feasts-fish-msg – 9/23/18 Serving fish at SCA feasts. Menu suggestions. NOTE: See also these files: fish-msg, seafood-msg, meat-smoked-msg, soup-msg, fried-foods-msg, feasts-msg, stockfish-msg, sausages-msg, sauces-msg. ************************************************************************ NOTICE - This file is a collection of various messages having a common theme that I have collected from my reading of the various computer networks. Some messages date back to 1989, some may be as recent as yesterday. This file is part of a collection of files called Stefan's Florilegium. These files are available on the Internet at: http://www.florilegium.org I have done a limited amount of editing. Messages having to do with separate topics were sometimes split into different files and sometimes extraneous information was removed. For instance, the message IDs were removed to save space and remove clutter. The comments made in these messages are not necessarily my viewpoints. I make no claims as to the accuracy of the information given by the individual authors. Please respect the time and efforts of those who have written these messages. The copyright status of these messages is unclear at this time. If information is published from these messages, please give credit to the originator(s). Thank you, Mark S. Harris AKA: THLord Stefan li Rous Stefan at florilegium.org ************************************************************************ Date: Sun, 22 Aug 1999 17:16:22 -0400 From: Philip & Susan Troy Subject: Re: SC - Fish recipes Kerri Canepa wrote: > As I was browsing through the menus in Menagier, I couldn't help notice the > preponderance of fish dishes. And that was on the meat day menus. Le Menagier seems to be somewhat unique in containing a couple of dishes calling for both meat and fish together; the meat tile, made of veal or poultry sauced with a crayfish-flavored almond sauce, and garnished with the tails, is one example, but there are others, I believe. > I'm curious. Has anyone used fish dishes in the feasts they prepare? Even here > in Alaska, salmon and halibut capital of the north, fish does not hit the > feast menu very often. > > If you have included fish recipes in feasts, how many did you prepare? How did > the feast attendees respond to them? Generally rather well. Favorites include the aforementioned meat tile (but I made it with shrimp), the cuminee de poissons from Le Menagier de Paris, roast salmon with cameline sauce, and saumon gentil from one of the early Forme of Cury proto-manuscripts somewhere in Curye on Inglyshe. The last one is a sort of quenelle, we served it with a green sauce. I've also had great success with mussels in a vinegar/butter broth, found, IIRC, in Gervase Markham's "The English Huswife". I serve enough for everyone to have around 3 ounces sans shell, skin, bones, etc., on the assumption there are a few who won't eat any at all, and those who like the stuff will pig out, more or less. Adamantius Date: Sun, 22 Aug 1999 15:39:55 -0600 From: "Karen O" Subject: Re: SC - Fish recipes >I'm curious. Has anyone used fish dishes in the feasts they prepare? Even here in Alaska, salmon and halibut capital of the north, fish does not hit the feast menu very often. >If you have included fish recipes in feasts, how many did you prepare? How did the feast attendees respond to them? My Dearest Cedrin, The one memorable fish course I had was at a Loch Salann Solstice -- we had whole salmons cooked in a steamer/commercial pressure cooker thingy. DEE LICIOUS!!! The event was at a National Guard Armoury, so we had a very large/commercial kitchen and the salmon were rock hard frozen solid just hours prior to feast, and perfectly cooked when served. I know, *I* couldn't get enough, and there was plenty to be had ** served with a delicate dill cream sauce** Unfortunately I wasn't involved with that part of the feast prep, and don't know how/what was done. Caointiarn Date: Sun, 22 Aug 1999 23:39:02 EDT From: LrdRas at aol.com Subject: Re: SC - Fish recipes kerric at pobox.alaska.net writes: << Has anyone used fish dishes in the feasts they prepare? >> Yes, Both myself and HTL Thorstein has prepared and included fish dishes in at least one course of every feast for the past few years. The dishes have ranged from simple fried fish to eel pies. They dishes were over-all well received. << If you have included fish recipes in feasts, how many did you prepare? >> How many dishes? Fish? Assuming you mean dishes here, the usual practice here is to include only one fish dish in the menu. <> The response is variable with those liking fish raving and those not liking fish showing little emotion or comment. Ras Date: Mon, 23 Aug 1999 09:30:54 -0400 From: Mary_HallSheahan at ademco.com Subject: Re: SC - Fish recipes Ostgardr regularly includes smoked whiting at late-winter feasts (partly that's because we have access to the Brooklyn Terminal Market where many miraculous things can be had at reasonable prices). At the first (and so far only) feast I cooked, we served fish with an egredouce sauce. Frozen filets for convenience, whatever they had in bulk at the Price Club. We'd intended to fry them but due to kitchen limitations we baked them instead. I aimed at one small filet per person, because this was as part of a 9-dish feast and portions of each individual dish were kept small. Egredouce is a godly sauce--it can be made ahead of time, canned if necessary, goes well with a variety of meats, and reheats like a dream.) I've also seen mussels in a spiced broth served at an event, unfortunately one mussel had a baby crab INSIDE the mussel...one of the scary-looking crabs not a typically eaten crab--and a scientifically-fascinated server wandered around showing it to everyone. Her presentation kind of killed my appetite for the dish that day... Emme Date: Sat, 25 Sep 1999 17:57:12 -0400 From: Philip & Susan Troy Subject: Re: SC - Is Medieval Food Yucky? THLRenata at aol.com wrote: > I will be teaching a class at Great Western War III entitled "Is Medieval > Food Yucky?", based in part on some discussions from this list about a year > ago. > > The class is a discussion of some of the myths about medieval and > Current-Middle-Ages food and the de-bunking thereof. > > I was hoping that some of the feast-mavens here would share some of their > adventures in this area, like how they got 200 people to eat _______ and like > it. I had great success a few years ago with the cominee de poissons from Le Menagier de Paris. This was at an EK Twelfth Night, and you haven't lived until you've tried to get 400 Easterners (except perhaps for the Carolingians and the Ostgardrians, in whose territories reside the two big wholesale fish markets of the East Coast) to eat fish. The cominee sauce ended up tasting a bit like a Singapore-style curry, with ginger, saffron, pepper, almond milk, and, of course, copious amounts of cumin. We then garnished the sauced fish (cod), pretty much as a joke, with those awful canned fried onion rings which we happened to have in our feast stores. I think one person complained, and the rest pretty much inhaled the stuff with a sort of whooshing noise. Of course the one who complained ended up as Queen a short time later; it made things a bit interesting for me for a year or so... Adamantius Date: Sun, 26 Sep 1999 09:02:23 EDT From: LrdRas at aol.com Subject: Re: SC - Can medieval food be heart-smart? ChannonM at aol.com writes: << However, unsauced, non breaded or [non]-deep fried fish is not what I have seen as being welcomed at feasts and I guess that's what I was alluding to. I >> The first time I served fish at a feast it was plain whiting fillets deep fried. There was none left at any of the tables although a rounded platter of it was served at each table. King Ruslan came back to the kitchen to ask it there was any he could take home with him. The 'no fish' at a feast thing is simply no more than a myth. Ras Date: Sun, 26 Sep 1999 08:44:06 -0700 From: Anne-Marie Rousseau Subject: Let them eat fish! was Re: SC - Can medieval food be heart-smart? hi all from Anne-Marie You know, I was always told that "SCA people wont eat fish". And we have two avowed piscatorially challenged individuals in our Culinary Guild. THis not withstanding, every time we've served fish it got gobbled up. Now, granted, we are VERY careful about the type (salmon and prawns vastly preferred over cod and mussles, apparently), and did it in a very non threatening way, but folks seemed to enjoy it. For the perioide feast at Council of Crowns we had a few years back, we served salmon and steamed mussels to great applause, and these were the Kigns and Queens of the Known World (ie fighters and their gals). We also served asparagus and notorious fortune cookies, but that's another story :). But then, we get requests for seconds on salat, for gawds sake :). So I would say that SCA people will eat fish, but I would suggest that it not be the only meat, so those true carnivores out there can skip it and still have a nice meal. - --AM Date: Thu, 30 Sep 1999 09:27:54 -0700 (PDT) From: Jeanne Stapleton Subject: Re: Let them eat fish! was Re: SC - Can medieval food be heart-smart? > For the perioide feast at Council of Crowns we had a few years back, we > served salmon and steamed mussels to great applause, and these were the > Kings and Queens of the Known World (ie fighters and their gals). We also > served asparagus and notorious fortune cookies, but that's another story :). ...and it was *excellent*, as this satisfied consumer can state. The poached salmon made into a dragon with cucumber scales was particularly fetching. > But then, we get requests for seconds on salat, for gawds sake :). Rorik did say, "Why are their flowers in my salad?" but I ate all of mine and all of his. Again, excellent. > So I would say that SCA people will eat fish, but I would suggest that it > not be the only meat, so those true carnivores out there can skip it and > still have a nice meal. Most people I personally know will relish well- prepared salmon. I know a few who won't touch any kind of fish, even canned tuna, but they tend to also be the ones who don't like any but the very blandest of food. Berengaria Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2003 14:04:21 -0700 From: "Kathleen A. Roberts" Subject: Re: Christianity in SCA cookery. was Re: [Sca-cooks] pre-Columbian foods To: Cooks within the SCA --On Wednesday, November 05, 2003 2:51 PM -0600 "Pixel, Goddess and Queen" wrote: > Anybody who's actually served fish at a feast care to comment? i have done salmon a number of times (when i could find it on sale for 2.99 lb... yes, it happens... or if it was a small feast) with good results. used master huen's recipe 'to seeth fresh salmon' and it was a big hit. once i cheated (period-wise) and used salmon pate from a local tiny bistro as 'a little dad will do ya' on an appetizer plate. they rough chopped the ingredients on request, i had hubby pick it up that a.m., and it cost me less than if i would have tried to make it myself! of course, folks were licking the plate on that one. confession? never been brave enuf to try a white fish... tho pickled herring might find a place on an 'appetizer' course one day. cailte now new mexican born in maryland Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2003 16:11:30 EST From: BaronessaIlaria at aol.com Subject: Re: Christianity in SCA cookery. was Re: [Sca-cooks] pre-Columbian foods To: sca-cooks at ansteorra.org In a message dated 11/5/2003 4:05:56 PM Eastern Standard Time, karobert at unm.edu writes: > Anybody who's actually served fish at a feast care to comment? Not long ago I served the Cazuela de Salmon from de Nola that was posted on this list and it was extremely well received. We even had a couple of folks rumaging in the fridge during the night looking for leftovers. I know that fish has been served here in Trimaris at other events as well, but I don't recall any specific comments about it. Ilaria Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2003 21:18:06 +0000 From: "Olwen the Odd" Subject: Re: Christianity in SCA cookery. was Re: [Sca-cooks] pre-Columbianfoods To: sca-cooks at ansteorra.org > On Wed, 5 Nov 2003, Susan Fox-Davis wrote: >> OK, steering this all back on topic: what about Christian dietary laws >> and why don't we ever seem to bother with them in the SCA? I keep >> trying to serve fish during Lent and all I get are complaints. O >> Tempura, O Morays! >> >> Selene Colfox > > Hmmm. Well, around here we've had a Princess who was deathly allergic to > fish, thus, no fish served at feasts during her reigns. Other than that, I > think part of the reason is that for most people, fish=tuna salad, > fish=tuna hotdish, fish=fish sticks, or fish=hyper-expensive swordfish > steak. Also, fish is quite expensive here in the heartland. When I > bought > for this last 12th night, I got pork butt for $.99/lb, but the cheapest > fish I could get was salmon at $4.99/lb. > > Anybody who's actually served fish at a feast care to comment? > > Margaret We made a star gazey pie for high table a while back. Not only did none of it come back, they came to the kitchen and asked for more. When told we only had made the one, they asked for the recipe! For this occasion I made it with fillets of fish instead of whole fish. I wrapped the bacon to cover the whole fillet and added a whole clove to not only act as the "eye" but to hold that end of bacon in place. We occasionally serve fillets of salmon and they are well recieved with little returning to the kitchen. I have been toying with some variations on making individual star gazey pocket pies for buffets. I will say that if anyone on this list is ever going to make something for Mary Grace of Gatlain to eat, just make a star gazey pie and stand back! Olwen Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2003 15:19:23 -0600 From: dailleurs at liripipe.com Subject: Re: Christianity in SCA cookery. was Re: [Sca-cooks] pre-Columbian foods To: "Cooks within the SCA" , "Cooks within the SCA" hey all from Anne-Marie we frequently serve fish in camp, especially on Fridays (Fast day and all that ;)) but I've found in the SCA, fish tends to be snubbed, except salmon for some reason. FOlks will inhale salmon but say "they dont like fish". problem is we have two of our active cooks who have such a strong dislike for anything piscatorially inclined ;) that they cant stand to have it cooked while they're in the kitchen. Also, we've found it can be tricky to prepare fish well in bulk (ie for 100+ diners). you dont want to over cook it, and unlike a roast that can sit and cool a bit and still be nice, tepid fish can be rather unhappy. We had good results though by placing large salmon fillets (we can get the stuff megacheap here in seattle, year round) in shallow pans with poaching liquid, etc, cover them in foil and bake. As long as the pan is covered they didnt tend to dry out, and gentle poaching seems to keep them from getting rubbery. We left the covered pans on a warm griddle to keep them warm until they were ready to serve, and they were dished up in preheated heavy ceramic plates (we ran them through the commercial dishwasher just before serving) We've also done shrimp things for feasts, but that was really touchy (over cook them and they turn VERY rubbery). We planned on a small serving per person (like 3 large prawns) as only one small tidbit in a much larger meal, and figured about 1/3 of our diners wouldnt eat them (which made those of us who like seafood that much happier ;)) Its also interesting to note that when we cooked a feast for the Known World Crowns some years ago, everyone specifically said they liked fish and seafood EXCEPT the local royalty ;). so yes, we can do fish for feasts but must take into account the strong aversions of a few (especially those few who are also useful ;)), and the sometimes touchy nature of bulk production. --Anne-Marie PS the ercipes we used were the stuffed salmon and buttered shrimps in the Elizabethan Feudal Gourmet pamphlets. http://www.liripipe.com/mcg/ hows that for a slick transition to a crass commercial plug? ;) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2003 16:24:10 -0500 From: "Barbara Benson" Subject: [Sca-cooks] Fish in Feast (was alot of things) To: "Cooks within the SCA" > When I bought for this last 12th night, I got pork butt for $.99/lb, > but the cheapest fish I could get was salmon at $4.99/lb. > > Margaret > Anybody who's actually served fish at a feast care to comment? Greetings, I have served salmon at 2 feasts, the same recipie both times. It is the Salmon Casserole recipie from de Nola. I know it has been posted numerous times to this list. The first time I served it was at a 3 day event where there were 2 feasts. The main (Sat) night was cooked by Maestro Niccolo and he also served a fish dish. I believe it was a trout in pastry. There were several comments afterward about fish being served successfully two nights in a row. I managed the salmon by serving it as a small portion in the third course along with another meat. I believe Niccolo found a really great price on frozen trout. I think expense is a major concern, but I also think a lot of people are afraid of the additional sanitary concerns that accompany fish. The perception is that fish, more so than the other meats, is sensitive to temperature and if a person does not know what they are doing then people could get really sick. This, I believe, can be gotten around by establishing yourself as a good cook and getting people to trust that you will not put a food in front of them that is going to get them sick. Of course, all of this good-will can be set back by the next cook who sends out chicken that is bloody at the bone. Because if you cannot even cook chicken right then there is no way that I am gonna eat your fish (speaking as the hypothetical feast goer). There is a fish dish out of Geuter Spise that I really want to try: 19. This is a good salmon dish. Take a salmon, scale it, split and cut the two halves in pieces. Chop parsley, sage, take ground ginger, pepper, anise, and salt to taste. Make a coarse dough according to the size of the pieces, sprinkle the pieces with the spices, and cover them completely with the dough. If you can fit them into a mould, then do so. In this way you can prepare pike, trout, bream, and bake each one in its own dough. If it is a meat-day, however, you can prepare chickens, partridges, pigeons, and pheasants, provided that you have the noulds, and fry them in lard or cook them in their moulds. Take chicken breast or other good meat, THis will improve your art of cooking even more, and don't oversalt. Glad Tidings, Serena da Riva Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2003 18:29:36 -0500 From: Morgana Abbey Subject: [Sca-cooks] Fish at feasts To: Sca-cooks at ansteorra.org I've noticed that the biggest problem (at least in these parts) is that, too often, the cooks try to serve a delicate hot fish in the first course. Now if, as is usual, things run late and feast gets pushed back, you have fish-flavored shingles. I got around this by serving a cold dish 2 years ago when I cooked Twelfth Night. [Trout in Orange Marinade--adapted from Marcella Hazan.] So I advise people to serve fish cold in the first course and save the hot dishes for later courses when you know you have control over the serving time. Morgana Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2003 19:00:48 -0600 From: "Terry Decker" Subject: Re: Christianity in SCA cookery. was Re: [Sca-cooks] pre-Columbianfoods To: "Cooks within the SCA" In Oklahoma, frozen whiting is about the cheapest, $1.50-2/poundin bulk. I've served it pickled and as floured and fried fillets with an apple/wine sauce. In all cases, the fish has disappeared. I've steered clear of the pickled fish in recent years because I don't have a period recipe. I did the fried fillets as a mixed fish and chicken course to handle some of the dietary problems of the local baron and baroness. He is allergic to chicken, she detests fish. The chicken was served with an orange sauce, which led to people experimenting with the sauces on various things all through the feast. Bear Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2003 19:10:02 -0600 From: "Terry Decker" Subject: [Sca-cooks] Fish was Christianity in SCA cookery. To: "Cooks within the SCA" > confession? never been brave enuf to try a white fish... tho pickled > herring might find a place on an 'appetizer' course one day. > > cailte Years ago, I did a Scandinavian feast (back before I was seriously working with period recipes) and sent the pickled whiting out with the first course. The Queen had three helpings of it before the Baroness leaned over and suggested that she might want to save room for the next two courses. The Queen, having had as much food presented as most feasts of the day, hadn't realized just how extensive the meal was. Do try white fish some day. The whiting fillets with the apple wine sauce beats pickled fish hands down, if you have a grill surface big enough to push the batches through quickly and serve straight from the grill to the platter to the table. Bear Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2003 12:18:11 -0800 (PST) From: Robin Carroll-Mann Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] Fish at feast To: Cooks within the SCA From: Ruth Tannahill > Lady Brighid ni Chiarran (spelling--I'msorry) That's okay -- I can't spell your patronymic, either. :-) > served a fish in bitter orange sauce that was out of this world. ::blush:; Thank you. That was the Cazuela de Salmon (Casserole of Salmon) from de Nola. My redaction and several others are in the Florilegium: http://www.florilegium.org/files/FOOD-MEATS/salmon-msg.text > Berelinde Brighid ni Chiarain Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2003 09:49:46 -0500 From: johnna holloway Subject: [Sca-cooks] Re: Whole Fish was Christianity To: Cooks within the SCA > oh, and the reproving looks > they have gotten from a baked fish with its head still on. The problem that I encountered with whole fish as a diner is that very few people know what to do when presented with a large whole bone in fish that is supposed to serve the entire table. The fish arrives and sits there on the platter because few people know how to debone and then serve pieces from a whole fish. Also few diners have the proper sort of knife at hand to handle a whole fish. I went up and down a row of tables one evening at a feast, deboning several platters worth, so that people could or would eat the fish course. My feeling was that it would have gone back to the kitchen untouched had someone not done it. Johnnae llyn Lewis Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2005 05:22:25 -0700 (PDT) From: Marcus Loidolt Subject: [Sca-cooks] Re: Sca-cooks Digest, Vol 27, Issue 25 To: sca-cooks at ansteorra.org Benedicte, Abot Johann from the middle of the Middle here, There is a good rule of thumb, according to a number of period sources, to have three 'meats' Fish, Fowl, Field. If a guest can't eat from one, they can from another. Granted the Fish might be preserved as salted or kippered (Herring seems to be the favorite here...long story inserted, long ago I was doing my second?? Feast, and was determined to serve some sort of fish, indeed kippered herring. I was warned that no one would eat it and that the barony would not pay for it! Okay says I, it'll be served as on table with the crudites and I'll pay for it from my own pocket! So it happened, the feeding frenzy and piracy that occurred is still talked about, those tables that liked it (and there were three that were really hooked on it) stole from those that either didn't like it, which is fine, and from those that were just a little to slow to recognize what they had in front of them!! LOL, Then they tried to bribe head table out of their fish too!! Since then no one ever really complains about me serving kippered herring (or any other fish) at my feasts. Johann von Metten Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 17:08:58 +1200 From: Adele de Maisieres Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] fish at SCA feasts To: Cooks within the SCA Stefan li Rous wrote: > I keep hearing this phrase about not eating fish, but I've heard many > other comments to the contrary. Me? I'd love to see a lot more, well- > prepared fish at SCA feasts. I served escabeche (fish poached in wine and vinegar and allowed to cool and jelly in it's cooking liquid-- delicious) at a feast once. A third of the dishes (I serve in messes) were essentially untouched (from the tables with the youngest and least adventurous eaters, I guess). The other two-thirds were scraped (and in one or two cases licked, I suspect) clean. I'd certainly serve it again. I've also had salmon, trout, mussels, and plain fried fish at feasts and I don't remember anyone complaining. I'd go so far as to say that fish is quite popular. > So, has anyone served eel? How well did it go over? So far, I've only > had eel out of a can. I don't think I have, but it would probably go down just fine-- smoked freshwater eel tends to be seen as a treat here (New Zealand). I don't think I've seen unsmoked eel for sale, but you can fish them out of any stream anyway. -- Adele de Maisieres Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2005 20:48:49 -0400 From: "Phil Troy / G. Tacitus Adamantius" Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] fish at SCA feasts To: Cooks within the SCA On Aug 12, 2005, at 12:50 AM, Stefan li Rous wrote: >> I was warned that no >> one would eat it and that the barony would not pay for it! > > I keep hearing this phrase about not eating fish, but I've heard > many other comments to the contrary. Me? I'd love to see a lot > more, well-prepared fish at SCA feasts. We serve fish pretty frequently at our feasts, but we live near the ocean, which makes seafood readily available and also probably helps provide a receptive crowd. Favorite period fish dishes include cuminade de poissons from Taillevent and/or Le menagier, any of several egredouce recipes, saumon gentil from, IIRC, The Forme of Cury, and a 17th-century English mussel recipe whose source I forget (but can probably locate) whose product is virtually indistinguishable from modern moules mariniere. > So, has anyone served eel? How well did it go over? So far, I've > only had eel out of a can. Smoked eel is exceptional. I've never served eel at an event, but I vaguely recall that al-Sayyid Ras al Zib served some kind of crustades for a fish day that involved salmon and eels, on at least one occasion. Adamantius Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2005 18:50:19 -0700 (PDT) From: Alexa Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] fish at SCA feasts To: Cooks within the SCA I helped with a feast over in Caid that served Mussels and also had a smoked salmon dish that had a mustard sauce on it. I am not one for most seafood. (occasionally shrimp, scallops and very picky about regular fish). I did not try the mussels, but many people enjoyed them. The salmon, I tried that, and for fish, it was pretty yummy. I don’t think we had much left over. Alexa Now in VA Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2005 20:54:27 -0700 From: "Nick Sasso" Subject: RE: [Sca-cooks] fish at SCA feasts To: "'Cooks within the SCA'" -----Original Message----- <<<>>> Did grilled, stuffed eels at my last feast in Meridies a couple of years ago, as a sort of taster dish. Those who tried it were pleased and calling for more. Some adventurous folks who never tried it, gave it a go. It was a pleasant way to introduce the dish, and have me interact with my guests while my expert kitchen hands kept the feast moving. Weird food as a 'try if you'd like' can be inviting and less pressure For the curious. Then there was the roasted orange salmon Serena de Riva foisted off to huge success at the 'feast of the twice-cooked dishes' :o) niccolo difrancesco Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 00:22:06 GMT From: "morgana.abbey at juno.com" Subject: [Sca-cooks] Subject: Re: kitchen tips To: sca-cooks at lists.ansteorra.org The best way to put fish in the first course is to serve it cold. When I planned my first feast, I got a lot of static about the fish course. Mostly it was that 1) no one would eat fish and 2) it will be dried out. Well, if you try to put a hot dish in the first course and something (royalty) delays the start of feast, yes it will be fish-flavored shingles hitting the tables. A cold dish went over so well that one half of one portion was all that came back to the kitchen. Save the hot dish for the second course. You just need to time it so that you're firing the fish as the first course is going out. Morgana Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 09:09:22 -0600 From: "Kathleen A Roberts" Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] Subject: Re: kitchen tips To: Cooks within the SCA On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 00:22:06 GMT "morgana.abbey at juno.com" wrote: <<< The best way to put fish in the first course is to serve it cold. When I planned my first feast, I got a lot of static about the fish course. Mostly it was that 1) noone would eat fish and 2) it will be dried out. >>> i make little salmon tartlets (piggy-pie shaped) that can be served hot or cold, usually cold, on the appetizer tray. many go out, none come back. cailte Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 14:41:05 -0500 From: "otsisto" Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] Subject: Re: kitchen tips To: "Cooks within the SCA" Take the "no one will eat fish" or "fighters only want meat" with a cup of salt. One year I autocrated, I also assisted the Head Cook. We serve fish (pickled herring - appetizers, broiled salmon- 2nd coarse). People ate it all, even the fighters. The only leftovers we had was the bashed neeps, fattigmann cookies and strawberry pudding. The latter two went to the post revel. De Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 15:44:00 -0400 From: euriol Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] Subject: Re: kitchen tips To: Cooks within the SCA I have served both Shrimp & Salmon successfully in the second course of a feast. The shrimp have been served both cold and hot. The salmon was actually baked whole and displayed whole in front of high table and served from there to the tables. Euriol Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 08:59:16 -0400 From: "Kerri Martinsen" Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] Subject: Re: kitchen tips To: sca-cooks at lists.ansteorra.org but at what point to you try to hold to period menus? Most that I have seen (well, Italian) start with lighter food - fish - and end with the "big heavy food" I did sea bass first (well, after soup) in my last feast mainly BECAUSE I wanted to be sure it would all be eaten. I didn't care so much if chicken got thrown away, but the sea bass? Not that there was any of it left anyway..even the plates came back clean. I sent the fish to the table in parchment envelopes. There is some documentation for cooking food in paper packs (albeiet not much) but I ran with it. The idea of having HOT fish at the table was a much desired on. Vitha On 8/22/08, Huette von Ahrens wrote: <<< I never put expensive foods on the first course because that is when your diners will be their hungriest. I always put chicken and other fowl dishes in the first course. Beef and other meats in the second course and fish in the third course because I can buy a lot less because by then the diners will be very full and will only want a bite or two of anything. Huette >>> Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 06:23:06 -0500 From: "Terry Decker" Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] fish at feasts To: "Cooks within the SCA" I've served pickled whiting, baked whiting and fried whiting and been pleasantly surprised when they disappeared. I've also served salmon, smoked and poached, without problem, although there was one feast where some of the tables failed to realize there were two sides to a salmon. I'm fairly sparing with fish because it can be a budget buster in Oklahoma, but it is well received when I do serve it. For several years, we had a Baron who couldn't eat chicken and a Baroness who detested fish, so I would divide a course between chicken and fish to meet their requirements. At one feast I served chicken with orange sauce and fried whiting with an apple and wine sauce. I later found out that the sauces were very popular, that people were playing mix and match with the sauces on other food and that some people tried them on the roast beef in the next course. Bear Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 12:56:48 -0700 (PDT) From: Huette von Ahrens Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] fish at feasts To: sca-cooks at lists.ansteorra.org I have served salmon at several of my banquets here in Angels and it always has been received very well. I have had several people tell me that they usually hate fish, but they loved how I made it. I.e. Poached in beer with parsley, rosemary and thyme. For those of you who want the recipe, check the Florilegium, as I have already posted it here two or three times. Huette Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 14:38:56 -0500 From: "Euriol of Lothian" Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] Fish at feasts To: "'Cooks within the SCA'" <<< Have you ever served fish at a feast? How? How was it received? Madhavi An Crosaire, Trimaris >>> I have served whole roasted salmon at feast. The salmon was then brought out whole to high table where it was cut and served out onto plates to be served at each table. I served it with Cameline Sauce on the side. Carving the fish in front of high table was, at least I thought, a nice way to present it. The bones are big enough that it was easy to eliminate most of them before it got served to a table. I have also served shrimp (dressed in vinegar) and red snapper (served with red wine sauce) successfully at feasts. I would recommend that you portion no more than 2oz of fish/seafood per person. I'll add that there was no leftovers of any of these dishes. I also did a butter fried shrimp recipe where it was dressed in seasoned flour before it was fried, then fresh ginger was grated right over the top. Euriol Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 14:40:19 -0500 From: Gretchen Beck Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] Fish at feasts To: Cooks within the SCA --On Thursday, November 20, 2008 2:29 PM -0500 jimandandi at cox.net wrote: <<< I am dallying with the idea of serving fish at a feast I'm doing in February, based on Chiqart and Menagier of Paris. What I would love to do is a whole roast fish "swimming" on a bed of decorated rice, with green sorrel verjuice on top and sprinkled with small whole shrimp. I have been warned away from doing this dish because "people don't eat fish at feasts" and "what about the bones?". So. Have you ever served fish at a feast? How? How was it received? If you have not, would you like to? >>> We're in a landlocked area where fish is not a normal part of the everyday diet (except for the ubiquitous fried fish sandwich), so we heard something of the same thing. That said, I've served a couple of fish dishes at feasts -- with considerable success. There were some people who didn't eat it, and some who didn't like it, but most people both ate and liked. I'll always regret the day I didn't save some of the calamari side dish (served after the manner described in Platina). "I'll get plenty back, people only sample wierd food". Not a bite, not a drip, not a drab came back to the kitchen. Another big success was a filet (essentiall a 1/2 of the fish slab, deskinned and deboned -- as you buy it at the warehouse club) of salmon roasted on a grill then poached in wine served with a long pepper sauce. I think your plan sounds lovely. The trick is to make sure that fish isn't the only thing for people to eat, and that there are things to eat that the fish hasn't touched. Another trick is, if it's supposed to be served hot, make sure it hits the table piping hot. Lukewarm and mostly cold fish that is supposed to be hot is just, well, yuck... Put out little plates for the bones -- people are smart, they'll figure out what to do with them (after all, they do it with chicken on a regular basis). toodles, margaret Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 14:50:30 -0500 From: ranvaig at columbus.rr.com Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] Fish at feasts To: Cooks within the SCA <<< Have you ever served fish at a feast? How? How was it received? >>> I wasn't the head cook, but a few years ago, one of our local feasts served a whole salmon to each table. Salmon has rather big bones, and the meat is easily separated. Some tables picked the bones clean, a couple didn't seem to notice that the fish had two sides, one table hardly touched it. Most were in between. Overall, they ate about 75% what was served. During cleanup, I picked apart the carcasses and took the leftovers home. :) Fish won't stand reheating or even being kept hot for long, when its ready you have to serve it quickly. Ranvaig Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 15:04:08 -0500 From: ranvaig at columbus.rr.com Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] Fish at feasts To: Cooks within the SCA <<< I wasn't the head cook, but a few years ago, one of our local feasts served a whole salmon to each table. >>> Also she got them at $0.99 a pound, each fish was probably 4 pounds, well over the suggested 2 oz per person. With current fish prices 2 oz would seem enough to serve. Allowing for the bones, for a table of 8, maybe 20 oz for a whole fish. Ranvaig Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 14:10:19 -0600 From: "Terry Decker" Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] Fish at feasts To: "Cooks within the SCA" I have served poached salmon, pickled whiting, and, most recently, lightly floured, fried whiting filets with an apple and wine sauce on the side. All were well received and I had no leftovers. That being said, all of these were prepared in ways that were not unfamiliar to the people at the feast, not everyone was enamored of the dishes, and I would have had half the salmon come back except that someone realized that a whole salmon has two sides. The whiting filets with the wine sauce were served with a chicken in orange sauce, because the Baron could eat fish, but not chicken, and the Baroness just the opposite. Having two meats and two sauces together in the same course made for some interesting experimentation at table. There are always people who will eat fish at feasts, so "people don't eat fish at feasts" is in error. What people don't want is badly prepared fish. As for the bones, select your fish and manner of preparation to minimize the problem. I do try to keep from being too outre in the preparation. And I make sure the fish is one dish in many, so it can be bypassed by anyone who doesn't want it. The question I would ask myself is, "is the idea of presenting my audience with a whole fish with the head on going to upset them?" Bear Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 15:20:25 -0500 From: "Euriol of Lothian" Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] Fish at feasts To: "'Cooks within the SCA'" The salmon I got for my feasts were probably closer to 20 pounds each. It was hard to get them whole into the oven. Euriol Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 15:27:01 -0500 From: "Phil Troy / G. Tacitus Adamantius" Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] Fish at feasts To: Cooks within the SCA On Nov 20, 2008, at 2:31 PM, wrote: <<< Have you ever served fish at a feast? How? >>> Lobster in blankmanger, mussels in butter and vinegar, oysters in gravy, smoked whiting with mustard sauce, fresh whiting fried and served with a "sober" [dark] raisin sauce and any of several variants: aigre douce, rappee, etc. Salmon many ways, from tarts, to poached, to poached dumplings in a sauce, shrimp with aged vinegar, shrimp sausages, scallop crepinettes, escabeche of cod and cominee / cuminade de poissons, also made with cod. The last is a favorite of mine, served in a thick, cumin-flavored almond-milk sauce. And Lobster Thermidor aux Crevettes with a Mornay sauce served in the Provencale manner with shallots and aubergines, garnished with truffle pate, brandy, and a fried egg on top and Spam. <<< How was it received? >>> Generally pretty well. I live in a group that has one of the larger seafood wholesale markets on the Eastern Seaboard in its backyard, so mostly it's a way of life. I'm pretty careful with portion control, allowing two to three ounces per portion cooked, buying about three times that raw and untrimmed to allow for head, bone, skin and fin waste, and shrinkage in cooking. Some will eat more than three ounces, some none, most will enjoy it and there may be two or three extremely vocal and rude people voicing their objections. If I run out I at least know some went out to every table and there's other food, and that's better than wasting it. Adamantius (who don't got much Spam in him) Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 15:43:52 -0500 From: ranvaig at columbus.rr.com Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] Fish at feasts To: Cooks within the SCA <<< The salmon I got for my feasts were probably closer to 20 pounds each. It was hard to get them whole into the oven. >>> That was four pounds (or more) of salmon on each table, maybe 10 or 12 fish altogether. Not one fish carved for the whole hall. Ranvaig Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 09:44:21 +1300 From: Antonia Calvo Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] Fish at feasts To: Cooks within the SCA The best-received single dish I've ever cooked was seared tuna dressed with oil and honey. I've also served salmon, monkfish and shrimp, and I've seen others serve white sea fish, trout and mussels. All those things have gone down fine. (What about the bones, exactly?) My feeling is that, in general, you should have a good variety of stuff on offer. If some people don't eat something, that's their hard luck and there's more for everyone else. -- Antonia di Benedetto Calvo Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 10:05:51 +1300 From: Antonia Calvo Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] Fish at feasts To: Cooks within the SCA Ah, that's another thing I've had at feasts-- smoked mackerel. That goes down well, too. And scallops. -- Antonia di Benedetto Calvo Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 16:16:03 -0500 From: "Euriol of Lothian" Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] Fish at feasts To: "'Cooks within the SCA'" I think I had two for the whole hall, but I think that was for about 100 people, one of the salmon was a little smaller than the other. But buying it whole like that, I got a good deal price wise. Euriol -----Original Message----- <<< The salmon I got for my feasts were probably closer to 20 pounds each. It was hard to get them whole into the oven. >>> That was four pounds (or more) of salmon on each table, maybe 10 or 12 fish altogether. Not one fish carved for the whole hall. Ranvaig Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 16:47:56 -0500 From: "Ginny Beatty" Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] Fish at feasts To: "Cooks within the SCA" For a Russian-themed feast a long time ago, I served a whitefish soup (Ukha) and it went over well. About 1 quart/table was about the right amount to serve. Not bad for the meat and 'tater crowd I usually feed. :) Gwyneth Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 16:59:57 -0500 From: Johnna Holloway Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] Fish at feasts To: Cooks within the SCA You don't indicate how many people you are serving or how many tables. Can you provide those tables with hot fish all at the same time? I personally would take and test this dish out on a group first just to see how it goes over locally. Are people prepared to debone a whole fish at table? That takes a certain skillset. Many people can't do it without destroying the fish and scattering the bones about and in a dimly lit hall that's even more problematic. Do you have someone or a couple of people that could serve the fish and debone them at table? Johnnae jimandandi at cox.net wrote: <<< I am dallying with the idea of serving fish at a feast I'm doing in February, based on Chiqart and Menagier of Paris. What I would love to do is a whole roast fish "swimming" on a bed of decorated rice, with green sorrel verjuice on top and sprinkled with small whole shrimp. I have been warned away from doing this dish because "people don't eat fish at feasts" and "what about the bones?". So. Have you ever served fish at a feast? How? How was it received? If you have not, would you like to? Curious,Madhavi An Crosaire, Trimaris >>> Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 16:04:55 -0800 (PST) From: Huette von Ahrens Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] Fish at feasts To: Cooks within the SCA I served poached salmon at a feast for 300+. It was a period recipe, poached in beer. Everyone loved it. A few people later told me that they normally hated fish, but loved what I served. I have also done pickled herring, which went over very well. I also considered doing lutefisk, but turned it into a subtlety/joke dish and served almond jello instead, molded like a fish. Only two people complained about the substitution. Huette Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2009 08:34:40 -0500 From: "Jim and Andi Houston" Subject: [Sca-cooks] Fish success! Thank you all and recipe To: "'Cooks within the SCA'" I just wanted to say thank you to everyone who shared their success stories serving fish at feasts. I may never do a feast without fish again! I wanted to do the "whole fish swimming on a bed of decorated rice" thing. It worked! People ate it! It was relatively easy, not too expensive, and really impressive. Whole Poached Fish Swimming on a Bed of Decorated Rice with Sorrel Verjus Fed 75 people as part of a large feast 7 lb whole fish, cleaned and gutted, smile and tail intact (I found whole fresh Mahi-mahi for $2.99/lb) Stems of parsley, tops of celery, whole peppercorns 1/2 bottle of verjus or white wine 5 lb basmati rice 1/4 lb butter 1/2 cup oil 3 tbl salt 20 c water 1/2 lb butter Teaspoon of saffron threads 1 lb slivered almonds 1/2 bottle of verjus 2 bunches fresh sorrel 1 bunch parsley Salt and sugar In a very large pot, melt butter and oil together. Add rice and toss continuously until at least half of the rice is opaque. Add water and salt and bring to a full rolling boil. Immediately cover tightly and pile cans on top of the lid to that no steam escapes. Put in a warm place like on top of the convection oven. Leave it alone for 30 minutes. After 30 minutes check the rice for done-ness, it should be perfectly steamed and separate. Melt butter, crush saffron thread with a mortar and pestle, add to hot butter, add slivered almonds. Pour butter over rice and stir through, carefully so as not to break up the rice grains too much. Put cover back on rice. Coarsely chop sorrel and parsley. Throw in food processor. Process slowly while pouring in enough verjuice to make a thin sauce. Taste and add salt and sugar until sharpness is just barely blunted. (This sauce was AMAZING) Find a shallow pan large enough for fish. Put any herbs or stock veggies on the bottom, then lay fish on top, then pour on wine or verjus, then pour water on just to barely cover fish. Bring fish up to a simmer and simmer until cooked through. To assemble: Find tray long enough for fish. Pile with rice and make a ditch in the middle. Using 4 people with 2 spatulas each, lift fish out of poaching liquid. Lay on rice. Using plates as stabilizers, turn fish so it's on its belly in the "ditch" of the rice. Fluff the rice. Take IMMEDIATELY out to the hall, parade around, bring it back to the kitchen. Quickly take the fish off the rice using plates. Do NOT break the fish! Using forks, start lifting the flesh off one side of the fish. If you move fast and the fish is still hot, it will lift right off the bones. Once most of the flesh is taken off, lift out the tail, spine and head in one piece. Don't forget the eat the cheeks! That's the best part of the fish! Then the rest of the flesh is left. Split fish and rice into platters for service, and serve. This must happen very fast as the fish cools quickly, I think we did it in less than 5 minutes using 4 people. Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 20:11:19 -0400 From: Elaine Koogler Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] Grilled Tuna - recipe for my upcoming feast To: Cooks within the SCA I did the same recipe some years back for a Mediterranean feast and it was very well received. I have a fish monger that sells me really great fish for very good prices...got a wonderful piece of sushi-grade tuna from him. We sliced the loin and grilled it, then served it with the sauce. Some folks who normally hate fish...won't eat fish...no, wouldn't touch it with a 10 foot pole (or even an 8 foot Czech)....thought it was steak or some other meat!! I managed to find an orange marinade made with Seville oranges at a local store that caters to Latino cuisine. It had relatively few additives to it and worked out very well. Kiri On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 6:37 PM, Euriol of Lothian wrote: <<< I'm currently in the process of planning a feast for the end of May that is based on Spanish Recipes and testing recipes out of Ruperto de Nola's "Libre del Coch" and flipping through the pages of the book I saw a recipe for Grilled Swordfish and Grilled Tuna. I thought to myself, I would like to make one of these for my feast. So at the store yesterday I found some frozen tuna steaks and thought I'd give the tunae recipe a go. Mind you, I had only glanced at the recipes about two weeks ago and could not remember any of the details. With tuna in hand and whatever was in my cabinet I decided to cook it for dinner tonight. Rereading the recipes I saw that the treatment of the sauce was very similar. >>> Edited by Mark S. Harris feasts-fish-msg Page 22 of 22