yeasts-msg – 8/2/15 Medieval use of yeast. Using it in the CMA. NOTE: See also these files: BNYeast-art, bread-msg, beverages-msg, beer-msg, mead-msg, breadmaking-msg, leavening-msg. ************************************************************************ NOTICE - This file is a collection of various messages having a common theme that I have collected from my reading of the various computer networks. Some messages date back to 1989, some may be as recent as yesterday. This file is part of a collection of files called Stefan's Florilegium. These files are available on the Internet at: http://www.florilegium.org I have done a limited amount of editing. Messages having to do with separate topics were sometimes split into different files and sometimes extraneous information was removed. For instance, the message IDs were removed to save space and remove clutter. The comments made in these messages are not necessarily my viewpoints. I make no claims as to the accuracy of the information given by the individual authors. Please respect the time and efforts of those who have written these messages. The copyright status of these messages is unclear at this time. If information is published from these messages, please give credit to the originator(s). Thank you, Mark S. Harris AKA: THLord Stefan li Rous Stefan at florilegium.org ************************************************************************ From: Richard Bainter Subject: Re: brewing yeasts To: bryn-gwlad at eden.com Date: Fri, 18 Oct 1996 09:08:45 -0500 (CDT) > >I am hoping it will be worth it in just better taste. (Things sitting > >around my house too long will start fermenting on the yeasts floating > >around in the air from the amount of brewing of late.) > Oh yuck. I can just see it now. Yeast growing on cheese, and milk and > sausage and tea and... old shoes and... Not that bad at all. Only had problems with juices left out. > How do you keep the wrong yeasts from the wrong beverage? You steralize and stop (lots of different methods) the yeasts in whatever you are brewing. Then when you pitch the yeast you want and it has the highest chance of taking hold. (You give it a head start by either using liquid yeast or a yeast starter.) > I'm assuming you are using different yeasts for beers, ales and wines. And many different kinds. There is a good yeast FAQ at: http://alpha.rollanet.org/library/yeast-faq.html > You're not doing bread making are you? Nope. My mother-in-law does that. > Yes, with commercial yeasts you may not > have to leave them open to the air for long, but.. Lots of people still use an open style fermintation. This means you just leave it open and let whatever lands in it go. This works in places that have high concentrations of the yeast you want. (And of course doing this successfully means that the yeast then has a higher chance of being the one you want due to it multiplying. Nice cycle.) -- Phelim Uhtred Gervas | "I want to be called. COTTONTIPS. There is something Barony of Bryn Gwlad | graceful about that lady. A young woman bursting with House Flaming Dog | vigor. She blinked at the sudden light. She writes pug at pug.net | beautiful poems. When ever shall we meet again?" From: "Philip W. Troy" To: sca-cooks at eden.com Date: Thu, 10 Apr 1997 20:27:16 -0400 Subject: Re: sca-cooks Greetings Sharon L. Harrett wrote: > A thread has been heating up on my other listserver and I would like > to ask you all your opinions. The discussion is on "yeast", for brewing and > baking. The argument seems to be split between those who believe that > "yeast" was unknown in period and therefore should not be used in any > authentic period cooking, baking or brewing. The other side is that although > folks in period did not neccessarily call their leavening "yeast" we know > now that most starters work because wild yeasts have taken up residence in > them, and that therefore to ensure a quality product for SCA consumption it > would not be a leap of logic to use packaged yeast for baking and brewing. > Ceridwen I don't see what the problem is with using commercial yeast. It provides a reasonably sure, unmutated yeast culture that does the job with a greater level of consistency than any sourdough can. Sourdough is a southern European thing anyway, and while it is very ancient, you cannot assume all baking was done that way. Northern European recipes generally call for barm, which is a byproduct from brewing ale, using a top-fermenting ale yeast. While this must at one time have been developed from wild yeasts, the ale recipes often call for adding an existing yeast starter. Considering the amounts produced by some of the brewing recipes, and the records of the disappointment expressed when a feast day's entire batch of ale or beer turned out to be bad, I wouldn't think they'd want to mess around taking chances By the way, where do people think the little blocks of fresh yeast, wrapped in foil, come from? If you read the label carefully, you'll generally find that much of it is produced by a subsidiary of Anheuser-Busch. Q.E.D. Adamantius From: nweders at mail.utexas.edu (Nancy Wederstrandt) To: sca-cooks at eden.com Date: Fri, 11 Apr 1997 10:43:05 -0600 Subject: sca-cooks yeast in cooking While I can't tell you the date of the recipe (it is during the 16th century) it is taken from A Booke of Cookry. To seeth Roches, Flounders, or Eeles. Make ye good broth with new yest, put therin vergious, salt, percely, a little time, and not much rosemary and pepper, so set it upon the fire and boile it, and when it is well boyled put in the Roches, Flounders, Eeles and a little sweet butter. Almost all the sauce for fish include yeast, which I found interesting. Many thanks to Katerine Rountre for her notes on yeast. They were what I needed since I haven't started redacting yet. Next question is how do you think the yeast was used....(what consistency) Clare St. John From: gfrose at cotton.vislab.olemiss.edu (Terry Nutter) To: sca-cooks at eden.com Date: Fri, 11 Apr 1997 13:44:41 -0500 Subject: sca-cooks yeast Hi, Katerine here. Tibor said: > Many thanks to Katerine Rountre for her notes on yeast. They were what I > needed since I haven't started redacting yet. Next question is how do you > think the yeast was used....(what consistency) > >Wow. I have NO ideas. I'd scoop up a tablespoon of ale barm from a bottle >of home-made beer, and taste it. And see how it works. (Damn shame if I'd >have to drink the beer to get to the barm, wouldn't it be? :-) I don't know either. I do know that yeast and barm show up as *alternatives* in some recipes, so there seems to have been some other form available; and since using sourdough occurs rarely relative to yeast, I doubt that's it. More than that, I can't say. Cheers, -- Katerine/Terry From: MaryGraceB at aol.com Date: Thu, 17 Apr 1997 15:34:43 -0400 (EDT) Subject: SC - More on Yeast...for real this time Ok guys....my mouse died and I am trying to learn to navigate without one until I can get to the store to get another....so that is hopefully a plausible excuse for sending out a message that did not have anything in it.... Following is the message that I intended to send regarding the yeast issue. MGB From: rayc at totcon.com (Ray Caughlin) Another older timer and I spend a couple hours on the phone and she said that I needed to inform people that yes yeast did exist during our societal time period: in its wild and natural form. She continued to tell stories of ways that our early ancestors used to harvest these yeastie beasties. Alewives, would make rush brooms which they used only to stir their brew. When not in use, they were hung near the open door way of their home. In essence the broom was being soaked in the ale makings and then it collected the wild yeast organism. Toast or bread was added to some brews to impart "their flavor." Our knowledge of yeast is modern. We know how to cultivate it and package it. We have been able to break it down and discover that different forms of yeast help produce food and beverages of varied kinds. Taken from a work by Duke (?)Caraidoc and his Lady Wife, " Chemical Leavenings So far as we can discover, both baking soda and baking powder are far out of period. According to the 1992 Old Farmer's Almanac, Saleratus (Potassium Bicarbonate) was patented as a chemical leavening in 1840. Hartshorn (Ammonium Carbonate) was used for stiffening jellies by about the end of the sixteenth century (Wilson) but we have found no reference to its use as a leavening agent prior to the late 18th century." http://www.pbm.com/~lindahl/cariadoc/cooking_from_primary_sources.html I think all will find this link filled with useful information concerning food and cooking for the Society. So I return to my statement that our ancestors had to gather the wild yeast by creating leavenings or starters which encouraged the growth of these wild wonders, but that yeast (by that name or as a purchasable product) did not! I am sorry if I stepped on anyone's toes by standing by my research, but if I didn't believe it, I wouldn't have written it. This does prove that having a host of awards after one's name does help. The you might have realized that I have done a great deal of research concerning food and food preparation. Still active (like proofed yeast) Lord Mandrigal of Mu, Master Oldenfeld Cooks Guild. From: "Philip W. Troy" To: sca-cooks at eden.com Date: Fri, 11 Apr 1997 16:26:50 -0400 Subject: Re: sca-cooks Greetings Aonghas MacLeoid (B.G. Morris) wrote: > Yeast, as we know it, would most definitely have been used in period times. > To achieve the yeast, and rising of today, periods cooks would leave a bowl > of flour, water (or milk) and sugar. This was used to collect *wild* yeast, > that would form the basis for bread, with a *natural* rising take place. It > is my opinion that medieval breads could be likened to *sour dough* bread. > > Regards, > Ealasaid The sourness of a given batch of sourdough starter depends on the number of generations that have passed, and mutated, since the capture of the original yeast. Wild yeasts of fairly recent vintage can still produce a not-especially-sour dough. It is only when it is recycled quite a few times that it becomes really sour, or in some cases, bitter. When it reaches that stage it is (and presumably was, or may have been) common practice to throw it away and start a new batch. Adamantius From: Deloris Booker Date: Tue, 15 Apr 1997 15:20:15 -0600 (MDT) Subject: SC - Re: sca-cooks Greetings Re Yeast in period, May I refer one and all to two books: English bread and yeast cookery : Elizabeth David Food in England : Huxley (long oout of print, but now available again in a vastly overpriced edition from Little Brown) Both books spend a lot of time on yeast in english cookery. Aldreada of the lakes From: Ilkka Heikki Salokannel Date: Thu, 17 Apr 97 23:37:40 PDT Subject: SC - Re yeast, chewets, and confits Greetings Cooks, Re Yeast: - You are quite correct in that the medieval cook couldnít go to a store and buy a package of dried yeast BUT both the word "yest" and "berme" or "barm" (ale yeast) were used in medieval sources (to give just a few examples): [Royal 17. A. iii MS. British Library, London. (c. 1370)] Ad faciendum brakott - "...put therto newe berm..." [MS BL Add. 5016 British Library, London (c. 1380) known as Form of Cury ] Frytour of erbesî - "... a lytel yest..."; Bragget - "... do gode berme aboue..." [Rawlinson MS. D1222 Bodleian Library, Oxford (c.1380)] Mynceleek - "...do theryn a litel berme or a litel sourdoug" [Harleian Ms. 279. (c.1420)] Cryspey - "... a lytel Berme..."; Fretoure - "take whete floure, Ale yest, Safroun, & Salt..."; Rastons - "...than take warme Berme...". [Holkham Collection (c. 1460) known as "A Noble Boke off Cookry ffor a Prynce Houssolde of eny other Estately Houssolde"] To mak rostand - "...a litill yest of new ale..." Leavening could be done two ways in the Middle Ages by either the sourdough method or by using the froth or "barm" from the top of fermenting ale. This was "ale yest". (Beer yeast ferments on the bottom.) They, of course, had no idea what yeast was (first discovered by Louis Pasteur in the 19th century). The "yeast" in the sourdough method was airborne wild yeasts of two kinds in medieval Europe. In the north the wild yeasts are what were later domesticated into modern "ale" and "beer" yeasts. In the south the wild yeasts are what become "wine" yeasts. As the temperature increased the limit of grape growing and airborne wild "wine" yeast moved north and the medieval climate was, on the whole, warmer than modern day. Modern "bread" yeasts are derived from the domestication of North American wild airborne yeasts. (Sourdough yeasts for starters came from N.America to France not the other way around.) Yeasts are differentiated by their tolerance for alcohol - a toxic waste product to the yeast. Here in N. America we can make very good sourdough without buying expensive starter packages, but have to protect our wine and beer during fermentation from wild yeasts. [I worked in R&D for Wine-Art in the seventies and read my way around an entire room of books about wine, wine history, wine tasting, the chemical composition of wine, and yeasts. - thought I should explain how I know this.] Mistress Rowenna de Roncesvalles OL. OP Barony of Lions Gate, Kingdom of An Tir - ------------------------------------- Name: Ilkka Heikki Salokannel E-mail: Ilkka Heikki Salokannel From: Mark Schuldenfrei Date: Fri, 18 Apr 1997 12:48:49 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: SC - Scottish Recipes In some of my older German recipe books, an ingredient is called for that translates as 'hartshorn'. It is used in place of baking powder. Is there a zoologist out there who could tell us if grated deer antlers would perform like baking powder or soda? If so, we could use the modern substitute for health reasons. If I recall correctly, hartshorn is an ammoniated equivalent to baking powder, still available in England, and which produces a slightly different flavor and texture. Tibor Date: Mon, 13 Oct 1997 11:46:50 -0400 From: Philip & Susan Troy Subject: Re: SC - beer bread recipe (was re: small feasts) Par Leijonhufvud wrote: > On Mon, 13 Oct 1997, Stephanie Rudin wrote: > > > gently and then dispose of the sediment. Would you want to keep that > > sediment > > when using it to cook with? Or is it just nasty stuff that should be > > disposed of? > > It should be usable as a "substitute" for yeast (it is yeast:-). IIRC > there are comments by Roman writers (with these words I hereby invoke the, > Adamantius! ;-) that the Germans had bread that was much nicer that their > own, without the sour taste and all. Pliny the Elder, Historia Naturalis, IIRC, is what you are referring to...the problem is that most of what comes to us as homebrew is top-fermenting ale, and what sinks to the bottom is almost completely dead yeast. You might be able to take a solution of water and sugar (preferably malt extract or actual brewer's wort) and use that trub at the bottom to create a live yeast starter. When you've got that, you can skim some of the foamy glop off the TOP, and use that for leavening, since it's now live yeast. Bear in mind that in period both brewing and baking were not so much frequent events as constantly ongoing processes, and the raw materials for one were regularly being produced by the other. Adamantius Date: Mon, 13 Oct 1997 12:47:50 -0500 From: "Decker, Terry D." Subject: RE: Re[2]: SC - beer bread recipe (was re: small feasts) The Romans used grape must from wine making as bread leavening. This produces a sourer leavening than the ale barm used by the German tribes. If you do use the sediment, try "cleaning" it by mixing it with a cup lukewarm water and a small pince of sugar. Keep the mixture warm and decant the liquor when the yeast grows. Use the liquor for leavening. To be honest, I haven't tried cleaning barm, but I'm working a deal with a local brewer to get ale barm to experiment with cleaning and growing it. Bear Date: Tue, 14 Oct 1997 00:07:41 -0400 (EDT) From: Ladypeyton at aol.com Subject: Re: Re: SC - beer bread recipe (was re: small feasts) >You might be able to take a solution of water and sugar >(preferably malt extract or actual brewer's wort) and use that trub at >the bottom to create a live yeast starter. When you've got that, you can >skim some of the foamy glop off the TOP, and use that for leavening, >since it's now live yeast. Bear in mind that in period both brewing and >baking were not so much frequent events as constantly ongoing processes, >and the raw materials for one were regularly being produced by the >other. I'm fairly positive that beer yeast used to make bread will not have a taste that you expect. Bear in mind that brewing & vinting yeasts are only distant cousins of bread yeasts today. I tried a wine with a bread yeast as an experiment. Yeuchhhh! I have never tried the reverse but I wouldn't be surprised if the same yeuchhh result was the outcome. If you try it I would be extremely interested in what your results were. Peyton Date: Tue, 14 Oct 1997 12:53:16 -0500 From: "Decker, Terry D." Subject: RE: Re: SC - beer bread recipe (was re: small feasts) There are many different kinds of yeast, each of which works best for specific purposes. The brewers I know carefully choose their yeasts and sterilize their carboys and equipment to reduce the possibility of introducing wild yeast. For baking I tend to use dry active yeast purchased by the pound and stored in a jar in the refrigerator. Trying to swap one kind of packaged yeast for another usually doesn't work. We know that for bread leavening the Romans used grape must, the Germanic tribes used ale barm, and that ale barm continued to be used into period. Brewing and baking were ongoing activities about the manors and probably remained that way through the period we recreate. They were among the first forms of work to become commercial enterprises as towns and urban centers began growing. Commercial medieval brewers cultivated their yeasts and I expect medieval baker's did the same, although I have found no evidence to support this. We do know that bakers did grow their own yeast in the 18th and 19th centuries. In the first half of this century, home bakers could still buy yeast from the local bakery. The commercial breweries, who had to cultivate yeast anyway, began to cultivate baker's yeast as well, providing a cheaper, better source of yeast to commercial bakers and the general public. The idea of growing yeast from the dregs and using the barm for baking is similar to the practice of cleaning barm. The gathered ale barm is allowed to settle, the liquor is then decanted and added to a warm solution of water and barley malt extract. The mixture is kept warm and the yeast is allowed to grow. The liquor is decanted and used as leavening. The process can be repeated indefinitely, but there are many reports of the yeast culture weakening over time. Unless you are really feeling experimental, starting with an ale barm is probably advised. Ales are top fermenting and are fairly light tasting. The use of ale barm (the foam on top of the ale pot) as bread leavening is documented. The active fermentation is at the top of the pot, so it makes a fast acting yeast (relatively) and it can be dried and stored for periods when no ale is brewing. The ale itself can be used as leavening (as long as it has not been pastuerized) since there is yeast throughout the product, but the action will be slower. Almost all American commercial beers are some form of ale. Beers are bottom fermenting and usually are heavier and more bitter than ale. The taste is carried over into any bake goods. And in any case, collecting beer yeast really would be scraping the bottom of the barrel. If you are interested in further research Stefans Floregium has some good information on yeast and Elizabeth David's English Bread and Yeast Cookery covers all of the ingredients in baking and covers a number of historical practices. Bear Date: Wed, 15 Oct 1997 05:30:33 +0200 (METDST) From: Par Leijonhufvud Subject: Baking (was: Re: SC - beer bread recipe (was re: small feasts)) On Tue, 14 Oct 1997, Decker, Terry D. wrote: > into period. Brewing and baking were ongoing activities about the > manors and probably remained that way through the period we recreate. Recent historical records (19th century and onwards to modern times in Finland) describe how a continous sourdough culture was maintained in the wooden baking trough. Enough yeast-containing dough always remained in the trough, and subsequently "restarted" each time baking was done. /UlfR - -- Par Leijonhufvud par.leijonhufvud at labtek.ki.se Date: Fri, 24 Oct 1997 23:29:45 -0500 From: "Decker, Terry D." Subject: RE: SC - Manchet (LONG POST) ><< e: adding the salt to the liquid...wouldn't that kill the yeast and >prevent > the bread from rising? >> > >Adding the salt to the recipe would slow down the growth of the yeast. This >is good. Fast growing yeast produces unwanted compounds which could, for >instance, cause a decided bitter flavor in the finished product. > >Ras Good point. Salt is generally added to improve the flavor of the bread, which is why I'll increase the salt the next time I make manchet. It does slow yeast activity and by doing so "sweetens" the bread. The ratios of yeast/salt/flour differ based primarily on the length of the rise. In the case of the recipe for manchet, the major rise of the bread is during baking and the rise times are so short that you really don't worry about fast growing yeast. Standard bread recipes usually call for 1 teaspoon of salt to one or two teaspoons of dry active yeast and about two pounds of flour with a two hour first rise and a one to two hour second rise. The place where the balance gets tricky is when you create a slow rise bread or a starter. Either of these may rise for as much as twelve hours. Some of the recipes I've seen call for tablespoon of salt to a teaspoon of yeast and two pounds of flour. Bear Date: Mon, 27 Oct 1997 11:22:18 -0600 From: "Decker, Terry D." Subject: RE: SC - Manchet (LONG POST) I learned some things about using yeast in solution over the weekend. Since I normally use dry active yeast, I am unfamiliar with the characteristics of keeping and using yeast in solution. The following is from a message I sent earlier and describes a test I ran this weekend. I learned a little more about yeast as a liquid over the weekend after I read about "cleaning" ale barm. Ale barm which is skimmed from the active fermentation at the top of the ale pot is poured into a gallon of fresh, clean water, stirred and left to sit overnight. This is to remove some of the taste of the bittering agents (like hops) in the ale. No actively fermenting, the yeast settles to the bottom. The water is decanted, except for the pint or so containing the yeast. Since I normal use dry active yeast, and I am unfamiliar with the characteristics of yeast being kept in solution, I decided to experiment. As a test, I decanted 1/2 cup of the yeast solution and added it to 1/2 cup lukewarm water and a pinch of sugar. I then stirred the yeast solution and decanted 1/2 cup into a 1/2 cup lukewarm water with a pinch of sugar. I covered the two test batches and let them stand in the kitchen for several hours. Then I stirred each solution and decanted 1 ounce of the solution into a 1/2 cup of lukewarm water and mixed in 1 cup of flour to make two starters. The remainder yeast solutions were returned to the yeast jar. After four hours, the stirred solution starter was about three times the size of the other. The starters were then used to make bread. They were added to dough mixtures of 2 cups of flour sifted with 1 tablespoon of salt, 2 tablespoons of melted butter, and 2 eggs. Two additional cups of flour were kneaded into each mixture. They were allowed to rise for two hours, then punched down kneaded slightly, formed into four one pound loaves, placed in greased baking tins and allowed to rise for two hours. They were baked at 400 degrees F for 45 minutes. The stirred yeast produced 2 one pound country loaves with superb taste and density. The unstirred yeast produced loaves with half the rise, a doughy texture and a taste which could be kindly described as terrible. This morning I looked at the yeast jar. There were three defined layers. A clear translucent layer at the top, solids at the bottom, and a yellow translucent layer in between. So apparently without active fermentation, the yeast concentrates toward the bottom of the solution and you get the best mix of yeast by stirring before decanting. This also means that the difference in rise between my second and third batches of manchet may be due to a difference in agitation as I decanted the yeast solution. Bear Date: Fri, 21 Nov 1997 10:42:22 -0400 From: Philip & Susan Troy Subject: Re: Unit alert! (was: SC - Long-Period food, bread, etc.) Par Leijonhufvud wrote: > > It is two envelopes primarily to get a good rise quickly. > > When you say; "an envelpe of yeast"; just how much yeast is this? If > given the amounts we non-US cooks have some chance of figuring out what > is equivalent, but not when it comes to packages. > > /UlfR > (Who buys yeast is 50 gram cakes) The recipe I based the peri-oid "white" bread recipe I posted called for 2 envelopes of dry yeast, or 1 ounce of fresh "cake" yeast. An envelope of dry yeast in the USA is a fairly standard measurement equivalent to 1/4 ounce per envelope (roughly 1 Tablespoon, if you buy it by bulk in jars or some such. So two envelopes is 1/2 ounce dry yeast, or roughly equivalent to a 1-ounce cake of fresh yeast, in the States, or approximately 1/2 of one of Ulf's 50-gram cakes in Sweden. Now, I should also point out that the recipe I posted was in response to a request from a lady looking for a bread recipe for an event, presumably to be baked in bulk. Yes, an experienced baker can get by with much less yeast, given things like sufficient time to start a sponge the night before, a six-hour rise time, give or take an hour, and a proper oven. And, yes, there are certainly ways to make the recipe produce a loaf that would be closer to some forms of period bread. This was an informed compromise, since I don't yet have a recipe scaled to make fifty loaves using freshly washed ale barm ; ), and I would want to be a bit more experienced in the technique before spending event money on it. Adamantius Date: Mon, 30 Mar 1998 15:17:38 -0600 From: "Decker, Terry D." Subject: RE: SC - Beer yeast for bread > Over the weekend, my husband bought a version of Red Hook > beer with a German name I don't recall at the moment (hefe something?). > It has active yeast in it and I thought all weekend of how to turn it > into yeast for bread. > > Anne I've estimated that you need about 1 oz. of fresh ale barm to leaven 2 lbs. of flour and I would expect it to take 12 to 24 hours to rise. The leas, having a lot of dormant yeast, aren't as active as fresh barm and need time to grow, which is why it took a couple of days for Charles Ragnar to produce bread. If you want the yeast to work faster, you probably need to cultivate it. If you want to try cultivate the yeast, sterilize a quart cannning jar, lid, and a large metal spoon, dissolve a couple of tablespoons of barley malt into two cups of boiling water, empty the canning jar, put the spoon into it (to dissipate heat) and pour in the boiling water, remove the spoon and cover the jar loosely with the sterile lid. Allow to cool below 100 degrees F. The idea is to kill off the molds and bacteria which can make your barm unusable. Wash off the neck of your beer bottle with hot water. Open the bottle and decant your drink, leaving an ounce or so in the bottle. Swirl it around to stir up the leas, and decant the leas into the solution in your canning jar. Loosely cover the jar. Agitate it mildly every few hours. Give it a few days. Then agitate and decant and ounce or two as needed. At this point the barm can be stored in the refrigerator for several weeks to months. If the barm is cold, agitate it and decant what you need, then allow the decanted solution to come to room temperature before mixing it into your bread making liquor. The process is not as simple as using the leas and there is the problem of infection. I've lost my last two barm experiments to mold. Must be El Nino. BTW, Your idea of using half a bottle as starter for beer bread is a good one. Active yeast should be in suspension in the liquid as well as in the leas. I hadn't thought about using Hefeweiss (I believe that's what you have) as a bread starter, but it would be an interesting experiment. Bear Date: Tue, 5 May 1998 15:21:27 -0500 From: "Decker, Terry D." Subject: SC - yeast - LONG & OOP While on a trip to New Orleans, I had the opportunity to stop at a bookstore in Shreveport and come up with a couple of treasures. One of these is Tullie's Receipts, a book of recipes assembled from various 19th century sources by the Kitchen Guild of the Tullie Smith House Restoration, Atlanta Historical Society. The recipes are from cookbooks published in the period, Southern manuscript cookbooks written in the period, the odd recipe glossed into a printed cookbook and venerable family recipes of undeterminable age. I found the entries for yeast interesting, and am transcribing a couple of them here. Dry Yeast Put four ounces of hops to six quarts of water; boil it away to three quarts. Strain, boiling hot (as directed for the Soft yeast) upon three pints of flour, a large spoonful of ginger, and another of salt. When it is cool, add a pint of sweet yeast. When it is foaming light, knead in sifted Indian meal enough to make it very stiff. Mould it into loaves, and cut in thin slices, and lay it upon clean boards. Set it where there is a free circulation of air, in the sun. After one side has dried so as to be a little crisped, turn the slices over; and when both sides are dry, break them up into small pieces. It thus dries sooner than if not broken. Set it in the sun two or three days in succession. Stir it often with your hand, so that all parts will be equally exposed to the air. When perfectly dry, put it into a coarse bag and hang it in a dry and cool place. The greatest inconvenience in making this yeast is the danger of cloudy or wet weather. If the day after it is made should not be fair, it will do to set the jar in a cool place, and wait a day or two before putting in the Indian meal. But the best yeast is made when the weather continues clear and dry; and if a little windy, so much the better. To use it, take, for five loaves of bread, one handful; soak it in a very little water until soft, which will be in a few minutes; stir it into the sponge prepared for the bread. This yeast makes less delicate bread than the soft kind, but it is very convenient. Mrs. M.H. Cornelius, The Young Housekeeper's Friend (1859) Baker's Yeast To a gallon of soft water put two quarts of wheat bran, one quart of ground malt, (which may be obtained from a brewery,) and two handfuls of hops. Boil them together for one half an hour. Then strain through a sieve, and let it stand till it is cold; after which put to it two large tea-cups of molasses, and half a pint of strong yeast. Pour it into a stone jug and let it stand uncorked till next morning. Then pour off the thin liquid from the top, and cork the jug tightly. When you are going to use the yeast, if it has been made two or three days, stir in a little pearl-ash dissolved in warm water, allowing a lump the size of a hickory-nut to a pint of yeast. This will correct any tendency to sourness, and make the yeast more brisk. Miss Leslie, Directions for Cookery (1847) Strong yeast is barm from the brew pot. Pearl-ash is cream of tartar. Date: Sat, 20 Jun 1998 12:26:04 -0500 From: "Decker, Terry D." Subject: RE: SC - Sourdough > Does anyone out there have any experience with making sourdough starter? I > started a batch a week ago and have been diligent about stirring several times > a day. At first (days 1-3) it bubbled up and tried to escape and was real > active and *smelled* like sourdough. But now (the 8th day -- the recipe said > 5-10 days) it just sort of lays there in the bowl. > > Is this normal, or should I start again? Any tips? > > Renata You probable should have sealed it in a jar and put it in the refrigerator about day 5. The starter needs to be used about once a week and you should replace the amount of starter you use with an equal amount of lukewarm water and flour mixed 1:1. To see if your starter is still useable, break 1 cup of starter apart in 1 cup of luke warm water (80 to 90 degrees F). Add a Tablespoon of honey or sugar to the mix and stir to dissolve. Stir in 1 cup of flour sifted with 1 Tablespoon of salt. Stir in more flour until the dough forms a ball (probably 2 cups). Knead on a floured surface, adding flour as necessary until the dough becomes smooth and elastic. Put the dough in a greased bowl, cover and let it rise until doubled (if it doesn't rise much, let it rise for 3 hours). Punch the dough down and form it into loaves (this recipe should make about 2 pounds of bread). Put the loaves on a greased baking sheet or into greased tins. Cover and let rise until doubled (or for 2 hours). Bake in a preheated oven at 375 degrees for about 35 minutes or until the loaves are brown and sound hollow when thumped on the bottom. If the bread is too dense, you've probably killed off most of the yeast in your sourdough starter and need to start over. If you like the results, replenish the starter and store it in a sealed container in your refrigerator. Bear Date: Sat, 20 Jun 1998 15:44:54 EDT From: Balano1 at aol.com Subject: Re: SC - Sourdough For the sourdough to get quiet after a fews days is perfectly normal. I grew up with fresh homemade Sourdough bread bread and waffles every weekend when my dad had the time to cook. Have kept my own starter going for years. When you take out half to make your bread or whatever and add it to the other bread ingredients, it will perk right up! BTW, that vinegar like substance is hooch and will become alcoholic in a short time! - Nadene Date: Sun, 21 Jun 1998 08:14:19 -0500 From: "Decker, Terry D." Subject: RE: SC - Sourdough > Just as a little aside, if the liquor of a starter has gone a sort of > orange/brown colour it probably shouldn't be used. I too grew up with > exclusively homemade bread (and had big jars of starter on the counter) > and that was the sage advice my mom gave me a long time ago. Does anyone > know why this is? I've always assumed that there are unwelcome guests in > the starter if this happens. > > Coll It's probably a mold. Normally, you will get green ones, but there are some red ones which attack grain products. My last yeast experiment failed when it became infected with mold. Bear Date: Sun, 21 Jun 1998 15:18:03 -0500 From: "Decker, Terry D." Subject: RE: SC - Sourdough > Bear says: > >>You probable should have sealed it in a jar and put it in the > refrigerator about day 5.<< > > The recipe says to keep it in the fridge covered with cheesecloth, not > sealed. > > What to do, what to do...?;) > > Renata If you leave it unsealed, be ready to use it every day or two. Refrigeration reduces humidity and it will take the water out of the starter. Covering and refrigeration extends the life of the starter and helps keep out molds and other undesirable critters. If you use it often, you could leave it in a jar on the counter with a loose top. There are a number of comments about the Alaskan "sourdoughs" carrying their sourdough starter in a pocket. Bear Date: Mon, 22 Jun 1998 08:00:25 +0200 (MET DST) From: Par Leijonhufvud Subject: RE: SC - Sourdough On Sun, 21 Jun 1998, Decker, Terry D. wrote: > If you use it often, you could leave it in a jar on the counter with a loose > top. There are a number of comments about the Alaskan "sourdoughs" carrying > their sourdough starter in a pocket. There is, of course, another method of keeping a sourdough starter. This is to use a wooden baking trough, and letting the remains of the last dought form part of the next. This was done in country-side Finland up until quite recently. I tried a version of this a few months ago. After baking I left the bowl (plastic) stand on the counter until dry. The next weekend I then simply mixed down the crusty remains with some flour and water. And it started to rise after having been left alone overnight, and worked well as a starter. Or you could just freeze it between uses if you aren't going to bake every week. /UlfR - -- Par Leijonhufvud parlei(at)algonet.se Date: Mon, 22 Jun 1998 09:00:01 -0500 From: "Decker, Terry D." Subject: RE: SC - Sourdough > There is, of course, another method of keeping a sourdough starter. This > is to use a wooden baking through, and letting the remains of the last > dought form part of the next. This was done in country-side Finland up > until quite recently. I tried a version of this a few months ago. After > baking I left the bowl (plastic) stand on the counter until dry. The > next weekend I then simply mixed down the crusty remains with some > flour and water. And it started to rise after having been left alone > overnight, and worked well as a starter. I got to thinking about this the last time you mentioned it. The wooden baking trough works for small batches, but I don't think it is effective for commercial quantities. I expect large batches of bread were boosted with ale barm to get a good rise in a reasonable time. However, let's take your technique a little farther. Create your leaven, let it rise and bubble for a few days, then dry it out. (Most bakers won't do this because reconstituting a leaven in quantity is a pain.) Grind the dried leaven to powder. At that point you have a high yeast content powder which can be added to the dough to leaven it. The powder should retain its potency up to about 120 degrees F and, as long as you kept it dry, could be easily transported in a pouch or a flask. The technique is similar to some stuff I've found in 19th Century recipes. > Or you could just freeze it between uses if you aren't going to bake > every week. Good idea. Bread dough will rise after freezing without a lot of problem, so a leaven should freeze just fine. I would let it come back to room temperature before mixing dough. > /UlfR Bear Date: Thu, 25 Jun 98 16:26:08 -0600 From: upsxdls at okway.okstate.edu Subject: Re[2]: SC - Sourdough (getting further and further from topi Ok, Bear, this is exactly what I'm looking for (although I didn't know it until late yesterday afternoon). All of my starter recipes have been "cheaters" (using store-bought yeast to make the starter). Several years ago I stumbled across a bread cookbook entitled "The Garden Way Bread Baker's Almanac" or something like that. It contains several receipes for making sourdough starter without store-bought yeast. If I recall, it even contains some special recipes for unusual diets. I can either post to the listserv, or you may email me privately: upsxdls at okstate.edu Good luck! Leanna McLaren of Sparrowhaven Date: Fri, 26 Jun 1998 07:55:08 -0400 From: Nick Sasso Subject: Why Sour? (Re[2]: SC - Sourdough (getting further and further) Ok, Bear, this is exactly what I'm looking for (although I didn't know it until late yesterday afternoon). All of my starter recipes have been "cheaters" (using store-bought yeast to make the starter)............. The things that give sourdough its characteristic tartness (as well as too many carboys of my beer!!) are the wild yeast, acetobaccili (makes acetic acid) and lactobacilli (makes lactic acid) that are in the wandering air about us. There are certainly other things, but healthy yeast from the store will not generally do the same. On a tangential note, there is a yeast strain that will give beer a banana and clove character when used in conjunction with wheat malt. Might ber a hoot to try in bread......or a starter...........(weihenstephan or wheat beer yeast). niccolo difrancesco Date: Mon, 6 Jul 1998 18:59:59 -0400 From: "Alma Johnson" Subject: Re: SC - Re: Yeast >I got a coupon for a free strip of Rapid-Rise yeast and it got me >wondering. I was hoping Adamantius or Bear or someone could answer this. >What exactly is rapid-rise yeast? What do they do to it to make it rise >faster? To the best of my knowledge, there are 2 differences. One is the strain of yeast. Some are more vigorous than others, and just about every yeast manufacturer has it's own, which is why you'll find that the "same" yeast from different companies will act differently. Next is the process by which the yeast is deactivated, to keep it dormant till you wake it up when _you're_ ready for it to work. The process often used is a heat drying process. This does, however, kill off some of the yeast. Instant yeast is dried at lower temps than active dry, killing fewer yeasties in the process, so you get a faster start, and generally more bang for your buck. Rhiannon Cathaoir-mor Not Adamantius, nor Bear, but a baking freak, nevertheless. Date: Mon, 6 Jul 1998 22:16:46 -0400 From: renfrow at skylands.net (Cindy Renfrow) Subject: Re: SC - Yeast Sigh. From http://www.breadworld.com/products/ , The Fleischmann's Yeast website: "Fleischmann's Active Dry yeast: This yeast is the original active dry yeast product. It is highly stable and known for its consistent performance and works best when dissolved in water prior to mixing. Fleischmann's Active Dry Yeast comes in two types of packaging: a strip of three 1/4-oz packets and a 4-oz glass jar. " "Fleischmann's Rapid Rise Yeast: This is an instant active dry yeast. It is a highly active strain that can be mixed directly with dry ingredients before use. Since the yeast does not need to be dissolved first and only one rise is required, the process of baking is significantly shortened. Fleischmann's Rapid Rise Yeast is available in a strip of three 1/4-oz packets. " "DESCRIPTION: a finely granulated, highly active instant dry yeast that hydrates and activates quickly does not need to be dissolved before using--best when mixed directly into dry ingredients HISTORY: Introduced in 1984 AVAILABLE FORM: Strips of three 1/4-oz packages DIETARY CONCERNS: The yeast is permitted for use in gluten-free, lactose-free, corn-free, soy-free, sugar-free, no-MSG and vegetarian diets. EQUIVALENTS: One 1/4-oz package = 2 1/4 teaspoons dry yeast SUBSTITUTIONS: One 1/4-oz package can be substituted for, or used in place of the following: 0.6-oz cake of Fresh Active Yeast Can also be used interchangeably (equal parts) with: Active Dry, Bread Machine or other instant yeast There is more info on the Fleischmann's site. Cindy/Sincgiefu Date: Fri, 17 Jul 1998 09:44:28 -0500 From: "Decker, Terry D." Subject: RE: SC - Re: Kvass and yeasties > Although none of my sources are good "period" sources, I would assume > (yes, I know the dangers) that wild yeasties have been around for a very > long time. Yeasts are one of the older lifeforms on the planet. They were first used to leaven bread in Egypt about 5000 years ago and were used prior to that to make beer. > You can make bread by just putting flour and water (a little > sugar or honey helps) in a container and leaving it open, or preferably > covered with thin cheesecloth. Except in a sterilized environment, yeast spores appear to be ubiquitous. Flour contains yeast spores which accumulated on the wheat and passed through the milling process. So, you can mix flour and water together in a covered container and still get fermentation. > Also, you never > know what types of yeasts you are collecting and the flavors they create > can be unpredicatable. Sometimes new and exciting, othertimes not so > nice. Many yeasts appear to be localized, so that some very fine flavors can only be created in a small geographic area. The chief problem with collecting wild yeast is that you also collect molds. This has little effect on a flour and water paste, but as you increase the sugar content of the mix, molds are more likely to form. I've lost a couple yeast experiments this way. > I know that I have seen statements about brewing mead done this way in > period, though I can't tell you the books and sources offhand. I am > sure that adding some already baked bread or fermented but not baked > dough to a brewing mixture would be a faster and more predicatable way > to get your brew a-bubbling. But there I go making the "they could have > done it in period" assumption that I am so well known for. > :-) > > -Failenn Actually, I think it may have originated as a way to keep from wasting stale bread, although Adamantius does point out the Egyptians produced a special bread for brewing. Yeast dies at about 140 degrees F, so baked bread contains no yeast internally. The Sumerians used a barley flat bread augmented with crushed barley for their brewing. In period, it would be more common to leaven your dough from the ale pot rather than boost your brew with dough, although I wouldn't put it past some crazy brewer who had the ale pot die. Bear Date: Tue, 25 Aug 1998 12:13:32 -0600 From: upsxdls at okway.okstate.edu Subject: SC - Sourdough starters The following starters come from "The Garden Way Bread Book: A Baker's Almanac" by Ellen Foscue Johnson. Garden Way Publishing. Charlotte, VT 05445 #1 Flourless Potato Starter 3 medium potatoes 4 cups water 1 tablespoon dry yeast 3 tablespoons sugar or honey Cook potatoes in water until soft. Drain, saving the water. Mash the potatoes, or puree in a blender When the cooking water has cooled to lukewarm, put it in a large glass, plastic or crockery bowl. Add the other ingredients, including the mashed potatoes. Stir to mix. Cover with a towel, and let it sit in a warm place, not over 90 degrees, for two days or longer. When the mixture is frothy and smells sour, place in a covered container and store in the refrigerator. #2 - Potato Water Starter 1 tablespoon dry yeast 2 teaspoons sugar 2 cups warm water in which potatoes have been cooked 2 additional cups water 2 cups unbleached white flour Dissolve the yeast and sugar in the warm potato water. Put in a glass, plastic, or crockery bowl; cover with towel and let it sit in a warm place for 48 hours. At the end of this time stir in 2 cups warm water and 2 cups flour. Cover. Let it stand overnight or longer, until the whole mixture is frothy and smells sour. Make sure your bowl is large enough to all for expansion. STore in a covered jar in the refrigerator. #3 - Milk Starter without Yeast 3 cups milk, whole or skim 2 cups unbleached white flour. Let the milk stand in a glass, plastic or crockery bowl, covered, twenty-four hours. Stir in the flour, cover and let stand for several days in a warm place. When the mixture is bubbly and smells sour, store in a covered jar in the refrigerator. For a little extra insurance (not for the purist), add one tablespoon sugar and on-half tablespoon dry yeast with the flour. #4 - Raw potato starter without yeast 1 cup warm water 1 teaspoon honey 1 cup unbleached white flour 1 cup raw, peeled, grated potato (about one medium large potato) Combine all ingredients in a plastic, glass or crockery bowl. Cover with towel and let sit in a warm place for several days, until foamy and soured. Don't get impatient; it may take three to seven days. Store in a covered jar in the refrigerator. #5 - Honey starter with yeast 1 tablespoon dry yeast 2 tablespoons honey 2 cups warm water 2 cups unbleached white flour Dissolve the yeast and honey in the water in a glass, plastic or crockery bowl. Stir in the flour. Cover with a towel and lst sit in a warm place for several days or until foamy and soured. Store in a covered jar in the refrigerator. These sour dough starters tend to foam and expand as the wild yeast beasties do their thing. I recall I have used the raw potato starter with good results, but when my Herman died, I went to the health food store ad purchased "sourdough starter in a packet." Now, I guess I'll try to bring another Herman to life. Hope these recipes help. Leanna of Sparrowhaven (upsxdls at okstate.edu) Date: Sat, 19 Sep 1998 16:32:25 -0500 From: "Decker, Terry D." Subject: RE: SC - oh-oh...Totally OOP > Hi there, Bread virgin here... > > I am atempting to make Sticky Buns. In the recipe it specifically calls for > "Robin Hood SAF Yeast". So off I went shopping this a.m. and couldn't find > this puppy anywhere to save my life. What I did get was Fleishmanns Active > Yeast. > > Now, in pre-reading the recipe it states that I include the yeast right in > with the flour, sugar, salt in a large bowl????? Add milk, butter and egg, > knead and place in a greased bowl. And then let it stand for 1.25 hours. > > Okay, I may have never baked real bread since I was a kid but I have used > yeast in the past. Don't you have to start it with sugar and water? Is SAF > yeast something entirely different? Will putting the Fleishmanns Active > Yeast in place of the other screw this up? > > Micaylah I don't know diddly about RH SAF Yeast, but from the way the recipe is written, it calls for a dry active yeast. Dry active yeast can be added directly to the dry ingredients and is supposed to activate when the liquid dissolves it. This is sometimes done to keep the yeast from losing potency when quickly blended with hot or cold liquids. Only problem, you don't know if the yeast has activated until the dough doesn't rise. These days, I cheat and proof the yeast with a little water and pinch of sugar and stir it into the dry ingredients before adding the liquids. You really don't need the sugar, but it activates the yeast faster and better. Bear Date: Sat, 19 Sep 1998 20:15:56 EDT From: SigridPW at aol.com Subject: SC - Re: proofing yeast << Now, in pre-reading the recipe it states that I include the yeast right in with the flour, sugar, salt in a large bowl????? Add milk, butter and egg, knead and place in a greased bowl. >> I've baked bread for years, and you may rest assured, if you follow the recipe as it is written, it will be fine. Dissolving yeast in warm water or milk mixed with sugar (or "proofing" as it is called) is not necessary. Just be sure the milk you use is heated till warm and double check your foil packet of yeast to be sure it is not "expired". On some things that date is useless, but on yeast it is dead serious! A day later and your recipe will indoubtedly be flat. Happy baking! Lady Madeleine de la Chatte Enfumee Date: Wed, 23 Sep 1998 12:10:50 -0500 From: "Decker, Terry D." Subject: RE: Re[2]: SC - oh-oh...Totally OOP > Bear, Micaylah: Watch the expiration dates on your yeast packets, they're > fairly accurate. I recently used up my last dab of yeast (expired 3 mos > ago) and opened a new jar. The first batch did rise (finally), but not as > rapidly as the fresh yeast. > Leanna of Sparrowhaven I buy in bulk and keep the yeast in a jar in the refrigerator. Kept cool, dry active yeast will keep indefinitely. Liquid yeasts and compressed yeast have a shorter shelf life. I do tend to proof the yeast, so that I don't get caught by surprise. Bear Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1999 10:47:16 -0600 From: "Decker, Terry D." Subject: RE: SC - once again bread > But I have a question...I love making sour dough bread.....but to me it is > never sour enough....can it be made sourer ? is that the proper way to say > it even? > Stacie The best sourdoughs are produced by a symbiotic reaction between Candida milleri, a strain of Saccharomyces exiguus, and Lactobacillus sanfrancisco. The reaction does not occur with S. cerevisiae (regular bread yeast). C. milleri strengthens the gluten and L. sanfrancisco improves the fermentation of the maltose and provides the characteristic sourness. Unfortunately, most of us are not in San Franciso where this combination is readily available. To make a sourdough starter, in a bowl, mix 2 cups of flour with one cup of water. Place the bowl on the counter and wait. It does not matter whether the bowl is covered or uncovered. The water and the flour will activate a natural amylase reaction to convert starch into sugar. The yeasts present in the flour will use the sugar to ferment the dough and create a sourdough. Exposing the starter to the air increases the probability of gathering wild yeasts and lactobacilli in the starter. None of this insures a good starter or decent sourdough. That is the luck of the draw. If you have problems with bugs, tape a couple layers of cheese cloth over the starter bowl. If it is sealed to the sides of the bowl, it will keep most bugs out, but let the yeasty beasties in. In my opinion, most recipes for sourdough starter are too complex and depend on S. cerevisiae to boost them, which defeats the idea of wild yeast and lactobacillus. I am considering trying a little sour cream or buttermilk to initially boost the lactobacilli in the starter, but this introduces other organic compounds which may be susceptible to molds and other infections. If you have a starter. Try leaving it on the counter and feeding it twice a day with 1/4 cup of water and 1/2 cup of flour. Use a big bowl, and be ready to bake two or three times a week. Keeping the starter on the counter makes it more active than keeping it in the refrigerator and it needs to be fed regularly to keep it from dying. If the bread still isn't sour enough, try baking bread made with starter, water, flour and salt. Leave out the shortenings, the sweeteners, and the yeast. Your first rise will likely take 8 to 12 hours. Your second rise will take 1 to 2 hours. Bear Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1999 13:34:28 -0600 From: "Decker, Terry D." Subject: RE: SC - once again bread > > The reaction does not occur with S. cerevisiae (regular bread yeast). > > Whose name, ironically, suggests it is, or was, in fact a brewer's > yeast, which might help account for the phenomenon. > > Adamantius Saccharomyces cerevisiae is the yeast found in ale barm. Today's baker's yeast is a variant of S. cerevisiae, so if you use compressed yeast or dry active yeast to leaven your bread, you are using the equivalent of ale barm. Most, if not all, of the top fermenting brewer's yeasts are variants of S. cerevisiae. Just to add to the confusion, variants of S. cerevisiae have been bred to be bottom fermenting and these are replacing the variants of S. carlsbergensis which were previously used in beer making. The symbiosis between C. milleri and L.sanfrancisco occurs because C. milleri can not use maltose, but can use all of the other sugars released by the amylase reaction. This leaves the maltose free to be used by L. sanfrancisco. Additionally, C. milleri is more resistant to the acidic environment created by the lactobacilli than many other yeasts. This fortuitous combination optomizes fermentation and sourness. Apparently, S. cerevisiae is a little wimpy in high acid environments. Bear Date: Sat, 9 Jan 1999 08:58:05 -0600 (CST) From: Lorine S Horvath To: "INTERNET:sca-arts at raven.cc.ukans.edu" Subject: Re: Bread & Soup In "Food and Drink in Anglo-Saxon England" Ann Hagen discusses drying yeast by dipping a thread into the yeasty mixture which settles to the bottom when making mead or beer... Something like making candles by dipping. My impression was that this would result in something very like the cakes of yeast used today, which give results not too different from the packets... Fiona nicAoidh Date: Mon, 13 Sep 1999 10:16:05 -0400 (EDT) From: cclark at vicon.net Subject: Re: SC - Trenchers-Long >Here is the Wroclaw Trencher receipe > ... 2 cups thick beer >1 cup active beer barm or 1/2 oz. active dry yeast ... Unless this is a late period recipe (and probably even if it is), I would assume that both the beer and the barm are ale and not lager beer. Ale yeast is top-fermenting, which means that it produces enough gas to lift it to the top. Lager yeast would be less useful as a leavening. Lager is also supposed to have been made only in Bohemia until fairly late in the SCA period. Modern bread yeasts are different varieties of the same species as ale yeast. In period, the same yeast was used for both. Alex Clark/Henry of Maldon Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2000 12:03:17 -0600 From: "Decker, Terry D." Subject: RE: SC - OOP - Sucess!! Interesting recipe. You might want to dissolve a pinch of sugar in the water before adding the yeast to help it along. No need to stir the yeast in, just sprinkle it on the water and let it dissolve. It will sink to the bottom, then you'll start getting a yeast colored scum on the surface. This is called creaming the yeast. The more active the yeast, the more scum. The water should be about 90 F. Above 110 F inhibits activation and begins killing the yeast. A teaspoon of yeast is approximately 1 package. I buy baker's yeast in bulk from a healthfood store rather than the grocery for about 1/3 of the grocery price. Baker's supply houses are also a good place to get bulk yeast (usually sold in 2 lb bags). Keep your excess yeast in a jar in the refrigerator. As for giving away bread, I tend to bake 4 to 8 loaves at a time and spread the wealth around. There are four period bread recipes from the European corpus and I believe you will find all of them in Stefan's Florilegium. If you can't locate them, let me know and I'll locate and send you a copy of a previous posting. Bear Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2000 22:25:44 -0500 From: "Robin Carroll-Mann" Subject: Re: SC - re: SC-OOP - Sucess! And it came to pass on 19 Feb 00,, that Marian Deborah Rosenberg wrote: >Brighid wrote: >> When you say that you proofed your yeast... did you actually see signs of >>life before you continued on? After ten minutes in warm water, the yeast >> should be foaming noticeably. > I can say for certain that it was warm in the kitchen as the entire > apartment is nice and cozy warm (being on the third floor and having a > nicely overheated office on the first floor). I can't say for certain > about much else as I was working with an ear infection that wouldn't let > me sleep, and then working with an ear infection that wanted to go to > sleep NOW halfway through my getting something started. --- If the kitchen was warm, but you didn't get risen dough in 6 hours, then you probably had some dead yeast. The next time you bake, look carefully for signs of life when you proof your yeast. If you don't see foaming, discard the yeast/water mixture and start over with fresh yeast. Lady Brighid ni Chiarain Settmour Swamp, East (NJ) Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2000 22:25:44 -0500 From: "Robin Carroll-Mann" Subject: RE: SC - OOP - Sucess!! And it came to pass on 19 Feb 00,, that Decker, Terry D. wrote: > A teaspoon of yeast is approximately 1 package. I thought a package was about 2-1/4 teaspoons -- a short tablespoon. > I buy baker's yeast in > bulk from a healthfood store rather than the grocery for anbout 1/3 of the > grocery price. Baker's supply houses are also a good place to get bulk > yeast (usually sold in 2 lb bags). Keep your excess yeast in a jar in the > refrigerator. [snip] > Bear I buy my yeast in 2-pound bags at Costco. I keep one working container in the fridge, and the rest (in tightly-sealed plastic containers) in the freezer. Lasts for about a year. Sometimes the tail-end of the bag dies off before I can use it, but it's still much more cost-effective than the little envelopes, or even the little jars. Lady Brighid ni Chiarain Settmour Swamp, East (NJ) Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2000 08:15:38 -0600 From: "Decker, Terry D." Subject: RE: SC - OOP - Sucess!! > And it came to pass on 19 Feb 00,, that Decker, Terry D. wrote: > > A teaspoon of yeast is approximately 1 package. > > I thought a package was about 2-1/4 teaspoons -- a short tablespoon. > > Lady Brighid ni Chiarain > Settmour Swamp, East (NJ) > mka Robin Carroll-Mann The yeast they sell in strips of three packages used to be 1/4 oz. per package. 1/4 oz of granulated dry active yeast is approximately 1 slightly rounded teaspoon. Two packages will give you a short tablespoon. Bear Date: Mon, 15 May 2000 16:29:53 -0700 From: "Browning, Susan W." Subject: RE: SC - sourdough experiment #1 alternate method I believe King Arthur Flour sells Lactobacillus SF. http://kingarthurflour.com Eleanor Date: Wed, 17 May 2000 08:38:36 -0500 From: "Decker, Terry D." Subject: RE: SC - sourdough experiment #1 alternate method > The starter sponge that I use isn't the San Francisco > lactobacillus. But it does have a strong sour taste. > > My recipe is two cups of flour and one cup of flat > beer. I usually use rye flour and, if I am fortunate, > I will use home brewed beer. It takes about three > days to start to bubble. I usually keep it on the > counter next to the oven. I personally think that the > introduction of beer gives the bread a closer flavor > to breads that were baked using barm. > > Huette Rather than beer, I would suggest unhopped brown ale, but let's not quibble, I've used beer for flavoring. A rye based starter is produced by different strains of yeast and lactobacillus than a wheat based starter and is generally sourer than wheat based starters. A point to remember is that the breads made with barm are primarily a northern European thing in period although Gothic bakers brought the technique to Rome in the 1st Century BCE. Most southern European bakers used leavens. In France, the use of ale barm was considered bad practice. At some point using anything other than a levain was prohibited by law and remained that way until some time in the 19th Century, if I remember the dates, when the prohibtion was lifted so Parisian bakers could produce some of their highly aerated breads. If you have a good starter, you might consider drying some of it and wrapping it in foil to give to people who are interested in trying it. Bear Date: Fri, 19 May 2000 07:28:39 EDT From: CBlackwill at aol.com Subject: Re: SC - finally! A baking success! and re: honey butter kelan at mindspring.com writes: > Seriously does yeast just not like some people? Is bread like gardening? > I don't think I'm the only one who can't get a ball of dough to do anything > but mock my wishes for it to rise. Yeast just doesn't like _you_! :) Seriously...what temperature are you trying to proof your bread at? How hot is the water when you put the yeast into it? How long do you give the bread to rise? Is your yeast still alive? A good way to check is by taking a portion of the water, adding a little of the flour and some sugar, and stirring your yeast into it. Let it sit in a warm place for about 10 minutes, and if it begins to bubble, it's alive. This will also help your dough, because it sort of "kick-starts" the yeast. Balthazar of Blackmoor Date: Fri, 19 May 2000 09:24:17 -0500 From: "Decker, Terry D." Subject: RE: SC - finally! A baking success! and re: honey butter > Seriously does yeast just not like some people? Is bread like gardening? > I don't think I'm the only one who can't get a ball of dough to do anything > but mock my wishes for it to rise. I have taught foods in high school for > three years now and each year I teach over a hundred kids to make perfect > yeast bread. How can my students get perfect results and my dough resemble > the density one would look for in oak furniture? > > Nyckademus Think kind thoughts at the miserable little yeastie beasties. Store yeast in a sealed container in the refrigerator. I assume you are using granulated dry active yeast, which is the most common kind in the US. One teaspoon will raise a dough containing 2 to 4 pounds of flour, but if you are having problems, try using a teaspoon yeast to each 2 pounds or less. One teaspoon equals a 1/4 oz. package. Proof your yeast. Take a cup of water at 90 to 110F put it in a bowl. Dissolve a teaspoon of sugar in the water (not necessary, but it does improve the action). Sprinkle a teaspoon of yeast on the surface of the water and let it dissolve. Within fifteen minutes, a very active yeast will bubble up and cover most of the surface. Usually, the less surface are covered, the less active the yeast. If you can't get it to "cream", the yeast may not be dead, but it certainly isn't very active and any rise will be very long. Most non-commercial recipes use more yeast than is really needed and a rise to doubled should take no more than 4 hours. If you use some of the old professional methods which use less yeast, the entire process takes much longer, the rises are extended, while retaining a good flavor. I usually use the faster rise, except when making sourdoughs. Plain bread of flour, water, yeast and salt should rise properly as long as the dough is around 3 cups of flour to 1 cup of liquid. Denser dough requires more rise time to aerate and expand. Enriched breads made with fats, sugar, eggs, milk, etc. may not rise to double, but often will aerate nicely, and reach proper proportions from exuberant oven spring. Check the percentage of protein in your flour which can be anywhere from around 6 to 17 percent. Most all purpose flours fall in the 9 to 11 percent range (IIRC), which make them adequate for bread. Flours with 13 to 17 percent are primarily commercial high-gluten flours and a bread bakers dream. Below 9 percent, the flours are better suited for cakes and pastries. From previous discussions, there are some all purpose flours available in the deep south which fall below 9 percent. Check your kneading technique. Under-kneading and over-kneading can affect the rise and the density of the bread. Bon Chance Bear Date: Sat, 20 May 2000 05:42:45 -0500 From: "Decker, Terry D." Subject: RE: SC - finally! A baking success! and re: honey butter > You may also be wary of your salt usage. It is a yeast inhibitor of > sorts, and its over use can certainly affect the environment the little > fellas like to live in. > > niccolo On the otherhand, salt strengthens the gluten. You should be able to add as much as a tablespoon of salt to 2 pounds of flour without seriously impacting the yeast. Bear Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2000 04:42:14 EDT From: CBlackwill at aol.com Subject: Re: SC - Small Beer? mermayde at juno.com writes: > It's two cups of sugar. And it's also a good idea to use just plain old > Fleishman's Baking Yeast. I tried making it with Champagne yeast and it > came out bitter. Another advantage to using baking yeast in a low/non-alcoholic brew is that baking yeast will die off at lower alcohol levels. However, since we are on the subject, "Eagle" brand baking yeast (professional yeast) is composed of nothing less the sachromyces cerivicea (sp?), or our tried and true ale yeast. I have used it to make ales, and have been marginally satisfied with the results. While there has never been a "bready" flavor, it does fizzle out at lower alcohol levels (about 3.8 to 4.3 percent in my experiments). Balthazar of Blackmoor Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2000 09:20:15 -0400 From: "Jeff Gedney" Subject: Re: SC - Small Beer? > Nope, the recipe very specifically states Fleishman's, and now that I > went back looking for it, guess who posted it? > Christianna > It's two cups of sugar. And it's also a good idea to use just plain old > Fleishman's Baking Yeast. I tried making it with Champagne yeast and it > came out bitter. > > Glad you like the recipe. POPPA!!! Poppa said this? Poppa, I think judging all brewing/vintning yeasts by champagne is a bit premature... "Premier cuvee" yeast, which I suggested is a "sweeter" yeast than Champagne, which is a very specialized yeast designed to ferment out as dry as possible, so it is used for dry and high alcohol wines. Champagne is also not able to use table sugar very well, and so has to produce more enzymes to breake sucrose into simple sugars, and these enzymes add bitterness. Premier cuvee is the one that seems to get distributed with those "make your own soda" kits that use Table sugar, and is the one that is frequently sent in most of the "sweet" wine kits, like "raspberry merlot". That is why I recommended it for this purpose. I think you should at least give it a try. brandu Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2000 09:21:48 -0500 From: "Decker, Terry D." Subject: RE: SC - Small Beer? > since we are on the subject, "Eagle" brand baking yeast (professional yeast) > is composed of nothing less the sachromyces cerivicea (sp?), or our tried > and true ale yeast. > > Balthazar of Blackmoor Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Pliny first noted the use of barm for leavening bread by the Germanic tribes. Because S. cerevisiae is top fermenting, it the active yeast can be skimmed from the surface of the ale pot. Three of the four known period bread recipes use barm for the yeast. Bear Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2000 12:41:22 -0500 From: "Decker, Terry D." Subject: RE: SC - yeast/alcohol was: small beer? > I could be wrong, though, but I seem to recall that > the yeast is cultured to enhance its carbon-dioxide production qualities over > its alcohol production. > > Balthazar of Blackmoor You are correct. Modern baker's yeast is cultivated to improve the carbon-dioxide production and reduce the alcohol production. It improves both the rise and flavor of the bread. It also makes the yeast less tolerant of acid environments. Bear Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2003 20:08:16 -0400 From: johnna holloway Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] Collecting Yeast from Birch Trees To: Cooks within the SCA I seem to remember that this question came up before. The early birch wine recipes (used Cindy's book to start) all seem to add yeast to the sap. Nothing is said about yeast coming off a birch tree there. I don't find it listed in E. David's English Bread and Yeast Cookery in the full rundown she has on yeast. Maybe they meant that sometimes the sap ferments on its own without the addition of yeast. Sap might do that, although what you end up with is ??? I did an involved Google search and turned this up--- A Handbook of Anglo-Saxon Food & Drink: Processing and Consumption and Production & Distribution one review mentions this-- One of my favorite bits: the Saxons would dip birch twigs in liquid yeast, hang dry, and store it that way -- their equivalent of today's modern yeast packets. Might this be the source? Johnnae llyn Lewis Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2004 20:00:03 -0400 From: Avraham haRofeh Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] barm for bread To: Cooks within the SCA > I'll be looking at your blog with keen interest -- as I too want to try > my hand at using beer barm for breadmaking. So just what is barm? Where > in the beer making process is it taken from? How much did you get, and > will you be able to sustain it for some time? Barm is the floating, yeast-laden foam on the top of the beer (or other fermentable). It would be skimmed off just before the beer was racked the first time. Barm, dried and crumbled into powder, was the first "baker's yeast". **************** Reb Avraham haRofeh (mka Randy Goldberg MD) From: Katja Date: May 19, 2004 7:57:15 PM CDT To: Stefan li Rous Subject: Re: [sca-ae-cooks] Links: The Staff of Life Funnily enough, I discovered something just last week regarding medieval leavening that you might find interesting. While perusing Dawson's fine cakes recipe from The good huswifes Iewell, I noticed the instruction "and a little Gods good about a sponfull if you put in too much they shall arise..." Curious, I looked up the phrase "God's good" in the OED and discovered that one of the archaeic meanngs of the phrase is barm or yeast. :) toodles, Katja Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 13:46:48 -0500 From: "Jeff Gedney" Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] Stefan finaly succeeds in making cider To: Cooks within the SCA > Is "Wyeast" the name of a company? Yes It is one of the largest suppliers in the US for live Brewing and vinting yeast cultures. Most home brew stores stock a refrigerator full of their products http://www.wyeastlab.com/ Capt Elias -Renaissance Geek of the Cyber Seas Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2005 14:51:49 -0400 From: Johnna Holloway Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] Barm yeast To: Cooks within the SCA Martinsen at ansteorra.org wrote: > Here's a question: I have a starter made from beer barm. (flour, water > & barm only). Now when a recipe calls for barm, (and it is a > bread-type dish, would using my starter be acceptable, or should I > start with fresh barm? > Has anyone worked out a ratio for how much "sediment" should be used > to how much flour? How about starter? I know it depends on how stiff > your starter is, how lively it is, so I'm guessing the answer is no. > > BVitha My guess is that this is going to be a matter of trial and error. It's gonna depend on how active your starter is. Some are fast; some are slow. It also varies to how warm the kitchen is and what the weather is like on the day of preparation. I've always found I had to play with all my sourdough mixtures on the day of baking. I discovered through the years that it's sometimes better to use fresh yeast and a bottle of ale when making recipes like the great cakes found in Martha Washington's Booke of Cookery which require "A full quart of Ale barme". One gets better results that could be duplicated and it meant I could construct a recipe that didn't involve making an ale barm to start. You might check out http://www.sourdo.com/culture.htm and see what Ed Wood has to say there about his various starters. Johnnae Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2005 08:52:03 -0500 From: "Terry Decker" Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] Barm yeast To: "Cooks within the SCA" Sediment? Whachoo want sediment for? Proper barm is taken from the top of an active ale pot where the top fermenting S. cerevisiae bubbles merrily along. S. cerevisiae is the yeasty beast found in baker's yeast or brewer's yeast. If you're doing beer, that is usually S. carlsbergensis (sic?) and is bottom fermenting. It will work, but it is not the barm being discussed in the recipes. There are some 18th and 19th Century recipes for washing sediment to extract yeast, so it may be that any malt liquor was fair game later on. With a starter, you use about one cup for one to two pounds of flour, replacing one cup of the liquor [liquid] in the recipe. Using a barm, I would do the same, replacing one cup of water with one cup of barm for one to two pounds of flour. The first rise may take anywhere from 2 to 12 hours, depending on the potency of the yeasty beasties. The second rise will be faster. With a very stiff starter (like the dough balls the French use), you would pull of a chunk weighing six to eight ounces and break it apart in the liquor to help scatter the yeast through the dough. Again, roughly a cup for one to two pounds of flour. You may want to modify the amount of starter you use as you get a feel for how your starter works. Best of luck on the project. Bear Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2005 09:24:37 -0500 From: "Terry Decker" Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] Barm yeast To: "Cooks within the SCA" > So I don¹t want to be using the "dredges" from when my brewer friend racks > his carboy? I want instead the bubbles from the top? Sorry...I'm not a > brewer.... > > The starter I have running right now I made from sediment that I dried out > and then "reconsitituted" about 3 months later. It is working well - made > 2 loaves from it. > > Vitha Actually, I was quibbling about your terminology and just pointing out that there are distinct differences between beer and ale yeasts and that it was top fermenting ale yeast that is commonly used for baking. The dry active yeasts you get at the grocery are all developed from ale yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae. If you are working with an ale, then skimming the top of an active fermentation should produce a good barm for bread. A bottom fermenting beer would be best siphoned from the bottom of the fermentation where the yeast is most active although you could probably get enough yeast by skimming the top. In either case, barm is "the yeasty foam that rises to the surface of malt liquors." Barm is not sediment. And for bakers from Pliny to the Renaissance, barm meant top fermenting ale barm. You might talk to your brewing friends about setting up a simple ale pot with a wide neck for dipping (a one gallon jar perhaps) using malt extract and brewers yeast. It's inexpensive, so if the experiment fails you aren't out much and it can be repeated as necessary. The ale produced is usually a mediocre drink, but that wouldn't be the object of the exercise. As for your starter, that's good work. It is not an experiment I have tried, so please keep me posted on how it is doing. Bear Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 09:41:59 -0500 From: "Terry Decker" Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] How long does bread keep (was Was bread served warm?) To: "Cooks within the SCA" > I've also found that the type of yeast makes a difference. Bread made with > brewer's yeast keeps much better than bread made with commercial bread > yeast. Based on this, it seems to be worth considering that in period > bread that was several days old might have been quite tasty. > > -Katherine Brewer's yeast and bread yeast are both Saccharomyces cerevisiae, so there is no difference in the base yeast. What you are seeing is a difference in crumb density. A lighter crumb (more aeration) tends to give up moisture faster than a dense crumb. Commercial bread yeast is selectively grown from strains that produce more CO2 to produce a lighter crumb, but that doesn't preclude any given brewer's yeast from being more active than a commercial bread yeast (I've encountered this a few times, probably as a result of shelf life or storage). You can more effectively control the aging of the bread by the size of the loaf and the flour mixture. Bear Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 22:16:54 -0600 From: "Terry Decker" Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] Observation on Leavenings To: "Cooks within the SCA" > Making a few loaves of whole wheat bread, and experimenting a little. > > One set was made with yeast from a local brewer's recent endeavors, > and the other with my starter. > > Interestingly enough here in the cold months the sourdough was very very > slow, but the yeast was quite perky, much like using regular yeast. > > I ponder this, is it true that the northern countries used a primarily ale > barm starter for breads, while lower (aka warmer) countries used dough > starters? > > Simon Hondy You are probably seeing the difference between a normal starter and a fresh active yeast. It is fairly common to use coolers to slow the rise of yeast breads, while allowing sourdoughs to rise at room temperature, because of the difference in the activity. The common view (to which I subscribe) is Northern Europe tended to use yeast in the form of ale barm while the area around the Mediterranean where wine was the common beverage used sourdough. Note that the use of yeast or starter is not geographically exclusive, but a tendency reinforced by climate. Ale doesn't do well in warmer climes. The Egyptians are the first people known to make leavened bread and from the little we know, it was sourdough. Dupaigne disagrees, stating that the Egyptians used ale barm, but doesn't provide any evidence to support the claim. It is possible that the Egyptians used both methods of leavening There are Roman recipes which use fermented grape must as leavening. To my knowledge, the earliest record of ale barm being used to leaven bread is a description in Pliny about the Vandals method of making bread. Yeast breads were probably being prepared by Gallic bakers in Italy by the time of Pliny's death in 71 CE (based on some of the finds from Pompeii, and information from David and Toussaint-Samat). The period English bread recipes use ale barm, which appears to have been the favored method into the 19th Century. Platina, on the otherhand, describes bread made from a dough starter. Dupaigne states that during the Middle Ages, natural starters were the standard in France until the 17th Century, when a mix of yeast and starter came into use. From other sources, I gather that starter was required by law in France until the developement of the baguette (which requires a very active yeast). Again Dupaigne provides little documentation and I have yet to find when the French limited breadmaking to natural starter. The evidence suggests that ale drinking regions used ale barm and wine drinking regions used starters. I still don't have a copy of that French text on Baking and Bakers in the Middle Ages (IIRC), so my answers may lie there. Bear Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 22:41:29 -0500 From: "Terry Decker" Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] Fermentation Sponge Question To: "Cooks within the SCA" For the sponge, the gluten content shouldn't matter. Sponges are meant to feed yeast growth, which means the available sugars are more important than the gluten. When you use the sponge to leaven a batch of bread the gluten level of the flour becomes an issue. If you wanted to boost a sponge, I think a teaspoon of diamalt added to the flour would do more than the gluten level of the flour. Bear > Does anyone have experience in whether starting the sponge with certain > kinds of flour determine what kind of sponge it will ultimately become? > For example using a lower gluten flour versus a higher gluten flour. > > Aldyth Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 22:55:14 -0500 From: "Terry Decker" Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] Fermentation Sponge Question To: "Cooks within the SCA" Point of terminology: a sponge is an initial dough created from flour and some form of leaven. It is usually used within 24 hours. A starter is a leaven that is continually replenished, which can be used to leaven a sponge. Bear Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 21:53:59 -0500 From: "Terry Decker" Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] yeast reservoirs? To: "Cooks within the SCA" > In the thread on pretzels, Master Cariadoc mentioned: > > <<< Note 3: The recipe is for a leavened bread, but > no leavening is mentioned. My guess is that it is > using either sourdough or a kneading trough with > its own yeast culture. I used sourdough. >>> > > Interesting point about the impregnated kneading trough and a good > thing to keep in mind when wondering if a bread is leavened or not. > > Anybody ever used one of these kneading troughs or something similar, > long enough that it might become a reservoir for some yeast and then > found that the new dough would pick up enough yeast from the trough > that it would affect the dough? > > Thanks, > Stefan While I've never experimented with a wooden dough trough, other experiences suggest that if you exploited a yeast culture embedded in a wooden dough trough, it would probably take a couple of days to get enough yeast to produce a decent rise. A cup or two of dough left in the trough to act as a starter would be more practical and , in the case of a commercial baker, provides greater control and consistency (although the commercial starter would probably be closer to 5 pounds than two cups). Leavening a lot of dough with a miniscule amount of yeast is largely a matter of technique, temperature and time. Bear Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 18:58:20 -0500 From: "Michelle LR" Subject: [Sca-cooks] Yest resevoirs To: sca-cooks at lists.ansteorra.org Written was: Anybody ever used one of these kneading troughs or something similar, long enough that it might become a reservoir for some yeast and then found that the new dough would pick up enough yeast from the trough that it would affect the dough? Answering thusly: I haven't, but my grandmother and her mother both did. Both of them had these old wooden bowls that were large and shallow. There was always flour in them. My greatgrandmother left her bowl out on the counter open with a dish cloth draped over it. My grandmother wrapped her bowl in a plastic bag and stored it under the counter. Neither of them ever bought much yeast, yet they made bread almost on a daily basis. I lived with my grandmother for several years and I remember asking about the yeast. I was told it wasn't needed because it was already there. Rarely did we have "stone bread" (as we called it) that didn't rise. Interestingly enough, they used these same bowls to also make biscuits and dumplings using baking soda and buttermilk. They would change from whole wheat to white flour interchangeably and even rye on occaission. My biscuits could be used as ballistics in a seige battle and I've always blamed it on not having one of those bowls. :) -- Mel. Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 10:18:13 -0400 (GMT-04:00) From: Christiane Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] Yeast reservoirs To: sca-cooks at lists.ansteorra.org Bear says: > While I've never experimented with a wooden dough trough, other experiences > suggest that if you exploited a yeast culture embedded in a wooden dough > trough, it would probably take a couple of days to get enough yeast to > produce a decent rise. A cup or two of dough left in the trough to act as a > starter would be more practical and , in the case of a commercial baker, > provides greater control and consistency (although the commercial starter > would probably be closer to 5 pounds than two cups). Leavening a lot of > dough with a miniscule amount of yeast is largely a matter of technique, > temperature and time. Many Italian bread recipes of today that I have found refer to a "lievito madre" (leavening mother), which is a bit of the leavened dough kept from the previous batch of bread. In Sicily they call this a criscenti. Seems logical that in a time when bread needed to be baked every day in the palazzo kitchens to feed the household, the baker kept a lievito madre or criscenti goimg at all times in the kneading trough or taken out and set aside in a bowl for the next day's baking. And it would be such a matter of course that it may not be mentioned in the recipes. Is "lievito madre" is a period term? Admittedly I have not done any real research into period Italian bread to know, therefore I'm throwing this one to the list. Gianotta Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 00:03:43 -0500 From: "Terry Decker" Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] Yeast reservoirs To: "Christiane" , "Cooks within the SCA" I can't address the history of the term "lievito madre," but from your description, it refers to a continuous starter rather than a "biga" which is a one use starter or sponge. The practice of the maintaining a starter is a long-standing tradition in much of the Mediterranean, where starters were more common that baker's yeast until the Modern era. In France and Italy, the starter will normally be a ball of dough rather than the semi-liquid starter you are likely to find in the US. The technique with which I am familiar is to break the dough starter apart in the liquor, so that it will be spread through the new batch of dough and expedite yeast production in the dough. I normally use 1 cup of starter for one to two pounds of bread, but you can get away with half that amount if you extend the first rise. The size of the dough ball you reserve is dependent upon the quantity of bread one needs to bake. From limited descriptions of the starters, commercial bakers retain five to ten pounds of dough as starter. For large establishments, baking would more likely be done in a seperate bakehouse rather than the kitchens and you might be baking bread every second or third day rather than daily depending on the number of people in the household. Bear > Many Italian bread recipes of today that I have found refer to a "lievito > madre" (leavening mother), which is a bit of the leavened dough kept from > the previous batch of bread. In Sicily they call this a criscenti. Seems > logical that in a time when bread needed to be baked every day in the > palazzo kitchens to feed the household, the baker kept a lievito madre or > criscenti goimg at all times in the kneading trough or taken out and set > aside in a bowl for the next day's baking. And it would be such a matter > of course that it may not be mentioned in the recipes. > > Is "lievito madre" is a period term? Admittedly I have not done any real > research into period Italian bread to know, therefore I'm throwing > this one to the list. > > Gianotta Date: Mon, 07 May 2007 07:19:57 -0400 From: Johnna Holloway Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] Yeast reservoirs To: Cooks within the SCA I came across good drawings of a farm bakehouse and a dough trough over the weekend in Food in England. If you search under dough trough in Google images, there are a number of images that can be found. Johnnae <<< For large establishments, baking would more likely be done in a separate bakehouse rather than the kitchens and you might be baking bread every second or third day rather than daily depending on the number of people in the household. Bear >>> Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 13:43:16 -0500 From: "Terry Decker" Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] Salt Rising Bread To: "Cooks within the SCA" Salt rising bread is a sourdough bread made from a spontaneously leavened batter created about 8 to 24 hours before making bread, rather than from a continuously maintained starter. Unlike a continuous starter which should only contain water and flour, these batters often have milk and sugar added to them to feed the the leven. The earliest recipe I have in my collection is from 1879 (Tyree, ed., Housekeeping in Old Virginia): Salt-Risen Bread Make into a thin batter: 1 pint of flour. 1 tablespoonful of corn meal. Half-teaspoonful of salt. Set in a warm place to rise. After it has risen, pour into it two quarts of flour, with sufficient warm water to mke up a loaf of bread. Work it well, set it to rise again, and when risen sufficiently, bake it.---Mrs. T. L. J. I question the accuracy of the claim that the leavening is by C. perfringens. In my opinion, the leavening bacteria are more likely to be members of Lactobacillus as in the case of normal sourdough. As with sourdoughs, any of the organisms in the batter are likely to vary with location. I would like to see a microbiological analysis of the batter before accepting any statements about how the bread is leavened. These batters are probably not Medieval in origin. To my knowledge, Medieval starters were kept as balls of dough, batters being more easily infected by mold than the more solid continuous starters. From experience (and having read a number of different recipes for salt rising bread), I think that the batter leavens are a response to mold infections in starters that weren't used daily, but I have no direct evidence to support my position. "Salt rising" is something of a misnomer. The function of the salt is not to leaven the bread, but to slow and even out the rise. Bear > On one of my left turns associated with my paper on bread, I came across a > reference to salt rising bread, leavened with the bacterium Clostridium > perfringens. All I have been able to find so far is that this seems to be > an american bread. I am not particularly pushing it to be period, but could > this have happened in period? Like most of the recipes I have found, it seems > to have "appeared". > > Aldyth Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 08:54:22 -0600 From: "Terry Decker" Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] Bread Yeasts To: "Cooks within the SCA" Sure, and it is probably correct, except that rather than beer the yeast is taken from ale. Bakers yeast is Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the top fermenting yeast used in ale. S. carlbergensis is usually used making beer and is bottom fermenting. Baker's yeast was taken from the barm on the top of the ale pot. The first reference to this practice can be found in Pliny. The practice does not hold with sourdough breads where a combination of yeast, usually some variety of Candida, and lactobacilli are the leavening agents. Until the 19th Century, when yeast started being packaged for sale by grocers, home bakers would often buy yeast for baking from brewers. Even today, most of the packaged yeast for baking is produced by subsidiary operations of major breweries. Bear > from another list that I monitor, there is a suggestion that brewerys and > bakerys in the Abby were located close together and further suggested that > the wort: juice from unfermented beer mash:(what we called 'squeezins') > was used as yeast for the making of bread. > > Anybody ever hear of this? > > Anybody ever try it? > > Malkin > Otherhill > Artemisia Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 15:42:59 -0800 From: Susan Fox Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] Bread Yeasts To: Cooks within the SCA Kimberly Vallance wrote: > Out of curiosity I have a place close by that sells brewers yeast... is > that usable in bread... If it's a health food store, selling Brewers Yeast as a supplement, then no, you can't use it. The yeast is lightly killed and taken for its B-Vitamin and mineral value, but is won't grow. If it's from a Brewing store, what the heck, go for it. Selene Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 21:47:08 -0600 From: "Terry Decker" Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] Bread Yeasts To: "Cooks within the SCA" I often use Brewers Yeast from the health food store. What I get is a dry active yeast sold in bulk and stored under refrigeration. It can be used as a supplement or for baking, but it is not sold specifically as a commercial supplement. Bear > If it's a health food store, selling Brewers Yeast as a supplement, then > no, you can't use it. The yeast is lightly killed and taken for its > B-Vitamin and mineral value, but is won't grow. > > If it's from a Brewing store, what the heck, go for it. > > Selene Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 13:15:36 -0500 From: "Terry Decker" Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] German Breads To: "Cooks within the SCA" > Commercial yeast are grown in molasses, they are adapted for using > the easy food they get from sugars and don't do well in the long run. > The wild yeasts are adapted to a different food source (the grain). What's your source for wild yeasts growing on grain? To my knowledge, all yeasts use sugars for food. The yeasts we have been discussing all feed on simple sugars and can not directly feed on grain. They can't even directly use the primary sugar in the molasses, sucrose. However, in commercial manufacture, the initial prue yeast infusion is fed on molasses malt to kickstart the process. Commercial yeasts have been bred to produce varying quantities of alcohol and CO2, but they eat the same sugars as wild yeasts of the same species. > There has been a lot of argument over this in the sourdough community > and the scientific arena. However, at least a few of the > microorganisms (and possibly the yeast that occurs naturally in > flour) appear to produce amylase (a starch degrading enzyme) and > maltase (an enzyme that breaks down complex sugars to simple sugars). > Though it is possible that these enzymes are also of plant origin and > may occur in the grain naturally, they definitely are produced in the > grain if it is germinated (that's part of the reason for malting > grain, to make these enzymes available for mashing and brewing). Grains have an outer coating bran which consists of a number of things that can't be converted to sugars. The outermost layer is called the aleurone layer consisting of a complex protein, aleurone. Among the things in the aleurone are hydrolytic enzymes and the triggers for releasing them, including diastase (alpha amylase). So there is no question that the enzymes in question are of plant origin and occur naturally in grain. Comparisons of fermentation between high and low alpha amylase flours demonstrates that some of the grain enzymes are released in fermentation. That almost certainly enhances the yeast enzyme production, which tends to be rather slow. During germination, gibberellin hormones trigger the release of the enzymes to break down the starch in the endosperm, so that it can be used by the plant embryo, which is why malting works the way it does. Malting is usually associated with beta amylase production. If anyone is interested, Lallemand (a yeast manufacturer) has quite a bit of information on measuring and standardizing enzyme levels in flour at http://www.lallemand.com/BakerYeastNA/eng/PDFs/LBU%20PDF%20FILES/1_15ENFL.PDF . One tidbit they mentioned (that I vaguely remember from long ago, that means more now than it did then) is that most breadmaking flours have .25 percent malted barley of wheat flour added. The enzymes are ready to go and the starch conversion has already started in these flours (and it should be noted on the label). Such a flour should give a nice kick to a sourdough starter. >> nor does it usually grow on the >> grain kernals. If they did, they would attack the flour >> immediately after milling. > > Yeast require a relatively large quantity of water to survive in > their active state, there is not enough moisture for this to occur in > the grain or the resulting flour. Even with relatively "green" grain. Water is a requirement of the hydrolytic enzymes that produce the sugars on which yeast feed. If it was simply that yeast need water, then they should be cheerfully chomping away on the rice in every rice paddy in the world. Oh, and that pesky bran layer that gets in the way. >> Yeast spores settle on the grain and are processed through with >> the wheat into the flour, which is why you can cover a bowl of >> starter with plastic and it will still ferment. > > Yeast are anaerobic organisms, they do not require oxygen except for > reproduction. While you feed a starter, a sufficient quantity of > oxygen is usually mixed into the slurry to enable the synthesis of > protein and the budding of new yeast cells. Once they enter the > fermentation stage, the yeast can survive just fine without oxygen It is immaterial to this argument whether they are anaerobic or not. The point is that there are yeast spores that go through flour milling and are in the flour we purchase. You can work in a totally sterile environment, but if you make a starter in that environment with off the shelf flour, it will likely be "alive!" BTW, aerobic fermentation promotes yeast growth while anaerobic fermentation increase the output of alcohol and CO2. >> I have encountered an interesting statement that I have yet to check out, >> that the yeast in San Francisco sourdough is now named Candida humilis, >> previously C. milleri, and originally identified as Saccharomyces exiguus. > > Again, genome sequencing needs to be done to determine if it is a > unique species, I'm not too hung up on that part of it really. It may > be unique, it may not. I think the difference in results that are > achieved have more to do with the way the starters are grown and > maintained than anything else. > > Dragon You don't consider the Stanford Yeast Genome Database extensive enough? Usually, it's a problem of finding the right paper. Checking Doctor Fungus shows C. humilis, C. milleri, and S. exiguus as seperate species and they still appear that way in some recent papers. It may be that there is a move afoot to consolidate them taxonomically, but that hasn't occurred, as yet. Understanding the particular yeast/lactobacilli combination of a given starter is a key to optimizing the maintanence of the starter. Also, it might make it possible to seed and maintain starters with specific characteristics. Bear Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 17:51:26 -0400 From: "Phil Troy / G. Tacitus Adamantius" Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] Arts and Sciences; bread To: Cooks within the SCA On Mar 31, 2009, at 5:39 PM, Johnna Holloway wrote: <<< I use a dry yeast and a bottle of ale when I make these sorts of recipes. Johnnae >>> I'd tend to agree that active dry yeast (which, remember, is still an active yeast culture which, when moistened, is no longer dry) is a perfectly good source of the same yeast you'd get from a top- fermenting ale. And given the percentage of non-yeast ale-related chemicals found in the aggregate dough mass once you use it for bread, the finished product probably shouldn't taste particularly like beer I'm not sure that adding even the bottle of ale is, strictly speaking, necessary to get the effect. Either way, the yeasts are still going to be breaking down a little of the starches and sugars found in the flour, and producing much the same metabolic byproducts. Adamantius, sticking his two-cent oar in... Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 17:58:05 -0400 From: Johnna Holloway Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] Arts and Sciences; bread To: Cooks within the SCA I don't know that it has that it lends that much ale taste. I use it in that yeasted great cake recipe. The original recipe calls for a full quart of ale barm for a peck of flour. (Truth be told--people like the idea that it has ale in it, I think.) Johnnae Phil Troy / G. Tacitus Adamantius wrote: <<< I'd tend to agree that active dry yeast (which, remember, is still an active yeast culture which, when moistened, is no longer dry) is a perfectly good source of the same yeast you'd get from a top-fermenting ale. And given the percentage of non-yeast ale-related chemicals found in the aggregate dough mass once you use it for bread, the finished product probably shouldn't taste particularly like beer. I'm not sure that adding even the bottle of ale is, strictly speaking, necessary to get the effect. Either way, the yeasts are still going to be breaking down a little of the starches and sugars found in the flour, and producing much the same metabolic byproducts. >>> Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 01:22:57 -0400 From: ranvaig at columbus.rr.com Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] rich yeasted cake To: Cooks within the SCA Johnna Holloway wrote: <<< That should work. Yeast depends on the packet. From the Red Star website A 1/4 -ounce packet of active dry yeast contains approximately 2-1/2 teaspoons; the measurement will not be exact as yeast is packaged according to weight rather than volume. A packet of yeast is sufficient to raise 4 cups, approximately 1-pound, of flour. >>> Ooh, heck, I use one packet of yeast for a *lot* more than 4 cups of flour... ----------- Yeast is alive. A vigorous starter is much better than using the dry yeast straight. If I'm doing a lot of baking, the night before, I'll take a packet and make a starter with water and flour, then feed the starter more flour and water a time or two. I don't use more than one packet, even for dozens of loaves. I don't bake often enough to keep a starter going, but that would be the period answer. Ranvaig Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2009 23:00:55 -0700 From: David Friedman Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] rich yeasted cake To: Cooks within the SCA <<< I don't bake often enough to keep a starter going, but that would be the period answer. Ranvaig >>> It's not that hard. A jar of sourdough starter will last in the refrigerator for a long time with no attention--I'm sure I've left mine unused for more than a month on multiple occassions. The trick is to then spend about three days getting it lively before you use it. 1 c flour + 1c water + 1/2c starter, leave 24 hours at room temperature. 1 c flour + 1c water + 1/2c starter (from the above), leave 24 hours at room temperature. 1 c flour + 1c water + 1/2c starter, leave 12 hours at room temperature. Repeat. Repeat, leaving 6 hours this time, and use it. I think that's the sequence I've been using, although I may have put in one too many 12 hour steps. Works very well for bread. A bit wasteful, since at each stage you are throwing out the surplus of the starter you made--unless you have friends who would like some starter of their own. -- David/Cariadoc Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2009 19:10:41 +1200 From: Antonia Calvo Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] rich yeasted cake To: Cooks within the SCA <<< Yeast is alive. A vigorous starter is much better than using the dry yeast straight. If I'm doing a lot of baking, the night before, I'll take a packet and make a starter with water and flour, then feed the starter more flour and water a time or two. I don't more than one packet, even for dozens of loaves. I don't bake often enough to keep a starter going, but that would be the period answer. >>> I've made starter that way, but I often kick-start yeast with a little malt syrup-- yeast *loves* maltose. -- Antonia di Benedetto Calvo Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 23:58:38 -0400 From: "Kingstaste" Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] Wild Fermentation Book To: "'Cooks within the SCA'" Yeah, familiar with his book, and have heard him speak in person. He is very passionate about his subject, and has some very good ideas for how to make it work. The book is colorful with lots of pics. Christianna -----Original Message----- Is anyone familiar with this book? Wild Fermentation: The Flavor, Nutrition, and Craft of Live-Culture Foods (Paperback)by Sandor Ellix Katz (Author), Sally Fallon (Foreword) ISBN-13: 978-1931498234 Chelsea Green Publishing Company (September 2003) Aldyth Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2009 21:54:09 -0700 From: Susan Fox Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] Wild Fermentation Book To: Cooks within the SCA Yes, I like it very much. It makes the whole subject very accessible. I use the basic pickle recipe frequently and I'm about to do the sauerkraut again for an upcoming weenie roast. No SCA-usable documentation, but he demystifies the whole thing because he's tried out every recipe in there. Also, he answers his own email and conducts workshops on the east coast. Selene Deborah Hammons wrote: <<< Is anyone familiar with this book? Wild Fermentation: The Flavor, Nutrition, and Craft of Live-Culture Foods (Paperback)by Sandor Ellix Katz (Author), Sally Fallon (Foreword) ISBN-13: 978-1931498234 Chelsea Green Publishing Company (September 2003) Aldyth >>> Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2010 21:54:59 -0500 From: "Terry Decker" To: "Cooks within the SCA" Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] Leven: yeast or sourdough? Berme is Middle English for barm, so your assumption is essentially correct. It is not beer residue, but the active fermentation from the top of the ale pot. S. cerevisiae, brewers or bakers yeast, is a top fermenter while most beer yeasts are bottom fermenters. In general, beer drinking regions use ale barm for leavening while other areas tend to sourdough. The earliest reference (that I have located) to using ale barm is found in Pliny. Imperial Rome is an exception in that after the Gallic Wars the practice of using ale barm for leavening move from Gaul into Rome and other parts of Italy. Other than that, most Mediterranean countries leaven with sourdough. At some point, which I have not yet determined, France required all bakers to leaven with sourdough, the law being changed at some point in the 20tgh Century. I would have to dig for the references, but I think Toussaint-Samat gives a basic Francocentric interpretation of the expansion of baking and Michael Grant gives other details in his works. There is a smattering of French baking law in Boulanger (IIRC). Most of the information on the subject is in snippets scattered among works on other subjects. Sourdough is the product of an environmental created symbiosis between a yeast (often on of the Candida) and some variety of lactobacillus. The actual combinations are very localized and vary widely in rise and sour taste. Bear <<< Recipes frequently don't say--and if they do refer to yeast, especially in a translation, the word might actually mean sourdough. I gather that sourdough, technically, is not yeast but a different organism with similar effects, but even assuming that's right, there is no reason to expect people in period to know. Our working assumption is that "berme" means yeast from beer residue and that otherwise the leven is beer yeast in beer drinking areas, sourdough in areas that don't drink beer, including the Islamic world. But I don't think we have any really solid evidence on the subject--does anyone else? -- David/Cariadoc >>> Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 08:12:58 -0400 From: Johnna Holloway To: Cooks within the SCA Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] Leven: yeast or sourdough? OED on barm defines it as "1. a. The froth that forms on the top of fermenting malt liquors, which is used to leaven bread, and to cause fermentation in other liquors; yeast, leaven." And there's a quotation attributed to Pliny but it's slightly different: 1601 HOLLAND Pliny II. 145 The froth or barme..[has] a property to keepe the skin faire and cleare in womens faces. Johnna On Oct 10, 2010, at 10:54 PM, Terry Decker wrote: <<< The earliest reference (that I have located) to using ale barm is found in Pliny. >>> Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 06:57:21 -0700 From: "Daniel Myers" To: "Cooks within the SCA" Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] Leven: yeast or sourdough? -------- Original Message -------- From: David Friedman Recipes frequently don't say--and if they do refer to yeast, especially in a translation, the word might actually mean sourdough. I gather that sourdough, technically, is not yeast but a different organism with similar effects, but even assuming that's right, there is no reason to expect people in period to know. Our working assumption is that "berme" means yeast from beer residue and that otherwise the leven is beer yeast in beer drinking areas, sourdough in areas that don't drink beer, including the Islamic world. But I don't think we have any really solid evidence on the subject--does anyone else? ------------ While most of the recipes I've seen either call for "yeast" or "barm", there are some that specifically call for "ale yeast" or "beer yeast". The following three are good examples: 19 - To make bisket bread, otherwise called French bisket. Take halfe a peck of fine flower, two ounces of coriander seeds, one ounce of anni seeds, the white of foure eggs, half a pinte of Ale-yeast, and as much water as will make it up into stiffe paste; your water must be but bloud warm: then bake it in a longroll as big as your thigh: let it stay in the oven but one houre, and wne it is a day old pare it and slice it overthwart: then sugar it over with fine powdred sugar, and so dry it in an oven again: and being dry, take it out, and sugar it again: then box it, and so may keep it all the yeere. [Delights for Ladies (England, 1609)] BOUCHET. To make six sixths of bouchet, take six pints of fine sweet honey, and put it in a cauldron on the fire and boil it, and stir continually until it starts to grow, and you see that it is producing bubbles like small globules which burst, and as they burst emit a little smoke which is sort of dark: and then stir, and then add seven sixths of water and boil until it reduces to six sixths again, and keep stirring. And then put it in a tub to cool until it is just warm; and then strain it through a cloth bag, and then put it in a cask and add one chopine (half-litre) of beer-yeast, for it is this which makes it the most piquant, (and if you use bread yeast, however much you like the taste, the colour will be insipid), and cover it well and warmly to work. And if you want to make it very good, add an ounce of ginger, long pepper, grains of Paradise and cloves in equal amounts, except for the cloves of which there should be less, and put them in a cloth bag and throw in. And after two or three days, if the bouchet smells spicy enough and is strong enough, take out the spice-bag and squeeze it and put it in the next barrel you make. And thus you will be able to use these same spices three or four times. [Le Menagier de Paris (France, 1393)] To mak rostand tak and mak a stiff bater of egg and pured floure sugur a goodelle and alitill yest of new ale and set it by the fier or els in a pot with boillinge watur that it may take alitile heet when it riseth swinge it to gedur and let it fall agayne and let the ovene be heet and clene swept and put the floure in an ovone to bak that it ryse as frenche bred then tak it out and cut away the cruste about the brod of a noble and mak a hole and raise it all about under the cruste and longe and ouer thwart as thyk as thou may with a knyf and so doun to the botom hole the crust all about set on the crust aboue and set them in the ovene till they be somdele dried and serue it furthe. [A Noble Boke off Cookry (England, 1468)] Also, the following recipe calls for "new berme" - while not conclusively yeast, I'd think that "new" would be an unlikely term for sourdough starter. To rost eggs in lent tak and blowe out the mete at the end of the egg and washe the shelles with warme water then tak thik mylk of almonds and set it to the fyere till it be at the boiling then put it in a canvas and let the water run out and kep all that hangethe in the clothe and gadur it to gedure in a dyshe put it to whyt sugure and colour the tone half with saffron and put ther in a litill newe berme and pouderd guinger and canelle and put som of the whit in the eggshell and in the mydl put in of the yallow to be the yolk and fill it up with whyt then set it in the fyere to rost and to xl eggs tak a lb of almond and a quarter gyngyure and canelle. [A Noble Boke off Cookry (England, 1468)] - Doc Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 09:13:57 -0500 From: "Terry Decker" To: "Cooks within the SCA" Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] Leven: yeast or sourdough? <<< Does wine making (from grapes, although I guess other fruits and honey as well) produce residue which includes yeast? If so, can't that yeast be used to produce yeast for bread and such? Or is that a different yeast unsuitable for use as a bread leaven? Stefan >>> Most alcohol producing yeasts can be used to make bread, but aside from the flavor issues, the big question is how much CO2 do they produce. S. cerevisiae generates a lot of CO2 which translates into lighter bread. Bear Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 09:16:55 -0500 From: "Terry Decker" To: "Cooks within the SCA" Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] Leven: yeast or sourdough? I was referencing the Natural Histories of Pliny the Elder. The Pliny II in the quote suggests that this reference is to Pliny the Younger. Bear <<< OED on barm defines it as "1. a. The froth that forms on the top of fermenting malt liquors, which is used to leaven bread, and to cause fermentation in other liquors; yeast, leaven." And there's a quotation attributed to Pliny but it's slightly different: 1601 HOLLAND Pliny II. 145 The froth or barme..[has] a property to keepe the skin faire and cleare in womens faces. Johnna >>> On Oct 10, 2010, at 10:54 PM, Terry Decker wrote: The earliest reference (that I have located) to using ale barm is found in Pliny. Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 15:20:19 +0000 From: Holly Stockley To: Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] Leven: yeast or sourdough? It isn't really the residues (lees) that you want. Been there - tried that. The resulting loaf tastes TERRIBLE. Blech. You want to get the actively fermenting foam on the top (presuming you're using Ale yeast... which you should be). But along with the yeast, you get a fair amount of liquid proto-beer. CAN you leaven bread with wine? Yep. But wine strains tend to be a little different than ale strains. They're not quite so aggressive, produce a bit less CO2 and tend to be more alcohol tolerant (as a group - there are some ale yeasts that are VERY tolerant). Wine is normally of a higher alcohol concentration than ale, so this makes sense. IF you use wine - you are essentially dumping a bunch of grape must into your bread with the yeast. And you get - grape flavored bread. Basically, it's easier to use ale yeast from beer and the result is better. Ale yeasts take to flour fairly well, and attenuate into nice baking yeasts within about a dozen uses. A lot of it is just greater compatibility for the substrate. Femke <<< Does wine making (from grapes, although I guess other fruits and honey as well) produce residue which includes yeast? If so, can't that yeast be used to produce yeast for bread and such? Or is that a different yeast unsuitable for use as a bread leaven? Stefan >>> Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 20:13:43 -0500 From: "Terry Decker" To: "Cooks within the SCA" Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] Leven: yeast or sourdough? Johnnae quoted: <<< OED defines leaven as a noun as "A substance which is added to dough to produce fermentation; spec. a quantity of fermenting dough reserved from a previous batch to be used for this purpose (cf. sour-dough)." With quotations such as: 1471 RIPLEY Comp. Alch. IX. viii. in Ashm. (1652) 175 Lyke as flower of Whete made into Past, Requyreth Ferment whych Leven we call. 1699 EVELYN Acetaria 53 Add a Pound of Wheat-flour, fermented with a little Levain. >>> So, does this mean that baking soda, baking powder, hartshorn etc. are not considered leavens, since they don't work through fermentation? Stefan ---------- A leaven is any substance that when added to dough causes it to rise. Since the process of fermentation was not understood until the 19th Century anything that caused the effect of raising dough might easily be considered an act of fermentation in period. Bear Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 14:48:13 -0400 From: Guenievre de Monmarche To: Cooks within the SCA Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] Period Pretzels, yet again... On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Terry Decker wrote: <<< Bear, this may be a dumb question, but have you baked directly from the ale barm? How was it different from, say, the powdered yeast you can buy at the grocery? I know when I was brewing small mead, I would skim off the foam and wonder if I could scoop it off and use it for bread. Never tried because even then I was having serious hand/wrist issues. Haven't made bread in about 15 years. I might give it a try if it was part of an experiment... Liutgard -- My limited experience with ale barm was that it wasn't as potent as modern dry active yeast, which has been carefully bred for the past 100 years to reduce alcohol production and increase the CO2. As I remember it, the bread took about 6 hours to rise. This was before I took copious notes on these kinds of experiments, so I have only memories to rely on. I should be in New Mexico full time by year's end and I'm thinking about getting a stone crock and running up an ale pot just to test the leavening. Terry >>> I actually have been playing around with bread-from-fermenting beer lately, just hadn't had time to reply to the list until now (thus the zombie thread). I got intrigued by a quote out of that Peter Brears book mentioned lately - Cooking and Dining in Medieval England - from page 118: "?Since the sourness produced by these methods was unsuitable for the finest white manchets and paindemain, they were replaced by a leaven of the frothy yeast carefully skimmed off the top of ale around the second day of its fermentation ... When required, a volume of it equal to one twentieth of the white flour was mixed with salt and warm water, mixed to a batter in the flour in the dough trough, and then processed just like the cheat dough." I have a Resident Brewer, and so I got to experiment. I found it made *very* tasty bread, but there were a couple of "gotchas" that affected the end result. 1. The first batch I tried was using a stout as the leavening, and even at only using 1/2 cup of beer foam to 24 oz flour (plus extra water, of course) that significantly affected the color of the bread. Here's a picture - http://www.erminespot.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/154128_10151787910267119_1644233747_n1.jpg - that's with *all white flour*, and it came out looking like half-whole-wheat. With a lighter beer - something along the lines of a newcastle brown - this effect was lessened. 2. The yeast was far more heat sensitive than the commercial yeast I usually work with - I usually proof bread in a briefly-heated oven, probably around 100 degrees or a bit more, for speed. The beer yeast just *stopped* at that temperature, but happily rose in a 65 degree house. 3. You could definitely taste a little beer in the final bread - it wasn't necessarily identifiable as beer if you didn't know that was what you were tasting, but it was there. I possibly could have used less beer foam and let it rise longer to reduce that effect while still getting a high-enough yeast population. Overall, though, the results were good, and much better than those a friend of mine achieved playing with "spent" beer barm. Guenievre Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 15:26:38 -0500 From: "Terry Decker" To: "Cooks within the SCA" Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] Period Pretzels, yet again... One of the things I haven't tried and and you haven't apparently tried either, is washing the yeast. Skim the froth from the active ferment and rinse it with repeated baths of cold water until white yeast settles out. The process shows up in a plantation cookbook from the early 19th Century. IIRC, the same cookbook discusses creating an active ferment (cream yeast) on potato water. I don't recall anyone who has used lees for leaven as having stated that they washed out the yeast to purify it. So such baking was done with all of the brewing impurities intact. English baking was done with ale barm, which based on 16th Century usage, would be the active ferment of an unhopped barley malt beverage. The ale might or might not have been bittered with gruit. So you might want to try this with a batch of traditional unhopped ale. Sounds like you had fun. Bear ----- Original Message ----- <<< I actually have been playing around with bread-from-fermenting beer lately, just hadn't had time to reply to the list until now (thus the zombie thread). I got intrigued by a quote out of that Peter Brears book mentioned lately - Cooking and Dining in Medieval England - from page 118: >>> Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 15:48:29 -0500 From: "Terry Decker" To: "Cooks within the SCA" Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] Use of Yeast First, yeast in this context is not derived from the dregs of anything. The recipes are English and from the late 16th Century so the yeast in question will be ale barm, the scum found on the top of an active ale pot. The particular yeast is Saccharomyces cerevisiae AKA baker's or brewer's yeast, so you can fake this with some bread yeast, malt extract and water or dissolve a little baker's yeast in water then add a bottle of unhopped ale (I like Dundee's). I haven't tried faking it with powdered barley malt, but I will one of these days. In Elizabethan England, ale barm would be be provided from a family's ale pot, a manor's ale house or purchased from a brewster. Neither recipe specifies whether this is "cleaned" yeast, where the barm is washed to remove impurities. Bear -----Original Message----- When digging up recipes for rock fish, I found some that called for yeast. Here are two examples: To seeth Roches, Flounders, or Eeles. MAke ye good broth with newe Yeast, put therein Uergious, Salt, Parsley, a litle Time, and not so much Rosemarie and pepper. So set it on the fyre and boyle it, & when it is wel boyled, put in Roches, Flounders, Eles, and a quantitie of sweet Butter. - The good Huswifes Handmaide for the Kitchin A Pyke sauce for a Pyke, Breme, Perche, Roche, Carpe, Eles, Floykes and al maner of brouke fyshe. Take a posye of Rosemary and time and bynde them together, and put in also a quantitye of perselye not bounde, and put into the caudron of water, salte and yeste, and the herbes, and lette them boyle a pretye whyle, then putte in the fysshe and a good quantitye of butter, and let them boyle a good season, and you shall have good Pyke sauce.... - A Proper newe Booke of Cokerye What are we talking about here? Is this dregs from a wine or ale barrel or is it bread yeast in sugar water? Any ideas? Guillaume Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 09:07:00 -0500 From: "Terry Decker" To: "Cooks within the SCA" Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] Use of Yeast <<< And no matter whether the yeast source is from wine or ale or bread, Why would you want to do this? There?s no dough or batter to use the yeast for a rising agent, as far as I can see. Is this to simply add a taste? Stefan >>> The yeast acts as a thickener and flavor enhancer rather than a leaven. This is an early version of what is now known as "nutrional yeast." Bear Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 12:26:10 -0400 (EDT) From: JIMCHEVAL at aol.com To: sca-cooks at lists.ansteorra.org Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] Non-leavening/non-brewing use of yeast My guess is that these would be in Germanic countries where beer was popular. The same countries were more likely to use yeast as a leavening for beer, whereas the French, for instance, used sour dough until the late seventeenth century (and even then use of yeast was fitful) despite knowing that the Flemish, for instance, used yeast and had lighter bread as a result. There's really no mystery here: more beer, more brewer's yeast, which is pretty much all there was until the nineteenth century. Jim Chevallier Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 16:49:35 -0400 From: Sharon Palmer To: Cooks within the SCA Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] Non-leavening/non-brewing use of yeast <<< My guess is that these would be in Germanic countries where beer was popular. >>> I checked Rumpolt (1581) for mentions of Hefen (yeast). I only found it used for pastries and brewing. (Rumpolt doesn't include bread recipes, apparently they purchased bread from a baker). Menus: Bischgoten (biscuit or biscotti) of white flour and Bierhefen (beer yeast). A dough mixed with white flour/ with eggs/ and with Bierhefen (beer yeast)/ of such a dough one can make many and various pastries. Large Piscoten (biscuit, biscotti) made of Bierhefen (beer yeast). Gebackens 8. Take warm milk and beautiful flour/ put beer yeast with it/ and mix the dough with it/ sprinkle a little with salt/ and work the dough well/ set it to the fire/ that it goes over itself (rises)/ wash the fists clean/ and grab into the dough/ take a piece of it/ and pull finely from each other/ until it becomes thin and nicely long/ throw into hot Butter/ in a longish pan/ like this you fry the dough rapidly/ give it warm or cold on a table. You might sprinkle with sugar or not. And in Bavaria one calls it fried Steigleder (climbing leathers). Gebackens 20. Take warm milk and beat eggs with it/ mix a dough with fair white flour/ take little beer yeast and butter to it/ let it stand a while behind the oven/ that it rises/ make it again into a ball/ and salt it a little/ then roll it out cleanly/ throw black raisins over it. Take a Walger (roller)/ that is warm/ and rubbed with butter/ and lay it on the dough/ wrap the dough over/ and tie it together with a twine/ so it does not fall off/ lay it to the fire and turn slowly/ like this will it roast cleanly. And when it becomes brown then take a brush/ and put it into hot butter/ and coat the cake with it/ like this it will be a beautiful brown. And when it is roasted/ so take it off the roller spit/ and put into both holes with a clean cloth/ that the heat remains/ let it remain like this/ until it is cool so give cold on a table/ so it becomes tender and good. And one calls it Spiesskuchen (spit cake). Gebackens 41. Make a dough with milk/ eggs/ and fair white flour/ put a little beer yeast in it/ and make a good dough/ that is not completely stiff/ and do not over salt it/ set it to the warm/ that it nicely risen/ punch it down on a clean board/ and do little black raisins around it/ make strutzel from it/ throw it in hot butter/ and fry/ like this it will nicely puff up/ give cold or warm on a table/ sprinkle it with sugar/ like this it is a good Gebackens (pastry). There are several mentions of Hefen (yeast), Urhab (=urheb or sourdough), and Mutter (mother, or culture) in the Kellermeisterey section. Ranvaig Edited by Mark S. Harris yeasts-msg Page 54 of 54