

From: Ruth Frey <ruthf at uidaho.edu>

Subject: [Sca-cooks] Re: Mustard, wine issues, fruit sweets.

To: sca-cooks at ansteorra.org

 

       Finally, as for fruit sweets, I had very good luck once with an

apple jelly candy recipe from _The Medieval Kitchen_ (don't remember

which original source it was in, though) made from equal weights pureed

fresh apples and honey, with spices added.  It took *forever* to cook

down to the point where it would "gel" when it cooled (the mix has to

be really coming away from the sides and bottom of the pan, and it has

to be on high-medium heat and stirred constantly to keep it from

burning, for, oh, a couple hours), but it was very, very good.  I bet

one could do the same thing with pears.  (Not necessarily in the same

line as the other pear sweets being discussed, but the comment jogged

my memory about the apple jellies, so I thought I'd share . . .).  :)

 

                    -- Ruth

 

 

Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2005 02:58:29 -0800 (PST)

From: Huette von Ahrens <ahrenshav at yahoo.com>

Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] Preserves?

To: Cooks within the SCA <sca-cooks at ansteorra.org>

 

--- Arianwen ferch Arthur <caer_mab at yahoo.com>

wrote:

> I noted a mention of pear preserves.  What is the

> difference between a pear preserve and a pear jam or

> jelly  (and I do know that a jelly is made from the

> strained juice and should be clear)  And what about a

> conserve?  (I have seen jars of blackcurrent conserve etc.

> =====

> Arianwen ferch Arthur

 

Here is a simplistic comparison.

 

Jelly: a sweet spread made from fruit juice,

sugar and pectin.  The result should be

translucent and jelled.

 

Jam:  sweet spread made from crushed fruit

pulp, sugar and pectin.  The result should be

opaque and thick, although I have occasionally

gotten jelled jams from the natural pectins

combined with the added pectins.

 

Preserves: a sweet spread made from whole

fruits or large slices of cored and peeled

fruits and sugar, cooked until a thick

consistency is achieved.  Not to be confused

with fruits canned in a sugar syrup.  Preserves

are much thicker.

 

Marmalade: a sweet spread made from chunks

of citrus fruits, including peels, sugar and

pectin. Should be thick almost to the point of

jelling.  Although I have heard of quince

marmalade.

 

Conserves:  a sweet spread made from large chunks

fruit and sugar, usually with nuts and raisins.

Although I have found companies tha confuse

conserves with preserves and use the words as

synonyms.

 

Butter: a sweet spread made from pulverized

fruit, sugar and spices and cooked to a thick

consistency.  Pectin usually is not added, but

I have seen recipes that call for it.

 

I hope that this helps.

 

Huette

 

 

Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2005 07:59:29 -0500

From: "elspeth" <elspeth at nc.rr.com>

Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] Period German Mustard Recipes (pear

        preserves)

To: "Cooks within the SCA" <sca-cook at ansteorra.org>

 

> Saint Phlip, wrote

> First, if you want to use Sabina Welserin's Pear Mustard, start looking

> for pear preserves now- they're very hard to find- I'm still looking.

 

Just searched the net and came up with a couple of sites that sell pear

preserves:

http://www.flyinggeesepreserves.com/pear_preserves.html

http://www.gourmetgroceryonline.com/inc/detail?v=1&;pid=778

http://www.hometownfavorites.com/shop/candy_cat.asp?c=32&;p=1&id=173&newp=

http://store.yahoo.com/spchoc/pearbutter.html (okay this one is pear  

butter)

 

And if your really enthusiastic you can make it.  There are a lot of  

recipes on the net.

 

Elspeth Macalpin

Newbie to the list.

 

 

Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2005 15:09:46 +1300

From: Adele de Maisieres <ladyadele at paradise.net.nz>

Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] Cranberry sauce (was Re: Report on

        Thanksgiving experiments) OOP

To: Cooks within the SCA <sca-cooks at ansteorra.org>

 

Daniel Myers wrote:

> This leads me to a medieval-relevant question:  Are there any lists

> out there of period fruits with high pectin contents?  I know that

> quince has quite a lot of pectin, and that gooseberries are also

> supposed to be good for jellies.  Any others?  Commercial pectin is

> made from apples, yes? Can apples be cooked to a jelly (and not be

> just thick applesauce)? How about plums?

 

Yes, apples can most definitely be cooked to a jelly, as can red or

black currants, quinces.

 

More about fruit pectin levels:

http://www.pickyourown.org/pectin.htm

--

Adele de Maisieres

 

 

Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 11:51:01 +0000

From: "Holly Stockley" <hollyvandenberg at hotmail.com>

Subject: RE: [Sca-cooks] Cranberry sauce and pectin

To: sca-cooks at ansteorra.org

 

Doc asked:

> This leads me to a medieval-relevant question:  Are there any lists

> out there of period fruits with high pectin contents?  I know that

> quince has quite a lot of pectin, and that gooseberries are also

> supposed to be good for jellies.  Any others?  Commercial pectin is

> made from apples, yes? Can apples be cooked to a jelly (and not be

> just thick applesauce)? How about plums?

 

Martha Washington's cookbook gives a recipe for Damsons in quaking jelly

that instructs you to cook the fruit in apple water (water in which apples

have been cooked).  Same principle.

 

I make my own pectin stock from apples instead of using the powder.

Basically, I chop up apples, peel, core and all, and cook them in just

enought water to cover.  Once they're soft through, I dump them in a jelly

bag overnight.  Take the resulting juice and boil it down by about half, and

process in whatever size jars are useful for you.  It will be stronger in

pectin if you use greener apples.  If you've got a local orchard, you might

even ask for the small apples when they thin the fruit in the summer.  That

way, they don't go to waste. ;-)  I've never tried with plums.  Apples are

neutral enough in color and flavor not to interfere with most other fruit

preserves.

 

In my experience, apples, pears, strawberries, some varieties of plums,

raspberries, and those you mentioned will set up without additional pectin

if you cook them to the jellying point.  Sour cherries are iffy, black ones

very frustrating without pectin.

 

Femke

 

 

Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2006 18:53:29 -0400

From: "Elise Fleming" <alysk at ix.netcom.com>

Subject: [Sca-cooks] Apricot Paste: Was Cotignac

To: "sca-cooks at ansteorra.org" <sca-cooks at ansteorra.org>

 

Hi, all.  Lots of chat about making fruit pastes, so here is a recipe that

worked pretty well.  I found that substituting one fruit for another wasn’t

exactly a one-to-one ratio. This recipe worked for apricots but didn’t

work well for apples.  Maybe I should try“raspes next time??

 

SWEET-MEATS OF MY LADY WINDEBANKS, Sir Kenelm Digby, The Closet of Sir

Kenelm Digby Opened, 3rd edition, 1677

 

She maketh a past of Apricocks (which is both very beautiful and clear, and

tasteth most quick of the fruit) thus.  Take six pound of pared and sliced

Apricocks, put them in a high pot, which stop close, and set it in a kettle

of boiling water, till you perceive the flesh is all become a uniform pulp;

then put it out into your preserving pan or possenet, and boil it gently

till it be grown thick, stirring it carefully all the while.  Then put two

pound of pure Sugar to it, and mingle it well, and let it boil gently, till

you see the matter come to such a thickness and solidity, that it will not

stick to a plate.  Then make it up into what form you will.  The like you

may do with Raspes or Currants.

 

Modernized recipe from 'Banquetting Stuffe' edited by C. Anne Wilson,

chapter 4, Rare Conceits and Strange Delightes by Peter Brears. (Edinburgh

University Press, Edinburgh, 1986, ISBN 0 7486 0103 1)

 

8 oz (225 g) (when prepared) peeled and stoned apricots

3 oz (75 g) sugar (Alys: 1/2 cup; 1 lb. apricots to 1/3 lb. sugar)

 

Place the apricots in a heatproof jar, seal the top with a piece of cooking

foil, and stand in a covered saucepan of boiling water for an hour.  Pour

the apricots into a small saucepan and gently boil, stirring continuously

until the paste is extremely thick; then add the sugar and continue

stirring.  When it is so thick that it has to be spread across the bottom

of the pan with a spoon, it may be turned on to a lightly greased plate,

worked into a shallow square block, and allowed to cool.  It has a deep

orange colour, and is every bit as good today as Sir Kenelm found it three

centuries ago.

 

Alys's revision:  (1 lb. apricots to 1/3 lb. sugar.   Ten apricots (2-2

1/2") are slightly under one pound when peeled and stoned.)

 

Slice the apricots, place in cooking container (Corningware 1 3/4 quart pan

holds a little over 2 lbs. of apricots).  Seal with foil and rubber band

for extra security.  Place in large pot, or larger Corningware container.

If you put a lid on the outer container you needn't top it off with boiling

water as quickly.  Add boiling water and set on burner at simmer for a good

two hours.  The apricots should have fallen into a mush by then.

 

To peel apricots easily, place them in boiling water for about two minutes

and then remove them.  The skins should peel off easily with a knife or

your fingers.  If you let them stay in the boiling water too long they

begin to cook and get mushy under the skin.  You can also just slice the

apricots without peeling them.  After they have cooked for two or more

hours, puree them in a blender.  It is best to use a thick pan for cooking

the pureed apricots and sugar.  If you simmer them on a low heat you need

not stir them continuously until the mixture begins to thicken and erupt

into "burps."  This "cooking down" process can take 4 hours or so depending

on the amount of apricots you use and the temperature of the heat.  You

will need to stir the mixture more and more as it gets thicker.  The

apricots are done when you can drag your spoon through the mixture and it

leaves a trail.  It should also be pulling away from the sides of the pan

at this time.

 

While this recipe doesn't call for a sugar syrup, you can make one by

taking an amount of sugar, wetting it enough to dissolve the sugar, and

heating it to hard crack stage.  Add it to the apricots, stirring as you

add it.  Then cook the mixture down over low heat until you can make a

trail with your spoon.  Pour into shallow, buttered pans and allow to cool.

You can cut them into squares or into shapes using small cookie or canapé

cutters.  Store between waxed paper or parchment paper.   With proper

storage they will keep for a year or so.

 

Alys Katharine, apricot lover

 

Elise Fleming

alysk at ix.netcom.com

http://home.netcom.com/~alysk/

 

 

Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 10:08:34 -0700

From: Susan Fox <selene at earthlink.net>

Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] Apricot Paste: Was Cotignac

To: Cooks within the SCA <sca-cooks at lists.ansteorra.org>

 

Cat Dancer wrote:

> Something to do with all those currants I've been collecting!!

> I have lots of red currants that I've been picking then stashing in

> the freezer every year until I have "enough to do something with".

> They tend to be fairly small--the big ones are about 1/4" across, and

> they're very seedy. Could I just start cooking them down in a little

> bit of water and then force them through a sieve to take the seeds out?

> Margaret

 

Yes, I would do that with any seedy fruit, currants, raspberries, even

rose hips.  I don't much like getting that crunch in my fruit paste,

others may like it?  A chaq'un son gout.

 

Selene

 

 

Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2006 08:59:28 -0400

From: "Elise Fleming" <alysk at ix.netcom.com>

Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] period fruit pastes (long and whiny and with

To: "sca-cooks at ansteorra.org" <sca-cooks at ansteorra.org>

 

Urtatim wrote:

> Of course there's the beet sugar vs. cane sugar issue. I've got a

> huge sack of pure cane sugar in my kitchen, but i suspect that most

> commercial preserves are made with the cheapest sugar they can get.

> Anybody have any idea if the sugar source will matter for fruit paste?

 

I wouldn't personally use any with beet sugar.  I had purchased 5 pounds of

sugar which, I believe, was mixed cane and beet.  It didn't perform the way

the pure cane sugar did. Perhaps someone else might have had different

results and this _was_ quite a while ago when I was still working with

fruit pastes.  Didn't like the results _at all_!

 

Alys Katharine

 

 

Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2006 18:10:17 +0000

From: "Holly Stockley" <hollyvandenberg at hotmail.com>

Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] period fruit pastes (long and whiny and with

        questions)

To: sca-cooks at lists.ansteorra.org

 

> Additional pectin may not be bad, but i dunno... anyone have any idea

> about that? I don't think i've ever made jam before. Or maybe i have,

> but if, so it was well over 30 years ago. I remember making Indian

> lime pickle and mango chutney in 1967, but i don't recall doing

> anything like it again.

 

Not a problem.  In fact, the recipe for Damsons in Quaking Jelly in Elinor

Fettiplace's receipt book directs the cook to start with "green apple

water."  Which is being used her for pectin.  I tend to make pectin stock

from green apples this time of year and can it for jam-making next year.

It's just a little insurance, and gives a bit more "snap" than commercial

pectin.  It won't do anything but maybe help the pastes set up better.

 

> Of course there's the beet sugar vs. cane sugar issue. I've got a

> huge sack of pure cane sugar in my kitchen, but i suspect that most

> commercial preserves are made with the cheapest sugar they can get.

> Anybody have any idea if the sugar source will matter for fruit paste?

 

I've used beet and cane and not had a problem either way.  I usually DO use

at least ceylon cinnamon, sometimes other spices, and some rosewater or

orange blossom water.  That might make pastes made from commercial preserves

"feel" more period??

 

Apple paste also goes quite well with cinnamon stick comfits.  ;-)

 

Femke

 

 

Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 01:15:43 +0000

From: "Holly Stockley" <hollyvandenberg at hotmail.com>

Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] period fruit pastes (long and whiny and

        withquestions)

To: sca-cooks at lists.ansteorra.org

 

> Fettiplace specifies "green apple water" and you mention using green

> apples. Do green apples have more pectin in them than red (ripe?)

> apples?  Hmmm, does green in this case simply refer to a type of

> apple, or does it mean an unripe apple?

 

Green as in unripe.  Green fruit has more pectin than ripe, whatever the

fruit.  The ripening process involves increasing levels of pectinase enzyme,

softening of the fruit, and a concurrent drop in pectin levels.  Local

orchards often thin their trees in the heat of the summer.  Those apples

work great, or just the earliest apples of a given variety that are often on

the greenish side.  I chop them up, seeds, peel, and all, and put them in a

stock pot with enough water to cover.  Boil them until they're soft, then

drain them overnight in a jellybag.  Return the liquid to the stove, and

reduce by half, then can like jam or jelly.  I end up using about 8 oz of

pectin stock per 2-2 1/2 quarts of fruit for jam or jelly.  Depends on the

fruit - more for cherries, less for raspberries, etc.  Proper set requires

specific ratios of acid, sugar, and pectin.  You develop a feel for it with

time.  Pastes are a little easier because they're drier, and you're unlikely

to run into a batch that won't set.  If you do, just leave them out to dry a

bit more.

 

> I think of comfits as being candied seeds. This use of cinnamon

> sticks to make comfits sounds interesting, although perhaps a bit

> more difficult to eat because they will have to be sucked on, or

> chewed for awhile. Sounds like an interesting soteltie item.

> Stefan

 

I used ceylon cinnamon, and broke up the sticks somewhat.  They're candy.

You can just crunch on the little bits.  Actually, I used Mistress

Hauviette's basic instructions, as filed on your site already.  ;-)  This

time of year, apple paste and a dish of cinnamon comfits tend to go over

pretty well.  Or I just dress the plate with the paste up with a  sprinkling

of the cinnamon comfits.

 

Femke

 

 

Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 18:50:02 -0700 (PDT)

From: Helen Schultz <meisterin02 at yahoo.com>

Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] Medieval questioniare

To: Cooks within the SCA <sca-cooks at lists.ansteorra.org>

 

Alys, didn't you say you didn't know of a period jam recipe (as  

opposed to a jelly)??  That cookbook I just mentioned has one I just  

found ...

 

English translation:

2.27. If you want to keep cherry jam for a year.

Add just as much sugar for cherry jam. Take 2 pounds cherries, take  

out the stones, and a pound sugar. Boil together until it has  

thickened and put it in the sun.

 

Modern Dutch translation:

2.27. Als U kersenjam een jaar wilt bewaren.

Doe nog eens zoveel suiker [erin] voor kersenjam. Neem 2 pond kersen,  

doe de pitten eruit, en een pond suiker. Kook samen tot het ingedikt  

is en zet het in de zon.

 

Middle Dutch:

27 Wyldy keerscruyt houden een jaer

Doet noch alsoe vele suyckers om keerscruyt neempt ij pont

keersen doet die steenen vuyt ende een pont zuyckers ziedet te

samen tot al dick is ende settet in die son

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Meisterin Katarina Helene von Sch?nborn, OL

Shire of Narrental (Peru, Indiana) http://narrental.home.comcast.net

Middle Kingdom

http://meisterin.katarina.home.comcast.net

 

 

Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 21:59:51 -0400

From: ranvaig at columbus.rr.com

Subject: [Sca-cooks] Jam (was Medieval Questionnaire)

To: alysk at ix.netcom.com, Cooks within the SCA

        <sca-cooks at lists.ansteorra.org>

 

> I disagree with their equating jam with jelly.  They aren't the same.  Jam

> is definitely a later "invention".  Or, can anyone show me a "jam" recipe?

 

Rumpolt Confect 23. Ungarische Pflaumen Confect / es sei wei? oder  

braun. Nimm die sauren Weichesl / und thu die Stengel darvon / setz  

sie in einem Kessel auf dz Feuwer oder Kolen / und la? auf sieden /  

denn sie geben von sich selbst Saft genug. Wenn sie kalt sein / so  

streich sie durch ein H?rin Tuch / thu sie in ein uberzindten  

Fischkessel / und setz auf Kolen / la? sieden / und r?rs umb / da?  

nicht anbrennet. Und wenns halb eingesotten ist / so nimm gestossenen  

Zimt und Nelken darunter / machs wohl s?? mit Zucker / und la? darmit  

sieden / bi? wohl dick / setz hinweg / und la? kalt werden / so  

kanstu es aufheben / so helt sichs ein Jar oder zwei.

 

Hungarian Plum Preserves/ be it white or brown.  Take the sour  

cherries/ and take the stems from it/ set them in a kettle over the  

fire or coals/ and let simmer/ until they give from themselves enough  

juice.  When it is cold then strain it through a hair cloth/ put them  

in a tinned fishkettle/ and set on coals/ let simmer/ and stir up/  

that it doesn't burn.  And when it is half cooked/ then take a little  

ground cinnamon and cloves in it/ make well sweet with sugar/ and let  

simmer together/ until it well thickened/ take away/ and let cool/ so  

you can lift it/ and keep it in a jar or two.

 

Ok, 1581 for Rumpolt, while period, might not be "medieval".  Rumpolt  

has recipes for a number of other fruits confects too. This came out  

very jam-like, although I think it was probably meant to be eaten as  

a spoon-sweet, rather than spread on bread.

 

Ranvaig

 

 

Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 13:54:35 -0700

From: aeduin <aeduin at roadrunner.com>

Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] Jam was Medieval Questionnaire

To: Cooks within the SCA <sca-cooks at lists.ansteorra.org>

 

I've seen it as jellies are clear, jams are

not.  And with homemade product as opposed to

store bought, preserves are canned jams.

 

Definitions from 1st ed. of the Penguin Guide to Food:

 

Jam:  a mixture of fruit and sugar boiled

together, poured into jars and sealed to give a

long-keeping preserve with a wet, semi-solid consistency.

 

Jelly:  a word applied to items made from

flavoured solutions mixed with a setting agent

and then allowed to cool.  Farther down in the

entry it refers to 'jelly preserves' are like jam

but use strained fruit juice rather than

pulp.  In N. America, however, jelly is a general term for jam.

 

aeduin

 

 

Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 17:02:38 -0400

From: "Phil Troy / G. Tacitus Adamantius" <adamantius1 at verizon.net>

Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] Jam was Medieval Questionnaire

To: Cooks within the SCA <sca-cooks at lists.ansteorra.org>

 

Except, AFAIK, the standard USA usage calls for jelly to be a

strained, clear or semi-transparent, pulp-free product, jam containing

some vaguely recognizable fruit pulp or solids, and preserves to

contain actual fruit blobs, hunks or chunks...

 

I still think the Rumpoldt recipe quoted in this thread is actually

for a fruit paste/"cheese".

 

Adamantius

 

 

Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 19:17:28 -0400

From: ranvaig at columbus.rr.com

Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] Jam (was Medieval Questionnaire)

To: Cooks within the SCA <sca-cooks at lists.ansteorra.org>

 

> Rumpolt Confect 23. Ungarische Pflaumen Confect / es sei wei? oder  

> braun. Nimm die sauren Weichesl / und thu die Stengel darvon / setz  

> sie in einem Kessel auf dz Feuwer oder Kolen / und la? auf sieden /  

> denn sie geben von sich selbst Saft genug. Wenn sie kalt sein / so  

> streich sie durch ein H?rin Tuch / thu sie in ein uberzindten  

> Fischkessel / und setz auf Kolen / la? sieden / und r?rs umb / da?  

> nicht anbrennet. Und wenns halb eingesotten ist / so nimm  

> gestossenen Zimt und Nelken darunter / machs wohl s?? mit Zucker /  

> und la? darmit sieden / bi? wohl dick / setz hinweg / und la? kalt  

> werden / so kanstu es aufheben / so helt sichs ein Jar oder zwei.

> Hungarian Plum Preserves/ be it white or brown.  Take the sour  

> cherries/ and take the stems from it/ set them in a kettle over the  

> fire or coals/ and let simmer/ until they give from themselves  

> enough juice.  When it is cold then strain it through a hair cloth/  

> put them in a tinned fishkettle/ and set on coals/ let simmer/ and  

> stir up/ that it doesn't burn.  And when it is half cooked/ then  

> take a little ground cinnamon and cloves in it/ make well sweet  

> with sugar/ and let simmer together/ until it well thickened/ take  

> away/ and let cool/ so you can lift it/ and keep it in a jar or two.

 

Ok, I made a translation mistake.  It should be "Jahr" or "year".  

Keep it a year or two.

 

The other word used for this fruit substance is "Latwerge" which  

comes from the word "Electuarium, from Greek "ekleikhein", to lick  

up.  Modern definitions of "Electuary" say it is a medical remedy in  

syrup.

 

Ranvaig

 

 

Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 19:32:51 -0400

From: "Elise Fleming" <alysk at ix.netcom.com>

Subject: [Sca-cooks] Jellies and Jams and Fruit Pastes, Oh My!

To: "sca-cooks at ansteorra.org" <sca-cooks at ansteorra.org>

 

Greetings!  There are a number of jellies in the English cookery books that

aren't like what we think of when we spread jelly on our bread.  Many

jellies of the Tudor and Elizabethan times were unsweetened, based on fish

or the jelly from the feet of pigs and calves.  These were often colored

and served during the "banquet" (dessert) course as well as during the main

meal.  There's some discussion of this in C. Anne Wilson's "'Banquetting

Stuffe'".  From what Wilson implies, even if sweetened, many of these

jellies were not made from fruit at this time.  And, if they were, the

result was usually clear, albeit colored.

 

Jam - to me, at least - has pureed or mashed up fruit pulp.  It isn't

clear.  Modern jam is at least spreadable whereas fruit pastes (or cheese?)

isn't really spreadable.  You can slice (leach) a fruit paste.  You can't

really slice jam.  I don't know how the Rumpolt recipe would come out.  I'd

take Adamantius's word that it looks more like a "fruit paste/'cheese'".

 

There are also preserves which - to me, at least - have chunks of fruit in

them and can be quite thick.  And, I don't believe (personal opinion only)

that preserves equate to either jam, jelly or fruit paste. My opinion is

that they are four different products which use sugar, fruit (in most

cases) and some type of liquid (which might be boiled out of the final

product).  Again, just to repeat, there are a number of jellies in English

and German cookery books that don't contain fruit.

 

You betcha it's confusing!

 

Alys Katharine

 

 

Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 17:43:14 -0700 (PDT)

From: Huette von Ahrens <ahrenshav at yahoo.com>

Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] Jam was Medieval Questionnaire

To: alysk at ix.netcom.com, Cooks within the SCA

        <sca-cooks at lists.ansteorra.org>

 

I think that we are getting stuck on semantics and not the actual  

item here.

 

Yes, the word "jam" doesn't appear in the English language until 1730.  However,

"preserves" appears in 1600 and "conserves" appears in 1555.  The Penguin Companion to Food says, 'The words "preserve" and "conserve" are also used more  

specifically to indicate an (often expensive or unusual) jam.  Although this is  

generally regarded as pretentious today, both words were used this way at least a century before the word "jam" became common.'

 

And looking up "jam" in the same work, it does indicate that jam as such was the decendent of "all the rather solid fruit and sugar conserves, preserves and  

marmalades of the 17th and 18th centuries."  It later states "The development which took jam from a solid confection to a soft, spreadable paste was the increased understanding of hygiene, such as the necessity for clean processing and for sealing the jars, that developed in the 19th century."

 

What I am saying is that if we make jam, we may not call it jam in period, but we can call the same product a conserve and still be accurate.  In other words, a jam by any other name is a conserve.

 

Huette

 

 

Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 21:49:30 -0400

From: ranvaig at columbus.rr.com

Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] Jellies and Jams and Fruit Pastes, Oh My!

To: alysk at ix.netcom.com, Cooks within the SCA

        <sca-cooks at lists.ansteorra.org>

 

> Again, just to repeat, there are a number of jellies in English

> and German cookery books that don't contain fruit.

 

When you talk about what "Jelly" means in German cookbooks, you are  

discussing translation issues, the cookbooks use different words for  

sweet and non-sweet gel type dishes.

 

Non-sweet gels are "Galrat" which might be better translated as  

galantine than jelly, a clear rich broth that gels when cold and is  

sometimes used to decorate a dish of meat.  One dish is a feathered  

bird poised on a "lake" of galrat.

 

"S?lze" which is usually translated as aspic is cold meat in a gelled  

broth.  Both of them sometimes/usually are flavored with vinegar.

 

Fruit gels are "Confect" or "Latwerge".

 

Ranvaig

 

 

Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 22:21:56 -0400

From: Daniel Myers <edoard at medievalcookery.com>

Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] Jam (was Medieval Questionnaire)

To: Cooks within the SCA <sca-cooks at lists.ansteorra.org>

 

On Oct 29, 2007, at 5:55 PM, Phil Troy / G. Tacitus Adamantius wrote:

> On Oct 29, 2007, at 4:18 PM, jenne at fiedlerfamily.net wrote:

>> It sounds like a marmalade to me, which is *a preserve* meant to be

>> eaten with a spoon, and for which there are lots of 16th c. recipes.

> It was my understanding that marmalades that aren't basically cotignac/

> quidony, IOW, quince pastes, are 18th or 19th century for spoonable

> versions. I think Elinor Fettiplace has some recipes for jam-like

> preserves, but she's not really medieval and she calls them preserves, IIRC.

 

It's hard to tell if this is "preserves" like or more "cotignac" like...

 

Source [A Book of Cookrye, 1591]: To make Conserve of Orenges. Take

Orenges and pare them very thin the red of the out sides away and

quarter them in four, and take away the white of the inside, then

seeth them in faire water softlye for breaking, ofte change them in

warm water til they be lost: as the yelownes dooth seeth away, so

weareth away the bitternes, then take them out of the water and lay

them in a fair vessell that the water may run away from them, then

beate them small with a spoone, and put to every pound of Orenges one

pound of sugar, and half a pound of Rosewater, and boile them

togither and box them.

 

The earliest marmalade recipe I've got is late 17th century...

 

Source [The English Housewife, G. Markham]: Marmalade of Quinces,

red. To make red Marmalade of Quinces, take a pound of Quinces and

cut them in half, and take out the cores, and pare them; then take a

pound of Sugar, and a quart of fair water, and put them all into a

pan, and let them boyl with a soft fire, and sometimes turn and keep

them covered with a pewter dish, so that the steam or air may come a

little out: the longer they are in boyling, the better colour they

will have: and when they be soft take a Knife, and cut them cross

upon the top, it will make the syrup go through that they may be all

of the like colour: then set a little of your syrup to cool, and when

it beginneth to be thick, then break your Quinces with a slice or

spoon, so small as you can in the pan, and then strew a little fine

Sugar in your boxes bottom, and so put it up.

 

As others have said, without the quantities and cooking times, some

of the compotes and such could easily be "jam-like".

 

- Doc

 

 

Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 22:46:38 -0400

From: Johnna Holloway <johnna at sitka.engin.umich.edu>

Subject: [Sca-cooks] Markham was Jam (was Medieval Questionnaire)

To: Cooks within the SCA <sca-cooks at lists.ansteorra.org>

 

But Markham is anything but late 17th century.

It first appears in 1615. We use and cite the edition from 1631

largely because we are using the McGill-Queens University Press

edition edited by Michael Best and he used the 1631as his copy-text.

 

Johnnae

 

Daniel Myers wrote:

> snipped

> The earliest marmalade recipe I've got is late 17th century...

> Source [The English Housewife, G. Markham]: snipped

> As others have said, without the quantities and cooking times, some

> of the compotes and such could easily be "jam-like".

> - Doc

 

 

Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 22:49:53 -0400

From: "Phil Troy / G. Tacitus Adamantius" <adamantius1 at verizon.net>

Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] Jam (was Medieval Questionnaire)

To: Cooks within the SCA <sca-cooks at lists.ansteorra.org>

 

On Oct 29, 2007, at 10:21 PM, Daniel Myers wrote:

 

> The earliest marmalade recipe I've got is late 17th century...

> Source [The English Housewife, G. Markham]: Marmalade of Quinces,

> red. To make red Marmalade of Quinces, take a pound of Quinces and

> cut them in half, and take out the cores, and pare them; then take a

> pound of Sugar, and a quart of fair water, and put them all into a

> pan, and let them boyl with a soft fire, and sometimes turn and keep

> them covered with a pewter dish, so that the steam or air may come a

> little out: the longer they are in boyling, the better colour they

> will have: and when they be soft take a Knife, and cut them cross

> upon the top, it will make the syrup go through that they may be all

> of the like colour: then set a little of your syrup to cool, and when

> it beginneth to be thick, then break your Quinces with a slice or

> spoon, so small as you can in the pan, and then strew a little fine

> Sugar in your boxes bottom, and so put it up.

> As others have said, without the quantities and cooking times, some

> of the compotes and such could easily be "jam-like".

 

I agree, it's hard to tell. But the reference to the extra boiling for

extra color (possibly a throwback to the quince paste being white --

which is really sort of amber -- and red, which is a russet so deep it

almost looks black), and the lining of boxes with sugar seems to me to

make a solid paste that continues to dry and solidify in the box more

likely.

 

Adamantius

 

 

Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 22:55:02 -0400

From: Johnna Holloway <johnna at sitka.engin.umich.edu>

Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] Jam (was Medieval Questionnaire)

To: Cooks within the SCA <sca-cooks at lists.ansteorra.org>

 

Dragging Anne Wilson's revised edition of The Book of Marmalade off

the shelf-- she includes a recipe for Condoignac from Le Menagier, a

Chardequynce from A Leechbook, and A.W.'s To make drie marmalde of peaches

from 1587. One of the main sources to look at is the 1608 A Closet for

Ladies and Gentlewomen.

 

Johnnae

 

 

Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 07:51:02 -0400

From: Johnna Holloway <johnna at sitka.engin.umich.edu>

Subject: [Sca-cooks] Wilson on 'Jams'

To: Cooks within the SCA <sca-cooks at lists.ansteorra.org>

 

Echoing what Huette and Alys wrote, here's some more

on the emergence of jams in English cookery: This may help in our

discussions.

 

On the topic of jam, C. Anne Wilson in the revised edition of The Book

of Marmalade (1999) writes:

 

The British themselves have not always had their soft-fruit jams. The

word "jam" began to creep into manuscript cookery-books in the last

quarter of the seventeenth century, and into the printed ones early in

the eighteenth. It had entered the English language only about a hundred

years before; and perhaps it had a middle eastern origin, for there is

an Arab word "jam" which means "close-packed" or "all together". From

its more general usage in English for things that were jammed against

one another, the word passed into the realm of confectionery, to denote

those preserves where soft fruits cooked with sugar were crushed

together, rather than sieved, and could thus be described as "jammed",

or "in a jam". pp. 16-17

 

Recipes for the marmalades of home-grown fruits other than quinces

appeared in the preserving books all through the seventeenth century.

The latter ones show a somewhat softer conserve, still dense and sticky,

but potted, not boxed, made from such fruit fruits as raspberries,

mulberries, cherries, white or red currants, gooseberries, apricots or

damsons, and it was for this type of conserve that the name "jam" was

coined. P.45

 

The revised edition of The Book of Marmalade is still in print. The

Florilegium carries a number of endorsements regarding the book.

 

Johnnae

 

 

Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 08:21:41 -0400

From: "Elise Fleming" <alysk at ix.netcom.com>

Subject: [Sca-cooks] Jam

To: "sca-cooks at ansteorra.org" <sca-cooks at ansteorra.org>

 

Huette wrote:

> And looking up "jam" in the same work, it does indicate that jam as  

> such was the decendent of "all the rather solid fruit and

> sugar conserves, preserves and marmalades of the 17th

> and 18th centuries." It later states "The development which took  

> jam from a solid confection

> to a soft, spreadable paste was the increased understanding of  

> hygiene, such as the necessity

> for clean processing and for sealing the jars, that developed in  

> the 19th century."

 

Okay... How I interpret the paragraph above is that jam, as we know it

today (mashed/pureed, spreadable fruit) is a later development - a

descendent of conserves and preserves.  Descendents aren't the same  

thing as their ancestors.  There are changes.

 

My picky-ness is because (as I think I mentioned) a person has been making

excellent jams but has been saying that the recipes are medieval.  From

everything written so far, and especially what Huette wrote and what I

found last night (below), the thing we Americans call "jam" (mashed/pureed,

spreadable fruit and sugar) is not "medieval" and appears not to have  

truly developed until post SCA period.

 

C. Anne Wilson, in "The Book of Marmalade" talks about the divergence of

meaning between "marmalade" and "jam" (p. 122) with the British tending

towards using "jam" and the Americans keeping the older form of

"marmalade".  She does write (p.45): "Recipies for the marmalades of

home-grown fruits other than quinces appeared in the preserving books all

through the seventeenth century.  The later ones  show a somewhat softer

conserve, still dense and sticky, but potted, not boxed, made from such

fruits as raspberries, mulberries, cherries, white or red currants,

gooseberries, apricots or damsons, and it was for this type of conserve

that the name 'jam' was coined."   (Alys notes - Her time frame says  

17th century (1600s) and she also specifies "later" recipes.)

 

So, yes,  semantics is involved because words describe (or try to!)

what we mean.  I'd really like to be able to help the jam person prove that

the mashed/pureed, spreadable(sometimes with seeds) fruit concoction that

she makes is within SCA period but given Huette's quote and Wilson's  

quote, I'm not convinced that "jam" (as Americans describe it) is within  

period.

 

Huette also wrote:

> What I am saying is that if we make jam, we may not call it jam in  

> period, but we can call

> the same product a conserve and still be accurate. In other words,  

> a jam by any other name is a conserve.

 

But given what Wilson writes (above) a jam derived from a conserve with the

recipes occurring in the later part of the 1600s.  That didn't mean that

someone (as Christianna wrote) made up a recipe that turned out softer and

less solid than the conserves were expected to be.  (And I'm not saying

that the conserves were "solid", just more solid than current jams.)

 

Doc - You might want to see Wilson's "Book of Marmalade" mentioned above.

She gives precursors that date to the 1st century AD and includes a 1587

recipe which uses the word "marmalade" in the title.  (It's from  

peaches.)

 

Flashback... Are we having a cuskynole-type discussion??

 

Alys Katharine

 

 

Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 08:54:49 -0500 (CDT)

From: jenne at fiedlerfamily.net

Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] Jam

To: "Cooks within the SCA" <sca-cooks at lists.ansteorra.org>

 

> But given what Wilson writes (above) a jam derived from a conserve with the

> recipes occurring in the later part of the 1600s. That didn't mean that

> someone (as Christianna wrote) made up a recipe that turned out softer and

> less solid than the conserves were expected to be. (And I'm not saying

> that the conserves were "solid", just more solid than current jams.)

 

There are a number of preserves in the 1587 _Good Huswife's Jewel_ which

call for equal weights of fruit and sugar and the use of whole fruit.  When

I looked at that last night, I wasn't sure whether that was jam or fruit

in syrup. Today, it occurred to me to look it up, and the Fannie Farmer

Cookbook on Bartleby says of Jams: "require equal weight of sugar and

fruit."

 

Comparing the recipes from the Fanny Farmer (1918) edition

http://www.bartleby.com/87/0037.html and the Good Huswife's Jewel may be

illuminating as to the relations of the English conserves and preserves

mentioned in Good Huswife to 'modern' preserves.

--

-- Jenne Heise / Jadwiga Zajaczkowa

 

 

Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 12:57:32 -0400 (GMT-04:00)

From: Robin Carroll-Mann <rcmann4 at earthlink.net>

Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] Jam

To: Cooks within the SCA <sca-cooks at lists.ansteorra.org>

 

Let me add another term to our list: electuary.

 

An electuary is a medicinal concoction mixed with sugar, honey, or  

syrup.  Here's a recipe from de Nola, consisting of two parts cooked,  

pureed fruit to one part sugar.

 

98.    ELECTUARY (76) OF SOUR CHERRIES FOR SICK PEOPLE WHO HAVE LOST THE DESIRE TO EAT

LETUARIO DE GUINDAS PARA LOS ENFERMOS QUE HAN PERDIDO LA GANA DE COMER

 

Take as many sour cherries as you wish and put them in a saucepan  

upon the fire; and cast them in water by themselves,

and let them cook in that water until they turn very tender and  

appear white; and then throw out that water of theirs in

which they cooked; and then take a sieve of very thin horsehair, in  

which you can strain them, and rub them so much

with your hands that everything passes through.  Then for each pound  

of these cherries prepared like this, take half a

pound of sugar and mix it in your saucepan on a gentle fire,  

constantly stirring with a cane until they are cooked; and

then put it aside; and put this electuary in a vessel of glazed  

earthenware, well-stoppered; if you wish, you can put some

cloves and a little cinnamon in it.

 

(Ruperto de Nola, 1529; Translation copyright Robin Carroll-Mann)

http://www.florilegium.org/files/FOOD-MANUSCRIPTS/Guisados1-art.text

 

So... is this a "jam"?

 

Brighid ni Chiarain

Barony of Settmour Swamp, East Kingdom

 

 

Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007

From: "Gwen Barclay" <gwenb at cvtv.net>

Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] Dancing on the cap of a jam jar

To: "Cooks within the SCA" <sca-cooks at lists.ansteorra.org>

 

Hey, Folks - coming from someone with a family business that made  

thousands of jars of jelly, jam, preserves,  conserves and marmalades  

through the years (20th century, not medieval) much of the difference  

between the types mostly has to do with the size fruit is cut,  

whether it is strained through a "jelly bag", plus the additional  

ingredients that are added.

 

I. Clear, bright juice from crushed fruit that has been hung in a  

jelly bag (usually of heavy muslin) over a bowl for several hours or  

overnight and usually cooked with pectin

until a soft texture forms = jelly.

 

II. Small chunks of fruit which cook with sugar and usually pectin  

until very soft and an almost formless consistency but not smooth = jam.

 

III. Medium to large pieces of fruit cooked with sugar and often  

pectin = preserve.

 

IV. A preserve containing pieces of fruit rind or peel, primarily  

citrus = marmalade.  Originally marmalades were made from quince -  

the Portuguese word marlelada means

"quince jam."

 

V. The same sized fruit cooked with sugar plus other ingredients such  

as  raisins, various other fruits and nuts = conserve.

 

Hope this may sort out the different types of spreads for breads or  

to eat as an accompaniment with meats and poultry.  But that's  

another story for another day.

 

Gwen in Texas - don't have a nom de plume as yet.  Maybe Lady  

Guinevere - if I have spelled it correctly?

 

 

Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 15:14:40 -0500 (CDT)

From: jenne at fiedlerfamily.net

Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] Jam

To: alysk at ix.netcom.com, "Cooks within the SCA"

        <sca-cooks at lists.ansteorra.org>

 

> My picky-ness is because (as I think I mentioned) a person has been making

> excellent jams but has been saying that the recipes are medieval.  From

> everything written so far, and especially what Huette wrote and what I

> found last night (below), the thing we Americans call "jam" (mashed/pureed,

> spreadable fruit and sugar) is not "medieval" and appears not to have

> truly developed until post SCA period.

 

Of course, pre-1600 isn't the same as "medieval" which is sort of a

problem-- something could date from around 1600 without being medieval.

 

If you would like to help this person, I'd recommend taking a look at  

the following books. Even if you don't agree that the preserves your

acquaintance is making are similar, perhaps you can steer him/her toward

the recipes in these for comparison.

 

- _The Elixirs of Nostradamus_ (1555)

- _Good Huswife's Jewel_ (1597)

- "Banquetting Stuffe" (1986 Leeds Symposium. C. Anne Wilson ed.)

- "Waste Not, Want Not" (1989 Leeds Symposium)

 

There's also recipes 175, 176, and 178 in The English Housewife to compare

to, and "A Closet for Ladies and Gentlewomen" which seems to be mostly

pastes

--

-- Jenne Heise / Jadwiga Zajaczkowa

 

 

Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 22:45:59 -0400

From: Jane Boyko <jboyko at magma.ca>

Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] red currents

To: Cooks within the SCA <sca-cooks at lists.ansteorra.org>

 

From "A Closet for Ladies and Gentlewomen. Or, The Art of Preferving,  

conferving, and Candying. ..."

 

To make Quodiniaks of Raspice or English Coriants.

 

Take Rafpices ripe and well coloured, and put them in a dish and put  

them foure spoonfuls rose-water, and mix them together with the backe  

of a spoone : then wring the liquid substance thorow a linnen cloth :  

season it by your mouth with sugar till it bee sweet enough, then  

boile it on a chafing dish of coles in a dish; till it be readie to  

print : then print it in your moulds, and box it, and so to keepe them.

 

If you have ever made jelly without pectin this would work.  You could follow a basic recipe to get the juice out.  I think the addition of  

rose water is very interesting and I want to go find some currents now.

 

Cheers

Marina

 

 

Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 02:13:01 +0000

From: Holly Stockley <hollyvandenberg at hotmail.com>

Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] red currents

To: <sca-cooks at lists.ansteorra.org>

 

Part of the problem is that most period preserve recipes are jams, rather than jellies.  And currants are seedy.  Not in an eat-the-seeds sort of way, either.  Nor big enough for a spit-out-the-pits sort of way.  So they're kind of hard that way.

 

You might try mixing them with an equal weight of dry ice in a (propped open) cooler until the freeze, and saving them until feast season.  They'll thaw with a texture very similar to fresh.  Or use them for a fruit paste.  

 

And from slightly post-period, A True Gentlewoman's Delight, 1653: "To make Paste of Goosberries, or Barberies, or English Currans.  Take any of these tender fruits, and boil them softly on a chafing- dish of coales, then strain them with the pap of a rotten Apple, then take as much sugar as it weighes, and boil it to a Candie height, with as much Rose-water, as will melt the sugar, then put in the pap of your fruit into the hot sugar, and so let it boil leasurely, till you see it reasonable stiffe, almost as thick as for Marmalet, then fashion it on a sheet of glasse, and so put it into the Oven upon two Billets that the glasse may not touch the bottom of the Oven, for if it do, it will make the paste tough, and so let it drie leasurely, and when it is dry, you may box it, and keep it all the year."

 

Femke

 

 

Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 13:55:29 -0400

From: Johnna Holloway <johnnae at mac.com>

Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] Sources for Preserving Recipes

To: Cooks within the SCA <sca-cooks at lists.ansteorra.org>

 

There's a handy two volume set on just fruit preserving recipes

that Stuart Peachey has put out. It's primarily original recipes

with some abbreviated hints on how to proceed in a modern kitchen.

 

*The Book of Preserving Fruit 1580-1660* Preserves, conserves,

marmalades, candies, dry fruit etc     Stuart Peachey     

       

*Volume 1: Apples - Oranges *   

        76p    7.00

*Volume 2: Peaches - Strawberries *   

        64p    7.00

 

http://www.stuart-hmaltd.com/types_of_food_1550_1660.php

 

These are sold by Stuart Peachey in the UK, but one can also buy them at

Books for Cooks in London.

 

In the

USA, the main vendor seems to be Sykes Sutlering.

http://www.sykesutler.com/ Write and ask or call and leave a message as

to if they have copies available and US prices.

They used to be sold at the War by various vendors too.

 

Johnnae

 

 

Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 15:03:03 -0500 (EST)

From: Devra <devra at aol.com>

To: sca-cooks at lists.ansteorra.org

Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] new book by Peter Brears - commercial plug

 

Prospect Books has finally released Peter Brears; new book JELLIES AND THEIR MOULDS, a 254p paperback with material covering medieval to modern jelly (jello). Includes discussion gelatin, extensive biblio, recipes, lotsa illos of molds, and a glossary. $45.

 

Devra the Book-Pusher

 

 

Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2011 13:58:36 -0500

From: Johnna Holloway <johnnae at mac.com>

To: Cooks within the SCA <sca-cooks at lists.ansteorra.org>

Subject: [Sca-cooks] new Peter Brears book - with commercial plug

 

Peter Brears' latest book Jellies and Their Moulds is just a great

work. 256 pages with many photos and his beautiful line drawings.

Besides the chapters on gelatin, jellies, gums, & starches, there are

these chapters:

 

CHAPTER THREE Medieval Jellies 53

CHAPTER FOUR Tudor Jellies 63

CHAPTER FIVE Stuart Jellies 71

 

Anyway it is well worth the purchase.

 

Johnna

 

On Feb 25, 2011, at 9:30 AM, Devra wrote:

<<< I expect that Johnna has already got this book, but Prospect has

finally come out with Jellies and Their Moulds, by Peter Brears, part

of the English Kitchen series. Paperback, 254 pp, covering material

from how jelly/gelatin is produced, to medieval recipes, through

modern recipes. Wonderful illus of various molds, bibli, glossary. A

nifty book, which I just happen to be selling for $24 (corrected price)

 

Devra the Book-Pusher >>>

 

<the end>



Formatting copyright © Mark S. Harris (THLord Stefan li Rous).
All other copyrights are property of the original article and message authors.

Comments to the Editor: stefan at florilegium.org