Home Page

Stefan's Florilegium

aprons-msg



This document is also available in: text or RTF formats.

aprons-msg - 6/2/99

 

Medieval aprons for both men and women.

 

NOTE: See also the files: cl-Norse-msg, p-kitchens-msg, linen-msg.

 

************************************************************************

NOTICE -

 

This file is a collection of various messages having a common theme that I  have collected from my reading of the various computer networks. Some messages date back to 1989, some may be as recent as yesterday.

 

This file is part of a collection of files called Stefan's Florilegium. These files are available on the Internet at: http://www.florilegium.org

 

I have done  a limited amount  of  editing. Messages having to do  with separate topics  were sometimes split into different files and sometimes extraneous information was removed. For instance, the  message IDs  were removed to save space and remove clutter.

 

The comments made in these messages are not necessarily my viewpoints. I make  no claims  as  to the accuracy  of  the information  given  by the individual authors.

 

Please respect the time  and  efforts of  those who have written  these messages. The copyright status  of these messages  is  unclear  at this time. If information  is  published  from  these  messages, please give credit to the originator(s).

 

Thank you,

   Mark S. Harris                  AKA:  THLord Stefan li Rous

                                         Stefan at florilegium.org

************************************************************************

 

From: hrjones at uclink.berkeley.edu (Heather Rose Jones)

Newsgroups: rec.org.sca

Subject: Re: Aprons?

Date: 30 Dec 1996 21:04:43 GMT

Organization: University of California, Berkeley

 

Sasha (sasha at web2.calweb.com) wrote:

:       The other day I got to thinking....if I want to coom at events but

: don't want my clothes to get messy, I ought to have an apron (duh), but

: how do I make it period?

:       I'm familiar with the Norse women's apron from earlier period, but

: what would a man (like myself) wear, post-1400 or so?  How early did

: aprons assume their "modern" design?

 

I'm away from my books, so I can't make any specific recommendations, but

look for period illustrations of cooks at work or butchers -- both will

normally be found wearing aprons. The majority that I _remember_ seeing

are basically a rectangle of white (almost certainly linen) cloth, wrapped

almost all the way around the waist, but more likely tucked into a belt

rather than having self-ties like modern aprons. Like I say, look for

cooks and butchers in period art and you should have no problem.

 

Tangwystyl verch Morgant Glasvryn

 

 

Newsgroups: rec.org.sca

Subject: Re: Aprons?

From: una at bregeuf.stonemarche.org (Honour Horne-Jaruk)

Date: Tue, 31 Dec 96 09:24:37 EST

 

sasha at web2.calweb.com (Sasha) writes:

>       The other day I got to thinking....if I want to coom at events but

> don't want my clothes to get messy, I ought to have an apron (duh), but

> how do I make it period?

>       I'm familiar with the Norse women's apron from earlier period, but

> what would a man (like myself) wear, post-1400 or so?  How early did

> aprons assume their "modern" design?

>       I have a Russian persona, if it matters, but any information would

> be helpful.  Thanks in advance.

 

       Respected friend:

       You can go either of two ways. In 1400, the"Old-fashioned" apron

was made from a small (9"by 9" or so) square of linen and a large

(30'by 30' or larger)square of linen, plus ribbons or stitched ties.

(please pardon the ASCII art)

                       free edge-small square

                       |               |

                       |               |

                       |               |

                       |               |

                       |               |

                       -----------------

                       ^attatch cartridge-pleated edge

                       of large square here^

 

       fold over small square and sew pleated edge inside it.

Add ribbons (ties) to produce:

 

 

               (_)~(_)~(________________)~(_)~(_)~

               ^ribbon |               | ^ribbon

                       |               |

                       -----------------

                     |"""""""""""""""""|

                     |                   |

                    |                     |

             (_)~(_|                       |_)~(_)

                  |                         |

                  V   extend down to hem    V

       When worn, the top ties go over the shoulders and the side ties

around the back, to an absolutely identical apron in the back. When

one's messy, just spin 'em.

 

       After 1450-ish, everybody, even women, was wearing belts

outside their gowns- aprons changed to a simple square of heavy

linen, tucked in to the belt only at the center so that the corners

of the top hung free.

       Me, I think the first one's a better apron. But version 2

requires no sewing and makes a fine emergency headcloth... }:->

 

                               Alizaunde, Demoiselle de Bregeuf

                               Una Wicca (That Pict)

                               (Friend) Honour Horne-Jaruk, R.S.F.

 

 

Newsgroups: rec.org.sca

From: bnostran at lynx.neu.edu (Barbara Nostrand)

Subject: Re: Aprons?

Date: Wed, 1 Jan 1997 07:26:12 GMT

Organization: de Moivre Institute

 

Noble Cousins!

 

> I'm away from my books, so I can't make any specific recommendations, but

> look for period illustrations of cooks at work or butchers -- both will

> normally be found wearing aprons. The majority that I _remember_ seeing

> are basically a rectangle of white (almost certainly linen) cloth, wrapped

> almost all the way around the waist, but more likely tucked into a belt

> rather than having self-ties like modern aprons. Like I say, look for

> cooks and butchers in period art and you should have no problem.

 

Self-ties as well as independent ties appear to have a noble lineage in

Japan going back centuries.  Perhaps the idea was imported from Japan by

the Portugese in the 16th century.  Self ties appear on Japanese clothing

at least as early as the Akusa period.  (ca. 600 CE)

 

Finally, consider looking into the sort of trade you are specifically

iterested in.  If it is cooking, then look at illustrations of what cooks

were wearing.  Please do not confine yourself to aprons.  There have been

a variety of overgarments used by different cultures to accomplish the

intended purpose.

 

                                         Your Humble Servant

                                         Solveig Throndardottir

                                         Amateur Scholar

 

 

From: Gretchen M Beck <grm+ at andrew.cmu.edu>

Newsgroups: rec.org.sca

Subject: Re: Aprons?

Date: Thu,  2 Jan 1997 17:29:43 -0500

Organization: Computer Operations, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA

 

Excerpts from netnews.rec.org.sca: 30-Dec-96 Re: Aprons? by Heather Rose

Jones at uclin

> I'm away from my books, so I can't make any specific recommendations, but

> look for period illustrations of cooks at work or butchers -- both will

> normally be found wearing aprons. The majority that I _remember_ seeing

> are basically a rectangle of white (almost certainly linen) cloth, wrapped

> almost all the way around the waist, but more likely tucked into a belt

> rather than having self-ties like modern aprons. Like I say, look for

> cooks and butchers in period art and you should have no problem.

 

In medieval art, almost any picture of a woman working will show her in

an apron -- the "month" pages of the Tres Riche Heures have several

examples, as do the various Medieval Woman's calendars.  The Hours of

Catherine of Cleves has several examples, both in the miniatures and in

the margins.

 

toodles, margaret

 

 

From: srankin at op.net (Susan Rankin)

Newsgroups: rec.org.sca

Subject: Re: Aprons?

Date: 2 Jan 1997 23:06:17 GMT

Organization: OpNet -- Greater Philadelphia Internet Service

 

grm+ at andrew.cmu.edu says...

>In medieval art, almost any picture of a woman working will show her in

>an apron -- the "month" pages of the Tres Riche Heures have several

>examples, as do the various Medieval Woman's calendars.  The Hours of

>Catherine of Cleves has several examples, both in the miniatures and in

>the margins.

 

     Hi Margaret!

 

     They could also try those Eyewitness Books, specifically the one about

vikings and the one about castles.  These sources are short and to the point

and have great illustrations/photographs.

 

      Susan

 

 

Newsgroups: rec.org.sca

Subject: Re: Aprons?

From: una at bregeuf.stonemarche.org (Honour Horne-Jaruk)

Date: Tue, 07 Jan 97 15:03:07 EST

 

sasha at web2.calweb.com (Sasha) writes:

 

>       Thank you for the very helpful reply...

>

> una at bregeuf.stonemarche.org (Honour Horne-Jaruk) writes:

>

>       <Helpful ascii diagram snipped>

>

> >     When worn, the top ties go over the shoulders and the side ties

> >around the back, to an absolutely identical apron in the back. When

> >one's messy, just spin 'em.

>

>       Do you know if this was worn by both genders?  I'm not opposed to

> wearing a woman's apron, but if possibly I'd like to be more authentic.

> --

> sasha at calweb.com - rps at 42.gigo.com - http://www.calweb.com/~sasha

       Respected friend:

       1) You're welcome. I do love it when those Ascii things work...

       2) Both sexes, all ranks involved with kitchens, many years. It

lasted so long because of all the advantages- reversable (twice- with

linen, turning a stained apron inside-out often hides the stain); fits

_everybody_ - ties control so much of the fit, and the pleating makes

it accomodate fat and pregnancy equally well; minimal waste- If cut

right, one five-yard length makes two nice long apron-sets (four

individual panels); maximum re-useability- all the stitching can be

unpicked and the sections reversed, turned, or whatever to even out

the wear; and maximum recyclability, as the worn aprons can be re-cut

into towels, etc. .

       In my original post, I forgot to mention that these were often

worn under a belt, which gave you the option of pouching the front to

hold whatever you would need soon, or tying the lower corners through

the belt to carry larger items.

       I've seen manuscript illos of these as late as 1415, and maybe

later (based on clothing styles). I don't think you'd have a problem.

 

 

                               Alizaunde, Demoiselle de Bregeuf

                               Una Wicca (That Pict)

                               (Friend) Honour Horne-Jaruk, R.S.F.

 

 

From: waltern at thoreau.rand.org (Walter Nelson)

Newsgroups: rec.org.sca

Subject: Re: Aprons?

Date: 14 Jan 1997 19:19:56 GMT

Organization: RAND Corporation

 

: sasha at web2.calweb.com (Sasha) writes:

 

: >     The other day I got to thinking....if I want to cook at events but

: > don't want my clothes to get messy, I ought to have an apron (duh), but

: > how do I make it period?

: >     I'm familiar with the Norse women's apron from earlier period, but

: > what would a man (like myself) wear, post-1400 or so?  How early did

: > aprons assume their "modern" design?

: >     I have a Russian persona, if it matters, but any information would

: > be helpful.  Thanks in advance.

 

It depends on what you are doing.

 

If you are a man working with hot or pointy things that might injure you

(e.g. a Smith or a Shoemaker) you would probably have a leather apron.  If

you are just trying to keep the filth off you, you would probably have a

linen apron.

 

In an interesting 15th Century illumination reproduced in the "Visual

History of Costume" series (the 14th/15th Century volume), there are

several workmen at a construction site wearing a style of apron that has

the advantage of being rather different from modern styles.  I have no idea

if it would be appropriate for a denizen of Moskovy or Novgorod though.

 

The lower portion is pretty standard, being the usual square piece of

fabric hanging down in front, from the waist. It is held in place by a

narrow linen tape, that incircles the waist and is tied in back.  It hangs

down to about the knees.

 

The interesting bit is the "bib" front.  Above the waist, it tapers upward

to a point just below the chin.  At that point, it is held up by a button

(it might be the top button of the doublet).

 

It is made of linen.

 

Walter Nelson

walter_nelson at rand.org

 

 

Date: Sun, 25 May 1997 14:39:55 -0400 (EDT)

From: Rooscc at aol.com

To: sca-arts at raven.cc.ukans.edu

Subject: garden wear

 

On dragging shirt tails or smock fronts through the mud

when gardening: I think they wore aprons. I haven't seen

a picture of an apron on a male gardener in period, but

think there was a mention of them in a gardner's

inventory (maybe in John Harvey's *Medieval Gardens*?)

Early modern gardeners' aprons looked something like

a hospital gown and also tied around the legs (otherwise

you'd just have more stuff to drag in the mud when you

bent over!). Assorted pockets were added. Isn't there

a carpenter's apron constructed something like this?

 

Alysoun

Middle

 

 

Date: Fri, 19 Sep 1997 12:52:31 -0400

From: Philip & Susan Troy <troy at asan.com>

Subject: Re: SC - Commemorative Cooking

 

Gee. The worst thing I've ever done to an innocent piece of garb was to

leap headfirst into a lit convection oven while wearing my lovely white

14th century Mediterranean cook's cote that Mistress Katherine

Gilliesfleur made me. (How's THAT for gonzo?)

 

The cote, BTW, is the nicest piece of work garb you could imagine. I

took a new white Bragard chef's coat over to Mistress Katherine's one

day, and asked her to help me find a period functional equivalent, that

does everything a chef's coat does: bias gusseted in the backs of the

shoulders to allow freedom of movement, double-thick cuffs (long so they

could be rolled up for extra protection, a quilted breast and high

collar to protect against scald burns, and many little cloth buttons so

it can be ripped off quickly in case of fire. A little round baker's

cap, like a vented sailor hat, goes with it.

 

Adamantius

 

 

Date: Mon, 22 Sep 1997 18:49:06 -0400

From: Philip & Susan Troy <troy at asan.com>

Subject: Re: SC - period chef's cotes

 

Mark Harris wrote:

> I have one file in Stefan's Florilegium on such protective clothing:

>

> aprons-msg        (18K)  6/ 6/97    Medieval aprons for both men and women.

>

> I wasn't aware of any medieval items like this with sleeves. I would love

> to have more information on this cote. Do you have any bibliographic

> info on where interested folks could find more info? Either pictures or

> descriptions?

 

Well, I may have one picture which, if I can find it, could probably be

scanned and e-mailed or posted. Essentially it is a fairly standard

14th-century cote, distinguished from a cotehardie by the fact that it

doesn't fit quite as closely, is longer, and generally less ornate than

a man's cotehardie.

 

I seem to have lost this garment, though. I had one of those situations

where I neglected to take it with me after leaving an event. I asked

someone else, not in a moving vehicle at the time, to grab it and get it

to me, and either they failed to grab it, or it ended up in somebody's

armor bag or some such. It is missing in action, and may never turn up.

I'll have to get another one made, or try making one myself.

 

The cote was made of off-white cotton upholstery denim, with a faint

twill pattern, as most denim has. It was cut, ostensibly, as a cote, but

behaved like a good-quality chef's coat. It opened up down the front,

using little cloth buttons and loops, that allowed the garment to be

torn open and quickly removed in case of being scalded by boiling oil,

or fire, or something like that. Instead of the double breast of a

modern chef's coat, this cote had a quilted breast, again, to protect

against ambient radiant heat and burning liquids, etc. Extra long

sleeves, with a double layer of fabric in the forearms to the edge of

the cuffs, again, to protect against burns. Better protection still was

available by cuffing up the sleeves a bit, which, as I say, were extra

long (almost knuckle length).

 

Sleeves were inset, and there were these weird curved seams across the

shoulderblades and down the back, creating a biased seam which allowed

me to stretch my arms up or out without straining the fabric or exposing

too much of my arm.

 

Oh, and there was a high collar, kinda like a Nehru jacket, to protect

the neck from heat/burns.

 

I feel naked cooking in a dalmatica, for all the aprons and oven mitts,

etc., that I have.

 

Ras, are you getting all this?

 

Adamantius

 

 

Date: Tue, 23 Sep 1997 09:50:29 -0700

From: Brett and Karen Williams <brettwi at ix.netcom.com>

Subject: SC - Master Adamantius' lost cote

 

Master Adamantius writes:

> The cote was made of off-white cotton upholstery denim, with a faint

> twill pattern, as most denim has. It was cut, ostensibly, as a cote, but

<snip>

>

> I feel naked cooking in a dalmatica, for all the aprons and oven mitts,

> etc., that I have.

>

> Ras, are you getting all this?

>

> Adamantius

 

(grin) *I* am, and hey, you're talking about something of which I know a

little. Me, I'm a cloth addict who likes to eat well, which is why I

lurk here instead of doing family law.

 

The deeply curved armsceye seams sounds exactly like a description of the

surviving quilted and padded cotehardie-- a correct citation of which

escapes me at the moment. One of the many Charles the ____ seems to

spring to mind. Denim is 'cloth de Nimes', according to SCA scuttlebutt;

more to the point, it's 3/1 cotton twill which by virtue of the long

warp and weft floats over adjacent threads will be more forgiving of

bias stretch and drape than a tabby-woven cloth (which means plain

weave). I would personally prefer to use a linen twill (if you look

at the Shroud of Turin in close up at its website, it's a 3/1 twill),

but they're hard to find. Linen has the unique property of being

able to shed dirt more easily than other fibers (dissertation on the

cell structure omitted for brevity). Linen is a little less likely

to go 'funt' than cotton.

 

At any rate, in Koehler, which is a mixed bag of uselessness and highly

useful information, there's a diagram for cutting a sleeve along these

lines on page 185, shown in a garment on page 184. While the garment

shown is one of those scandalously short houpelande-types, this sleeve would

accomplish the same effect of being able to swing the arm through a wide

range of motion. A modern armsceye (such as found on a mundane shirt or

'sport coat') will not suffice. The full name of the book is "A History

of Costume", Carl Koehler (it's really an umlaut) and it's in print

from Dover Books as ISBN 0-486-21030-8.

 

The sleeve cited will fit into a squared-off armsceye rather than a

rounded one. It's also sufficiently loose enough and square enough to

handle the quilting and long cuffs described. When I first read Master

Adamantius' description, my first thought was that someone who really

knew cloth and its properties well had designed his garment with its

intended purpose exactly in mind-- a success in cloth.

 

ciorstan

 

 

Date: Tue, 30 Sep 1997 08:47:05 -0400

From: Philip & Susan Troy <troy at asan.com>

To: mark_harris at risc.sps.mot.com

Subject: Re: SC - cooks' cotes

 

Mark Harris wrote:

> For the files, a bibliographic referance giving where the picture may be

> found would be useful. That way people who can't get graphical images

> could still find a picture.

 

The Medieval Health Handbook: Tacuinum Sanitatis, Edited and with notes

by Luisa Cogliati Arano, pub. George Braziller, New York, 1976. ISBN

0-8076-0808-4, LOC # 75-21725

> In both messages you've posted you describe the cote you have. I'm still

> not sure which (or all) features were period since you really describe

> the cote you have and not what can be seen in the pictures.

 

What I said was that the cote was designed to function with the ease of

movement and protective qualities of a modern chef's coat. It is also

designed to look like a period cote, as shown in several illustrations

in Tacuinum Sanitatis. I can't vouch for whether or not the specific

pattern design is what was used in period, as that isn't my area of

expertise. However, the cote was designed and made by someone for whom

period costume is her area of expertise, and subsequent comments from

others on the SCA-cooks list suggest that it could well have been done

exactly that way.

 

So, the garment is period-looking, and whether or not closer inspection

will reveal flaws in its periodicity has yet to be determined...in the

mean time I highly recommend the design for cooks who wish to remain

safe while cooking and look spiffy while doing it.

 

BTW, the cote, for what it's worth, is the primary garment that you wear

with hosen or trews, under your apron.

 

I'll look for the picture and talk to Mistress Katherine about a drawing

of the pattern, which I suspect would be more helpful. This shouldn't be

too much trouble, since we will have to be making a new one anyway.

 

Adamantius

 

 

Date: Wed, 13 Jan 1999 00:19:14 -0500

From: Karen at stierbach.atlantia.sca.org (Larsdatter, Karen )

To: Elisabeth Borden <ldyelisbth at yahoo.com>, sca-arts at raven.cc.ukans.edu

Subject: Re: Italian Renn Garb Question

 

<snip> ... cos I don't have a good answer for the first question ... ;)

 

Lady Elisabeth Borden (cute name ... have you got it past the

heralds yet?) ;) wrote:

 

> Second question...  these girls weren't wearing aprons, and were

> working in the kitchen.  Are aprons something which would have been

> worn?  And if so, does anyone know what style it would have been?

 

Check out the frescoes of "The Triumph of Minerva," from the late

15th century, by Cosimo Tura and Francesco Cossa.  One of the

panels features a great many young ladies embroidering, spinning,

and weaving.  One of the girls wears a green apron over a white

dress.

 

The only place I can find online with a picture of this fresco is:

http://people.ne.mediaone.net/benfatto/spindles/spinner.html

 

Karen Larsdatter

 

<the end>



Formatting copyright © Mark S. Harris (THLord Stefan li Rous).
All other copyrights are property of the original article and message authors.

Comments to the Editor: stefan at florilegium.org